[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 104 (Wednesday, June 14, 2023)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2086-S2089]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                               Broadband

  Mrs. CAPITO. Mr. President, I rise to talk about something that is 
unseen but really impacts every aspect of our daily lives, something 
that has major implications on the future of my State and many rural 
States just like the Presiding Officer's rural areas, and that is 
reliable broadband connection and the implementation of service in our 
unserved and underserved areas.
  Internet connection is something that we often take for granted, 
certainly in the DC area we do--especially in our cities and urban 
communities. It is a mainstay of so many facets of our life.
  So just think about it. We rely on internet connection for our 
communication with our family and friends, our emergency services, 
obtaining information. I have already done that about five times today, 
getting some additional information--banking, conducting business, and 
as we experienced firsthand during the pandemic, essential aspects of 
our workforce participation, the education of our children, and I would 
add in healthcare here. Even as we transitioned back to in-person work 
and school post-pandemic, these capabilities are so essential and 
greatly beneficial.
  In West Virginia, our State is the only State entirely encompassed by 
Appalachia, and we are recognized across the world for our mountainous 
terrain. So we love our mountains in West Virginia, but our topography 
in West Virginia has dealt us a challenging hand when it comes to 
adopting needed advancements to connect people to the internet.
  So we know one thing: It is expensive, and it is a lot easier said 
than done. But this lack of broadband connectivity and reliability is 
one of the biggest concerns that I hear every time I travel in the 
State. That is because our homes, our schools, our hospitals, our 
health clinics, our churches, our businesses, if they lack the 
appropriate level of connectivity or lack it entirely, you are behind. 
You are behind. You are not participating. You can't get the help that 
you need. You can't communicate the way you want to. And in a lot of 
cases, you are not going to live in a place that doesn't have 
connectivity. So this is something that must change and something that 
I am committed to changing.
  So one of my first initiatives as a U.S. Senator was launching my 
Capito Connect Plan to help bridge this digital divide that we see in 
the country. The plan served as a roadmap for bringing affordable, 
high-speed internet connection and access to our homes, our businesses, 
and our classrooms throughout the State. Since launching this 
initiative, we have made a lot of progress--we have--connecting our 
communities in our State. We have had a lot of conversation, and, 
really, we have kind of bridged a lot of what we thought would be the 
impossible.
  We have expanded cellular service in Paw Paw, a very remote area, and 
in Lincoln County, a very rural area, by initiating searches for 
providers. We have secured millions of dollars in broadband funding 
investments through the USDA programs, and we have hosted multiple 
visits with our FCC officials to bring attention to our State's 
broadband needs.
  Increasing rural broadband funding has been a focus of the 
Appalachian Regional Commission. I have also supported major broadband 
builds like Zayo's announcement to connect a fiber optic network right 
through the North Central part of our State. We have also been 
receiving critical feedback from listening sessions in all 55 counties, 
including soliciting all kinds of data back from folks in West Virginia 
onto our website. Also, when we were leading efforts to craft the 
bipartisan infrastructure law, I made sure, along with many others, 
that this was included because this is an essential part of our 
infrastructure. And we are making a difference.
  So we have made a lot of advances. We have. But there is still much 
more work to accomplish. Now is not the time to look back and see what 
we didn't do and how maybe we could have done it better. Now is the 
time to look forward and see where we are and where we are going to be. 
So we are at a really critical moment here and one we must take 
advantage of.
  We have all prioritized funding and provided funding for broadband in 
many different pieces of legislation. We have done that every year in 
appropriations--and I am on appropriations--and I personally have made 
sure that we have included this not just in the appropriations bill but 
also in the bipartisan infrastructure package.
  So, on Monday, I was back home in West Virginia and got the chance to 
speak to some of the greatest young men and women in our State at West 
Virginia Girls State and West Virginia Boys State. It is clear in 
talking to some of them that our best and brightest are unlikely to 
stay in our State if they don't have this reliable broadband. It just 
doesn't make sense. The lack of internet connectivity will impact how 
they join the workforce, how they further their education or perform 
the tasks of everyday living that have become so dependent on 
broadband.

