[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 79 (Tuesday, May 7, 2024)]
[House]
[Pages H2931-H2934]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1915
PROTESTS AT UNIVERSITIES
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 9, 2023, the Chair recognizes the gentleman from California
(Mr. Kiley) for 30 minutes.
Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise to present a resolution that I am
introducing in this House and that I hope will receive prompt passage
and bipartisan support.
The resolution reads as follows:
Whereas, in recent weeks, tent encampments have spread at
universities across the country. These encampments are illegal and in
violation of university policies.
They have become rife with anti-Semitic threats and acts of violence,
harassment, and other disruptive behavior.
Some universities have responded by evenhandedly enforcing the law
and clearing the encampments. They have emphasized the rights of
students to protest and express their opinions in innumerable ways
while making it clear that acts in violation of the law or university
rules will not be tolerated.
Other universities have decided to ignore the law and ignore their
own policies, allowing encampments and other illegal activity
associated with them to grow unchecked for weeks.
Encampments have made demands of universities such as divesting from
companies tied to Israel, cutting ties with Hillel campus programs, and
ending study abroad programs to Israel.
Some of these universities have even negotiated with those in the
encampments and agreed to their demands around changes in university
policy, including Northwestern University, UC Riverside, Brown,
Rutgers, Johns Hopkins, and the University of Minnesota.
Still, others have canceled classes, moved to online meetings, or
canceled graduation ceremonies, and that includes Columbia, UCLA, UC
San Diego, and Emory University.
These encampments and the criminal behavior connected to them, such
as threats or acts of violence, blocking or occupying buildings,
genuine harassment, or other disruptive behavior, are not protected by
the First Amendment.
To the contrary, they disrupt the operation of the university and the
academic freedom and speech rights of other students.
Free speech on campus means universities should encourage free and
open expression in speech, writing, listening, challenging, and
learning while never shielding students from ideas the university
disagrees with or limiting expression on the basis of content.
It does not mean universities should tolerate the promotion of
violence, the destruction of property, the obstruction of students'
freedom of movement, harassment, vandalism, or other unlawful acts.
Resolved, the House finds canceling classes and commencement in
response to unlawful encampments is unacceptable and unfair to the
majority of students.
The House condemns any negotiation where a university changes its
policy in response to the demands of those engaged in unlawful activity
on campus.
The House condemns any concessions made by universities based on
demands from those participating in unlawful encampments, including
ending study abroad programs to Israel, cutting ties with Hillel, and
divesting from companies associated with Israel.
The House calls on universities across the country to work with local
law enforcement to immediately clear tent encampments from university
property and restore safe learning environments on their campuses, and
further resolves that noncompliant students, faculty, or staff be
subject to appropriate consequences.
Mr. Speaker, I am hopeful that we can come together and pass this
resolution, and it can set the right tone for universities across the
country because by this point, it is clear as day that the wrong
approach is to allow illegal encampments to exist on campus and then to
keep growing, growing, and growing as we have seen at UCLA, at USC, and
at Columbia. That only
[[Page H2932]]
makes the problem more unmanageable. It only causes things to spiral
out of control.
The universities that have taken the right approach have said you, as
a student, are fully protected under the First Amendment to express
yourself on any topic with any opinion you would like in countless
different ways.
You are free to do that on our campus, but what you are not free to
do is to set up structures on campus, to impede other students, or to
engage in threats or acts of violence and other unlawful disruptive
conduct that we have been seeing on these campuses.
I am hoping that this resolution will point in the right direction
those universities who have been approaching this problem in the wrong
way to the detriment of their students.
Now, perhaps the only thing more disgraceful than these illegal pro-
Hamas encampments is the way that these universities have catered to
them.
Perhaps even more disgraceful than that is the way that some
politicians have, the way that some political leaders have remained
silent or have refused to condemn things that are so morally clear or
have equivocated on the clearest of moral questions.
While President Biden did come out and make a strong statement today,
up to this point, his response has been manifestly inadequate.
The Governor of my State, Governor Newsom, in California, has had
next to nothing to say about it, even though some of the worst
situations are on California campuses.
