[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 39 (Wednesday, March 1, 2023)]
[House]
[Pages H976-H988]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
REDUCE EXACERBATED INFLATION NEGATIVELY IMPACTING THE NATION ACT
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Perry). Pursuant to House Resolution 166
and rule XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the Committee of the
Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration of the
bill, H.R. 347.
Will the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Babin) kindly take the chair.
{time} 0911
In the Committee of the Whole
Accordingly, the House resolved itself into the Committee of the
Whole House on the state of the Union for the further consideration of
the bill (H.R. 347) to require the Executive Office of the President to
provide an inflation estimate with respect to Executive orders with a
significant effect on the annual gross budget, and for other purposes,
with Mr. Babin (Acting Chair) in the chair.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The Acting CHAIR. When the Committee of the Whole rose on Tuesday,
February 28, 2023, amendment No. 10 printed in House Report 118-4
offered by the gentleman from New York (Mr. Langworthy) had been
disposed of.
amendment no. 11 offered by ms. omar
The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 11
printed in House Report 118-4.
Ms. OMAR. Mr. Speaker, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:
Page 2, line 14, after the period, insert the following:
``In estimating the inflationary effects of any major
Executive order under this subsection, the President,
Director, and Chair shall consider the factors described in
subsection (d).''.
Page 3, after line 2, insert the following:
(d) Factors.--The factors described in this subsection are
the following:
(1) Benefits.--With respect to benefits provided by the
applicable major Executive order, the total annual economic
value of--
(A) personal consumption expenditures, net of investments,
and defensive spending;
(B) the purchase of consumer durables and other household
durables used for home improvement, including appliances,
vehicles, and solar panels;
(C) publicly provided goods and services;
(D) higher education;
(E) job skills that are essential to an economy that--
(i) is self-sufficient; and
(ii) addresses ecological scarcities and directs resources
to sustainable development without degrading the environment;
(F) time spent toward leisure activities;
(G) unpaid labor, including--
(i) parenting;
(ii) volunteering; and
(iii) time spent on household duties;
(H) infrastructure, including--
(i) transportation systems;
(ii) communication networks; and
(iii) sewage, water, and electric systems; and
(I) ecosystem services with respect to protected natural
areas, including--
[[Page H977]]
(i) flood control;
(ii) water purification;
(iii) pollination of crops;
(iv) control of pests and invasive specifies;
(v) outdoor recreation;
(vi) hunting and fishing;
(vii) harvesting of plants for medicinal and edible
purposes;
(viii) carbon sequestration; and
(ix) maintenance of biological and genetic diversity.
(2) Costs.--With respect to costs of the applicable major
Executive order, the total annual economic costs of--
(A) income inequality based on household expenditures;
(B) underemployment and unemployment;
(C) homelessness;
(D) domestic abuse;
(E) violent, property, white-collar, and organized crime;
(F) water, air, and noise pollution at the household and
national level;
(G) the loss of farmland and productive soils, including
soil quality degradation;
(H) the loss of natural wetlands, primary forest area, and
other at-risk ecosystems;
(I) high amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas
emissions;
(J) the depletion of the ozone layer;
(K) the depletion of nonrenewable sources of energy;
(L) lost leisure time due to traffic congestion; and
(M) accidents involving motor vehicles.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 166, the gentlewoman
from Minnesota (Ms. Omar) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from Minnesota.
Ms. OMAR. Mr. Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Chair, I rise today to call on Congress to take up economic
measurement tools that will uplift all Americans.
My amendment would add factors from the genuine progress indicator to
register budgetary reporting. GPI would supplement the information we
get from traditional measures like GDP, which mainly emphasizes growth
for its own sake.
GPI would provide a more accurate and inclusive assessment of
economic well-being. It evaluates the positive and negative factors of
economic activity ranging from the benefits of infrastructure and
workforce development to the process costs of income inequality and
pollution on our collective well-being.
It would give us the chance to finally account for important but
overlooked aspects of society such as wealth distribution, economic
sustainability, and the overall quality of life for everyday Americans.
We must recognize that collective prosperity is only attainable if we
identify the gaps and barriers preventing our most vulnerable
communities from thriving.
My amendment simply seeks to give lawmakers more comprehensive data
so that we can make more informed policy decisions.
Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to vote for this amendment in order
to focus our policy lens on the lives of working and poor families in
America.
Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
{time} 0915
Mr. COMER. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Kentucky is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. COMER. Mr. Chairman, my colleague's amendment, unlike some others
offered, would not eliminate requirements for inflation-impacted
assessments. What it would do is overburden the assessments with a host
of issues that do not have much to do with inflation.
What are those issues? The list is quite extensive, but let me
highlight a few. There are the annual economic values of publicly
provided goods and services, higher education, and time spent on
leisure activities and outdoor recreation. There are the annual
economic costs of lost leisure time due to traffic congestion,
accidents involving motor vehicles, and the depletion of the ozone
layer.
In other words, inflation would no longer be the bill's focus. Under
this amendment, it would just be one factor among many other things,
but that is how we got to where we are. Inflation is running rampant
precisely because the administration is ignoring the inflationary
impact of its policies, and it is ignoring the deep harm that inflation
is inflicting on the American people. That is why inflation should be
the focus of this bill.
Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment,
and I reserve the balance of my time.
Ms. OMAR. Mr. Chairman, I yield such time as he may consume to the
gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Raskin).
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chairman, I thank the distinguished gentlewoman from
Minnesota for yielding.
Just to recap where we are from yesterday, the whole Congress eagerly
awaited to hear what the big anti-inflation initiative would be coming
from the GOP side of the aisle. In the past, Richard Nixon had offered
wage and price controls. Herbert Hoover, of course, had dismantled all
social spending. What was going to be the big plan coming from the
Republican side? The big plan is to ask for the President of the United
States, when he issues executive orders, to add inflation estimates.
Of course, there is no study showing that executive orders have had
any impact on inflation or deflation in the country, so it seems now we
are on a real wild goose chase where people are pasting all different
kinds of things on it.
The gentlewoman from Minnesota actually comes forward with a very
interesting idea, which would be a wonderful thing to talk about if we
had a real hearing in the Oversight Committee about the subject. What
she is saying is that a number of States, including my State, Maryland,
have adopted the genuine progress indicator as a real index of social
and economic well-being in their communities.
What this does is it doesn't count negative things like the costs of
car accidents and asbestos poisoning as part of GDP. Right now, there
are so many negative things that are included as part of GDP. The
genuine progress indicator has, I believe, 26 different factors that
measure actual progress in social and economic well-being.
If we are going to go down this road without a hearing, without any
real analysis, and this is going to be the majority's approach to
dealing with inflation, then, by all means, let's include the genuine
progress indicator.
Mr. COMER. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
Ms. OMAR. Mr. Chairman, as my colleague on the other side of the
aisle admittedly said, this is just another factor that gives us more
tools, more ability to fully comprehend what is happening with our
economy.
Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to support this amendment and vote
``yes.''
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentlewoman from Minnesota (Ms. Omar).
The amendment was rejected.
Amendment No. 12 Offered by Mr. Perry
The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 12
printed in House Report 118-4.
Mr. PERRY. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:
Page 3, line 11, strike ``$1,000,000,000'' and insert
``$1,000,000''.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 166, the gentleman
from Pennsylvania (Mr. Perry) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Pennsylvania.
Mr. PERRY. Mr. Chairman, the underlying bill requires the President
to have prepared for the American people and consider the inflation
impacts of all major executive orders. This provides transparency to
the American people of the economic impacts of such executive orders.
At the Rules Committee last night, the minority raised concerns that
these requirements would apply to a limited number of circumstances.
This amendment actually appeases these concerns by lowering the
threshold at which an executive order is considered major for the
requirements of the bill from $1 billion to $1 million.