  So Congress has a much needed and very important role to play here, 
and I am confident in our ability to rise to this occasion in the face 
of this challenge.
  But in order to distribute the unprecedented funding that is coming 
from the bipartisan infrastructure law to the communities and States 
that need it, we have got to have accurate data.
  This has been a flaw in the system. That is why NTIA and FCC have 
been tasked with developing the National Broadband Map, to determine 
where the unserved and the underserved communities were located.
  Why is that important? Because much of the funding, as it should be, 
is

[[Page S2087]]

not to up your service in an urban area or up my service in Charleston, 
WV, in a more, I would say, suburban-type area, but it is to go to 
these unserved and underserved areas. We have to have accurate data. So 
with accurate data, we can work and distribute funding as we should, as 
is proper.
  There is no doubt that the first maps that came out in November were 
inaccurate. They failed to properly account for the connectivity 
needs--I know I can speak for my State, but I am sure it is the same 
all across the country. And this is something that our State of West 
Virginia, we really took it personally because we know that this is a 
once-in-a-lifetime chance to really get it right.
  So they invited challenges. They said if you can identify a residence 
or a home or business that is shown as being served, and you are 
unserved or underserved, then you can challenge the map to say that is 
an inaccurate recording of the status of broadband activity.
  So we had over 120,000 challenges of which 86,000 of these were 
accepted. That means they went back and looked, and working with our 
State broadband council that has done a phenomenal job, they went back 
and looked and found that 86,000 homes or businesses that were recorded 
as being served in actuality had either no service or very little 
service--something that was considered underserved. This is going to 
help us as the distribution of the larger sums of money come to 
actually provide the dollars to get to those places.
  These developments are encouraging and the FCC will continue to 
improve this and two future versions are being planned.
  The need for connectivity remains. Updated mapping shows that over 
271,000 locations in my State now remain without service. I think some 
people watching this would probably say: It can't possibly be that you 
don't have service. But if you get to some of these remote areas, and 
sometimes they are not even that remote, you get out into some of the 
more rural areas where there is maybe one provider or there is no 
competition, it is not an economic model to serve one home that is 10, 
15 miles away.
  So there are people. When I get a show of hands in classrooms in West 
Virginia, I get at least 20 percent to 30 percent of the students in 
those classrooms do not have good service. Think about doing their 
homework when they get home. They can't do it. Most of it relies on 
information that you get from the internet. So it really puts those 
students and those families behind.
  While funding will be allocated by the end of this month, we have to 
make sure also that it is not wasted. Sadly, we have seen this happen. 
In our own State in 2010, money was wasted when our first chance came 
along to be able to connect more people. So we have to make sure that 
that doesn't happen. That is why I have introduced the Rural Broadband 
Protection Act. It is a bill with broad bipartisan support that would 
improve government programs responsible for connecting people. I look 
forward to marking up this legislation in committee here soon.

