[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 20, 2024)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2453-S2455]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                                 Russia

  Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, over the weekend, the Russian Federation 
held a Presidential election. And surprise, surprise, officials 
declared a landslide victory for President Vladimir Putin. By their 
account, Putin won a fifth term in office with a whopping 87 percent of 
the vote--the highest level of support in any previous elections.
  This reminded me of a story--I think maybe true, maybe apocryphal--of 
a reporter who was traveling with a driver in Iraq in the run-up to the 
Iraq war. And as was typically the case in dictatorships, the report 
was that Saddam Hussein won 100 percent of the vote. And the reporter 
asked the driver, he said: Well, you have been with me; clearly, you 
haven't been able to go and cast your ballot. To which the driver 
responded: Well, I guess Saddam knew what was in my heart.
  As implausible as that result was and as implausible as this result 
is, it is entirely predictable. After all, elections in Russia are 
unlike elections here in the United States or any other democracy.
  In Russia, elections are carefully orchestrated by the Kremlin. The 
candidates are hand-selected. The results are predetermined. And the 
opportunity for change is nonexistent.
  In short: Russia's elections are a sham. They are neither free nor 
fair, and it is no surprise that Vladimir Putin will continue to lead 
the corrupt and morally bankrupt Kremlin.
  The result of this election was always guaranteed. And the only real 
question is: What comes next? What, if anything, will change with the 
start of Putin's new term in office?
  Well, there is widespread speculation this could signal the beginning 
of a new military mobilization into Ukraine. The Kremlin has made a 
habit out of rolling out unpopular policies in the period after a 
Presidential election.
  Following 2018, for example, the Kremlin raised the retirement age--a 
move that was deeply unpopular among the Russian people.
  Putin even alluded to this new strategy when speaking to reporters in 
Moscow. He said:

       All the plans we have created to develop Russia will 
     certainly be carried out and their goals achieved.

  He added:

       We have come up with grandiose plans and will do everything 
     to carry them out.

  Well, this should be an additional warning sign that cannot be 
ignored by the United States or our allies. We are at a critical 
juncture in Russia's war against Ukraine, and more support is 
desperately needed.
  It is in America's national security interest to help Ukraine because 
Vladimir Putin will not stop in Ukraine, just as he did not stop with 
the invasion and annexation of Crimea in 2014.
  He will keep coming and coming and coming. And he doesn't have very 
far to go after Ukraine to encounter NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization. And we have a treaty obligation with those countries 
under article 5 to come to the defense of any one

[[Page S2454]]

of those countries that are attacked. So this is very close and near 
and dear to the United States' national security interests.
  Over the past few months, the United States has provided Ukraine with 
unprecedented defense aid: Javelins, Stingers, grenade launchers, small 
arms, ammunition, and more.
  A few weeks ago, the Senate passed a security supplemental that, 
among other things, provided additional support for Ukraine as it 
battles Russian forces. That legislation passed the Senate with 
overwhelming bipartisan support. But it awaits action in the House of 
Representatives.
  The Senate, as we know, is not a rubberstamp for the House, and the 
House is not a rubberstamp for the Senate. Neither Chamber is under any 
obligation to take up bills that originated in the other Chamber and 
pass them as is. But we also have a duty to address the biggest threats 
that our country is facing--one posed by Russia's aggression in Ukraine 
and in Europe, generally.
  I am glad that our friends in the House are working on their own 
security supplemental. I appreciate the comments being made by the 
Speaker that we will not leave Ukraine hanging out to dry.
  We know that the House is working on ideas that include a number of 
policies that were not part of the Senate's legislation. One of them is 
called the REPO Act--REPO for Ukrainians Act--which would repurpose 
seized Russian assets to help finance aid for Ukraine. It would shift 
some of the financial burden of supporting Ukraine from U.S. taxpayers 
to Putin and the Russian oligarchs, whose assets have been seized.
  This is a bipartisan bill introduced by Senator Risch, the ranking 
member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee; and it has been 
cosponsored by a quarter of all Senators, myself included.
  Now, the House version of the bill was introduced by my friend and 
fellow Texan, Chairman   Michael McCaul, chairman of the House Foreign 
Relations Committee. And it has more than 75 bipartisan cosponsors. 
This is a smart and effective way to continue supporting Ukraine 
without sticking American taxpayers with the bill.
  I am disappointed that these measures weren't included in the Senate 
supplemental, but I hope our colleagues in the House will pass this 
bill--the REPO Act--as part of their security supplemental.
  I am also encouraged to hear that the House is likely to include 
language to extend the lend-lease authority. This authority was 
created, as pertains to Ukraine, by legislation I introduced with 
Senator Cardin, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 
called the Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act, which became the 
law nearly 2 years ago.