This reduced threshold will ensure the President is required to
assess the inflationary impacts of significantly more executive orders
than the underlying bill would require, which actually increases the
amount of transparency provided by this bill.
I am sure the minority would agree with increased transparency. They
[[Page H978]]
asked for it just last night. They asked for it just in the last debate
over the last amendment.
Mr. Chairman, I am sure we have all heard from our constituents about
the impact of inflation. This amendment allows us to expand our efforts
to address their concerns.
While some of my friends on the other side of the aisle might say,
well, we need a different index, or we need an additional index, here
is what the American people don't need: They don't need some report of
progress or you name whatever you want to name it.
What the American people know is this: When they go to the store,
everything they are buying costs more. It is unaffordable. When they go
to the gas station to try to fill up their tank, it costs them more.
When they go to the lumberyard, when they go to the bank, when they try
to buy a new home, everything costs more.
They don't need some index to tell them that the cost of living is
going up and something is causing it, and one of the things is this.
Regardless of which party is in power in the executive branch,
executive orders would maybe actually reduce the cost of inflation. We
need to know that, too. We just want to know what the answer is
regardless of which way. This amendment would provide for that.
Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Maryland is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chairman, now we move from the ludicrous to the
absurd to the sublime.
Yesterday, they wanted a report from the President upon issuance of
an executive order for executive orders having an inflationary impact
or having an economic impact of $1 billion. Today, they have gone to
one one-thousandth of that. They want a report for every $1 million.
The gentleman points out that I observed yesterday that it would
apply to only a handful of executive orders, which is absolutely right.
I wasn't arguing or wasn't concerned, as he said, that it applies to
too few cases. I was just reflecting about how silly the whole exercise
was.
They didn't even seem to understand how few executive orders it would
apply to, just like they forgot to put into the legislation a
requirement that it actually be published, something that was remedied
yesterday in the Boebert amendment.
In any event, Mr. Chairman, now they want an inflationary estimate
statement when there is an executive order that has $1 million economic
impact, which, by my quick calculation here, is three one-hundred-
thousandths of 1 percent of the $26 trillion U.S. economy. It is a
fraction of the budget of the Oversight Committee itself. We may as
well be saying we should register what the inflationary impact is of
the majority and minority budgets in the Oversight Committee.
Obviously, this is an exercise in futility, in silliness. They are
finger painting on their own legislation, which itself is not based on
any legislative process, based on any hearing, and it obviously does
nothing to reduce inflation.
That, however, is what this administration has been working on. Of
course, they don't talk about unemployment anymore, which they used to
talk about, because President Biden's administration created 12 million
new jobs, whereas the last President destroyed millions of jobs. The
economy has come roaring back under the Biden administration, just like
the Biden administration is actually bringing inflation down.
Example: Check out the Inflation Reduction Act. Everybody who is on
insulin in America under the Medicare program is now paying only $35 a
month. Now, we know that they opposed that. We know they wanted to
repeal that provision. I think they still do want to repeal that
provision, but that was a very concrete action, to lower prescription
drug prices for diabetics within the Medicare program. They have been
lowered across the board within the Medicare program.
That is the kind of specific programmatic action that the Biden
administration has undertaken, not a silly reporting bill, which some
days is applying to a billion dollars, some days it is applying to a
million dollars. There is no rhyme or reason to what they are doing.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. PERRY. Mr. Chair, I will just say this. I am not from Maryland,
and I don't live around the beltway here, where everything is just
fine. I live up in Pennsylvania, where $1 billion or $1 million is a
lot of money to hardworking people who get up in the dark of night and
head out to work. A million dollars is a lot of money, and they would
like to know where we are spending it here.
Mr. Chair, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from
Kentucky (Mr. Comer), the chairman of the committee.
Mr. COMER. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of the Perry amendment.
My colleague's amendment extends the bill's coverage to executive
orders with annual impacts of $1 million or more. This makes sure
inflation assessments will be prepared for most executive orders.
This is not an undue burden on the President. Even at President
Biden's relatively blistering pace, he has issued only 107 executive
orders over more than 2 years.
I submit that, with today's sky-high inflation continuing and with no
clear end in sight, it is important that the inflationary impacts of
most of President Biden's executive orders should be assessed. If my
colleague's amendment is adopted, they will be.
Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on this amendment.
Mr. PERRY. Mr. Chair, may I inquire as to the time remaining.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Pennsylvania has 2 minutes
remaining. The gentleman from Maryland has 2 minutes remaining.
Mr. PERRY. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chairman, I don't know that there is much left to say
on the substance of this amendment.
I did hear my colleague from Pennsylvania make some sort of
disparaging remark about Maryland and about how he didn't live in
Maryland, where, apparently, we don't understand the value of money.
Well, the land where we actually are standing today used to be part
of Maryland. It was ceded by Maryland to Congress for the purpose of
creating the District of Columbia.
When our Capitol came under attack by violent insurrectionists and
those who were chanting ``hang Mike Pence'' and who were determined to
overthrow the 2020 Presidential election, there were hundreds of police
officers who came from Maryland to join the Metropolitan Police
Department and the Capitol Police officers in defense of the Capitol of
the United States.
I take umbrage at any insinuation that the people of Maryland need to
take a back seat to anybody in terms of the defense of the principles
of this country. I would thank Mr. Perry for a correction about that.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. PERRY. Mr. Chair, let me just say this. There were no disparaging
remarks about Maryland, only the fact that people in Pennsylvania
understand the value of $1 million or $1 billion, and they want to know
how it is being spent in Washington, D.C. It is their government. The
citizens of the United States, it is their government, and it is their
tax money.
This amendment seeks to provide that transparency so that they know
the effect of executive orders coming out of the White House, how it
affects their wallet. They should know that. We should all be for that.
If you want to discuss the Inflation Reduction Act, you can call any
bill here anything you want to. You can call it kids are beautiful and
the Sun is going to shine today. But here is what I know: In central
Pennsylvania, where I live, the good citizens that I represent are
paying $5, $6, $7 for a dozen eggs. They are paying $6, $7 for a pound
of hamburger. They can't afford to drive to work. They can't afford to
pay their energy bills. They are having a hard time paying their
mortgage.
That is inflation, sir. That is inflation, to the good gentleman from
Maryland. Part of that is caused by the White House's edicts that
impose
[[Page H979]]
things on the American people. They want to know and have the right to
know what that is so they can inform their votes.
Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chairman, yes, the prices of housing are too high,
and the prices of groceries are too high. That is why the
administration is working concretely to lower prices and why inflation
is coming down now across the board.
What do we get from the majority today? They want a reporting bill
about the inflationary impact in executive orders, nothing even about
what Congress is doing and how Congress is behaving and contributing to
inflation. They want to somehow add a technical reporting requirement
for executive orders and think that is accomplishing something.
The administration is lowering the cost of student debt despite the
fact that they are doing everything they can to stop it. The
administration is acting to lower housing prices across the country. We
have moved to lower prescription drug prices and healthcare across the
country. They have been fighting us every step along the way. Instead,
they come back with this reporting bill, which, again, will do nothing
to help the fight against inflation.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
{time} 0930
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Perry).
The amendment was agreed to.
Amendment No. 13 Offered by Mr. Perry
The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 13
printed in House Report 118-4.
Mr. PERRY. Mr. Chair, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:
Page 2, line 11, after ``index'', insert the following:
``(including a detailed description of such impact)''.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 166, the gentleman
from Pennsylvania (Mr. Perry) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Pennsylvania.
Mr. PERRY. Mr. Chair, as we all should know by now, this bill
requires the President to consider for any major executive order the
impact of the executive order on inflation. I mean, the President is
the President of the United States and the well-being of every citizen
should be of the President's concern, and I believe it is.
When the American people have been suffering this inflation for
years, it makes sense to require the President, no matter which party,
to at least consider the impact of his actions on the American people,
because they don't have any choice in the matter till the next
election.
