[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 198 (Friday, December 1, 2023)]
[House]
[Pages H6071-H6076]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                  HONORING THE MEMORY OF NANCY PALMER

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 9, 2023, the gentleman from California (Mr. Kiley) is 
recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the majority leader.
  Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the memory of Nancy 
Palmer, a longtime Grass Valley resident and community leader who 
passed away peacefully in her home in September.

[[Page H6072]]

  Nancy was born in Jacksonville, Florida, on September 18, 1938, and 
later went on to attend Jacksonville University. She and her husband, 
Captain Gary H. Palmer, moved to western Nevada County in the 1970s 
where she soon began devoting her time and talents to many local 
organizations, including Music in the Mountains, Hospice of the 
Foothills, Grass Valley Rotary, and Sierra College.
  Having grown up in a college town, Nancy recognized the value of 
community-based education. In 1994, she was elected to the Sierra 
College board of trustees, a position she was to hold for an impressive 
29 years. During her tenure, Sierra College opened two other campuses, 
serving thousands of students in Placer and Nevada Counties.
  Trustee Nancy Palmer's passion for community colleges extended beyond 
the Sierra College district. She coordinated professional trainings for 
fellow trustees at the State level, coaching student trustees from the 
73 California community college districts across the State.
  As the keynote speaker for numerous Sierra College commencement 
ceremonies, she often inspired students with her motto: Action Requires 
Courage.
  Nancy's accomplishments demonstrated a life lived with action and 
courage. She will be lovingly remembered by the people she influenced 
and for her invaluable contributions of time and effort to her 
community.
  The Sierra College board of trustees wrote that they are deeply 
saddened to announce the passing of their valued colleague. President 
of the board, Paul Bancroft, stated that Nancy cared about the college 
so much and her dedication as the representative for Nevada County was 
evident in everything she did.
  Willy Duncan, Sierra College's superintendent and president, spoke 
for his colleagues by stating that Nancy was a wonderful colleague, but 
more than that, she was a dear friend, and he will miss her greatly.
  On behalf of the Third Congressional District and the United States 
House of Representatives, I offer heartfelt condolences to Nancy's 
colleagues; her sisters, Judy Butler Good and Roberta Butler; her 
daughter-in-law, Lisa Palmer; her nephew, Rodney Shawn Scott; and the 
countless other lives that she touched.

                              {time}  1230


 Celebrating the 100th Anniversary of the Dow Hotel and Dow Villa Motel

  Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I wish to mark and celebrate the centennial 
anniversary of the Dow Hotel and Dow Villa Motel located in my district 
in Inyo County, California.
  Over a century ago, in 1923, Walter and Maude Dow built the hotel to 
provide lodging for big movie crews that were filming the stunning 
eastern Sierras.
  Today, the hotel still hosts guests from the film industry as well as 
tourists visiting the nearby natural attractions.
  In 1957, Joe and Verna Bonham and Ivan and Barbara Turner took over 
ownership and played an integral role in expanding the hotel's 
facilities.
  With their leadership, an adjacent motel named ``The Dow Villa 
Motel'' was built and additional sections were constructed, expanding 
the hotel's overall capabilities by more than double, from 20 rooms to 
50.
  With a core value of being a family-operated hotel, it was then sold 
in 1978 to the Bonham's daughters, Lynne Bunn and Jeanne Willey, who 
still own it today.
  The historic Dow Hotel overlooks a magnificent view of the Sierra and 
Mt. Whitney and is well known for its hospitality and charming 
atmosphere.
  It holds countless memories and historical significance for the area, 
having hosted producers, directors, and stars, including Clayton Moore, 
John Wayne, Roy Rogers, and many more.
  One hundred years ago, Walter and Maude Dow saw the economic benefit 
of having movie business in the region and responded by building what 
has become a treasured and iconic landmark for the Lone Pine community.
  Therefore, on behalf of the United States' House of Representatives 
and the Third Congressional District of California, I am honored to 
recognize the Dow Hotel and Dow Villa Motel for their 100 years of 
contributions to our local economies and participation in the business 
community.


