[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 40 (Thursday, March 2, 2023)]
[Senate]
[Pages S625-S627]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                           U.S. Armed Forces

  Mr. WICKER. Mr. President, our Nation is once again in an age of 
great power conflict. It is a dangerous time for this country, for our 
military, and for our citizens.
  The mission of the U.S. military is to deter and, if necessary, win 
real wars, not engage in culture wars. And so I rise this afternoon to 
say that this administration's current diversity, equity, and inclusion 
program is not only unnecessary but harmful to our military and to our 
national security.
  But, first, let me do a quick history lesson. Eighty years ago, our 
country was pitted against fascist foes from three continents. Our 
``greatest generation,'' my father among them, answered the call to 
arms and defended the world against an evil autocrat. Back then, the 
military was not what it should be. Our ranks were segregated. But a 
group of fearless African-American airmen challenged the conscience of 
the military and the Nation and paved the road to change.
  In early 1943, the Tuskegee Airmen were making the final preparations 
to deploy to North Africa and later to Italy to take on the Axis war 
machine. They made history as the first African-American combat pilots, 
and they served with honor and distinction.
  Their actions are now the stuff of popular film and literature, and 
they are a cornerstone of American culture. But the valor of the 
Tuskegee Airmen did not just appear overnight. John C. Robinson, a 
native son of my home State of Mississippi, spent a decade laying the 
groundwork for the airmen's future heroism. Born to a Pullman porter, 
Robinson completed 10th grade but was barred from further education. He 
could afford only a wagon ride on his first trip to the Tuskegee 
Institute, where he would learn the engineering trades hundreds of 
miles away from home.
  He persevered, after facing several rejections from America's leading 
aviation school, and eventually he worked as a janitor by day and 
studied aviation by night, graduating at the top of his class with 
flying colors.

[[Page S626]]

  When Mussolini's brigades of Italian fascists invaded Ethiopia, 
Robinson jumped into the breach. He led the air campaign in one of the 
first salvos of World War II. His story would become well known to 
Americans in the newspapers and on the radio waves, and he inspired a 
generation as one of the first Black combat pilots.
  As one historian put it, it was solely because of Robinson's 
contributions that the Tuskegee program became popular with the Army. 
Only in America, could the son of a Mississippi porter who was denied a 
college education because of the color of his skin become one of the 
finest aviators his country ever saw in a moment when we needed him 
most.
  This is who we are. This is what our service men and women sign up to 
defend every day. Today, as then, we live in an age of great power 
conflict. Today, as then, we face hate-filled autocrats who seek to 
dominate. These foes present the American people with a test, and the 
Tuskegee Airmen's story reminds us that we can pass that test. The 
Tuskegee Airmen knew the principles of the United States--liberty and 
justice for all--though not fully achieved, were worth fighting for at 
home and abroad.
  Because of their courage, along with the leadership of our 
government, their focus on the core mission of the U.S. military to 
defend us in war led to the defeat of fascism in Europe, but it also 
changed our troops. The Tuskegee Airmen's heroism challenged the 
conscience of the Armed Forces and the country. They paved the way for 
a transformation.
  The U.S. military today is the largest, most diverse engine of social 
mobility in this country. The U.S. military is the most successful 
civil rights program in the history of the world.
  The fact is, American soldiers from all backgrounds are now promoted 
on the basis of their character, commitment, ability, and courage. The 
treatment dreamed of by the Tuskegee Airmen has become a reality.
  That is why it is so mystifying, even disturbing, to see the current 
diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. If you look at the 
policies of the Department of Defense, you would be forgiven for 
thinking our forces are today under a cloud of segregation and 
extremism.
  The truth is, the military now represents the best of our society and 
has consistently advanced the cause of equal rights. Even before the 
rest of the country was ready to take that pivotal step, the military 
took that step.
  Now, as Commander in Chief, President Biden still has the most 
important job that the Commander in Chief has ever had, and that is 
leading our military in defense of the United States. But his 
administration is making that job harder every day by focusing on 
leftwing social issues.