This amendment requires for executive orders that are found to have
an impact on the Consumer Price Index--we have got to have some
measure, right? Most people recognize the Consumer Price Index--a
detailed description of that impact so that we can all be on the same
page and we can all reference the same data point.
Folks, this is common sense, and it is reasonable. The way this bill
is currently written, I support the bill. The statement prepared by the
President must simply include whether it has an impact on inflation and
maybe the impact is to lower inflation. That would be awesome.
I think we are going to have to wait a couple years until we get a
President that actually does that. So be it, we will accept that, even
this legislation under a new President that lowers the cost of
inflation by executive order.
The current bill doesn't talk about the extent of the impact, which
is what this amendment seeks to remedy. This amendment requires that
statement to provide actual information on the extent of the impact
regarding the Consumer Price Index.
With that, Mr. Chairman, I urge adoption of this amendment, and I
reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Maryland is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chair, I am afraid I remain unilluminated as to what
that amendment will do. Apparently, the purpose is to require a more
detailed or technical description of the projected impact, or when an
assessment required by the bill finds that there will be some
inflationary effect.
Again, this sounds like it is simply adding more bureaucracy, more
paperwork with no return on investment for the taxpayer dollars that it
would obviously take to conduct such an analysis. I mean, here we have
gone for more than two centuries with apparently no economist arguing
that what we really need to stop inflation is more reporting in the
process of issuance of executive orders by Presidents of the United
States.
Suddenly, somebody had a great epiphany over there, without even a
legislative hearing, that what was really needed was just for the
President of the United States to append an inflationary statement to
executive orders at the rate of a billion dollars, perhaps to be
amended to a million dollars.
Who knows if it is 50 million or 100 million, but it doesn't make any
difference because there is no data behind any of it. There is no
analysis. You may as well spin a wheel and pick a number at which a
report is going to be compelled by the majority here for the so-called
REIN IN Act, which stands for the Reduce Exacerbated Inflation
Negatively Impacting the Nation Act.
You could go by other titles, including the running on empty index,
no new ideas, none act, since basically they are scraping the bottom to
try to figure out something to say about inflation, because the
administration is actually bringing inflation down.
Now, we notice they don't talk about unemployment, which used to be
their mantra: jobs, jobs, jobs. But when Joe Biden came back and
created 12 million new jobs after the last administration destroyed
millions of jobs with their lethal recklessness in the mismanagement of
the coronavirus pandemic and Joe Biden turned it around in this
administration, they stopped talking about it.
However, they did notice that there was global inflation going on
because of the disruption of the global supply chain and because of
Vladimir Putin's filthy, imperialist invasion of Ukraine, which some of
their Members actually are cheerleaders for, then there was a real
problem with inflation.
The administration has steadily been bringing it down, which is why
it doesn't have quite the political salience it used to, but the world
was waiting with bated breath to determine what their actual plan would
be and, alas, their whole plan is a reporting requirement. Nothing to
do with Congress and Congress being able to do anything, but a
reporting requirement for the President when he issues executive
orders.
I think the public is gravely disappointed by this complete collapse
of any real commitment to the one issue they thought they had organized
their conference around.
Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. PERRY. Mr. Chair, I yield such time as he may consume to the
gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Comer), chairman of the House Oversight
Committee.
Mr. COMER. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of the Perry amendment.
The one thing that has become clearly obvious to me, Mr. Chairman, is
the fact that my friends on the other side of the aisle, they have no
idea how much inflation this administration's policies have created for
the American people.
That is the perfect reason why we need to support this bill, as
amended; if for no other reason, so we can help our friends on the
other side of the aisle have some type of measurement so they can see
how damaging their policies and their out-of-control spending has been
on everyday, average Americans when they go to the grocery store, when
they fill up their gas tank, when they try to pay their rents now.
My colleague's amendment is a wise one. This bill requires inflation
impact assessments to be prepared for the President's executive orders,
but as we all know, the executive branch routinely does as little as
possible to comply with assessment and reporting requirements Congress
imposes on it.
[[Page H980]]
This amendment makes sure the executive branch will include in its
inflation impact assessments detailed descriptions of the effects the
President's executive orders have on inflation, not just back-of-the-
envelope sketches.
In other words, it makes sure the executive branch will comply with
the spirit of the bill, not just its letter.
Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on the Perry
amendment.
Mr. PERRY. Mr. Chair, may I inquire as to how much time is remaining.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Pennsylvania has 1\1/2\ minutes
remaining.
Mr. PERRY. Mr. Chairman, the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Raskin), my
friend, talks about increased bureaucracy, the increased bureaucracy of
informing the American people.
My goodness. My goodness. I have never heard that from my friends on
the other side of the aisle, ``increased bureaucracy.'' I mean, all
they do around here is infuse more government into our lives with every
single thing they do.
The gentleman talks about the medical situation and price-fixing. He
doesn't call it price-fixing, but that is what it is. It is price-
fixing. More bureaucracy taking more drugs off the market, more
lifesaving research off the market, but they are good with that.
They talk about 12 million new jobs, but don't talk about the fact
that in one of the reporting periods a million jobs were created but
then it was only months later we find out that only 10,000 were
created.
Oh, and that first report? Right before the election. Interesting how
that happened.
He doesn't want to talk about that or the workforce participation
rate. He talks about lowering inflation. You can talk about that all
you want to but people that pay for things don't experience it. So you
can say it is true, but the reality is that it is not true. All these
years he has been saying it is unnecessary to do this.
My goodness. My good friend from Maryland is a member of the
legislature. You would think he would want to preserve the power of the
legislature instead of handing it to the executive branch, which is
what this place has done for years upon years.
Now we have a chance, and my friend wants to hand yet more power to
the executive branch instead of preserving the power of the branch that
he serves in.
Mr. Chairman, I urge adoption of the amendment, and I yield back the
balance of my time.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chairman, one can only regard with amazement the
gentleman's insinuation that I want to hand power to the executive
branch when we have been acting here in Congress to pass the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and to pass the Inflation
Reduction Act in the last Congress.
All of the measures they oppose, we moved in order to make real
economic progress in the country. Congress was doing that.
They have a big opportunity today to come forward with what their
anti-inflation agenda is. Their whole anti-inflation agenda is: we are
going to beg the President of the United States to append some
inflation numbers to an executive order, to a handful of executive
orders over the course of the year.
The gentleman also, I think, slipped in his opposition to our
legislation, which reduces to $35 a month what diabetics have to pay
for their insulin shots. He calls this price-fixing.
My friend from Pennsylvania is invited to contradict me if I
misunderstood him. I think he was describing all of the lowering of
prescription drug prices we have done.
We are saving millions of Americans across the country thousands of
dollars in their Medicare prescription drug prices, and the gentleman
just called that price-fixing. I assume he is opposed to it.
Mr. Chair, I am happy to yield, if he would like to correct me, but
otherwise I am going to go back with the conclusion that you are
opposed to all of the lowering of the prescription drug prices that the
Congress actually engaged in in the 117th Congress.
Finally, the gentleman would like to somehow put in our court the
burden of bureaucracy.
Well, let's talk about the major bureaucracy that is being put in
place in America today to violate the rights and the freedom of women
to make their own medical decisions as they try to criminalize that.
I don't know exactly where the gentleman is--perhaps he can clarify
it--most of them support a national ban on abortion, taking what was a
constitutional right for more than a half century and turning it into a
felony criminal offense or a misdemeanor criminal offense.
You want to talk about bureaucracy? You want to talk about police
state? That is on you.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Perry).
The amendment was agreed to.
Amendment No. 14 Offered by Mr. Roy
The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 14
printed in House Report 118-4.
Mr. ROY. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:
Page 3, beginning on line 11, strike ``, but'' and all that
follows through ``Tribe'' on line 24.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 166, the gentleman
from Texas (Mr. Roy) and a Member opposed each will control 5 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas.