Just today, the Secretary of Education, Miguel Cardona, testified
before our committee, the Education and the Workforce Committee.
Now, Mr. Cardona came into this hearing with a troubling record. For
example, he recently refused to say whether chants of ``From the River
to the Sea'' are anti-Semitic.
At today's hearing, I asked him some basic questions. I asked him if
he would condemn the illegal tent encampments on university campuses.
Secretary Cardona refused to do so.
I asked him if he would condemn faculty members who interfere with
the attempts of law enforcement to clear out these encampments and
enforce the law. Secretary Cardona refused to condemn them.
I asked him if he would condemn calls to divest from Israel.
Secretary Cardona refused to do so. Perhaps most incredibly, I asked
the Secretary several times, Secretary Cardona: Will you condemn calls
for universities to cut ties with Hillel? As, for example, the
organization Students for Justice in Palestine recently did at UC Santa
Cruz.
I asked him again and again: Secretary Cardona, will you condemn
calls to cut ties with Hillel? And Secretary Cardona refused to do so.
Why is this so hard? Hillel is a center for Jewish community and
campus life on campuses all across the country.
Secretary Cardona is unwilling to condemn those who say universities
should cut ties with these organizations? Secretary Cardona is
unwilling to condemn these overtly anti-Semitic statements?
Given what the President said today, if we are to take seriously his
statements condemning what is happening on our university campuses, we
need to ask the question whether we can take that commitment seriously
so long as Miguel Cardona remains his Secretary of Education.
Funding Cuts for Charter Schools
Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong opposition to this
administration's proposal to cut funding for the charter school
program.
This is an incredibly important program for many charter schools
across the country in allowing them to start up and offer an option to
students in communities across the United States.
Now, prior to this year, this administration's support for charter
schools has been tepid at best. Funding for the charter school program
has remained flat as funding for various other parts of the education
budget has increased substantially.
Yet, this year, the administration went a step further. Its proposed
budget for the Department of Education proposes a $40 million cut to
the charter school program from $440 million to $400 million.
Now, Secretary Cardona was asked about this at today's hearing, and
he explained: Well, the Fiscal Responsibility Act requires us to make
budget cuts--so he decided to go after charter schools.
Mr. Speaker, that makes no sense whatsoever. The Department is asking
for a significant increase in its budget this year, a $3.7 billion
increase, so that its overall discretionary budget is $82.5 billion.
They are asking for a $3.7 billion funding increase while cutting
funding for the charter school program by $40 million.
Mr. Speaker, I am in strong opposition to these cuts. I hope that
this House will push back on them in a bipartisan manner because the
reality is that charter schools across the country have made tremendous
progress in closing achievement gaps and expanding the options that are
available to parents.
In fact, a recent study out of Stanford validated the work that
charter schools have done and the results that they have gotten in
closing achievement gaps that have persisted in other parts of our
public education system.
The reality is that there are far too many communities in this
country, particularly in my State of California, where schools simply
are not getting the job done. There are communities where the
neighborhood school--that young people, that kids are assigned to--does
not teach them to the read in the way that it should, does not teach
them math in the way that it should, leaving them ill prepared for
success in life.
In many of these communities you have charters like Kipp Academy and
many others that have started up and have done things differently.
These are charters that have had high expectations, that have made
significant gains, that have gotten kids reading above grade level and
outperforming their peers at other schools in math. These charters are
putting them on a path of future opportunity and success in life, but
that is exactly what this proposal from this administration is going to
cut funding for.
It should also be noted that even in communities that have good
public schools--like in my district, we have a number of truly
outstanding traditional public schools--charter schools are still of
value.
We have a number of terrific charter schools as well, and they might
be right for some families but not for others.
The entire point is that not every student is the same, not every
family is the same. By allowing a variety of options, some of which
might have different focuses or a different approach to pedagogy or
options that might offer immersion education or a focus on career
technical education, this empowers parents to make the choice that is
right for their child and their family.
I find it completely unacceptable that this administration is
withdrawing support for charter schools.
