[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 202 (Thursday, December 7, 2023)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5836-S5837]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
LEGISLATIVE SESSION
Mr. SCHUMER. I move to proceed to legislative session.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the motion.
The motion was agreed to.
Syria
Mr. RISCH. Mr. President, I rise in opposition to this resolution.
First, this resolution obscures the facts and alleges that American
troops are involved in hostilities in Syria.
American troops have remained in Syria across multiple
administrations to ensure the lasting defeat of the Islamic State. Our
presence is authorized under the 2001 Authorization for the Use of
Military Force, the legal cornerstone of our counterterrorism
operations around the world. The Islamic State remains a threat to
Americans and our partners. According to the State Department's latest
reports on terrorism, the Islamic State ``remains resilient and
determined to attack.''
Senator Paul no doubt recalls the Islamic State's attacks across the
region--the depraved videos of slaves, beheadings, the Yazidi genocide,
and the attacks against civilians in France and into the heart of
Europe. As recently as last year, we saw the Islamic State conduct a
prison break in northern Syria and witnessed an uptick in attacks.
Despite the fact that we shattered their caliphate, the group is down,
but not out. Our troop presence is a critical element to maintaining
pressure on the Islamic State and keeping Americans safe.
Senator Paul's resolution points to the numerous Iranian-sponsored
attacks against our troops in Iraq and Syria. I share these concerns
and urge the administration to do more to establish deterrence against
Iran.
The House went through this exercise as recently as March and voted
down a similar effort to pull our troops by a wide margin.
I urge my colleagues to oppose this resolution.
Mr. SCHUMER. I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Kentucky.
Vote on Motion to Discharge
Mr. PAUL. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays on S.J. Res. 51.
[[Page S5837]]
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the motion.
Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The yeas and nays are ordered.
The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant bill clerk called the roll.
Mr. THUNE. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator
from North Dakota (Mr. Cramer), the Senator from Kansas (Mr. Moran),
and the Senator from South Dakota (Mr. Rounds).
The result was announced--yeas 13, nays 84, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 333 Leg.]
YEAS--13
Braun
Durbin
Lee
Markey
Merkley
Murphy
Paul
Sanders
Tuberville
Vance
Warren
Welch
Wyden
NAYS--84
Baldwin
Barrasso
Bennet
Blackburn
Blumenthal
Booker
Boozman
Britt
Brown
Budd
Butler
Cantwell
Capito
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Cassidy
Collins
Coons
Cornyn
Cortez Masto
Cotton
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Duckworth
Ernst
Fetterman
Fischer
Gillibrand
Graham
Grassley
Hagerty
Hassan
Hawley
Heinrich
Hickenlooper
Hirono
Hoeven
Hyde-Smith
Johnson
Kaine
Kelly
Kennedy
King
Klobuchar
Lankford
Lujan
Lummis
Manchin
Marshall
McConnell
Menendez
Mullin
Murkowski
Murray
Ossoff
Padilla
Peters
Reed
Ricketts
Risch
Romney
Rosen
Rubio
Schatz
Schmitt
Schumer
Scott (FL)
Scott (SC)
Shaheen
Sinema
Smith
Stabenow
Sullivan
Tester
Thune
Tillis
Van Hollen
Warner
Warnock
Whitehouse
Wicker
Young
NOT VOTING--3
Cramer
Moran
Rounds
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Heinrich). The motion is not adopted.
The motion was rejected.
The Senator from Rhode Island.
____________________