Mr. ROY. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to offer an amendment to this
underlying piece of legislation to ensure that it applies to
everything. I don't believe that we should be in the business of
exempting certain executive orders. I think they should apply across
the board.
My amendment would strike the exceptions to the bill's inflation
estimates for executive orders that provide emergency assistance or
relief or related to national security.
I don't believe that we should be pulling out of the calculation
those executive orders that touch on national security simply because,
frankly, often my colleagues on both sides of the aisle want to be able
to use ``emergency'' for all manner of sins, and they want to be able
to use the Defense Department to hide behind all manner of sins and
expenditures.
The underlying bill is actually an important piece of legislation,
despite what my colleague from Maryland is saying.
Why? Because the executive orders being offered by this
administration, and frankly by many administrations, do have an actual
and significant inflationary impact.
{time} 0945
We are allowing the executive branch to run amuck. We are allowing
the executive branch to essentially legislate and make massive policies
that have an enormous impact on everyday, hardworking American people.
That is why this legislation is important. Unlike our colleagues on
the other side of the aisle who like to use the power of government to
be able to actually put gasoline on the fire of inflation by spending
more money, by engaging government into the business of the American
people, we want to be able to look at information about what government
is doing to cause the problem in the first place.
For example, the President's executive order on vaccine mandates. You
don't believe that had a massive inflationary impact to go around this
country, forcing people to stick a needle in their arm or lose their
job, causing all sorts of constraints in labor supply, making it
difficult for people to carry out their jobs?
You don't believe that the executive orders on minimum wage, the
executive orders on the Keystone pipeline, and other limitations on
Federal oil and gas leases, the executive orders with respect to WOTUS
and NEPA and all sorts of environmental rules and regulations that
restrict the ability of the American people to create wealth, create
jobs, create opportunities; you don't believe those create inflationary
impact?
Of course they do. Our job in Congress is to check the executive
branch. Our job in Congress is to stand up for the American people and
get the government out of their lives.
[[Page H981]]
This amendment is designed to make sure that we are going to apply it
equally to all manners of the executive orders produced by the
President, regardless of party. We believe that it is critically
important.
Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition.
The Acting CHAIR: The gentleman from Maryland is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. RASKIN. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New York (Mr.
Jeffries), the distinguished minority leader.
Mr. JEFFRIES. Mr. Chair, I thank the distinguished gentleman from the
great State of Maryland for his tremendous leadership.
I rise today in opposition to the amendment, as well as to the
underlying bill, the so-called REIN ACT, which is not really designed
to do anything meaningful in terms of addressing the economic concerns
of the American people.
That is consistent with the fact that over the last 2 months of this
extreme MAGA Republican majority, they have been focused on doing
anything but dealing with the real kitchen-table pocketbook concerns of
the American people.
Over the last year or so, all we heard was that this extreme MAGA
Republican majority was going to try to address the economic concerns
of everyday Americans.
So we have been waiting and waiting and waiting for the big, grand
Republican plan--waiting for it, notwithstanding the fact that
President Biden's administration has done a tremendous job pulling us
out of a once-in-a-century pandemic, and in partnership with Democrats
through the American Rescue Plan, saved the economy from a deep
recession, put shots in arms, money in pockets, kids back in school,
invested in the infrastructure of this country, which will create
millions of good-paying jobs; passed the CHIPS and Science Act to bring
domestic manufacturing jobs back home to the United States of America;
passed the Inflation Reduction Act to strike a dramatic blow against
the climate crisis, set our planet on a sustainable trajectory forward;
strengthened the Affordable Care Act, lower healthcare costs, drive
down the high price of lifesaving prescription drugs for millions of
Americans, including many on insulin, which will now be reduced to $35
a month.
That is the economic record of this administration: 12 million good-
paying jobs created over the last 2 years, record unemployment.
Yes, we still have challenges that we need to address as we try to
emerge from this inflationary environment that has afflicted the entire
world.
Oh, by the way, the United States' economy has emerged from COVID in
a better position than any other developed country because of the Biden
economic plan and the partnership with House Democrats and Senate
Democrats.
But we have been waiting and waiting and waiting for the grand
Republican plan, and here it is, the so-called REIN IN Act. Three
pages. Three pages.
What does it call for? Reports. Reports. It is the grand Republican
economic plan. Why? Because you have been focused on the wrong things.
Now, House Democrats, we are going to continue to invest in the
American people, invest in education and job training, invest in
transportation and infrastructure, invest in research and development,
invest in technology and innovation, invest in the creation and
preservation of affordable housing, invest in the health, the safety,
the economic well-being of the American people.
That is our plan. We are going to continue to put people over
politics. We get three pages calling for reports, the so-called REIN IN
Act.
Here is what we should be reining in. We should be reining in the
extreme MAGA Republican effort to cut Social Security.
We should rein in the extreme MAGA Republican effort to cut Medicare;
rein in the extreme MAGA Republican effort to criminalize reproductive
freedom and impose a nationwide ban; rein in the extreme MAGA
Republican effort to crash the United States' economy and default on
our debt for the first time in American history.
We should be reining in your effort to hand over sensitive security
footage from the January 6 violent insurrection to an avowed conspiracy
theorist. That is what we should be reining in.
A three-page plan calling for reports is not a serious effort to
address the challenges facing the American people, but we will continue
to be serious about putting people over politics, fighting for lower
costs, fighting for better-paying jobs, fighting for safer communities,
fighting for reproductive freedom, and defending our democracy at all
costs.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chair, I thank the gentleman for his extraordinarily
insightful and significant remarks.
The only exception I would take is when he referred to extreme MAGA.
We actually had a colloquy about this yesterday with the good
gentlewoman from Colorado.
I had gently suggested that perhaps our colleagues on the other side
of the aisle could stop referring to ``Democrat Congresswomen'' with
``Democrat plans'' and ``Democrat bills.''
``Democrat'' is a noun. The adjective is ``Democratic.'' So it would
be the ``Democratic Congresswoman,'' the ``Democratic bill,'' and so
on.
I said it grates on our ears the same ways it would grate on your
ears if every time we invoke the name of your party, we said the
``banana Republican Congresswoman'' or the ``banana Republican Member''
or the ``banana Republican Conference.'' That, we would consider a
breach of civility and decorum, so would we prefer to go back to
something else.
Yet, the gentlewoman from Colorado said, if I understood her
correctly, that she would continue with her deliberate mispronunciation
of the name of our party in its adjectival form.
By the way, she took the opportunity to raise the whole question of
MAGA, which I had not mentioned. She said, and when you call me MAGA,
don't call me MAGA--call me ultra-MAGA.
So when the minority leader referred to the extreme MAGA element,
which appears to be driving the train over there, he should have called
it the ultra-MAGA element out of deference to the gentlewoman from
Colorado.
I certainly will be able to honor her wishes in the future as she
chooses to be described as ultra-MAGA.
Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. ROY. Mr. Chair, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Kentucky
(Mr. Comer), my friend.
Mr. COMER. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of the Roy amendment. My
colleague's amendment removes exceptions in the bill to the requirement
that inflation impact assessments be prepared for all major executive
orders.
With historic inflation created by this administration's inflationary
policies, as well as the previous House majority's excessive,
unnecessary spending spree, historic inflation is harming households
across the Nation.
Our focus should be on doing everything we can to protect our
constituents against further inflation. Extending the bill's
requirement to all major executive orders is one way we can do that,
and that will not unduly burden the President.
After all, the bill's requirements do not prevent any executive order
from being issued. They just make sure the President is aware of the
inflationary impact that his orders may threaten because I don't think
my friends on the other side of the aisle realize how much these orders
have impacted inflation.
So I hope that this helps stop the Bidenflation at its source by
helping President Biden to see that the inflationary consequences of
his actions at the time he is considering them. I urge my colleagues to
vote ``yes''.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chair, may I inquire as to how much time is
remaining?