I also find it unacceptable that my State of California has taken a
number of steps in recent years to make it more difficult to start up,
to operate, and to renew charter schools.
What we need to do is look to the success that many charters have had
and to draw lessons that we can then use to improve public education
across this country so that every child in America has access to a
quality education as they deserve.
OPPOSING THE INCREASE IN THE GAS TAX
Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to a forthcoming
increase in the gas tax in California. It almost defies belief, but
California's gas tax is about to increase yet again, reaching $0.60 per
gallon.
Now, the State already has the highest gas tax in the country and by
far the highest gas prices. As of today, Californians pay $1.70 more
per gallon for gas than the national average and $0.53 more per gallon
than the next closest State.
I will say that again: We pay $0.53 more per gallon than the State
with the second-highest gas prices. Even if you were actually to
eliminate the entire gas tax in California, $0.60 per gallon, we would
still have the second-highest gas prices in the entire country.
I am calling on Governor Newsom and the legislature to act to make
sure that this gas tax increase does not go into effect.
Californians are already suffering under inflation and the price of
groceries and the price of electricity as
[[Page H2933]]
well, which is the second highest of any State in the country. The last
thing they need is another increase to the gas tax.
I am calling on State lawmakers to stop this gas tax increase. As a
matter of fact, what they should really do is suspend the gas tax
entirely.
It wouldn't bring prices down to a reasonable level, but it would
provide folks throughout our State with relief that they very much
need.
{time} 1930
Recognizing Sergeant Major Douglas Power
Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I would like to now recognize a few
outstanding individuals and organizations within my district.
Mr. Speaker, I rise to recognize retiring Sergeant Major Douglas
Power for his distinguished service with the United States Marine
Corps, most recently as the government and external affairs officer for
the Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center in Bridgeport,
California.
Doug entered the Marine Corps Reserve in August 1980 and went on to
graduate from boot camp and transfer to Active Duty in 1985.
After first transferring overseas in 1987, his deployments to various
locations, including Korea, Kuwait, and Iraq, underscored his
commitment to defending our country.
Throughout his more than three decades of military service, Sergeant
Major Power displayed an unwavering dedication to service and
leadership.
Deservingly, he was awarded multiple decorations and medals,
demonstrating the legacy of honor and sacrifice that he established.
He retired from military service in 2012, at which time he began his
new career as the government and external affairs officer at the
training center.
After 12 years of faithful dedication to civic service and community
engagement, he retired from that role this year, on April 30, 2024.
I am proud to represent outstanding servicemembers like Sergeant
Major Power in Congress. I thank him for his service to our district
and our country.
Therefore, on behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I
am honored to recognize Sergeant Major Douglas Power for his heroic and
valuable service to our country and community, and I wish him the best
in his retirement.
Recognizing Stacey Simon
Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I wish to recognize retiring County Counsel
Stacey Simon for her 25 years of service to Mono County.
Stacey has served the people of Mono County for more than two
decades, most recently as county counsel, and never wavered from her
goal of making the county a better place.
Throughout Stacey's tenure, she not only skillfully handled the
routine business of the county but also guided Mono through various
complex problems and challenges, including the uncertainties of COVID-
19.
Additionally, she played an instrumental role in many local projects,
most notably the construction of the Lee Vining Community Center and
preschool program, the county's solid waste franchise system,
implementation of HIPAA, housing developments, and much more.
Mr. Speaker, it looks like we had an issue with our graphic, so I am
going to start over.
Mr. Speaker, I wish to recognize retiring County Counsel Stacey Simon
for her 25 years of service to Mono County.
Stacey has served the people of Mono County for more than two
decades, most recently as county counsel, and never wavered from her
goal of making the county a better place.
Throughout Stacey's tenure, she not only skillfully handled the
routine business of the county but also guided the county through
various complex problems and challenges, including the uncertainties of
COVID-19.
Additionally, she played an instrumental role in many local projects,
most notably the construction of the Lee Vining Community Center and
preschool program, the county's solid waste franchise system,
implementation of HIPAA, housing developments, and much more.
No matter the obstacle, Stacey has been a model of positive
leadership as she has helped the county weather every crisis, hardship,
or transition it faced.
