[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 117 (Monday, July 10, 2023)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2267-S2269]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Business Before the Senate
Mr. CORNYN. Madam President, it is actually good to be back in the
Senate this week after 2 weeks back home, and we certainly have a busy
schedule ahead of us. The fact is that, unfortunately, this was a
product of the inattention or lack of urgency that the majority leader
has had to deal with the Senate's necessary work so far. We are a
quarter of the way through the 118th Congress, and we, frankly, don't
have a lot to show for it.
Under our colleagues' leadership, this Chamber developed an
embarrassingly short list of accomplishments. Despite the chaos at the
southern border, we haven't had the opportunity to vote on legislation
to address this humanitarian and security crisis, either in the Senate
Judiciary Committee or here on the floor. They simply just ignore it: 5
million border encounters since President Biden took office. Last year
alone, 108,000 Americans died of drug overdoses. Seventy-one thousand
of those were from synthetic opioids, virtually all of which come from
Mexico, the precursors having been imported from China.
Would that be enough to get the attention of the President and the
majority leader to actually do something in that area? Well, apparently
not.
[[Page S2268]]
Yesterday, I was interested to see that the Senator from New York--
the majority leader--sent a letter to our Senate colleagues
highlighting his plans for the next 3 weeks. Actually, we only have
about 10 workdays in these next 3 weeks before now the regularly
scheduled August recess. Again, more of the same that we have seen so
far this year--not much time and a lot to do.
Senator Schumer mentioned his desire to move forward on bills
relating to drug pricing, fentanyl, permitting reform, rail safety,
marijuana banking, China competition, artificial intelligence, and a
number of other topics in the next 3 weeks.
Now, to be clear, I don't think the majority leader actually believes
we are going to produce legislation in these areas. Maybe you would
call this a wish list. But it is only wishful thinking to believe that
in the U.S. Senate you are going to be able to get all of these
necessary items addressed in the next 10 working days.
And, of course, that ignores the fact that we have a bicameral
legislature. We have the Senate and the House. Has he prevetted any of
this legislation with the House to see whether, assuming the Senate
would act, that the House would actually take it up and pass it and the
President would sign it into law?
That is how we legislate around here. It is not performance art. It
is not show business. This is actually about doing the people's
business and passing legislation through an admittedly difficult
process.
But this is where we find ourselves having waited until this late
moment to deal with so much important legislation. The Democratic-
controlled Senate has been downright sleepy for the last 6 months. And
I have no reason that this letter, this wish list, will prompt some
miraculous turnaround.
The lack of productivity in this Congress has created a major backlog
of important bills, which must be our top focus. We have a lot to do
and not much time to do it, but that is by design. That is not the way
the Senate should be operating.
We heard from the previous speakers a lot about the national defense
authorization bill, which is our annual Defense bill, which we passed
for the last 61 years in a row--61 years in a row. Before this last
break, the Senate Armed Services Committee completed its work on that
bill and passed it out of committee by a vote of 24 to 1--bipartisan
bill out of the Armed Services Committee demonstrating an overwhelming
bipartisan support.
This legislation, as we all know, is about supporting our
servicemembers, modernizing our military, and addressing our biggest
security challenges, including China.
Senator Wicker, from Mississippi, the ranking member, has shared his
disappointment over the fact that this year's Defense bill doesn't
adequately seek to fund our defense needs.
Now, of course, this is an authorization, in the jargon of the
Senate--it is not an appropriation--but typically what happens is the
authorizing committees will set a level of funding and then the
Appropriations Committee will come behind that and fund it, presumably,
at that level.
But I know many of us are committed to working in the coming weeks to
increase those funding levels to ensure that our military has the
resources it needs to protect the American people, especially in the
face of 40-year-high inflation.
I don't have to tell anybody within the sound of my voice what
inflation has done to their standard of living and their purchasing
power over the last couple of years. Basically, this is like a silent
tax, where you have less and less to spend for the necessary
expenditures in your life, whether it is your transportation, your
food, your clothing, your childcare, your healthcare, or the like.
Well, the military is experiencing the ill-effects of this 40-year-high
inflation, too, and its purchasing power has been decreased
dramatically.
Well, I hope that we will have a turnaround of sorts and that the
Defense authorization bill will get off to a strong start, but it is a
long way from the finish line.
While this bill did pass the committee, it still needs to be brought
to the floor. There needs to be an opportunity for Senators to offer
amendments and debate the bill, hopefully improve it, and then vote on
it by the full Senate, and that takes time.
Under the regular procedures of the Senate, to bring a bill like that
to the floor and to account for all of the potential procedural
obstacles that would be encountered, it would take you more than a week
to process the bill. And we have 3 weeks before August--10 days of
actual working time--and this is what the majority leader has presented
us with.
So we know that we need to get to work. The NDAA should pass before
the end of fiscal year, which is September 30, and the Senate is only
scheduled to be in session for 7 weeks before then. So even after we
come back from the August recess, in order to meet the deadline of the
end of the fiscal year, September 30, we only have 4 more weeks after
we get back before the NDAA essentially lapses--the national defense
authorization bill--absent our action in the meantime.
I don't have to tell my colleagues that providing for the common
defense is one of our most important responsibilities. And the National
Defense Authorization Act is the foundation for that. So I hope the
majority leader will allow the Senate to take up the bill soon.
I think I heard the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee
just now suggest that perhaps the NDAA will come to the floor next
week, and I hope that is true. But certainly, in order to give Senators
an opportunity to participate and hopefully debate and offer amendments
and improve the bill, it is going to take time, and that is something
we don't have a lot of.