The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Bucshon). The gentleman from Maryland has 2\1/
2\ minutes remaining.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chair, so I believe our colleagues are coming clean.
They opposed the American Rescue Act, which was absolutely essential
legislation to get the country out of the Trump economic wreckage
during the last administration.
We had 14.8 percent unemployment; the highest unemployment rate since
the Department of Labor started keeping statistics.
[[Page H982]]
Today it is down to 4 percent with the creation of 12 million new
jobs under the Biden administration. So they shift the subject from
unemployment, which they used to talk about, to inflation.
Well, they raised the debt limit themselves three times under Donald
Trump who contributed 25 percent of the entire debt of the Nation
between George Washington and Joe Biden.
Mr. Chair, 25 percent all came from the Trump administration, but
they are looking for something to try to pin on Biden.
So rather than acknowledging that Putin's war in Russia and the
disruption of the global supply chains caused by the coronavirus
pandemic created a global inflation, and America is doing much better
bringing it down than anybody else, they decide just to try to demonize
and vilify Joe Biden.
Why? Because the cabinet is empty. The cupboard is bare. There are no
ideas over there, as the distinguished minority leader said.
They are not offering any ideas--some reporting requirements, and
they are doodling on that; should it be a billion or a million or
hundred million.
Who knows? There has been no hearing on it, so they are making it up
as they go along on the floor of the House. We can do much better as we
did in the 117th Congress to get America moving again.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. ROY. Mr. Chair, may I inquire as to how much time is remaining?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Texas has 1\1/2\ minutes
remaining.
Mr. ROY. Mr. Chair, the question seems to be about we have nothing
allegedly in the cupboard, nothing to offer. I think there is plenty to
offer.
How about stop spending money we don't have? How about stop dumping
trillions of dollars into the economy, jamming up inflation?
How about ending all of the subsidies and all of the Federal
expenditures that are undermining the American people's ability to
create wealth and create jobs?
The gentleman talks about the amount of debt that was increased under
President Trump. How about the 43 to 45 percent of our entire debt that
was increased under Nancy Pelosi as Speaker?
Because those are the actual facts, and this is the body that has the
power of the purse. This is the body that starts all the spending. We
know where the spending starts.
The fact of the matter is my colleagues on the other side of the
aisle like to talk about creating 12 million jobs.
First of all, this body doesn't create jobs. The government doesn't
create jobs. The American people create jobs.
The fact is our labor participation rate is still far behind pre-
COVID levels. We are basically playing catch-up to the utter
destruction that was levied against the American people by government,
against the American people, shutting down this economy, locking our
kids in the corners, setting our kids back generations in terms of
their academic performance, and criticizing three-page bills.
I will tell you what. It is a far cry better than the 4,100-page,
$1.7 trillion omnibus bill jammed through by the Democrats in December,
destroying this economy.
Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chairman, it is always a pleasure to hear my friend
from Texas, Mr. Roy, who mentions something which sounded like a
substantive suggestion about ending corporate subsidies, or perhaps I
intuited or interpreted that.
If he wants to work on legislation with me on ending corporate
welfare and corporate subsidies in America, I would love to do that.
That would be a serious step in the right direction, and I would love
to work with him on that.
I take it by his suggestion that we rein in spending, something that
I referred to when we talked about the Republicans raising the debt
limit three times under Donald Trump, they had no problem with doing it
back then and creating all of this debt, and we know that the former
President was spending like a drunken sailor.
I take it that by not mentioning the legislation anymore, he is
basically conceding that this bill will do nothing to bring down the
inflation rate. It certainly will not. I don't know if they have been
able to mobilize a single economist in the country who would argue that
passing this legislation will bring the inflation rate down.
Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
{time} 1000
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Roy).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes
appeared to have it.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Texas will
be postponed.
Amendment No. 15 Offered by Mr. Yakym
The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Lawler). It is now in order to consider
amendment No. 15 printed in House Report 118-4.
Mr. YAKYM. Mr. Chair, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:
Page 2, line 3, strike ``For'' and insert the following:
(1) In general.--For
Page 2, after line 14, insert the following:
(2) CPI impact disaggregated.--If an Executive order is
determined to have a quantifiable inflationary impact on the
consumer price index under subsection (a), the statement
required by such subsection shall include the amount of such
impact on the consumer price index in total and disaggregated
by the Food, Energy, and All Items Less Food and Energy
categories of the consumer price index (as such categories
are determined by the Secretary of Labor in consultation with
the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics).
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 166, the gentleman
from Indiana (Mr. Yakym) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Indiana.
Mr. YAKYM. Mr. Chair, my amendment is a simple one. It would require
that the President's inflation analysis include not just a top-line
estimate but also a breakdown to the CPI's three major subgroups: food,
energy, and all items less food and energy.
Americans are navigating inflation rates not seen in generations, and
their dollar isn't going far enough because wages aren't keeping up. It
is no wonder that a recent Gallup poll found that 50 percent of
Americans say they are worse off financially than just a year ago, and
that is a level not seen since the Great Recession.
Let me be clear: We have this generational inflation thanks to 2
years of runaway spending. I will grant that the pandemic caused
massive disruptions to our economy, supply chains, and our way of life.
It was going to be a bumpy ride coming out of that.
However, policies like the American Rescue Plan that were rammed
through Congress without a single Republican vote threw gasoline on the
fire and supercharged inflation. With one hand, the government was
giving away money, and with the other hand, they were taking it right
back, and then some, due to inflation.
Yet, Americans have essentially been told not to believe their lying
eyes. They were assured that inflation would merely be ``transitory,''
even as it spiraled higher. They were told it was all Vladimir Putin's
fault, even though energy inflation averaged just over 21 percent in
2021, the year before Russia invaded Ukraine.
Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act--again, without a single
Republican vote. The only problem with the Inflation Reduction Act is
that it doesn't actually reduce inflation.
Everyday Americans' experience with inflation has made one thing
abundantly clear: Not all inflation is created equal. Energy and food
inflation are particularly harmful. There is no more kitchen-table
issue than food inflation. There is no more readily available reminder
of the toll of inflation than the price at the pump.
Energy and food inflation impact every single American and hit those
living paycheck to paycheck especially hard. Seniors and others on
fixed incomes have watched helplessly as costs have risen beyond their
ability to keep up.
[[Page H983]]
My amendment will ensure that the President keeps food and energy
costs front and center before signing an executive order by breaking
out the inflation analysis down to CPI's three main subgroups: food,
energy, and all items less food and energy.
An overall inflation figure is not enough. Last month's inflation
reading showed a 6.4 percent year-over-year rise in top-line inflation,
but let's drill down one level deeper. Food inflation was 10.1 percent,
and energy inflation was 8.7. This has been the story for the last 2
years. Energy inflation has outpaced overall inflation for 24 of the
last 24 months, and food inflation has outpaced overall inflation for
13.
The top-line number simply doesn't tell the entire story. Drilling
down one level deeper in the inflation analysis will increase
transparency for the American people. It will focus attention not just
on inflation but on the type of inflation.
If the President wants to sign an executive order that, for example,
bans new energy production, the American people deserve to know how
that order will impact energy inflation.
Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to support my amendment, and I
reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Maryland is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chair, I thank the gentleman for introducing his
amendment, which would add yet another reporting dimension to this
already wasteful, bureaucratic paperwork exercise when what the
American people need, deserve, and are getting from the Biden
administration is real, tangible action to bring down prices in
America.
What are we doing? Well, here is one of the things we are doing for
older people who disproportionately depend on prescription drugs and
people battling illness right now: We have dramatically lowered the
cost of prescription drugs in the Medicare program for millions and
millions of Americans.
We just heard someone on the other side of the aisle, the gentleman
from Pennsylvania, call this price fixing. Well, here is an example of
the price fixing that President Biden and the Democratic majority are
engaged in. We fixed the price for people who were paying thousands of
dollars for insulin shots. We fixed it by putting it down to $35 a
month, and they oppose it.