          Congratulating the Rocklin High School Football Team

  Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I wish to recognize and congratulate the 
Rocklin High School football team on winning the CIF Division 2 Sac-
Joaquin Section championship game.
  The Rocklin Thunder football team beat St. Mary's Rams last week by a 
score of 17-6, winning their first section title since 2009.
  Rocklin head coach Jason Adams set this goal for his team and the 
defense led by defensive coordinator Greg Benzel was ready for the 
challenge.
  The stout Rocklin defense stopped the Rams in the red zone time and 
again, forcing four turnovers in the process.
  The offense took advantage of the defensive stops and turnovers when 
Rocklin quarterback Reeve Slone scrambled for a 44-yard touchdown run 
to put his team up 14-6 just before halftime.
  From that point, Rocklin never looked back. Coach Adams' team was 
able to achieve this because of their commitment to a common goal and 
every member of the team playing their role.
  However, the job is not quite finished for the Rocklin Thunder. They 
will be hosting Grant Union High School tonight in the Division 2 
NorCal Regional game.
  Mr. Speaker, I wish Coach Adams and his team the best of luck in 
their pursuit of a State championship.
  Go Thunder.


      Discovery of a Secret, Illegal Chinese Biolab in California

  Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, following the discovery of a secret, illegal 
Chinese biolab in California, I requested an investigation by the 
House.
  The Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party recently released 
its highly disturbing report, and I commend the select committee and 
Chair Gallagher for getting to the bottom of many of the disturbing 
facts in play here.
  The lab was run, we have learned from the committee's report, by an 
international fugitive from China named Jesse Zhu.
  After running various state-connected companies in China, Mr. Zhu 
moved to Canada where he set up dozens of corporations to steal 
valuable American intellectual property and unlawfully transfer it to 
China.
  The Supreme Court of British Columbia found he committed fraud on an 
epic scale, resulting in a $330 million judgment.
  He then fled to America, assumed a new alias, David He, and set up 
several more companies, including the one behind this lab in Reedley, 
California.
  The lab was discovered nearly a year ago when a code inspector came 
upon a suspicious warehouse in Reedley. There was a hose out of the 
back of the warehouse. Inside, she found many Chinese nationals wearing 
white lab coats, glasses, masks, and latex gloves, along with thousands 
of vials of biological substances, and 1,000 mice. Some of the mice 
were actually found dead.
  It was later learned that these were transgenic mice, genetically 
engineered to catch and carry the COVID-19 virus.
  A further inspection found blood tissue and other bodily fluid 
samples and serums, along with thousands of vials of selected 
biological material. Some of the vials were labeled with the names of 
infectious agents, while others were labeled in a code that was never 
deciphered.
  At first, the CDC refused to investigate. They even hung up on local 
officials who had called to ask for help when they learned about the 
lab.
  The local Representative got involved and, finally, the CDC did do an 
inspection. They found at least 20 potentially infectious agents, 
including HIV, tuberculosis, and the deadliest known form of Malaria. 
Yet still, the CDC didn't bother to test any of these samples. They 
simply accepted what was on the label even if the contents were 
unknown. They didn't test it even if there was a code they couldn't 
decipher.
  The committee said this made it impossible for them to fully assess 
the potential risks that this specific facility posed to the community.

  The select committee report calls this decision by the CDC 
``baffling.'' Later, local officials discovered a refrigerator in the 
lab that had eluded the CDC that was labeled ``Ebola.''

