[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 17, 2024)]
[Senate]
[Pages S149-S150]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




          STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

      By Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. Marshall):
  S. 3597. A bill to reauthorize programs relating to oral health 
promotion and disease prevention; to the Committee on Health, 
Education, Labor, and Pensions.
  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, last week, we received remarkable news 
about a milestone in America's healthcare: A record 20 million 
Americans are now covered by health insurance under the Affordable Care 
Act.
  This is a sign of progress as we improve the quality of life and 
healthcare protections under President Biden.
  Having quality, affordable healthcare coverage means having peace of 
mind if you get a diagnosis, an accident, or if you need access to care 
and are facing medical debt.
  I know this story. I have been there. I was a law student at 
Georgetown when my wife and I were blessed with the birth of our first 
child, a baby girl born with a serious medical condition. As a young 
father without insurance, I can tell you, there is no greater feeling 
of helplessness.
  That is why Democrats have been committed to expanding health 
insurance to millions more Americans and ensuring it contains 
protections for patients with preexisting conditions.
  But even with these successes, there are serious gaps in America's 
healthcare system, gaps which are unimaginable until you learn 
specifically what I mean.
  I want to focus on one of them: access to dental care.
  I spent the August recess last year visiting small towns in Southern 
Illinois. I met with the new mayor of Carbondale, IL, Carolin Harvey.
  I asked her: OK. You have a U.S. Senator in your office, Mayor. What 
is your ask? What do you want?
  Her answer: pediatric dentistry, of all things. I couldn't imagine 
that. I thought it would be a sewer line or a street or something for 
law enforcement--pediatric dentistry. She said: Senator, we just don't 
have enough dentists for kids in Southern Illinois. In fact, there are 
10 rural counties in the State that have only 1 dentist to serve their 
community. In Lawrence County, there is 1 dentist for 15,000 people. 
That ratio--a local ratio--is 11 times worse than the national average.
  What is the result of a shortage of dentists, particularly for kids? 
Patients' conditions worsen as they face delays to getting an 
examination.
  My office was recently contacted about a child in Southern Illinois 
who was found to have tooth decay in her 18-month checkup. The patient 
is covered by Medicaid, and her parents had a hard time finding a 
dentist who would even see her.
  Imagine this for a minute as I tell you this story, that you are a 
father or mother of a child who is 18 months old and has tooth decay 
and pain. After nearly a year, the patient was finally treated for 
severe tooth decay, erosion of the upper incisor teeth, and a large 
tooth abscess, but her condition did not improve after multiple rounds 
of antibiotics so her dentist called around to find a specialist to see 
her.
  They were told by the specialist that ``unfortunately, we have over 
200 patients on our [waiting] list, so we really cannot help [her].'' 
This child is going to have to develop a much worse condition known as 
facial cellulitis, then she can be sent to an emergency room and then 
``we can see her.''
  Listen to what I just said. You have a child who is a year and a half 
old, who has already been treated by a dentist, who has complications, 
who is trying to find her way back to the dentist and is being told: 
Sorry. There is a waiting list here of 200 people. Get to the end of 
the line, and wait.
  Perhaps, though, there is a way out. If this child's condition 
worsens or is complicated, then maybe we can qualify under a new code 
under Medicaid to finally see her and treat her. In other words, this 
toddler had to develop deep-tissue infection--putting her at risk of 
sepsis, jaw damage, and other life-threatening illnesses--to get her 
decayed teeth pulled.
  Imagine that as a parent, would you. Think about that for a minute.
  Her dentist called a specialist in a neighboring State. Thankfully, 
they were able to perform emergency surgery to remove the decayed teeth 
but not before risking life-threatening illnesses.
  That is the reality for people in the United States of America and in 
the State of Illinois today. That is unacceptable. In fact, it is 
embarrassing. So what are we going to do about it in Washington, with 
all our money and all our power?
  Thankfully, there is a Federal program that can help. It is called 
the National Health Service Corps. It provides a scholarship and loan 
repayment to dental, medical, and mental health providers who work in 
rural and urban areas in need. It is the primary Federal program 
intended to build a pipeline of healthcare providers and address 
shortages such as the one I just described to you. Nationwide, there 
are 20,000 professionals serving in the National Health Service Corps, 
treating 21 million patients.
  But $310 million in mandatory funding for this program will expire at 
the end of this month. We cannot allow this to happen. Senator Marco 
Rubio--a Republican from Florida--and I have a bipartisan measure to 
extend this program and nearly triple its funding. It is supported by 
more than 65 leading medical organizations. They know the reality on 
the ground for poor people in America, particularly in rural areas and 
urban areas in need.
  The Senate HELP Committee passed a major bipartisan package last fall 
that included significant new funding for this program. I urge my 
Republican colleagues to join and support it.
  But there is a lot more we need to do. For example, in Illinois, only 
one-quarter of practicing dentists accepts Medicaid. Think about that. 
Only one-quarter of practicing dentists accepts Medicaid. Since so few 
dentists take Medicaid patients, it means that kids in Illinois, with 
private insurance, are six times more likely to get a dental 
appointment than those who have Medicaid. In other words, if you are 
poor, that child complaining of a toothache is just going to have to 
take it. That, unfortunately, in my State and in many States, is 
reality.
  Low reimbursement rates and arbitrary practices by companies that 
administer dental benefits under Medicaid contribute to this. So I 
recently sent a letter to the three major insurance providers--
DentaQuest, Avesis, and Envolve--to understand their tactics and their 
corporate strategies and ensure they are not putting unnecessary 
barriers up for basic dental treatment.
  I am also working with stakeholders to bring in Federal dollars to 
expand dental residency training programs, fund mobile clinics that 
drive into rural areas, and expand surgical capacity.
  I might just say this as an aside. I am often asked the question: Why 
in the world do we treat dentistry as anything other than a medical 
specialty? It certainly is. If you have got a sore