Talk about inflation? What about inflation for diabetics? They don't
count? We are not interested in inflation for diabetics, just for large
corporations, the people who got more than $1 trillion in a tax cut
from the last President? That is who we care about?
We don't care about millions of people who have diabetes in the
country, who are spending thousands of dollars a year to pay for their
insulin shots? Well, we cut that inflation down to $35 a month, and we
get a lecture from them about how that doesn't count.
The Biden administration is trying to cut hundreds of millions of
dollars from people who have to pay under a staggering student loan
debt today, and they are fighting us on that. They don't care about
that kind of inflation. They don't care about the pocketbooks of people
who are staggering under student loan debt, 43 million people. We are
talking about billions of dollars. Forty-three million people will be
assisted by the student loan debt executive order and initiatives taken
by the Biden administration, but that doesn't count for them.
We started this series of amendments by talking about the fact that
they have this self-imposed political speech impediment. They can't
correctly pronounce the name of our party in its adjectival form, but I
thought of a solution to this because I was reading a great book by
H.W. Brands about Franklin D. Roosevelt called ``Traitor to His
Class.'' In the book, he has a bunch of Roosevelt's speeches. Do you
know what President Roosevelt called our party? Not the Democratic
Party, much less the Democrat Party. If you can't pronounce it, do what
Roosevelt did. He called us the democracy. He said the ``economic
royalists,'' the corporate plutocrats, say if you invest in the
wealthiest people in society, some of the wealth will trickle down on
everybody else, but the democracy says you invest in the great working
middle class of America, and we will all rise and prosper together.
That is the doctrine of the democracy.
If you can't pronounce the name of our party, just call us the
democracy. That is what we are today because we defend the right to
vote, and we defend free and fair elections, and we stand by the
results of elections.
We defend not only the country and our democratic allies all over the
world, as in Ukraine, but we defend this body; we defend this Chamber;
we defend the Capitol of the United States; and we defend the interests
of the working majority of Americans.
The American people are not asking for more reports and more
bureaucracy. They are asking for action, and that is what the Biden
administration and Democrats in Congress are giving them.
Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. YAKYM. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Kentucky (Mr. Comer).
Mr. COMER. Mr. Chair, I rise in support of the amendment.
Perhaps no part of Bidenflation has been more painful than its
impacts on food and energy prices. One can hardly imagine kitchen-table
issues greater than those.
Bidenflation is causing food prices to skyrocket, as well as the
prices for energy to cook it and the prices of the gasoline needed to
get to the market. The list goes painfully on.
My colleague's amendment makes sure that when the President is
considering major executive orders, he will be informed in a crystal-
clear way of the inflationary impacts his orders may have on food and
energy prices. It is my hope that will bring some relief to our
constituents at their kitchen tables.
Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on this amendment.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Chair, the Biden administration brought Trump's
unemployment rate, which was skyrocketing, down. We went from 14.8
percent to less than 4 percent, creating 12 million new jobs.
Now, President Biden is bringing down the soaring inflation rate he
inherited because of the massive disruption in global supply chains
caused by the lethal recklessness of the Trump administration in
mismanaging the pandemic response.
We are saying, let's finish the job. Just as we brought unemployment
down, we are bringing inflation down. We are making the American
economy work for the American people through strategic investments like
the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, a $1.2 trillion investment
in the roads, the highways, the bridges, the ports, the airports, and
broadband across the country, in rural areas.
President Biden is fighting for investment in the American people,
and that is what the Democrats are fighting for, not a bunch of
reports. We don't need this legislation.
Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. YAKYM. Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to support this
amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Yakym).
The amendment was agreed to.
Announcement by the Acting Chair
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, proceedings
will now resume on those amendments on which further proceedings were
postponed, in the following order:
Amendment No. 1 by Mr. Bost of Illinois.
Amendment No. 3 by Mrs. Boebert of Colorado.
Amendment No. 6 by Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas.
Amendment No. 7 by Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas.
Amendment No. 9 by Mrs. Lee of Nevada.
Amendment No. 14 by Mr. Roy of Texas.
The Chair will reduce to 2 minutes the minimum time for any
electronic vote after the first vote in this series.
Amendment No. 1 Offered by Mr. Bost
The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Illinois
(Mr. Bost) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the
ayes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
[[Page H984]]
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 324,
noes 83, not voting 32, as follows:
[Roll No. 125]
AYES--324
Aderholt
Alford
Allen
Allred
Amodei
Armstrong
Arrington
Auchincloss
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Balint
Banks
Barr
Bean (FL)
Bentz
Bergman
Beyer
Bice
Biggs
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NC)
Boebert
Bost
Brecheen
Buchanan
Bucshon
Budzinski
Burchett
Burgess
Burlison
Calvert
Caraveo
Carbajal
Carey
Carl
Carter (GA)
Carter (TX)
Case
Castor (FL)
Chavez-DeRemer
Ciscomani
Cline
Cloud
Clyde
Cole
Collins
Comer
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Craig
Crane
Crawford
Crenshaw
Crow
Cuellar
Curtis
D'Esposito
Davids (KS)
Davidson
Davis (NC)
De La Cruz
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
DeSaulnier
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Dingell
Donalds
Duarte
Duncan
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Escobar
Eshoo
Estes
Ezell
Fallon
Feenstra
Ferguson
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Fletcher
Flood
Foster
Foxx
Frankel, Lois
Franklin, C. Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Gaetz
Gallagher
Gallego
Garbarino
Garcia (TX)
Garcia, Mike
Gimenez
Golden (ME)
Gonzales, Tony
Gonzalez, Vicente
Gonzalez-Colon
Good (VA)
Gooden (TX)
Gosar
Gottheimer
Granger
Graves (LA)
Graves (MO)
Green (TN)
Green, Al (TX)
Greene (GA)
Griffith
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Harder (CA)
Harris
Harshbarger
Hern
Higgins (LA)
Hill
Himes
Hinson
Horsford
Houchin
Hoyer
Hoyle (OR)
Hudson
Huizenga
Hunt
Issa
Jackson (NC)
James
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (PA)
Kaptur
Kean (NJ)
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Khanna
Kiggans (VA)
Kildee
Kiley
Kilmer
Kim (CA)
Kim (NJ)
Krishnamoorthi
Kuster
LaHood
LaLota
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Landsman
Langworthy
Latta
LaTurner
Lawler
Lee (CA)
Lee (FL)
Lee (NV)
Leger Fernandez
Lesko
Letlow
Levin
Loudermilk
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Luna
Luttrell
Lynch
Mace
Magaziner
Malliotakis
Mann
Manning
Massie
Mast
Matsui
McBath
McCaul
McClain
McClintock
McCollum
McCormick
Meuser
Mfume
Miller (IL)
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Mills
Molinaro
Moolenaar
Mooney
Moore (AL)
Moore (UT)
Moran
Morelle
Moskowitz
Moulton
Moylan
Mullin
Murphy
Neguse
Newhouse
Nickel
Norcross
Norman
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ogles
Omar
Owens
Palmer
Panetta
Pappas
Pascrell
Payne
Peltola
Pence
Perez
Perry
Peters
Pettersen
Pfluger
Phillips
Pingree
Plaskett
Porter
Posey
Quigley
Radewagen
Reschenthaler
Rodgers (WA)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rosendale
Ross
Rouzer
Roy
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Rutherford
Ryan
Salazar
Salinas
Santos
Schiff
Schneider
Scholten
Schrier
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Scott, David
Self
Sessions
Sewell
Sherman
Sherrill
Slotkin
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (WA)
Smucker
Sorensen
Soto
Spartz
Stansbury
Stanton
Stauber
Steel
Stefanik
Steil
Stevens
Stewart
Strickland
Strong
Takano
Tenney
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Titus
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Turner
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Orden
Vasquez
Veasey
Wagner
Walberg
Waltz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson Coleman
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Wexton
Williams (NY)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke
NOES--83
Adams
Aguilar
Barragan
Beatty
Bera
Blumenauer
Blunt Rochester
Bonamici
Bowman
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Brownley
Bush
Cardenas
Carson
Carter (LA)
Cartwright
Casar
Casten
Cherfilus-McCormick
Chu
Cicilline
Clark (MA)
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Crockett
Dean (PA)
Deluzio
Doggett
Espaillat
Evans
Foushee
Frost
Garamendi
Garcia, Robert
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Grijalva
Hayes
Higgins (NY)
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee
Jacobs
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Kamlager-Dove
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (PA)
Lieu
McGarvey
McGovern
Meeks
Menendez
Meng
Moore (WI)
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Norton
Ocasio-Cortez
Pallone
Pelosi
Pocan
Pressley
Ramirez
Raskin
Sanchez
Scanlon
Scott (VA)
Sykes
Tlaib
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Underwood
Velazquez
Williams (GA)
Wilson (FL)
NOT VOTING--32
Bilirakis
Buck
Cammack
Castro (TX)
Clarke (NY)
Cleaver
Davis (IL)
Garcia (IL)
Grothman
Houlahan
Huffman
Jackson (TX)
Joyce (OH)
Kustoff
Lofgren
McHenry
Mrvan
Nehls
Rogers (AL)
Sablan
Sarbanes
Scalise
Schakowsky
Simpson
Spanberger
Steube
Swalwell
Trone
Vargas
Westerman
Wild
Williams (TX)
Announcement by the Acting Chair
The Acting CHAIR (during the vote). There are 2 minutes remaining.
