[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 14, 2023)]
[Senate]
[Pages S764-S765]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank
Ms. WARREN. Mr. President, on Friday, we experienced the second
largest bank failure in our Nation's history. And make no mistake, this
failure was the direct result of leaders in Washington weakening
financial rules.
In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, Congress passed the
Dodd-Frank Act to protect consumers and to ensure that big banks could
never again take down the economy and destroy millions of lives.
Since then, Wall Street executives who hated the whole idea of the
bill spent millions to keep it from becoming law and, after it passed,
spent millions more to try to weaken it.
In 2018, the big banks won. With support from both parties, President
Trump signed into law a law to roll back critical parts of Dodd-Frank.
Now, I fought against these changes. On the eve of the Senate vote in
2018, I warned from right here on the Senate floor that ``Washington is
about to make it easier for the banks to run up risk, make it easier to
put our constituents at risk, make it easier to put American families
in danger, just so that the C.E.O.s of these banks can get a new
corporate jet and add another floor to their new corporate
headquarters.''
I wish I had been wrong, but last week, the FDIC was forced to rush
in to take over two failing banks--Silicon Valley Bank and Signature
Bank--and then take extraordinary actions to protect those banks'
customers and prevent the contagion from spreading throughout the
economy.
Both SVB and Signature Bank suffered from a toxic mix of poor risk
management and weak supervision. If Congress and the Federal Reserve
had not rolled back key provisions of Dodd-Frank, these banks would
have been subject to stronger liquidity and capital requirements to
help withstand financial shocks. They would have been required to
conduct regular stress tests to expose their vulnerabilities and shore
up their businesses. They would have had a more aggressive regulator
standing at their shoulder, looking more closely at every part of the
banks' business. But because those stringent requirements were taken
out of Dodd-Frank, when an old-fashioned bank run hit SVB, the bank
could not withstand the pressure.
Shortly after that, Signature Bank collapsed, and to fight back the
risk of contagion and to protect the banking system, the Federal
Government once again was called on to take extraordinary measures--the
kind of measures that Dodd-Frank was originally supposed to protect us
against.
These threats should never have been allowed to materialize, and now,
we must prevent them from occurring
[[Page S765]]
again by reversing the dangerous bank deregulation of the Trump era.
On Monday, President Biden called on Congress and regulators to
reverse the Trump-era deregulation and ``strengthen the rules on banks
to make it less likely that this kind of bank failure will happen
again.'' The President is right, and that is why today, on the 5-year
anniversary of having weakened Dodd-Frank, I am introducing
legislation, along with 15 of my colleagues--including the Presiding
Officer, including my colleague from Vermont--to reverse the mistakes
that Congress and President Trump made 5 years ago when they rolled
back a portion of Dodd-Frank.
This is what my legislation does:
First, it repeals section 401 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory
Relief, and Consumer Protection Act. This will restore strong Fed
oversight of some of the Nation's largest banks, which together hold
trillions of dollars in assets. Stronger oversight will help protect
our economy from heightened risk. It is absolutely essential that we
demand stronger, not weaker, oversight of these multibillion-dollar
banks.
Second, my bill repeals section 402 of the 2018 law. That section
slashed the capital requirements for large, systemically significant
custody banks. Big banks cannot be trusted with lower capital
requirements that degrade their ability to withstand financial shock.
Finally, my bill repeals section 403, which made it easier for giant
banks--those much larger than SVB--to weaken liquidity requirements by
adding municipal debt to the definition of ``high-quality liquid
assets,'' particularly because such debt is actually not very liquid at
all.
Now, there are a lot more changes we need to make to our banking
laws. There are many other provisions in the 2018 law that I oppose.
But today I remain focused on exactly the weakened rules that permitted
banks like SVB and Signature to load up on risks, run up their profits,
pay their executives giant bonuses, and eventually blow the banks to
pieces.
I recognize legislation won't fix everything. For 5 years, Jay Powell
has overseen a deregulatory effort at the Federal Reserve Bank for
banks like SVB. In 2021, I asked him if he could name a single--a
single--regulation on banks that he thought should actually be
strengthened instead of weakened, and he could not.
Preventing further crises will require a complete 180-degree
turnaround from the Fed starting immediately. This bill will address
the immediate issue in front of us--an explosion of risk in large
financial institutions like SVB that have been inadequately supervised
and regulated for the last 4 years--and it will show Americans across
the country, in the wake of this disaster, that Congress is capable of
acting quickly and decisively to make sure that a serious problem
doesn't get worse--a lot worse.
The bank failures our Nation experienced this weekend were entirely
avoidable if Congress and the Fed had done their jobs and kept strong
oversight of big banks in place. Now, we must act quickly to prevent
the next crisis by repealing the dangerous Trump-era provisions that
made banks weaker.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
____________________