[[Page S150]]

tooth or a decayed tooth or a problem in your mouth, you want help, and 
you want it now; and you want a professional to provide it. They go 
through years and years of training. Yet, instead of being treated like 
a medical specialty like orthopedics or cardio, they are in a different 
category altogether. It makes no sense.
  Today, I am announcing a new bill that I am introducing with Senator 
Roger Marshall of Kansas. Our bipartisan legislation will authorize 
funding for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to enhance 
public health activities to improve dental care across America. It will 
support education, data collection, sealant treatments in schools, 
water fluoridation efforts, the development of the dental workforce, 
and community outreach efforts, such as the distribution of 
toothbrushes--the basics--to new parents and children.
  Illinois has not received funding for this important work in nearly 
20 years due to a lack of funding. I want to change that. If we improve 
the health of Americans, especially kids, then we must invest in 
preventing cavities, tooth decay, and infections. We must also ensure 
that patients have access to treatment, regardless of their ZIP Codes.
  I appreciate the partnership of my colleague Senator Marshall, and I 
will be working to pass this bipartisan legislation quickly.
  I want to say, just in closing, to the mayor, Carolin Harvey of 
Carbondale, IL, that you shocked me when you suggested pediatric 
dentistry was your ask. It told me a lot about you, your heart, and 
your caring for kids. Now that we know the reality of kids waiting for 
months and months and even years for basic dental treatment, let's do 
something about it, not just in Illinois but across this country. This 
is fundamental and basic, good health, and we need to make sure it is 
included in all healthcare coverage.
  Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be 
printed in the Record.
  There being no objection, the text of the bill was ordere to be 
printed in the Record, as follows:

                                S. 3597

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Promoting Dental Health 
     Act''.

     SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS.