[[Page H6073]]

  Now, while the supposed purpose of the lab was to sell various 
medical test kits, all this company actually did was buy counterfeit 
kits from China and then resell them here in the United States. Thus, 
as the committee put it, there was a lack of apparent legitimate or 
even profit-motivated criminal motive in the operation of the illegal 
facility.
  This raises the question: What was it there for? What was the true 
purpose of the facility? This is especially pressing to ask given that 
Jesse Zhu, the illegal operator of the lab, was receiving unexplained 
payments via wire transfer from Chinese banks.
  The report further notes that no one knows whether there are other 
unknown biolabs because there is no monitoring system in place.
  It is very clear that we need further congressional action and 
investigation here. First of all, we need to examine the role of the 
CDC, which seemed to completely drop the ball here.
  Why did the CDC ignore local officials about the lab for months? Why 
didn't they test any samples from the thousands of vials with unclear 
or coded labels? How did they manage to miss a freezer that was 
actually labeled ``Ebola''?
  Then we also have to ask: How did this lab escape detection? How many 
more such operations could there be in California and across the 
country? Finally, we need to learn more about what was the lab's true 
purpose. Why was it there? What was it planning on doing? Why is it 
that its operator was receiving so much money from China?
  These are questions that we need answers to. Furthermore, it has also 
become clear that we need to update the monitoring and regulatory 
framework, which clearly has gaps because a facility like this was 
allowed to go undetected. In fact, it relocated several times and 
potentially posed a serious risk to the surrounding communities.
  I commend the work that was done by the select committee, and we need 
to move forward to make sure that we are doing everything we can to get 
to the bottom of what happened here and to keep our communities safe.


        $6 Billion Permanently Off-Limits to the Iranian Regime

  Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to commend the passage of the No 
Funds for Iranian Terrorism Act, which I am a cosponsor of, which 
overwhelmingly has passed the House of Representatives and would 
permanently freeze $6 billion that the administration had released to 
Iran.
  Now, this was released by the administration as part of a deal. They 
claim the money was only for humanitarian purposes, but we know full 
well that money is fungible; that Iran is very skilled when it comes to 
sanctions evasion, and that Iran is funding terrorist organizations and 
their proxies on a massive scale, including Hamas and Hezbollah and, 
thereby, posing a serious existential risk to the State of Israel.
  In fact, FBI Director Christopher Wray recently confirmed that Iran 
is the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism and has even 
attempted attacks on American soil. By imposing immediate, mandatory 
sanctions on foreign financial institutions that facilitate the 
transfer of these restricted $6 billion in funds covered under that 
deal, the No Funds for Iranian Terrorism Act will ensure that that 
money remains permanently off-limits to the Iranian regime.
  Mr. Speaker, I am grateful that the House came together on a 
bipartisan basis to pass this legislation that I have coauthored. I 
urge the Senate to give it prompt consideration and for the President 
to sign it.


               Governor Newsom is Making California Worse

  Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, last night there was a televised debate 
between the Governor of my State, Gavin Newsom, and the Governor of 
Florida, Ron DeSantis. It was set up as sort of a comparison of the two 
States' models of governments and which is the better model for other 
States and the country to follow.
  While it is true that Florida has done quite well in any number of 
areas, really the comparison could have been made between California 
and virtually any other State in the country. When it comes to the key 
metrics of economic performance and quality of life, California is the 
very worst State in the country.
  Despite that, we have a Governor who went on television and, in fact, 
has for months, for years now been trying to claim that California is, 
in fact, leading the Nation. He has said time and time again that 
California is a model for the Nation. He has said the future happens 
first in California.
  Indeed, it is true that the current administration here in Washington 
has copied any number of California's policies and, in fact, has 
elevated many of California's officials--Julie Su, the Acting Secretary 
of Labor held that position for Governor Newsom; Vice President Kamala 
Harris; the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra was 
formerly California's attorney general; Alejandro Mayorkas; Douglas 
Parker, the head of OSHA.
  Therefore, a matter of great national concern is to really look at 
the facts of what is happened in California. What the Governor tried to 
do last night, Governor Newsom, that is, was to present a complete 
alternative reality using false, misleading, in some cases simply 
delusional, assertions about the true nature of life in California.
  I wanted to take a moment today to correct some of the misstatements 
that were made by Gavin Newsom in last night's debate.
  First, there was a discussion of the California exodus, and the 
Governor refused to acknowledge the fact that people are leaving our 
State in record numbers. In fact, he even asserted that more people are 
moving to California than to Florida.
  Here is the reality: Between 2019 and 2022, 1,044,000 people left 
California, while 737,000 people moved to Florida. So many people have 
been leaving California that the State literally did run out of U-
Hauls. In fact, for three straight years, California has led the Nation 
in U-Haul departures.

