[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 25, 2023)]
[House]
[Pages H3936-H3938]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
UNMANNED AERIAL SECURITY ACT
Mr. GUEST. Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (H.R. 1501) to prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from
operating or procuring certain foreign-made unmanned aircraft systems,
and for other purposes, as amended.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 1501
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Unmanned Aerial Security
Act'' or the ``UAS Act''.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OR PROCUREMENT OF CERTAIN
FOREIGN-MADE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS.
(a) Prohibition on Agency Operation or Procurement.--Except
as provided in subsection (b) and subsection (c)(3), the
Secretary of Homeland Security may not operate, provide
financial assistance for, or enter into or renew a contract
for the procurement of--
(1) an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that--
(A) is manufactured in a covered foreign country or by a
business entity domiciled in a covered foreign country;
(B) uses flight controllers, radios, data transmission
devices, cameras, or gimbals manufactured in a covered
foreign country or by a business entity domiciled in a
covered foreign country;
(C) uses a ground control system or operating software
developed in a covered foreign
[[Page H3937]]
country or by a business entity domiciled in a covered
foreign country; or
(D) uses network connectivity or data storage located in a
covered foreign country or administered by a business entity
domiciled in a covered foreign country;
(2) a software operating system associated with a UAS that
uses network connectivity or data storage located in a
covered foreign country or administered by a business entity
domiciled in a covered foreign country; or
(3) a system for the detection or identification of a UAS,
which system is manufactured in a covered foreign country or
by a business entity domiciled in a covered foreign country.
(b) Waiver.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Homeland Security is
authorized to waive the prohibition under subsection (a) if
the Secretary certifies in writing to the Committee on
Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of
the Senate that a UAS, a software operating system associated
with a UAS, or a system for the detection or identification
of a UAS described in any of paragraphs (1) through (3) of
such subsection that is the subject of such a waiver is
required--
(A) in the national interest of the United States;
(B) for counter-DAS surrogate research, testing,
development, evaluation, or training; or
(C) for intelligence, electronic warfare, or information
warfare operations, testing, analysis, and or training.
(2) Notice.--The certification described in paragraph (1)
shall be submitted to the Committees specified in such
paragraph by not later than the date that is 14 days after
the date on which a waiver is issued under such paragraph.
(c) Effective Dates.--
(1) In general.--This Act shall take effect on the date
that is 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) Waiver process.--Not later than 60 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland
Security shall establish a process by which the head of an
office or component of the Department of Homeland Security
may request a waiver under subsection (b).
(3) Exception.--Notwithstanding the prohibition under
subsection (a), the head of an office or component of the
Department of Homeland Security may continue to operate a
UAS, a software operating system associated with a UAS, or a
system for the detection or identification of a UAS described
in any of paragraphs (1) through (3) of such subsection that
was in the inventory of such office or component on the day
before the effective date of this Act until--
(A) such time as the Secretary of Homeland Security has--
(i) granted a waiver relating thereto under subsection (b);
or
(ii) declined to grant such a waiver; or
(B) one year after the date of the enactment of this Act,
whichever is later.
(d) Drone Origin Security Report to Congress.--Not later
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the
Committee on Homeland Security of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs of the Senate a terrorism threat
assessment and report that contains information relating to
the following:
(1) The extent to which the Department of Homeland Security
has previously analyzed the threat that a UAS, a software
operating system associated with a UAS, or a system for the
detection or identification of a UAS described in any of
paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (a) operating in the
United States poses, and the results of such analysis.
(2) The number of UAS, software operating systems
associated with a UAS, or systems for the detection or
identification of a UAS described in any of paragraphs (1)
through (3) of subsection (a) in operation by the Department,
including an identification of the component or office of the
Department at issue, as of such date.
(3) The extent to which information gathered by a UAS, a
software operating system associated with a UAS, or a system
for the detection or identification of a UAS described in any
of paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (a) could be
employed to harm the national or economic security of the
United States.
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ``business entity'' has the
meaning given such term in section 334 of the Graham-Leach-
Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. 6764).
(2) Covered foreign country.--The term ``covered foreign
country'' means a country that--
(A) the intelligence community has identified as a foreign
adversary in its most recent Annual Threat Assessment; or
(B) the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination
with the Director of National Intelligence, has identified as
a foreign adversary that is not included in such Annual
Threat Assessment.
(3) Intelligence community.--The term ``intelligence
community'' has the meaning given such term in section 3(4)
of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)).
(4) Unmanned aircraft system; uas.--The terms ``unmanned
aircraft system'' and ``UAS'' have the meaning given the term
``unmanned aircraft system'' in section 44801 of title 49,
United States Code.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Mississippi (Mr. Guest) and the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Payne)
each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Mississippi.
General Leave
Mr. GUEST. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and
include extraneous material on H.R. 1501.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Mississippi?