Stacey is known for her incredible depth of knowledge, curiosity, and
tenacity, as well as for demonstrating the utmost care and concern for
her clients and county staff.
Therefore, on behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I
am honored to recognize Stacey Simon for the dedicated leadership and
years of service she provided to the people of Mono County, and I
proudly join Mono County in wishing her the very best in her
retirement.
Recognizing Alpine Watershed Group
Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I would like to take a moment to recognize
the Alpine Watershed Group for receiving the 2022 Forest Service
Volunteers Program Citizen Stewardship and Partnerships Award.
The Alpine Watershed Group is a community-based nonprofit
organization in my district that is dedicated to conducting essential
water quality monitoring, habitat restoration, and education programs
throughout Alpine County.
Over the span of more than two decades, the Alpine Watershed Group
has been an instrumental partner to the Humboldt-Toiyabe National
Forest and the United States Forest Service.
In 2022 alone, the Alpine Watershed Group planned and recruited for
multiple volunteer events in the forest, including large watershed and
forest restoration projects, trash and roadside cleanups, tree
planting, and watershed monitoring.
Due to the help of their volunteers at the annual Creek Day event, 72
bags of trash were removed, amounting to more than 500 pounds; 25 bags
of invasive weeds were removed; 102 willow stakes were installed; 600
feet of fence in Hope Valley were removed; and a beaver dam analogue in
Faith Valley was constructed.
In addition to these efforts, the group provides continual outreach
and environmental education programs that support the United States
Forest Service's mission to care for the land and serve the people.
Their devoted efforts have made an indelible impact on our national
forests, local watersheds, and the Alpine County community.
Therefore, on behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I
am honored to recognize the Alpine Watershed Group for this outstanding
accomplishment and commend them for their significant contributions and
dedication to promoting the sustainability of our Nation's natural
resources.
Celebrating Soroptimist International of Loomis Basin's 50th
Anniversary
Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I wish to mark and celebrate the 50-year
anniversary of the Soroptimist International of Loomis Basin club.
Over the span of five decades, they have made a significant
contribution in the Loomis community and Sacramento region by investing
in the development of women of all ages and fostering a passion to make
both our local and international communities a better place.
The Loomis chapter of Soroptimist International was founded 1974 with
the mission to provide women and girls with the access to education and
training they need to achieve economic empowerment.
In addition to hosting and participating in many local events, they
provide scholarships and grants for women to improve their economic
status while honing valuable skills to further their education and help
with employment opportunities.
Their dedicated efforts have made a meaningful difference in the
lives of women and girls, and it is an honor to represent exemplary
organizations like the Soroptimist International of Loomis Basin here
in Congress.
Therefore, on behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I
am honored to recognize the Loomis Basin Soroptimists and their 50
years of dedication to the women of our community.
Recognizing Sergeant Major Douglas Power
Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, we are recognizing Sergeant Major Douglas
Power again so we have the appropriate accompanying graphic.
Mr. Speaker, I wish to recognize retiring Sergeant Major Douglas
Power for his distinguished service with the United States Marine
Corps, most recently as the government and external
[[Page H2934]]
affairs officer for the Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center
in Bridgeport, California.
Doug entered the Marine Corps Reserve in August 1980 and went on to
graduate from boot camp and transfer to Active Duty in 1985.
After first transferring overseas in 1987, his deployments to various
locations, including Korea, Kuwait, and Iraq, underscored his
commitment to defending our country.
Throughout his more than three decades of military service, Sergeant
Major Power displayed an unwavering dedication to service and
leadership.
Deservingly, he was awarded multiple decorations and medals,
demonstrating the legacy of honor and sacrifice he established.
He retired from military service in 2012, at which time he began his
new career as the government and external affairs officer at the
training center.
After 12 years of faithful dedication to civic service and community
engagement, he retired from that role this year, on April 30, 2024.
I am proud to represent outstanding servicemembers like Sergeant
Major Power in Congress. On behalf of the United States House of
Representatives, it is my honor to recognize him for his distinguished
service to our community and our country.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
____________________