  What is so notable about this is that prior to the Newsom 
Governorship, California has gained population every year since our 
founding in 1850.
  We have always been the State that people want to come to, the State 
where anyone could get ahead, and now we are the State that so many 
people can't wait to leave behind.
  It was just this complete abrupt change in the trajectory. California 
continued to grow and then Governor Newsom took office and suddenly we 
are leading the Nation in departures. We have the highest out-migration 
rate in the country.
  In fact, it is even more stark when you look at San Francisco, the 
city that Newsom was the mayor of, the city represented by 
Congresswoman Pelosi, the city that Vice President Harris is from. This 
is a city that is on the verge of collapse.
  Those aren't my words. That is the editorial page of the San 
Francisco Chronicle. This is a city where businesses are leaving 
seemingly every day, citing the intolerable conditions in that city.

                              {time}  1245

  In fact, San Francisco right now is losing residents faster than any 
major city in United States history. That is right, San Francisco is 
losing residents faster than even Detroit when Detroit went bankrupt.
  What is Newsom talking about when he actually said on live television 
that there are more Floridians going to California than vice versa? The 
reality is that, actually, if you do a direct comparison, over 50,000 
more people went to Florida than came to California.
  What Newsom did is very revealing. He said that the rate of 
Californians per capita moving to Florida is lower than vice versa, but 
he did an asymmetrical comparison where he used per capita numbers when 
looking at the State that people are departing from but used raw, 
absolute numbers looking at the State that they are going to.
  If you were to do it in a symmetrical manner, whichever way you did 
it, whether you did raw numbers on both sides or per capita numbers on 
both sides, of course, California does much worse. It is, after all, 
the State that has the highest outmigration rate in the country.
  The Governor's willingness to go on television and distort the 
numbers so egregiously, use this completely nonsensical trick where you 
make it per capita on one side but not the other, shows how willing he 
is to mislead both

[[Page H6074]]