  It was rooted in the same principle as President Roosevelt's Lend-
Lease Act in World War II, which allowed the United States to supply 
Great Britain and other allies with military resources.
  President Roosevelt recognized how critical it was to support Great 
Britain, which lacked what it needed to protect its people and to fend 
off German aggression. He famously vowed to transform the United States 
into the arsenal of democracy and worked with Congress to get the Lend-
Lease Act passed to achieve that goal.
  The original Lend-Lease Act was signed into law in March of 1941 and 
allowed the United States to supply its allies with resources at a 
critical moment during World War II.
  Later that year, Winston Churchill said the bill ``must be regarded 
without question as the most unsordid act in the whole of recorded 
history.''
  The circumstances we find ourselves in today are not the equal of 
March 1941, thank goodness. But they could be. In fact, the 
circumstances today look eerily similar to the circumstances in 1939 
when Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia for many of the similar reasons that 
Putin claims he has a right to invade Ukraine.
  If the world had stood up to Germany then, we may have avoided global 
calamity and prevented the loss of millions of innocent lives.
  The lessons of the past must inform the present. And I believe we 
have a duty to exercise our role--America's unique role--as the arsenal 
of democracy to help Ukraine defend its sovereignty and to prevent 
further spread of military aggression and Russian desires to restore 
the Soviet Union, which is what Vladimir Putin said: The failure of the 
Soviet Union in 1991 was the greatest geopolitical tragedy of the last 
100 years.
  You know, I have thought about that and contrasted that statement 
with the fact that Russia lost between 20 and 30 million people in 
World War II. Putin says the failure of the Soviet Union was the 
greatest geopolitical tragedy in the last 100 years; and he must mean a 
greater tragedy than the loss of 20 to 30 million Russians.
  That is how he thinks. And he wants to restore that golden age for 
the Soviet Union. And so he will not stop with Ukraine.
  Given the aid provided by Congress over the past couple of years, the 
Biden administration hasn't relied on the lend-lease authority to aid 
Ukraine, but that doesn't mean it isn't needed now.
  Ukraine is willing to fight. President Zelenskyy is willing to lead 
the Ukrainian people in that fight. But it needs additional assistance 
from the United States and our NATO allies to fend off this Russian 
invasion.
  Ukraine's arsenal is shrinking by the day. It is rationing its 
artillery shells and its other ammunition, and it has asked the United 
States for additional help.
  Now, there are different points of view, but there is broad 
bipartisan agreement that America should continue to support Ukraine. 
But there is also a growing concern over the cost of that assistance. I 
understand that. That is a concern that I share, which is why I 
introduced the modern Lend-Lease Act in the first place. Because lend-
lease is not a blank check, it gives the administration the option to 
lease or rent defense articles to Ukraine. It would allow us to answer 
Ukraine's call to provide more of what they need and ensure it is done 
in a more fiscally responsible way.
  The weapons the United States and our allies have provided thus far 
have allowed Ukraine to punch above its weight against the Russian 
Army. But one thing the Russian Army is capable of doing is to engage 
in a war of attrition, simply to wear down the opposition, both 
militarily and politically.
  But Ukraine has punched above its weight against the Russian Army, 
but it can't do so without ammunition and without defense articles. 
Additional American assistance is vital to Ukraine's success in this 
war, and we need to reauthorize the lend-lease authority as soon as 
possible.
  This legislation was attempted to be added to our security 
supplemental, and, for some reason, it didn't make the cut. But I hope 
now that our colleagues in the House will pass a security bill that 
includes both the lend-lease extension and the REPO Act and send that 
bill back here to the Senate without further delay.
  The future of Ukraine is at stake, but that is not all. The rest of 
the world is watching to see how the United States and our NATO allies 
respond to a power-hungry dictator. If the United States fails to 
support Ukraine in this pivotal moment, other authoritarian governments 
will take note. America's response to this war will likely affect 
Iran's calculations when it comes to Israel and its other proxies that 
it supports throughout the Middle East, being the No. 1 state sponsor 
of terrorism. And it will also figure into China's calculations when it 
comes to Taiwan. If they see the United States respond with passivity, 
they can expect to be met with the same level of weakness when these 
other autocrats and dictators act.
  We cannot allow America's global leadership to be diminished in this 
way because it is dangerous. This isn't a status symbol or something 
that we want to be able to brag about. This is about our own safety and 
our own national security, and that comes from strength. As Ronald 
Reagan said, peace comes through strength.
  The tyrants and the madmen around the world must see the United 
States and our allies with strength, and a strong security supplemental 
is one key to demonstrating that strength and that commitment.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.

[[Page S2455]]

  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. LEE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The Senator from Utah.
  Mr. LEE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I be permitted 
to speak for up to 10 minutes, followed by Senator Menendez for up to 5 
minutes, prior to the scheduled vote.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.