[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 25, 2023)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1334-S1335]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Nomination of Joshua David Jacobs
Mr. GRASSLEY. Mr. President, I will vote no on the nomination of
Joshua Jacobs to be Under Secretary for Benefits at VA. I will do so
for reasons I have already stated publicly in the Record when I paused
consideration of his nomination last month. I placed that hold to bring
attention to serious ethical lapses and the VA's complete stonewalling
of my inquiry into those issues.
Veterans Affairs, for 2 years, has chosen the path of inattention and
disrespect, not just to this Senator from Iowa, but more importantly to
the Senate, the people I represent, and all Americans who believe in
honest government.
I began my inquiry 2 years ago into serious conflicts of interest at
the VA, concerns that it had failed to protect sensitive and
confidential information about publicly traded companies, and the
shocking and potentially illegal--and fully documented--termination of
a person the VA suspected of being a whistleblower. The VA failed to
cooperate on all counts.
These are matters that are in the VA's own best interest to resolve.
It doesn't do the VA or anyone else any good, and it certainly does no
good for our veterans, for these serious matters to be swept under the
rug.
At my request, VA's inspector general investigated the serious
allegations I raised of potentially criminal conflicts of interest and
confirmed them to the extent possible. However, he wasn't able to
finish his investigation and determine whether criminal activity
occurred because the subjects refused to cooperate. The conflicts of
interest were known to senior VA officials, who did nothing to stop
them and instead assured the conflicted official they would make the
issue go away, and they did, until I raised my inquiry. Documents show
a VA official berated the whistleblower, removed their key duties, and
then fired them.
VA did not cooperate with my investigation, and that has left serious
questions unanswered. It waited nearly 9 months and after four letters
to respond at all, and even then, it was only to refuse to provide
answers. After 2 years, we are still waiting for those answers.
[[Page S1335]]
And if you think this is all old news, just last month, I raised new
allegations obtained by my office about potential contract
irregularities at VA. It appears from public records that the VA has
awarded lucrative contracts to former VA officials who resigned under
ethical clouds. We need answers to that and all the other questions I
have raised, and I will not stop pushing for those answers. My staff
counts over 30 questions that VA to date has not fully responded to,
after six oversight inquiries from my office and multiple attempts to
gain their cooperation.
Mr. Jacobs, the nominee before us today, served as a senior adviser
to various VA Secretaries and was there as the VA obstructed my
inquiry. He had a front row seat at VA through a string of failures and
crises, from the Phoenix wait list scandal, to VA's failures in
processing claims for victims of sexual trauma, veterans' claims
backlogs, delays in the GI Bill modernization initiative, and a host of
challenges and scandals.
Mr. Jacobs has never adequately explained his role in these matters
or what potential role he may have played in VA's lack of
responsiveness to congressional inquiries. In addition, for reasons I
explained in my public hold statement on his nomination March 14, I
found his responses to my questions for the record to be woefully
inadequate and evasive. Where is the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee
in making sure the VA and this nominee are held accountable? After 2
years of that same pattern from the VA, the Senate should not confirm
this nominee. VA can and must do better in responding to congressional
inquiries and fulfilling its role of serving veterans and the American
people. I will vote no.
____________________