  West Virginians have been persistent and diligent and, honestly, I 
think, quite patient--but are now very frustrated--throughout the 
process. They can always expect the same from me, as however they are 
feeling is however I am going to feel, because that is how you are as a 
representative.
  So I will continue my efforts for these broadband capabilities--to go 
to that last house, that last home, that last business--in this 
Mountain State. We are on the cusp, I think, of a major breakthrough 
here--we are all on board on this--and one that I am committing to see 
through.
  With that, I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. Cortez Masto). The Senator from Kansas.
  Mr. MORAN. Madam President, I rise this afternoon to discuss, along 
with a number of my other colleagues who share the understanding, the 
importance of broadband access, especially to rural America.
  A recent study by the University of Kansas found that up to 1 million 
Kansans live in regions that lack access to high-speed broadband 
services. Often, rural areas have the worst quality broadband or, as is 
too often the case, they have no access to broadband.
  The benefits of access to high-quality broadband are clear. They are 
known. We have worked hard to be in positions here in the U.S. Senate 
in which we are fully engaged on the issue of making sure that all 
Americans have access to this service. Broadband access is correlated 
with more jobs, greater economic growth, better healthcare outcomes, 
and increased educational performance.
  This means our country will be weaker as we confront the economic and 
security challenges we are facing, including labor shortages, STEM 
education shortcomings, and the lagging American leadership in key 
technology areas. When millions are without broadband, we limit our 
potential as a nation.
  Lack of access or lack of access to good-quality broadband is 
certainly a local issue. It is an individual issue. It is a local 
business, a local family, a local school, a local library issue. But 
the consequence of those individuals, those families, those schools 
being absent broadband service is a detriment to our Nation.
  Recognizing the importance of access to high-quality broadband, 
Congress has allocated significant resources to help bridge the digital 
divide, but the first step in appropriately allocating those resources 
is knowing where the money needs to go.
  I sponsored the Broadband DATA Act, which was enacted in 2020, to 
require the FCC to use granular data to create a more accurate and 
refined broadband map to better target areas so we know where the new 
investments are needed. Getting these maps right is critical and has 
not been easy. The first time I saw the maps that were developed, it 
was like, this doesn't reflect at all what I know about my home State 
of Kansas.
  Congress has devoted significant resources. We were involved in the 
effort to allocate additional dollars so that broadband maps could be 
updated and the data could be improved and hopefully get the 
information correct. We have been working on this since 2020.
  If the FCC maps aren't accurate, a large portion of funding will be 
poorly used, and areas in need won't get the resources required to 
increase access to broadband. Millions of dollars in new resources for 
Kansas rely upon the accuracy of the maps. It would be poor government 
and a waste of taxpayer dollars if the outcome is that we are only 
providing money to places that already have broadband service or have 
quality broadband service and once again forgetting, forgoing those 
that don't.
  The FCC is required to allow Americans to challenge the inaccuracies 
within the maps, making certain the maps improve over time. After 
receiving feedback from Kansans over the last few weeks and months, a 
second version of the map was released at the end of May. I understand 
from talking with Kansans that this map is more accurate than the one 
before. Continued oversight of the FCC's work will be necessary, and I 
continue to work with my colleagues on those efforts.
  Now that we know where the need exists--now that we better know where 
the need exists, we need to make certain that investments are 
appropriately targeted to those most in need and not waste it on 
overbuilding existing networks. We also must ensure that the program 
requirements encourage broadband providers to participate rather than 
discourage them with burdensome requirements that do not line up with 
congressional intent.
  I also want to make certain that every dollar Congress has allocated 
to broadband deployment actually goes to broadband deployment, not back 
to the Treasury. This is why, in a bipartisan way, we have introduced 
legislation to ensure that broadband grants are not considered taxable 
income. This is particularly important as critical broadband deployment 
programs at the Department of Commerce allocate funds at the end of 
this month, just a few days from now. Every dollar taken back by 
Treasury represents a community remaining disconnected, and I encourage 
my colleagues to work with me so this is not the case.
  As part of my oversight work as the ranking member of the Commerce, 
Justice, Science Appropriations Subcommittee, I invited Commerce 
Secretary Gina Raimondo to Kansas to hear directly from Kansans about 
the

[[Page S2088]]