There was no objection.
Mr. GUEST. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Madam Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1501. It is imperative that
the Department of Homeland Security is equipped to protect the Nation
against all threats. This protection includes ensuring that the
unmanned aircraft systems, or drones, that DHS uses and buys are not
made in foreign countries that do not align with our interests,
countries like China.
DHS requires the dominant, air domain capabilities that drones
provide to accomplish many of its land and maritime missions. DHS uses
drones for everything from surveilling the border to the Coast Guard
National Security Cutter's operational need for a persistent airborne
surveillance capability. Utilizing drones is a cost-effective way to
cover large areas of the homeland.
However, many of the commercial drones used in the United States are
manufactured in China, which dominates the United States' market. Of
the top 10 drone manufacturers that supply the United States market, a
single Chinese manufacturer towers over the others with nearly 77
percent of market share.
Because of this threat, several other Departments, such as Commerce
and Interior, have taken actions to ground their drone fleets until the
threat to U.S. Government data can be determined.
DHS has also issued warnings in recent years about Chinese-made
drones, specifically citing concerns that they may be sending sensitive
data to their manufacturers in China where it can then be assessed by
the Chinese Government.
Our colleagues in the Senate share our concerns. In fact, Senator
Rick Scott and Mark Warner have introduced similar legislation to ban
the purchase and use of these drones across the Federal Government, not
just at DHS.
Given the role drones have in protecting homeland security, it is
more important than ever to require DHS to assess its drone fleets.
Once DHS has identified the extent of the problem, we can then work
with the Department to find a suitable solution.
{time} 1930
This bill would require DHS to provide a threat assessment report to
Congress on whether the agency has analyzed the threat of its drones
that are manufactured in covered countries. It would also require that
they report the number of these drones the department has in operation
and the extent to which the information gathered by these drones may be
a threat to the homeland or economic security of the United States.
Second, the bill would prohibit DHS from buying or using drones made
in a covered foreign country going forward.
I am proud to say that this bill was passed out of the House Homeland
Security Committee in a bipartisan fashion.
I thank my friend and colleague, Chairman Green, for being an
original cosponsor of this bipartisan legislation and Congressman
Cuellar for being a cosponsor of this bill. I am grateful that this
body passed this measure in a bipartisan fashion last Congress, and I
am optimistic that we will be able to do so again today.
Madam Speaker, with China looming as a growing threat on the horizon,
maintaining our homeland security is of the utmost importance. I urge
my colleagues to support H.R. 1501, and I reserve the balance of my
time.
Mr. PAYNE. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Madam Speaker, to help carry out its many missions, the Department of
[[Page H3938]]
Homeland Security has increasingly come to rely on unmanned aircraft
systems, or drones.
DHS utilizes these eyes in the sky to make timely assessments about
the extent of damage caused by hurricanes, tornadoes, and other natural
disasters in instances where the Federal Emergency Management Agency
cannot easily deploy personnel to affected areas.
The Coast Guard uses drones to enhance its ability to collect and
disseminate information on maritime hazards and threats. In remote
parts of the land border, DHS uses them to detect and prevent illicit
smuggling activities.
Many unmanned aircraft systems in the marketplace today are
manufactured in nations considered foreign adversaries. As such, there
are legitimate security concerns about the integrity of the data drones
collect.
Recent reports suggest that Chinese-manufactured drones might be
compromised and used to send sensitive information to the Chinese
Government.
In response to security concerns, the Departments of the Interior and
Defense have taken steps to limit their use of foreign-made drones.
H.R. 1501, the Unmanned Aerial Security Act, would direct the
Department of Homeland Security to take similar protective measures.
It would prohibit DHS from purchasing or using drone systems
manufactured in a foreign country that is deemed to be an adversary by
either the intelligence community's annual threat assessment or the
Secretary of Homeland Security.
Importantly, H.R. 1501 allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to
waive the prohibition in certain circumstances, such as the national
interest of the United States or for research or intelligence purposes.
Finally, the bill requires DHS to report to Congress on information
related to drones, including the results of any threat assessments
conducted.
H.R. 1501 has bipartisan support and was reported out of the Homeland
Security Committee by voice vote.
Madam Speaker, I commend my colleague from Mississippi (Mr. Guest)
for introducing this bill that seeks to ensure the integrity and
security of the drone systems that the Department of Homeland Security
operates.
Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. GUEST. Madam Speaker, I, again, urge my colleagues to support
H.R. 1501, and I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. Luna). The question is on the motion
offered by the gentleman from Mississippi (Mr. Guest) that the House
suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 1501, as amended.
The question was taken.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds
being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.
Mr. GUEST. Madam Speaker, I object to the vote on the ground that a
quorum is not present and make the point of order that a quorum is not
present.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further
proceedings on this question will be postponed.
The point of no quorum is considered withdrawn.
____________________