[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 21, 2023)]
[Senate]
[Page S840]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
LOWER ENERGY COSTS ACT
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, on H.R. 1, over the weekend, the U.N.
International Panel on Climate Change released their most dire warning
to date: Unless the world swiftly transitions to clean energy and curbs
emissions, our planet risks crossing a point of no return sometime in
the next decade. What awaits us on the other side could be severe and
irreversible: droughts, storms, and crop failures at a level we can
scarcely imagine today.
I think of my young grandchildren, and I worry about the world they
are going to grow up in. This is something that should make every one
of us want to do something real about climate change. Unfortunately,
House Republicans seem to think the best solution for our energy needs
is not to help America transition to clean energy. They think doubling
down on more giveaways to Big Oil is the way to go.
I have been very clear about two things: Democrats want to see a
bipartisan, commonsense energy proposal come together in Congress, but
Republicans' H.R. 1 proposal is dead on arrival in the Senate.
Let me just repeat that so they hear it from the other side of the
aisle. H.R. 1 is dead on arrival in the Senate.
So you can do all of the hoopla you want in the House. It ain't
passing. It is not going to change a thing.
No serious proposal would omit, as the House bill does, long overdue
reforms for accelerating the construction of transmission to bring
clean energy to projects online. You can't have a good bill without
some transmission. Transmission is vital to getting clean energy from
where it is produced to where people live, but the Republican H.R. 1
proposal leaves this problem untouched. It is one of the major things
we must do this year.
No real energy proposal would stuff itself with poison pills in the
way Republicans' H.R. 1 does as well. House Republicans want to repeal
everything from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund to the methane fee--
imagine repealing the methane fee when methane is 10 times as dangerous
as CO2--and the royalty reforms for oil and gas leases.
Democrats just passed these into law--to wide acclaim throughout the
country and throughout the world--through the Inflation Reduction Act.
So to undo them a few months later is ludicrous. It is laughable. It is
not happening.
Until Republicans recognize that permitting reform is an essential
step toward laying the foundation for clean energy and that
transmission is essential, no proposal or package they put forward will
be taken seriously.
Fortunately, there are some on both sides of the aisle in both Houses
who are attempting to put together bipartisan legislation, and it has
my blessing for them to try and come up with something that would be
reasonable, productive, and could pass.
____________________