challenges they face when deploying broadband across our State. She 
heard from County Commissioner Randy Leis about the benefits broadband 
access has brought to Meade County, including education and business 
opportunities. She also heard from a host of rural telephone and 
telecom providers about what they need from the Department of Commerce 
to successfully deploy broadband across Kansas.
  During this visit, Secretary Raimondo--and I express my appreciation 
here today on the Senate floor. I appreciate her coming to my State to 
hear and see what is the circumstance. During this visit, Secretary 
Raimondo reiterated her commitment to provide every Kansan with access 
to high-quality broadband services.
  To preserve the smalltown Kansas way of life that I and many Kansans 
and Senators here today value, I look forward to working with Federal 
and State officials to make certain that Kansas and particularly rural 
Kansans are connected to quality broadband service. Of all the things 
we do in my world to try to make sure Kansans have a bright future, one 
of the important ones is to make sure we have access to the 
technologies of today and tomorrow.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from North Carolina.
  Mr. BUDD. Madam President, over the last several years, much has been 
made about the digital divide that exists here in America. The more 
digital the economy becomes, the bigger the divide between big cities 
and small towns.
  As someone who still lives on a family farm in Davie County in North 
Carolina, I have always made it a priority to stand up for North 
Carolinians who don't have the advantage of large population centers. 
Rural Americans across our State and our Nation shouldn't have their 
economic opportunities diminished because of their ZIP Code.
  One of the biggest challenges we face in bridging the digital divide 
is politicalization. An example of this is the Broadband, Equity, 
Access, and Deployment--or BEAD--Program. This program provides ``over 
$42 billion to expand high-speed internet access by funding planning, 
infrastructure deployment and adoption programs'' across the country, 
but once the Biden administration got a hold of this funding, they 
began funneling it toward their liberal wish list instead of toward 
commonsense broadband deployment.
  Another example is the Biden administration's Notice of Funding 
Opportunity, which gives favorable treatment to government-owned 
networks over private ones, and they load up that funding with climate 
mandates that drive up costs for these communities. This is 
fundamentally the wrong approach.
  At the end of the day, what rural Americans are looking for is pretty 
straightforward: They want the highest quality internet for the most 
affordable price as quickly as possible.
  This is not the time or place for social agendas or for partisan 
distractions. We have to keep our eye on bridging the digital divide so 
that rural Americans have a fair shot at opportunities where they can 
achieve their God-given potential. This is just one more way we can 
build a strong nation.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Alabama.
  Mr. TUBERVILLE. Madam President, I join my Republican colleagues on 
the floor today in support of expanding broadband access across rural 
America.
  I recently had the honor of becoming ranking member of the 
Agriculture Committee's Subcommittee on Rural Development and Energy, 
which has jurisdiction over the U.S. Department of Agriculture's 
broadband programs. My top priority as ranking member is expanding 
broadband access to unserved populations that need it most so our rural 
communities are not left behind.
  In today's economy, people need fast and reliable internet to work, 
to go to school, have virtual meetings, and even see their doctors 
through telemedicine. Our farmers need an internet signal to operate 
their farms, their facilities, drive tractors, irrigate crops, apply 
pesticides, and implement precision agriculture technologies. Without 
it, they do not have an opportunity to compete.
  Recently, the USDA increased the requirements for sufficient 
broadband access from speeds of 25 over 3 megabits per second to 100 
over 20 megabits per second download and upload speeds. Yet 1 out of 10 
people in my State of Alabama didn't even meet the previous 25-over-3 
threshold. So why change it? Either don't change it or build better 
broadband.
  I am grateful to the chairman of the Rural Development Subcommittee, 
Senator Welch of Vermont, for his hard work and partnership on this 
bipartisan issue. The subcommittee recently held our first meeting, and 
it was a success. It was exactly what we needed. We had a great 
discussion with witnesses and colleagues on the importance of 
broadband.
  Later this year, we will have a farm bill coming up in Congress--very 
important. We need to ensure that expanding rural broadband is included 
in this year's farm bill.
  Also, earlier this year, I was proud to join a bipartisan group of my 
colleagues to introduce the Broadband Grant Tax Treatment Act. This 
bill would amend the Tax Code to ensure that Federal grant funding for 
broadband isn't considered taxable income. It just doesn't make sense 
to fund broadband and then tax broadband users for using it.
  I want to thank my colleagues who are here on the floor today for 
their support, and I want to encourage all of my colleagues to join us 
in this effort. Rural broadband is vital for the success of our rural 
communities and for the entire economy.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Kansas.
  Mr. MARSHALL. Madam President, for the past 6 years, my staff, my 
family, and I have traveled to every corner of the State. We have 
crisscrossed it multiple times. We have been in every county in Kansas 
multiple times--town halls and roundtables and listening sessions. In 
fact, just last week--the last week we were on break--we probably made 
a dozen stops. At every one of those stops, at every one of those 
roundtables, I can guarantee you the subject of high-speed internet 
came up.
  Together, we built solutions to address the challenges our rural 
areas are facing. Together, we built hospitals, municipal water 
facilities, grocery stores, and critical infrastructure in our State's 
communities. But despite all of these achievements, many Kansans agree 
that one job is still not finished, and that is the crucial task of 
building out high-speed broadband connectivity to every part of the 
State.
  Nothing highlighted the inadequate infrastructure for high-speed 
broadband across Kansas more than the COVID-19 lockdowns. Our schools 
and businesses across the State were shut down. Hundreds of thousands 
of Kansans were sent home to do their jobs and schoolwork. A lackluster 
internet connection impacted children's education across the State and 
many families' ability to keep up with remote work.