his own constituents and people throughout our country.
  A second area where major correction is needed is when it comes to 
the handling of COVID-19. Here is the reality: California had the 
single most draconian and longest-lasting lockdowns in the country when 
it came to school shutdowns, business shutdowns, church shutdowns and 
when it came to mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and vaccine passports. 
Each and every step of the way, California had the highest level of 
government coercion and control.
  Yet, the Governor gets up in last night's debate and says, no, 
Florida was the lockdown State, which is truly boggling to the mind 
that he would stand up and, with a straight face, make that assertion. 
Yes, it is true that basically every State, right when COVID arrived, 
did take drastic measures when we didn't know what this was in those 
first couple of weeks in February and March. The difference is some 
States learned and others did not.
  Some States looked at the evidence on how best to handle this public 
health challenge and acted accordingly in an evidence-based manner that 
placed trust in their citizens, whereas California never learned and 
continued a state of emergency until 2023.
  In fact, if you look at a direct comparison, Newsom last night 
claimed that Florida shut down schools, but in fact, if you look at the 
facts, Florida ranked third out of the 50 States in getting kids back 
to school. Where did California rank? California ranked 50 out of 50 
States in getting kids back to school. We had the longest-lasting 
school shutdowns in the country. Those harms are going to be with us 
for a long, long time.
  Newsom was saying one thing last night, but just a few weeks ago, he 
actually admitted--this is a Politico story--we would have done 
everything differently when it came to COVID. He tried to make excuses. 
He said we didn't know what we didn't know, but that is not true. It is 
not a matter of hindsight being 2020 because so many other States--in 
fact, every other State--managed to do a better job.
  Here is the truly perverse thing: Despite everything California did 
to take away the rights of its citizens, to shut down beaches, to shut 
down youth sports, to keep kids out of school, many of whom have not 
come back, by the way, despite the incalculable damage to our young 
people, to our businesses, to our democratic institutions in the name 
of public health, California wound up with an excess mortality rate 
exceeding the national average even though we had the benefit of a 
relatively young population.
  That is why the recent Lancet study actually says California had one 
of the highest standardized COVID mortality rates in the entire 
country. Yet, Newsom, of course, ignores that. He simply accuses 
Florida of having tens of thousands of lives die unnecessarily, 
completely ignoring the actual facts of the situation.
  The reality is, having lived through Newsom's one-man rule in 
California, at every turn, the Governor prioritized getting himself in 
the headlines and rewarding special interests over the health and well-
being of Californians, and this continued for years. In fact, things 
got worse as time went on.
  Even after he had set the record for how long he was keeping kids out 
of school, on October 1, 2021, the Governor announced that California 
was going to be the first State in the Nation to impose a student 
vaccine mandate for COVID-19. It applied to all grade levels, public 
and private schools alike, with no exceptions for religion and personal 
belief.
  He was the first Governor to announce such a mandate. He boasted 
about being the first Governor to announce such a mandate, and he wound 
up being the only Governor to announce such a mandate. At the beginning 
of this year, he formally withdrew the mandate without it ever going 
into effect. Even the World Health Organization now says COVID vaccines 
are not needed for healthy kids and teens.
  A third issue that came up in last night's debate was homelessness. 
Newsom claimed that he has spent unprecedented resources on 
homelessness and has gotten 68,000 people off the streets. The first 
part is true; the second is preposterous. California has spent $20 
billion on homelessness over the last 5 years, and the problem has 
gotten worse. We spent all that money, and it has gotten worse.
  In recent years, homelessness in California has increased 15 times 
faster than the country as a whole. Half of all the unsheltered 
homeless in the whole country now live in California. Newsom himself 
acknowledged that Californians are ``wondering where the heck all their 
tax dollars are going.'' If you want to do a direct comparison, the 
Federal Government has counted over 171,000 homeless in California last 
year versus 25,000 in Florida.

  Newsom himself even said when he was in Los Angeles recently that it 
looked like a third-world country. San Francisco, frankly, is much 
worse, with the one exception of a couple of weeks ago when the 
President of China came to town when there was the AIPAC conference 
with world leaders in San Francisco. The New York Times wrote a story 
talking about the makeover and beautification efforts that were hastily 
undertaken. The Times article said: ``San Francisco had the air this 
week of teenagers frantically cleaning up after a house party with 
their parents on the way.'' The Times continues, ``Perhaps the most 
obvious change has been seen at the Speaker Nancy Pelosi Federal 
Building. For 2 years, . . . people regularly used drugs in an adjacent 
alley. Most have seemingly disappeared in a poof.''
  The Times reported that San Francisco added more than 200 beds to its 
shelter system just for the arrival of President Xi from China. It 
notes: ``Some residents have wondered why San Francisco has been able 
to fix its notorious problems for the President [of China] but not for 
them.''
  A fourth issue that came up in the debate was education, and Newsom 
tried to claim that California is outperforming Florida. He cites 
fourth grade reading and eighth grade math. Here is the reality: Number 
one, California spends a lot more money than other States. California 
spends 45 percent more per pupil on K-12 education than Florida does. 
What do we get in return for that money? California has the lowest 
literacy rate in the country.
  There are 800 California schools where 75 percent of students do not 
read at grade level. California's most recent eighth grade reading 
scores are the worst of any State in the country that was measured. Our 
fourth grade reading scores are the third worst in the country.
  That is why it was unbelievable to me when, last night, Newsom 
asserted that our eighth grade reading scores are somehow indicative of 
good leadership when we literally have the worst eighth grade reading 
scores in the country.
  Poor students, by the way, fare worst of all in California's 
education system. California has ranked 49 out of 50 States in 
achievements for students who are eligible for free and reduced lunch.
  The issue of gas prices also came up last night, and Newsom tried to 
say that Californians are being ripped off. I agree with him on that. 
Californians are being ripped off. He said we are being ripped off by 
the oil companies. The reality is that California has by far the 
highest gas prices of any State in the country.
  Right now, gas prices in California are $1.58 above the national 
average, so if the oil companies are ripping us off, why are they 
ripping us off so much more in California than any other State?
  There are a few reasons why gas prices are so much higher in 
California. Primarily, it is that we have the highest gas tax in the 
country. We have all kinds of regulations and fees that add much more 
to the price of each gallon. The reality is that we are getting ripped 
off, but we are getting ripped off by our own government.
  By the way, what do we get in return for this, for paying the highest 
taxes on gas in the country, money that is supposed to be going to 
transportation? California generally ranks as having about the second 
or third worst roads of any State in the country, which people will be 
sure to tell you if you drive through California for any reasonable 
stretch of time. That is the sad reality of Gavin Newsom's California--
highest taxes, deepest potholes. We sacrifice the most and get the 
least in return.
  The issue of taxes also came up last night, and Newsom tried to 
somehow