       Section 317M of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
     247b-14) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (d)(2), by striking ``2010 through 2014'' 
     and inserting ``2024 through 2028''; and
       (2) in subsection (f), by striking ``2001 through 2005'' 
     and inserting ``2024 through 2028''.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Mr. PADILLA (for himself, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Schatz, and Ms. 
        Hirono):
  S. 3605. A bill to require the Secretary of Transportation to develop 
guidelines and best practices for local evacuation route planning, and 
for other purposes; to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
  Mr. PADILLA. Madam President, I rise to introduce the Emergency 
Vehicle and Community, EVAC, Planning Act. This legislation would 
strengthen communities to incorporate emergency evacuation routes in 
the transportation planning process.
  Specifically, this bill would direct the Department of 
Transportation, DOT, in consultation with the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, FEMA, to develop and publicly disseminate guidance 
and best practices for States, territories, Indian Tribes, and local 
governments to utilize to ensure necessary considerations are taken for 
evacuation routes during local planning.
  As we suffer from increasingly catastrophic natural disasters--from 
fires to hurricanes to flooding--efficient emergency evacuation routes 
can be the difference between life and death for our most vulnerable 
communities.
  The 2018 Camp Fire tore through the town of Paradise, CA, 
incinerating roughly 19,000 homes, businesses, and other buildings. 
Eighty-five people perished. But one of the most horrifying aspects of 
this tragedy was that some of the victims were killed in their cars 
when flames overtook the backed-up traffic on the only road out of 
town.
  We saw similar concerns in Louisiana during Hurricane Katrina, which 
resulted in efforts to improve evacuation route capacity, after nearly 
100,000 residents were trapped inside the city of New Orleans.
  And most recently in Lahaina, HI, a lack of evacuation routes 
contributed to making this the deadliest U.S. wildfire in more than a 
century. Press accounts detail the harrowing experience of people 
finding themselves caught in their cars, jammed together on narrow 
roads, surrounded by flames on three sides and the ocean on the fourth.
  In the event of a natural disaster, people need to efficiently access 
evacuation routes that have been strategically designed to save lives 
and move people out of the area quickly.
  Many cities, counties, and Tribal governments--especially those that 
are rural or low-income--that are the most vulnerable to disaster are 
also the least likely to have the resources and in-house expertise 
necessary to develop cornprehensive and efficient emergency evacuation 
routes.
  I thank Senators Cassidy, Schatz, and Hirono for introducing this 
important legislation with me. I hope all of our colleagues will join 
us in supporting this bill to ensure communities are equipped with the 
guidelines and best practices necessary to bolster disaster 
preparedness and save lives.
                                 ______
                                 
      By Mr. PADILLA (for himself and Ms. Murkowski):
  S. 3606. A bill to reauthorize the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act 
of 1977, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 
and Transportation.
  Mr. PADILLA. Madam President, I rise to introduce the NEHRP 
Reauthorization Act of 2023. This bipartisan legislation would 
reauthorize the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, NEHRP, 
and improve the Nation's earthquake preparedness.
  This bill would reauthorize the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction 
Program, NEHRP, and authorize a total of $175.4 million per year from 
fiscal year 2024 to 2028 across the four Federal Agencies responsible 
for long-term earthquake risk reduction under NEHRP: the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, FEMA, the National Institute of Standards 
and Technology, NIST, the National Science Foundation, NSF, and the 
United States Geological Survey, USGS.
  Specifically, the NEHRP Reauthorization Act of 2023 would authorize 
$10.6 million for FEMA, $5.9 million for NIST, $58 million for NSF, and 
$100.9 million for USGS per year from fiscal year 2024 to 2028. This 
funding would support research, development, and implementation 
activities related to earthquake safety and risk reduction.
  In California and across the Nation, earthquakes threaten lives, 
infrastructure, and communities. NEHRP allows vulnerable communities 
across the State to better prepare and respond to earthquakes through 
crucial tools like the ShakeAlert Earthquake Early Warning System 
Program and working to advance the scientific understanding of 
earthquakes.
  I want to thank Senator Murkowski for introducing this important 
legislation with me in the Senate, and I hope all of our colleagues 
will join us in supporting this bipartisan bill to improve our nation's 
earthquake preparedness.

                          ____________________