[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 180 (Wednesday, November 1, 2023)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5316-S5317]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS
By Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Mr. Reed):
S. 3180. A bill to establish a working waterfronts grant program; to
the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Ms. COLLINS. Madam President, I rise today to introduce the Working
Waterfront Preservation Act, legislation to help preserve access by our
Nation's fishermen and maritime workers to the waterfronts in coastal
communities. I would like to thank my friend Senator Jack Reed from
Rhode Island, who joins me in introducing this legislation.
According to the most recent data from the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, commerical and recreational fisheries are
responsible for more than 1.7 million jobs in the
[[Page S5317]]
United States, $253 billion in sales, and $117 billion in value-added
impacts. In Maine, our fisheries are one of our State's most important
resources and are vital to our economy. A report of Maine's seafood
sector as a whole, which included downstream contributors, found that
in 2019, the sector contributed more than $3.2 billion to Maine's
economy. Although the fishing industry is a significant economic
contributor both nationwide and in Maine, it is losing access to the
working waterfronts that are vital to the industry's survival.
A working waterfront is defined as land that is used for or that
supports commercial fishing, aquaculture, boatbuilding, or the for-hire
recreational fishing industries. That may be a technical definition,
but these areas represent much more to coastal communities. A recent
study conducted by the Maine Coast Fishermen's Association sums it up
perfectly: ``Working waterfronts are more than just a place of business
for commercial fishermen; they are a hub of information, a collection
of salty characters, a safe haven, a meeting room, a space for support,
and they are well-deserving of both a place in Maine's history and its
future.'' The importance of these areas cannot be overstated.
In Maine our fishermen and women are losing access to waterfront
property up and down the coast. In some coastal Maine communities, once
thriving working waterfronts no longer exist. Recent interviews
conducted by the Island Institute in Maine uncover that ``for all
practical purposes, working waterfront access [in these towns] is
essentially gone.'' The reasons for this are complex. In some cases,
burdensome fishing regulations have led to a decrease in landings,
hindering the profitability of shoreside infrastructure. In other
cases, soaring land values and rising taxes have made the current use
of commercial land unprofitable. Property is being sold and quickly
converted into private spaces, which means that they are no longer
available to support our fisheries.
While this trend has been happening for decades--in 2006, Maine's
working waterfront only took up 20 miles of Maine's nearly 3,500 miles
of coastline--the recent demand for coastal properties has intensified
this problem in Maine. We can help preserve these areas for the next
generation of fishermen, boatbuilders, and maritime workers with
dedicated investments. Currently, the primary mechanism for preserving
Maine's waterfronts is through a State-run program called the Working
Waterfront Access Protection Program. Since 2008, that program has
helped preserve 34 waterfront properties. The legislation I am
introducing today would help scale up that model program so that more
communities can be assisted.
There is currently no targeted, Federal assistance program to help
the commercial fishing industry and other maritime sectors gain or
preserve access to working waterfront areas. The Working Waterfront
Preservation Act would create a $20 million program to help municipal
and State governments, nonprofit organizations, and participants in
maritime industries improve working waterfront property in our coastal
States. Grants would be administered by the Economic Development
Administration, and successful applicants would need to be endorsed by
State fisheries agencies, which have the local expertise to understand
the needs of each coastal State. In order to be eligible for a grant,
recipients would be required to permanently protect an area as working
waterfront, to ensure that it can be used for commercial purposes for
decades to come, and to invest in the cost themselves.
This legislation is crucial for the continued prosperity of coastal
communities across the country. I urge my colleagues to join Senator
Reed and me in supporting this important legislation.
______
By Mr. PADILLA (for himself, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Sanders, Mr.
Cardin, Mrs. Murray, and Ms. Warren):
S. 3194. A bill to amend title 5, United States Code, to achieve
parity between the cost-of-living adjustment with respect to an annuity
under the Federal Employees Retirement System and an annuity under the
Civil Service Retirement System, and for other purposes; to the
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Mr. PADILLA. Madam President, I rise to speak in support of the Equal
COLA Act, which I reintroduced today.
The Federal Government's workforce is central to protecting our
national security and delivering critical services to hundreds of
millions of Americans. As such, it is essential that the Federal
Government attract and retain an effective workforce and, once their
service is complete, ensure retirees receive the dignified retirement
that they deserve.
Unfortunately, in 1986, Congress created a two-tiered system that now
prevents nearly 800,000 retired Federal employees from receiving a full
cost-of-living adjustment when consumer prices increase more than 2
percent from year to year.
In January, some Federal retirees will receive a 3.2-percent COLA.
However, other Federal retirees will receive only a 2.2-percent
increase due to this policy, which fails to protect retired employees
living on a fixed income.
That is why I am proud to reintroduce this legislation to fix this
unfair system and ensure that all retired Federal employees receive
full retirement benefits that keep up with the cost of living.
I hope my colleagues will join me in support of this bill to ensure
that retired Federal employees no longer pay the price of a misguided
law and that their benefits fully keep pace with the cost of living.
______
By Mr. KAINE (for himself and Mr. Warner):
S. 3195. A bill to designate the General George C. Marshall House, in
the Commonwealth of Virginia, as an affiliated area of the National
Park System, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Energy and
Natural Resources.
Mr. KAINE. Madam President, today, I am introducing legislation to
designate the General George C. Marshall House, also known as the
Dodona Manor, in Leesburg, VA as an affiliated area under the National
Park Service.
The legislation will be the final step in the year-long effort to
recognize the Dodona Manor as a unit of the National Park System. It
will also promote the public appreciation of the significant historic
contributions made by U.S. military leader and statesman George C.
Marshall.
George C. Marshall was an American hero, playing a significant role
in the Allied victory in World War II and serving as an architect of
one of the most significant foreign policy initiatives in our country's
history. He led a lifetime of public service, serving as Chief of Staff
to the Army during America's entry into World War II, as Secretary of
State, where he orchestrated the historic Marshall Plan to rebuild
Europe following the war and provided counsel to Presidents Roosevelt
and Truman, and as Secretary of Defense after the onset of the Korean
war. He acquired Dodona Manor while serving as the Chief of Staff of
the U.S. Army in 1941 and lived there until his death in 1959.
Today, the George C. Marshall House is dedicated to preserving and
advancing General Marshall's life's work and legacy by hosting
international exchanges, historical exhibits, and community events, and
supporting educational programming based on General Marshall's desire
to inspire future leaders. The legislation would bring greater
resources, including technical assistance, accessibility improvements,
and new programming, to this historical site and enable the Marshall
House to improve and expand its work.
I am hopeful that this designation will provide new resources to
preserve, honor, and celebrate General Marshall's legacy at this
historic site, and I am pleased that companion legislation is also
being introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by my colleague,
Representative Jennifer Wexton, who has led this effort for years.
____________________