[[Page H6075]]

slice and dice the data to say that California for certain people has a 
lower tax burden than Florida does. The reality is this: California has 
the highest income tax in the country and the highest gas tax in the 
country. When you look at the overall tax burden in California, total 
taxes are $10,167 per person. In Florida, it is about half that, 
$5,406.
  Newsom wanted to talk about the working class. Well, here is the 
reality of life in California for the working class.
  California has the third highest cost of living in the country.
  California has, by far, the highest gas prices in the country, thanks 
to an extremely regressive set of taxes.
  California has the third worst inequality in the country.
  California has the highest poverty rate in the country. California 
leads the Nation in the real poverty rate.
  Last year, California had the lowest wage growth in the country. 
Wages went up less in California for workers than in any State in the 
country.
  That is why the California exodus, when you think of all the people 
leaving, is not just people who are well off who want to escape the 
very high income tax rates. It is actually working people who just 
cannot afford to get by in our State, who are not allowed to pursue 
their career, who are unable to buy a home because of skyrocketing home 
prices. That is the reality of life in California under Gavin Newsom.
  There was also discussion of the economy, both nationally and in 
California. Newsom said something very interesting. He said that the 
Nation's current unemployment rate is a sign of a booming economy. He 
said the unemployment rate is pretty low nationally. That is the link 
that he drew--low unemployment rate, good economic stewardship.
  The first response to that is that that is a mirage on a national 
level, given that the workforce participation rate has gone down 
significantly. Any small business owner will tell you that they are 
still to this day having a very hard time getting workers.
  However, if we take Newsom at his word that the low unemployment rate 
is a sign of good leadership, well, then we can look at California's 
unemployment rate to assess his leadership. As it turns out, California 
has the second highest unemployment rate in the entire country.

  If you want to do a direct comparison between California and Florida, 
just to pick one example, since January 2019, employment has increased 
by over a million--1,031,000--in Florida. It has declined by 85,000 in 
California.
  If you ask Californians themselves how they think the economy is 
doing, 71 percent of Californians expect bad times economically over 
the course of the next 12 months. That is a majority of Democrats, 
Republicans, and Independents who believe the economy is on the wrong 
track and expect things are going to get worse in California.
  As a final point, the Governor was just a few months ago boasting 
about how California had a surplus the last couple of years and how 
that was, again, a great sign of positive governance, of economic 
stewardship. Well, you didn't hear him mention that last night, and the 
reason why is that California has a massive deficit right now, a $31.5 
billion deficit, which is out of step with what was happening last 
year. Right now, Florida has a $17.7 billion surplus.
  Now, when it came to immigration and the border, Governor Newsom made 
a truly outlandish claim. He said that it is Congress and not President 
Biden that is responsible for the border crisis. Let's just look at the 
basic facts.
  From 2014 until the beginning of the Biden administration, there were 
only 4 months out of that whole span of 6-plus years that had more than 
100,000 encounters along the southern border, so only 4 months out of 
all those months for 6 years where there were more than 100,000 
encounters at the border. Under the Biden administration, there were 29 
straight months with more than 100,000 border encounters.