{time} 1037
Mses. BLUNT ROCHESTER, OCASIO-CORTEZ, Messrs. LARSON of Connecticut,
CARTER of Louisiana, and DOGGETT changed their vote from ``aye'' to
``no.''
Messrs. KIM of New Jersey, KILDEE, Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas, Mr.
KRISHNAMOORTHI, Ms. BALINT, Mrs. FLETCHER, Mr. SOTO, Ms. KUSTER,
Messrs. THANEDAR, NORCROSS, SORENSEN, VEASEY, TONKO, and HARDER of
California changed their vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Stated for:
Mr. GROTHMAN. Mr. Chair, I was delayed in a meeting. Had I been
present, I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 125.
Mr. JACKSON of Texas. Mr. Chair, I was unavoidably detained. Had I
been present, I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 125.
Amendment No. 3 Offered by Mrs. Boebert
The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Colorado
(Mrs. Boebert) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which
the ayes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 386,
noes 31, not voting 22, as follows:
[Roll No. 126]
AYES--386
Adams
Aderholt
Aguilar
Alford
Allen
Allred
Amodei
Armstrong
Auchincloss
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Balint
Banks
Barr
Barragan
Bean (FL)
Bentz
Bera
Bergman
Beyer
Bice
Biggs
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NC)
Blunt Rochester
Bonamici
Bost
Brecheen
Brown
Brownley
Buchanan
Bucshon
Budzinski
Burchett
Burgess
Burlison
Bush
Calvert
Cammack
Caraveo
Carbajal
Cardenas
Carey
Carl
Carson
Carter (GA)
Carter (LA)
Carter (TX)
Cartwright
Case
Casten
Castor (FL)
Chavez-DeRemer
Chu
Cicilline
Ciscomani
Clark (MA)
Cline
Cloud
Clyde
Cole
Collins
Comer
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Craig
Crane
Crawford
Crenshaw
Crow
Cuellar
Curtis
D'Esposito
Davids (KS)
Davidson
Davis (NC)
De La Cruz
Dean (PA)
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Dingell
Doggett
Donalds
Duarte
Duncan
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Escobar
Eshoo
Espaillat
Estes
Evans
Ezell
Fallon
Feenstra
Ferguson
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Fletcher
Flood
Foster
Foushee
Foxx
Frankel, Lois
Franklin, C. Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Gaetz
Gallagher
Gallego
Garamendi
Garbarino
Garcia, Mike
Gimenez
Golden (ME)
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Gonzales, Tony
Gonzalez, Vicente
Gonzalez-Colon
Good (VA)
Gooden (TX)
Gosar
Gottheimer
Granger
Graves (LA)
Graves (MO)
Green (TN)
Green, Al (TX)
Greene (GA)
Griffith
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Harder (CA)
Harris
Harshbarger
Hayes
Hern
Higgins (LA)
Higgins (NY)
Hill
Himes
Hinson
Horsford
Houchin
Houlahan
Hoyer
Hoyle (OR)
Hudson
Huizenga
Hunt
Issa
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jackson (NC)
Jackson (TX)
Jackson Lee
Jacobs
James
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (PA)
Kaptur
Kean (NJ)
Kelly (IL)
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Khanna
Kiggans (VA)
Kildee
Kiley
Kilmer
[[Page H985]]
Kim (CA)
Kim (NJ)
Krishnamoorthi
Kuster
LaHood
LaLota
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Landsman
Langworthy
Larson (CT)
Latta
LaTurner
Lawler
Lee (CA)
Lee (FL)
Lee (NV)
Leger Fernandez
Lesko
Letlow
Levin
Lieu
Loudermilk
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Luna
Luttrell
Lynch
Mace
Magaziner
Malliotakis
Mann
Manning
Massie
Mast
Matsui
McBath
McCaul
McClain
McClintock
McCollum
McCormick
McGarvey
McGovern
Meeks
Menendez
Meng
Meuser
Mfume
Miller (IL)
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Mills
Molinaro
Moolenaar
Mooney
Moore (AL)
Moore (UT)
Moore (WI)
Moran
Morelle
Moskowitz
Moulton
Moylan
Mullin
Murphy
Nadler
Napolitano
Neguse
Nehls
Newhouse
Nickel
Norcross
Norman
Norton
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ogles
Owens
Pallone
Palmer
Panetta
Pappas
Pascrell
Payne
Pelosi
Peltola
Pence
Perez
Perry
Peters
Pettersen
Pfluger
Phillips
Pingree
Plaskett
Pocan
Porter
Posey
Quigley
Radewagen
Raskin
Reschenthaler
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rosendale
Ross
Rouzer
Roy
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Rutherford
Ryan
Salazar
Salinas
Sanchez
Santos
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Scholten
Schrier
Schweikert
Scott (VA)
Scott, Austin
Scott, David
Self
Sessions
Sewell
Sherman
Sherrill
Slotkin
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (WA)
Smucker
Sorensen
Soto
Spanberger
Spartz
Stansbury
Stanton
Stauber
Steel
Stefanik
Steil
Stevens
Stewart
Strickland
Strong
Sykes
Takano
Tenney
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Titus
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Turner
Underwood
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Orden
Vargas
Vasquez
Veasey
Velazquez
Wagner
Walberg
Waltz
Wasserman Schultz
Watson Coleman
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Westerman
Wexton
Williams (NY)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke
NOES--31
Beatty
Blumenauer
Bowman
Boyle (PA)
Casar
Cherfilus-McCormick
Clarke (NY)
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Crockett
Frost
Garcia (TX)
Garcia, Robert
Grijalva
Huffman
Kamlager-Dove
Keating
Larsen (WA)
Lee (PA)
Mrvan
Neal
Ocasio-Cortez
Omar
Pressley
Ramirez
Scanlon
Tlaib
Waters
Williams (GA)
Wilson (FL)
NOT VOTING--22
Arrington
Boebert
Buck
Castro (TX)
Cleaver
Davis (IL)
Garcia (IL)
Joyce (OH)
Kustoff
Lofgren
McHenry
Miller-Meeks
Rodgers (WA)
Sablan
Sarbanes
Scalise
Simpson
Steube
Swalwell
Trone
Wild
Williams (TX)
{time} 1043
Announcement by the Acting Chair
The Acting CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining.
