[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 76 (Thursday, May 2, 2024)]
[Senate]
[Page S3309]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MORNING BUSINESS
______
REFORMING INTELLIGENCE AND SECURING AMERICA ACT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Mr. WARNER. Madam President, this explanatory statement memorializes
the understanding of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
regarding the implementation of section 25 of Reforming Intelligence
and Securing America Act.
I ask unanimous consent that the explanatory statement be printed in
the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
Explanatory Statement on the Reforming Intelligence and Securing
America Act
The following is the Explanatory Statement to accompany the
Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, Public Law
118-49 (``the Act''). This Explanatory Statement memorializes
the intent of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
regarding the implementation of Section 25 of the Act.
Section 25 of the Act includes a technical modification to
the definition of ``electronic communication service
provider'' (ECSP) in Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act (FISA) to address unforeseen changes in
electronic communications technology in the sixteen years
since Section 702 of FISA was first enacted.
The technical modification is intended to fill a critical
intelligence gap regarding the types of communications
services used by non-U.S. persons outside the United States
that arose following litigation before the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) and the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (FISC-R).
Section 25 does not affect the overall structure of Section
702, or the protections codified in the statute. It remains
unlawful under Section 702 for the government to target any
entity inside the United States including, for example, any
business, home, school, recreational facility, or place of
worship. Further, it remains unlawful under Section 702 to
compel any service provider to target the communications of
Americans or any person inside the United States.
Congress intends that the amended ECSP definition will be
used exclusively to cover the type of service provider at
issue in the litigation before the FISC--that is, those
technology companies providing the service the FISC concluded
(and the FISC-R affirmed) fell outside the then-existing
statutory definition. As of the enactment of this
legislation, the number of technology companies providing
such a service from which the government intends to seek
compelled assistance under Section 702 is extremely small. In
a letter dated April 18, 2024, and placed into the
Congressional Record the same day, the Department of Justice
committed to provide, and Congress intends to receive, a list
of such technology companies in classified form.
To facilitate appropriate oversight of the government's
commitment to apply the updated definition of ECSP for the
limited purposes described above, the Department will also
report to Congress every six months regarding any application
of the updated definition. This additional reporting will
allow Congress to ensure the government adheres to its
commitment regarding the application of this narrow
definition. Further, the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence will work to ensure that application of this
revised definition is circumscribed to the specific services
at issue in the litigation before the FISC and FISC-R in the
Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025.
____________________