  Rural broadband's impacts go far beyond the classroom for our Kansas 
communities. In today's quickly evolving cyber world, adequate internet 
connection is a necessity, not just a luxury. Doctors at my alma mater, 
KU Med Center in Wichita, are trying to offer clinical trials to rural 
Kansan participants through secure video checkups. Having a premier 
healthcare virtual consultation option in communities where there is a 
shortage of access to quality care can save the patient hours of 
driving and, in many cases, save their lives.
  In addition to healthcare benefits, having high-speed internet brings 
our farming techniques into the 21st century. In rural areas, the 
capability of using the best technology available in farming practices 
depends on a reliable internet connection. Precision agriculture 
internet apps allow farmers to monitor conditions--hour by hour, second 
by second--more effectively in the field, and they can track crop 
yields and feed the world, producing more food with less--more food 
with less water, more food with less fertilizers.
  By utilizing this latest farm equipment, our State's farmers and 
ranchers are able to leave the land cleaner, healthier, and safer than 
when we found it.
  Madam President, the call for a strong internet connection across 
Kansas has only grown. That is why I rise

[[Page S2089]]

today to highlight the importance of broadband expansion.
  There is still so much work to be done to get rural America up to 
speed, and I realize this work will never be done, just like our roads 
and bridges that were amplified so much in the 1950s and 1960s. We 
still have to go back and repair those roads and bridges. There is 
always one more road and bridge that we need to go back and fix, and 
that will be the rule with high-speed internet. There is always 
something bigger and faster out there that we need to keep pace.
  I am proud to have played a role as a member of the Kansas House 
Agriculture Committee in 2018 when we drafted the farm bill, which 
directed both the USDA and FCC with dollars to fund new and innovative 
ways to connect rural residents.
  In 2018, we authorized the ReConnect Program at the USDA, which 
awarded funding for broadband connectivity services to under- and 
unserved areas. ReConnect provided $5.2 million to connect over 1,300 
households, 16 businesses, and 23 farms in Kansas during its first 
round of funding.
  In 2023, we introduced a new effort in the 2023 farm bill, with my 
colleague and fellow member of the Senate Ag Committee, Senator Peter 
Welch of Vermont. The ReConnecting Rural America Act provides a minimum 
speed of 100/100 high-speed internet build-out speeds, prioritizing 
long-term broadband infrastructure in our most rural communities.
  Every Kansan I have spoken to has voiced the need for symmetrical 
speeds in their community and for increasing investments in fiber to be 
made by providers. By bolstering broadband infrastructure for our rural 
communities, we are able to stay up to speed with what is happening in 
the rest of the world.
  Through these Federal efforts, combined with the administration of 
funds at the State level, I believe that we are getting closer than 
ever to making a real impact in rural broadband connectivity. Still, we 
must stay dedicated to the task at hand and ensure that this 
infrastructure is built to last.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. Rosen). The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mrs. BLACKBURN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
order for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.