Every Member of this Chamber has the right to offer their ideas to
strengthen and improve this legislation, just like we should on any
piece of legislation. And the majority leader should not try to jam the
process by saying: Oh, now, we don't have enough time so we are going
to have to do away with the opportunity to have full debates and
amendment process because we are running up against a deadline. Well,
that deadline is of his own making because he failed to deal with this
in a timely manner.
But September 30 isn't the only deadline that we have for the Defense
authorization bill. It is also the farm bill. Every 5 years, Congress
passes a farm bill to support everything from crop insurance to
nutrition programs, to rural broadband. The impact of the farm bill is
felt in communities across America, including those in my home State of
Texas.
Texas is home to nearly a quarter of a million farms and ranches,
more than any other State in the country. And one out of every seven
working Texans actually works in an ag-related job. These hard-working
men and women raise cattle, chickens. They grow corn and sorghum. They
produce cotton and hay, not just for the Nation but for the world.
Texas farmers and ranchers produce food and fiber for America and for
exports as well, and they are facing increasingly strong headwinds.
I mentioned inflation, which has been at a 40-year high. It has
increased the cost of every input that farmers and ranchers have, from
diesel to fertilizer, you name it. It has eroded their purchasing
power. Their operating costs have skyrocketed for everything. I
mentioned fertilizer and fuel. Pesticides is another major expense. And
so their profit margins continue to get slimmer and slimmer.
I was somewhat amused to hear that President Biden, during our 2-week
period away from Washington, DC, began to tout something he calls
Bidenomics, like he is proud of it. He said: This is a lot like
Reaganomics, except it is Bidenomics. It has nothing to do with
Reaganomics, which actually worked. But I was amused because when I
looked at the RealClearPolitics' average of the President's approval
rating for his economic policies, it stands at a whopping 38.7
percent--38.7 percent approve of President Biden's economic policies.
Bidenomics is like putting lipstick on a pig to try to dress it up to
make it look better than it really is.
But in addition to our economic woes, Mother Nature has unleashed a
set of challenges as well. Last year alone, natural disasters caused
more the $21 billion in crop losses nationwide. Today, areas across
Texas are experiencing a hot and dry summer. We are used to that. It is
summertime. It is July. We are used to hot and dry
[[Page S2269]]
summers. But farmers are also battling very little rainfall, and they
are praying that their crop loss will not be more than minimal.
The farm bill includes farm safety net programs which are a lifeline
for countless producers. They are critical at managing the risks
inherent with this critical industry. Everybody knows farming and
ranching is risky, for the reasons I mentioned and others.
But this year I hope we can build on the progress we made in the last
farm bill to ensure that the agriculture sector is as resilient as
possible.
This sector not only feeds, fuels, and clothes America, as I said, it
also drives our economy and feeds the world.
In Texas alone in 2021, ag exports totaled more than $7.2 billion. In
2019, Texas A&M's AgriLife Extension Service estimated the economic
impact of the ag sector to be nearly $160 billion, which is more than 8
percent of my State's GDP.
So a strong, on-time farm bill is essential to the health and well-
being of this important sector of the economy, but it is also important
beyond that. It is important to the American people, and it is
important to our economy.
Our colleague Senator Boozman from Arkansas is a ranking member. And
our colleagues on the Agriculture Committee, I know, have been working
hard to draft this year's farm bill, and I appreciate the hard work
that they put into it. But I am eager to work with our colleagues to
get this bill across the finish line on time, again, before it lapses
at the end of this fiscal year.
And then, there is another big one, Federal Aviation Administration
Reauthorization. As though we needed another big, heavy lift before the
end of the fiscal year, it is also the deadline to reauthorize the
Federal Aviation Administration. Over the last couple of years,
travelers have dealt with widespread flight cancellations, paralyzing
staffing shortages, and rising prices. We have also witnessed some
jarring safety issues, including near-collisions on airport runways in
Minneapolis and New York.
Last month, Senators Cantwell, Cruz, Duckworth, and Moran introduced
the FAA Reauthorization Act to address these and other issues. But like
the National Defense Authorization Act and the farm bill, the FAA needs
to be reauthorized by September 30. Again, all of these deadlines are
well-known by the majority leader, but here we are finding ourselves
with very little time and a lot to do.
And last but not least is, likely, the biggest lift before us for
before September 30, and that is to fund the government. As part of the
debt limit agreement, Senator Schumer vowed to bring all 12
appropriations bills to the Senate floor by September 30. How he is
going to be able to keep his promise is not clear to me, given the
traffic jam that we are going to experience, because this includes
funding for our military, veteran services, border security, and so
much more.
Senator Collins and Senator Murray and all of our colleagues on the
Appropriations Committee are determined to restore some regular order
and common sense to the funding process. I hope the majority leader
will stick by his word and put all 12 appropriations bills on the
Senate floor before the end of the fiscal year.
We don't need, and the country does not want, another omnibus
spending bill like we saw at the end of last year, which, of course,
was by design, because it empowers the leadership to the detriment of
rank-and-file members of the Congress. When you are presented with a
``shut down the government,'' ``take it or leave it'' proposition at
the end of the year, having bypassed all of this normal process, the
question is, Are you going to keep the government open? Are you going
to fund the government? Are you going to fund defense, veterans, border
security, or not? And that is simply an abomination we do not need to
repeat again. And so I do hope the majority leader will keep his word.
None of these bills are an easy lift. They require a lot of hard
work, cooperation, and time, and we only have 7 weeks of legislative
session to pass them all. So far, the 118th Congress hasn't been a
productive one. The Democratic majority has struggled to complete even
the most basic tasks, and now we have a lot of work to do, maybe an
impossible amount of work to do, by design. The clock is ticking, and
we can't let these critical responsibilities slip through the cracks.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. Hirono). The Senator from Kansas.