  In the wake of a disastrous retreat from Afghanistan and increasingly 
hostile behavior from China and Russia, the President should be 
prioritizing military readiness. Instead, he has decided, inexplicably, 
to spend his first 2 years in office focusing on something else--on 
shaping the Department of Defense into an institution that is 
spearheading toxic social policies instead of focusing on military 
strength. This agenda has harmed military readiness and alienated a 
large portion of potential military recruits.
  The ideas propagandized by the bureaucrats and so-called diversity 
officers within our military are painting a false picture of reality. 
In addition, they clearly run afoul of America's founding principles 
and our country's dedication to the proposition that all men are 
created equal.
  The mission of the U.S. military is to deter real wars and win them 
if necessary, not to wage culture wars within the ranks. But there are 
numerous examples of how this administration has made it a top priority 
to push progressive social policies on the military, and it is 
undermining the effectiveness of our national defense.
  Within the first 6 months of the Biden administration, Pentagon 
civilian leadership demanded the creation of a powerful new diversity, 
equity, and inclusion bureaucracy focused on everything but readiness.
  Right before the 2022 midterms, the Secretary of Defense released a 
memo warning, with no evidence whatsoever, that the recent Supreme 
Court decision on abortion would negatively impact readiness and 
recruiting, with no evidence whatsoever that this was true. Every 
dollar we spend on defense should have a clear connection to advancing 
military effectiveness and lethality.
  My colleague Senator Joni Ernst, herself a veteran, has been 
especially clear-eyed on this topic, proposing legislation blocking the 
use of taxpayer dollars to fund specious efforts related to abortion at 
the Department of Defense. I agree, and I am glad to join her in this 
effort.
  The Senate Armed Services Committee has a duty to conduct careful 
oversight and analysis of the Department of Defense.
  Today's woke social issue agenda does not improve military 
effectiveness or lethality. That is why my colleague Senator Tom Cotton 
and House Member  Dan Bishop are introducing new legislation to stop 
the use of critical race theory in the Department of Defense, including 
in our service academies.
  It will take strong support for efforts like these to root out toxic 
ideas, but we must begin to do it now. Misguided efforts from 
bureaucrats and political appointees alike to inject domestic social 
issues into defense policy will harm our military's ability to perform 
its mission.
  It pains me to say this, but public confidence in our services is low 
and shrinking. The Reagan Institute reports that fewer than half of 
Americans have trust in the military, down from over 70 percent a few 
years ago.
  Largely because of the President's decision to advance his liberal 
ideology on our armed services, the military now faces the biggest 
challenge to recruiting in the history of the modern All-Volunteer 
Force. By the end of this year, the Army will likely be more than 
30,000 soldiers smaller today than it was the day President Biden took 
the oath of office. The Navy is actively recruiting thousands of people 
who are normally barred from military service because the Navy 
recruiters cannot find enough qualified recruits to man our growing 
fleet.
  Recruiting is an essential element of military readiness. Hardware is 
important, to be sure, but if our best and brightest are discouraged 
from putting on a uniform, we cannot hope to field a ready force.
  Addressing this problem starts with addressing how we shape our 
future leaders. Our four military service academies share a commitment 
to excellence and boast an impressive track record of molding the 
officers who will lead the branches of our Armed Forces. I am delighted 
to help so many young Mississippians gain admission to our academies. 
But, sadly, over recent years, even our academies have not been immune 
to the same spread of toxic race- and gender-infused agenda that has 
inflamed so many college campuses across the Nation.
  Across the service academies, students can now find indoctrination 
courses on, and I quote, ``the social and physical constructs of race, 
gender, and ethnicity in the context of social inequality in America.'' 
At every service academy, one can now find diversity, equity, and 
inclusion programming listed for students. The examples of what this 
does to the military would be laughable if they weren't so dangerous. 
This past September, the Air Force Academy actually instructed cadets 
that the words ``mom'' and ``dad'' might not be inclusive enough. In a 
less amusing part of the same briefing, cadets were told to avoid the 
word ``colorblind.'' This is happening at our Nation's elite service 
academies, not at the faculty lounge at Berkeley, and it is ridiculous.
  Many raise concerns about extremism at the military. Yet, after a 
military-wide standdown to focus on extremism in the ranks, we found 
out that fewer than 100--fewer than 100--persons out of a military of 
1.2 million Active-Duty servicemembers had engaged in extremist 
activity.
  General Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, later revealed 
that between the standdown and new ``diversity, equity, and inclusion'' 
training requirements levied by the Biden administration, the 
Department of Defense has spent nearly 5.9 million man-hours on the 
issue of extremism. That represents over 64,000 hours for each 
confirmed case of extremism last year.

[[Page S627]]

  To the extent there is extremism in the military--and it is rare--it 
is a problem we can work together on a bipartisan basis to solve, as 
Senator Dan Sullivan has repeatedly discussed, and I appreciate his 
leadership. But again I say it is extremely rare in the U.S. military.
  In fact, many of the attempts to root out extremism have unintended 
consequences, including convincing potential recruits that they are not 
welcome in the military. These efforts have also punished Americans 
with earnest and deeply held beliefs--people who share the same beliefs 
as I do, people who want to serve in the military.
  For example, as part of the ``extremism stand down day,'' the Navy 
issued training materials to sailors stating explicitly that 
conservative views of ``marriage, abortion, and LGBTQ rights'' are 
``not considered mainstream''--``not considered mainstream.'' The U.S. 
Navy should not sideline traditional religious and moral views by 
declaring them out of step with the times.
  Let me be clear. I hold sincere convictions about the sanctity of 
life. I may be in the majority in some States, and I may be in the 
minority in others, but I am entitled to my views, and our Department 
of Defense has no business characterizing them as outside the 
mainstream.

  One thing that is not mainstream is the Pentagon's unrelenting focus 
on diversity, equity, and inclusion over the past 2 years. The U.S. 
military is the largest and most diverse public institution in the 
country. For decades, it has been an engine of economic and social 
mobility and a place for Americans of all stripes to come together in 
support of a common mission. From the youngest private to the most 
senior general, our military is composed of Americans from every 
possible background you can imagine. We should celebrate that fact.
  Sadly, this is not the operating mentality of the leadership at 
today's Pentagon. The Department of Defense's new Diversity, Equity, 
Inclusion, and Accessibility Strategic Plan aims to, and I quote, 
``ensure equitable career progression'' for military personnel by 
eliminating promotion and retention barriers.
  By adding ``equity'' rather than ``equal opportunity'' to the 
military promotion process, the Biden administration is judging the 
selection of military leaders not on the content of their character but 
on whether an individual happens to be a member of one demographic 
group for another. Simply put, this amounts to quotas over merit.
  This equity approach to promotions and assignments takes a 
sledgehammer to the foundation of the military, and, worse, it creates 
divisions that put our men and women in uniform at risk. It pits them 
against each other based on factors they cannot control.
  More than any other public institution, our military represents the 
broadest picture of American society. That is as it should be. It is 
not ``systemic racism,'' as one senior member of the Defense Department 
said. This rhetoric draws the ridicule of our enemies. The Chinese 
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the agents of the Kremlin have shown no 
hesitation in ridiculing the language of woke bureaucrats.
  Rather than fighting culture wars at the Pentagon, our focus should 
turn to doing everything in our power to expand the population eligible 
and qualified for military service. I will partner with any other 
Member of Congress who wants to achieve this goal.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The senior Senator from Florida.