                              {time}  1300

  If you ask what changed between the time before Biden took office and 
the time that he did take office, it wasn't Congress. The President had 
a Democrat Senate and a Democrat House for the first 2 years of his 
administration.
  The total numbers now are: 6.4 million illegal crossings at the 
southern border. There have also been 1.7 million known got-aways.
  In fiscal year 2021, this administration set a record for illegal 
border crossings. In fiscal year 2022, the administration broke that 
record. In fiscal year 2023, the administration broke that record.
  This is another area where Newsom's tendency to grasp for some 
distorted factoid and paint a completely alternate picture of reality 
is on display.
  When he did his initial interview with Hannity in June of this year, 
Newsom said, no, no, no. Biden is doing a great job at the border. 
Look, this month illegal crossings are down 70 percent. There happened 
to be a blip in June.
  You didn't hear him use that talking point last night. Why is that?
  In subsequent months, illegal border crossings have been off the 
charts.
  In September of this year, we set an all-time record for a single 
month where we had 269,735 crossings across the southern border.
  There was also mention of sanctuary policies in the debate last 
night. Newsom has tried to mislead everyone about the extent to which 
he supports sanctuary policies and exactly what these policies do.
  I will read to you something he said in 2018. Newsom said, ``Let me 
be clear: California is a sanctuary State.'' That is what he said. 
``Let me be clear: California is a sanctuary State.''
  He said, We have defied and resisted the Trump administration's 
policies at every turn. We will do it again.
  Newsom even signed a law closing ICE detention facilities that was 
overturned by the Ninth Circuit as unconstitutional.
  The evidence is extremely clear that we have a crisis at the southern 
border, that this administration has refused to take the actions that 
are necessary to address it, and that Governor Newsom has made the 
situation worse in our own State.
  For him to now blame Congress or to blame the House specifically is 
beyond belief when in the House we passed the Border Security Act 
earlier this year, the most robust border security bill that has passed 
the House in a long, long time--maybe ever--which would make a huge 
difference in the crisis at the border, which is contributing to the 
fentanyl crisis, to human trafficking, and is introducing potential 
national security and terror threats into our country.
  In the House of Representatives, we passed that bill. What has 
happened since? It has been gathering dust on Chuck Schumer's desk in 
the Senate. It is well past time for action on this issue.
  The ninth area where the Governor completely misled in last night's 
debate was when it came to crime. He said crime is down in California.
  In fact, FBI data shows violent crime in California increased 13 
percent the last few years as it has gone down across the country.
  California cities have seen an epidemic of retail theft. In San 
Francisco this year a string of high-profile businesses, Whole Foods, 
Nordstrom, Anthropologie, have left the city, and they basically all 
cited the crime problem as the reason. In Los Angeles, police have 
advised residents not to go outside wearing jewelry.
  In fact, if you want to do a direct comparison between Florida and 
California when it comes to crime, there were a few figures cited in 
the debate last night.
  One that is very interesting and is very telling is when it comes to 
motor vehicle theft. Now, why is this telling? Because in California, a 
lot of the crime doesn't even go reported because it won't be 
prosecuted.
  You have all these laws that have basically legalized retail theft, 
have legalized open air drug use, like Prop 47. We have other laws like 
Prop 57 that have downgraded a lot of offenses. We have cities that 
have defunded the police.
  We have these so-called progressive prosecutors like George Gascon 
who Newsom initially appointed as D.A. of San Francisco who refused to 
prosecute even those crimes for those laws that are on the books.
  You have businesses that will be robbed in broad daylight and they 
will

