[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 59 (Monday, April 8, 2024)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2635-S2636]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Israel
Mr. WICKER. Madam President, in 1948, President Truman recognized the
State of Israel on behalf of the United States. He clearly called for
the world ``to accord the State of Israel the right of self-defense.''
In the decades since, American leaders have stood by Israel. Our
support has been reliable, spanning Presidential administrations and
congressional terms. It has been bipartisan. President Eisenhower
continued President Truman's promise to stand with Israel, establishing
a bipartisan tradition cemented by Presidents from Kennedy to Reagan,
from Clinton to Trump.
In America, voters regularly select new parties to lead our country.
Administrations come and go. Congresses come and go. That volatility
makes it all the more profound that we have always kept our solemn
promise to stand with our allies.
It has now been 75 years since President Truman made this vow. For
those many decades, Israel's position has always been and will be to
live peacefully in its ancestral land alongside its Arab and largely
Muslim neighbors.
Slowly, often grudgingly, other nations in that region have come
around to that position.
Egypt agreed to peace with Israel in 1979. Jordan has been a longtime
U.S. partner and has lived in peace with Israel since 1994. Recently,
the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain agreed to partnership with Israel
in the Abraham Accords.
[[Page S2636]]
One regime that has continually rejected the international consensus
about Israel is the Islamic Republic of Iran. Three decades into the
21st century, Iran and its proxies continue to pursue Israel's absolute
annihilation. Coexistence has never been the policy of Iran or its
terrorist proxy group Hamas.
Disturbingly, we find adherents of that view here at home. Last week
in Michigan, protesters chanted ``Death to Israel'' and ``Death to
America,'' rejecting either country's right to even exist. This is one
example of the rise of anti-Israel and anti-Semitic incidents we have
seen since October 7. They show us what our Jewish friends and allies
fight against every day.
Of course, the protests and chants remind us of a pivotal event.
Yesterday, we marked the 6-month anniversary of the October 7 attacks.
Hamas, backed by Iran, demonstrated both its goal--the annihilation of
Israel--and its strategy--the murder and hostage-taking of civilians.
October 7 was one of the worst attacks on the Jewish people since the
Holocaust. It was a nightmare scenario that eight decades of Israeli
citizens have had to guard against. In light of those atrocities, our
task is clear: We need to reaffirm Israel's right to self-defense.
Since October 7, Hamas has continued to pursue its goal by the same
strategies. It single-mindedly seeks to wipe Israel off the map and
does not care how many innocent people are lost on the way, how many
families are burned alive. Hamas's entire operation is a violation of
international law. By contrast, Israel has essentially been striving to
administer civilian aid while uprooting terrorists who hide behind
those civilians--all in dense urban settings.
International friends and allies can and should give advice and
counsel to each other on issues of mutual security and diplomacy. That
has always been the practice between Israel and the United States. On
the other hand, it is wrong to make demands of an ally and to suggest
that vital aid to them will be withheld unless those demands are met.
This is especially true when those conditions are ones which we
ourselves could never accept.
War is always a tragedy. On top of that, it also carries accidental
sorrows in its wake. The killing of seven World Central Kitchen aid
workers was an avoidable and unmitigated tragedy. Our hearts break for
their loved ones, their colleagues, and others delivering humanitarian
assistance around the world.
And this is personal to me. Teams from World Central Kitchen have
come to the aid of my State of Mississippi. World Central Kitchen was
there on the ground during the recent Jackson water crisis. They
answered the call in the wake of the 2023 tornadoes. I am an advocate
and friend of Jose Andres. I have worn the ``World Central Kitchen''
cap in Poland when I spent time serving meals to refugees from the
brutal Russian invasion.
I believe that Israel takes the workers' deaths seriously too. The
Israeli Defense Forces assumed responsibility right away. Its leaders
promptly launched an investigation. Since then, the Israeli Government
has said that the military committed ``serious violations'' of
protocol. They have admitted this about themselves. They fired two
officers and disciplined three others for mishandling information and
breaking the Israeli Defense Forces' rules of engagement.
That is more than the Biden administration can say about themselves.
In the chaos of our disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal, our military
shelled a car in Kabul. Leaders initially feared the vehicle carried
explosives destined for American servicemembers, but it turned out to
be a civilian vehicle, and 10 innocent people, including 7 children,
died at our hands. The Biden administration took far longer than Israel
to own up to that mistake. I am glad our country did eventually
acknowledge our fault.
This shows that the free world holds ourselves to exacting standards
of care for the innocent caught in harm's way--including the thousands
who have died in Gaza since October 7.
Time and again, Israeli combatants have published warnings before
taking a building. They regularly give evacuation notices to civilians.
In so protecting the innocent, they risk giving the enemy a heads-up,
but they do this. Yet it has become fashionable to hold Israel to
unachievable standards, benchmarks to which we do not hold ourselves or
any other ally.
Hamas does not place itself under such handicaps. This Iranian proxy,
Hamas, has no regard for the standards of civilian protection. For one
of many examples, look no further than the hostages taken October 7 and
their often brutal treatment.
Unfortunately, our President's recent call for a cease-fire plays
directly into Hamas's hands. Our Commander in Chief's priority should
be the release of hostages and victory for our ally. But instead of
displaying American resolve, our President seems to be mollifying the
left wing of his party.
Calling for a cease-fire instead of hostage release and unconditional
victory creates a false equivalence between Israel and Hamas. After
Pearl Harbor, no one asked us about a cease-fire. After 9/11, no one
asked the United States about a cease-fire.
We need to remember that Israel is fighting terrorists bent only on
the destruction of the Jewish State. Hamas's leadership has vowed to
commit repeats of the October 7 massacres. If this terrorist group is
not totally eradicated, it will continue killing and kidnapping.
To paraphrase former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir, if Hamas put
down their weapons today, there would be no more violence; if Israel
put down their weapons today, there would be no more Israel.
Hamas started this conflict, and they could end it today. Hamas could
let hostages walk out of the tunnels and into the sunshine. Its
militants could stop using women and children and aid workers and
healthcare workers as human shields.
We need to give our steadfast ally what it needs to win this battle.
Victory has to be our position.
I believe we should keep our promises to our friends. Our Commander
in Chief threatens to break that promise to Israel today.
The President's call for an immediate cease-fire is tantamount to a
call for Hamas to remain in business, to reestablish itself for future
atrocities. That is not something Israel will allow--nor should they--
and it is not something we should ask of Israel or any other partner or
ally.
A world in which a terrorist organization can win by committing mass
murder is a more dangerous world for us all. The allies who have stood
by us for 7\1/2\ decades and who stood by us after 9/11 understood that
then, and we should not forget that now.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. MORAN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. Butler). Without objection, it is so
ordered.