[[Page H6076]]

just let the people go. They won't bother to file a police report 
because they know that nothing is going to happen.
  You can't actually look at reported crimes as an accurate gauge of 
how much criminal activity there is.
  When it comes to vehicle thefts, that is different because there is 
usually an insurance claim. We get realistic, accurate numbers when it 
comes to motor vehicle thefts.
  How does that compare? In 2022, reported vehicle thefts per capita 
were 250 percent higher in California than they were in Florida.
  That will be no surprise to anyone who has been to San Francisco. The 
advice often is you should roll down your windows when you leave your 
car parked so at least they won't break them when they are trying to 
break in.
  I want to mention one final issue, the 10th and final issue--although 
there are certainly plenty of others--where the Governor of our State 
gave a completely false and misleading characterization about what life 
is like in California, and that is on the issue of personal freedom.
  The Governor called California the freedom State, but the Cato 
Institute rankings of freedom in the 50 States ranked California as the 
48th most free State. Florida ranked second out of the 50 states.
  Just look at what happened, of course, during the COVID lockdowns 
where California had the highest measure of government control and the 
least measure of personal choice and freedom.
  It began long before that. California has every year continued to 
erode the rights and freedoms of its residents.
  When it comes to economic freedom, for example, Newsom signed into 
law AB 5, which has deprived countless people of their right to earn a 
living, effectively abolishing independent contracting for many 
professions in California.
  Now, his former Secretary of Labor, Julie Su, is trying to do the 
same thing through the regulatory process here in Washington, D.C.
  Look at things like bans on straws, bans on gas-powered leaf blowers, 
bans on chopsticks and other single-use food items, bans on even gas-
powered vehicles by 2035, if Gavin Newsom has his way.
  Every day in California, we wake up wondering what is going to be 
banned next. For Newsom to somehow claim we are the freedom State is a 
delusion of the highest order.
  I will close by making this point, though, Mr. Speaker, which is that 
California, I believe, is the greatest State in the country.
  It is the State where everyone has always wanted to come to. We have 
everything to offer, and there are still so many great things about our 
State: the amazing people and diversity of cultures and world-leading 
companies in California. We have great universities in our State, as 
well.
  We have so many great things going, and we still have parts of our 
State that people are moving to and want to live in--specifically, my 
district.
  My district is one of the few parts of California that is growing 
right now. In fact, while the State as a whole has for three straight 
years led the Nation in U-Haul departures, the largest city in my 
district, Roseville, was second in the Nation in U-Haul arrivals.
  Why is it that people are moving to our area while they are leaving 
other parts of California?
  The reason is that we have fought against the failed governance model 
that Gavin Newsom has tried to impose on the State as a whole and that 
is in an especially advanced stage in places like San Francisco.
  During the COVID years, we fought in every way we could to allow our 
communities to follow the evidence and allow citizens to live their 
lives as they saw fit.
  We ended up getting our kids back to school sooner than any other 
part of California. We ended up having an unemployment rate in Placer 
County, for example, that was about half the rest of the State.
  What was the result of that? We actually ended up having way better 
COVID-19 outcomes than the State as a whole because we focused on the 
things that would actually make a difference on disease control rather 
than population control, rather than gratuitously taking away the 
personal freedoms of our residents.
  Even before COVID and now after--at least as we have moved away from 
that paradigm--we continue to try to chart a different course than 
California as a whole has taken.
  We support small businesses in our communities rather than attacking 
them. We support law enforcement in our communities rather than 
defunding the police and rather than contributing to a false and 
misleading narrative, a negative narrative about our law enforcement.
  We have led the entire Nation in going after fentanyl dealers and 
charging them with murder, so we don't have more of our kids continuing 
to get victimized.
  When Gavin Newsom says California is a model for the Nation, nothing 
could be further from the truth. I am very proud to represent 
communities that do represent a model for how California as a whole can 
once again become the Golden State.
  I encourage everyone who watched the debate last night to take a 
close look at the facts because there is an increasing tendency for 
California's failures to become national failures.
  As a Representative from California, I will be fighting in every way 
I can to make sure that that doesn't happen.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

                          ____________________