Ms. WILSON of Florida and Mr. ROBERT GARCIA of California changed
their vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
Ms. SANCHEZ changed her vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Stated for:
Ms. BOEBERT. Mr. Chair, my voting card did not register my vote. Had
I been present, I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 126.
Amendment No. 6 Offered by Ms. Jackson Lee
The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Texas
(Ms. Jackson Lee) on which further proceedings were postponed and on
which the noes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 181,
noes 236, not voting 22, as follows:
[Roll No. 127]
AYES--181
Adams
Aguilar
Allred
Auchincloss
Balint
Barragan
Beatty
Bera
Beyer
Bishop (GA)
Blumenauer
Blunt Rochester
Bonamici
Bowman
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Brownley
Bush
Carbajal
Cardenas
Carson
Carter (LA)
Cartwright
Casar
Castor (FL)
Cherfilus-McCormick
Chu
Cicilline
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Crow
Cuellar
Davis (NC)
Dean (PA)
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
Dingell
Doggett
Escobar
Eshoo
Espaillat
Evans
Fletcher
Foushee
Frankel, Lois
Frost
Gallego
Garamendi
Garcia (TX)
Garcia, Robert
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Gonzalez, Vicente
Green, Al (TX)
Grijalva
Harder (CA)
Hayes
Higgins (NY)
Himes
Horsford
Houlahan
Hoyer
Huffman
Ivey
Jackson (NC)
Jackson Lee
Jacobs
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Kamlager-Dove
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Khanna
Kildee
Kilmer
Kim (NJ)
Krishnamoorthi
Landsman
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Lee (NV)
Lee (PA)
Leger Fernandez
Lieu
Lynch
Magaziner
Manning
Matsui
McBath
McCollum
McGarvey
McGovern
Meeks
Menendez
Meng
Mfume
Moore (WI)
Morelle
Moskowitz
Mrvan
Mullin
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Neguse
Nickel
Norcross
Norton
Ocasio-Cortez
Omar
Pallone
Panetta
Pascrell
Payne
Pelosi
Peltola
Peters
Pettersen
Phillips
Pingree
Plaskett
Pocan
Porter
Pressley
Quigley
Ramirez
Raskin
Ross
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Salinas
Sanchez
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Schiff
Scholten
Schrier
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Sherman
Sherrill
Slotkin
Smith (WA)
Soto
Spanberger
Stansbury
Stevens
Strickland
Sykes
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tlaib
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Underwood
Vargas
Veasey
Velazquez
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson Coleman
Wexton
Williams (GA)
Wilson (FL)
NOES--236
Aderholt
Alford
Allen
Amodei
Armstrong
Arrington
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Banks
Barr
Bean (FL)
Bentz
Bergman
Bice
Biggs
Bilirakis
Bishop (NC)
Bost
Brecheen
Buchanan
Bucshon
Budzinski
Burchett
Burgess
Burlison
Calvert
Cammack
Caraveo
Carey
Carl
Carter (GA)
Carter (TX)
Case
Casten
Chavez-DeRemer
Ciscomani
Cline
Cloud
Clyde
Cole
Collins
Comer
Craig
Crane
Crawford
Crenshaw
Crockett
Curtis
D'Esposito
Davids (KS)
Davidson
De La Cruz
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Donalds
Duarte
Duncan
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Estes
Ezell
Fallon
Feenstra
Ferguson
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flood
Foster
Foxx
Franklin, C. Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Gaetz
Gallagher
Garbarino
Garcia, Mike
Gimenez
Golden (ME)
Gonzales, Tony
Gonzalez-Colon
Good (VA)
Gooden (TX)
Gosar
Gottheimer
Granger
Graves (LA)
Graves (MO)
Green (TN)
Greene (GA)
Griffith
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Harris
Harshbarger
Hern
Higgins (LA)
Hill
Hinson
Houchin
Hudson
Huizenga
Hunt
Issa
Jackson (IL)
Jackson (TX)
James
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (PA)
Kean (NJ)
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Kiggans (VA)
Kiley
Kuster
LaHood
LaLota
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Langworthy
Latta
LaTurner
Lawler
Lee (FL)
Lesko
Letlow
Levin
Loudermilk
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Luna
Luttrell
Mace
Malliotakis
Mann
Massie
Mast
McCaul
McClain
McClintock
McCormick
Meuser
Miller (IL)
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Mills
Molinaro
Moolenaar
Mooney
Moore (AL)
Moore (UT)
Moran
Moulton
Moylan
Murphy
Nehls
Newhouse
Norman
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ogles
Owens
Palmer
Pappas
Pence
Perez
Perry
Pfluger
Posey
Radewagen
Reschenthaler
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rosendale
Rouzer
Roy
Rutherford
Ryan
Salazar
Santos
Schneider
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Self
Sessions
Sewell
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smucker
Sorensen
Spartz
Stanton
Stauber
Steel
Stefanik
Steil
Stewart
Strong
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Turner
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Orden
Vasquez
Wagner
Walberg
Waltz
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Westerman
Williams (NY)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke
NOT VOTING--22
Boebert
Buck
Castro (TX)
Cleaver
Davis (IL)
Garcia (IL)
Hoyle (OR)
Joyce (OH)
Kim (CA)
Kustoff
Lofgren
McHenry
Rodgers (WA)
Sablan
Sarbanes
Scalise
Steube
Swalwell
Takano
Trone
Wild
Williams (TX)
[[Page H986]]
{time} 1047
Announcement by the Acting CHAIR
The Acting CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining.
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment No. 7 Offered by Ms. Jackson Lee
The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Texas
(Ms. Jackson Lee) on which further proceedings were postponed and on
which the noes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 187,
noes 232, not voting 20, as follows:
[Roll No. 128]
AYES--187
Adams
Aguilar
Allred
Auchincloss
Balint
Barragan
Beatty
Bera
Beyer
Bishop (GA)
Blumenauer
Blunt Rochester
Bonamici
Bowman
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Brownley
Bush
Carbajal
Cardenas
Carson
Carter (LA)
Cartwright
Casar
Castor (FL)
Cherfilus-McCormick
Chu
Cicilline
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Craig
Crockett
Crow
Cuellar
Davids (KS)
Davis (NC)
Dean (PA)
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
Dingell
Doggett
Escobar
Eshoo
Espaillat
Evans
Fletcher
Foster
Foushee
Frankel, Lois
Frost
Gallego
Garamendi
Garcia (TX)
Garcia, Robert
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Gonzalez, Vicente
Green, Al (TX)
Harder (CA)
Hayes
Higgins (NY)
Himes
Horsford
Houlahan
Hoyer
Hoyle (OR)
Huffman
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jackson (NC)
Jackson Lee
Jacobs
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Kamlager-Dove
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Khanna
Kildee
Kilmer
Kim (NJ)
Krishnamoorthi
Kuster
Landsman
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Lee (NV)
Lee (PA)
Leger Fernandez
Levin
Lieu
Lynch
Magaziner
Manning
Matsui
McBath
McCollum
McGarvey
McGovern
Meeks
Menendez
Meng
Mfume
Moore (WI)
Morelle
Moskowitz
Mrvan
Mullin
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Neguse
Nickel
Norcross
Norton
Ocasio-Cortez
Omar
Pallone
Panetta
Pascrell
Payne
Pelosi
Peters
Pettersen
Phillips
Pingree
Plaskett
Pocan
Porter
Pressley
Quigley
Ramirez
Raskin
Ross
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Salinas
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Schiff
Scholten
Schrier
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Sewell
Sherman
Slotkin
Smith (WA)
Sorensen
Soto
Stansbury
Stevens
Strickland
Sykes
Takano
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tlaib
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Underwood
Vargas
Veasey
Velazquez
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson Coleman
Wexton
Williams (GA)
Wilson (FL)
NOES--232
Aderholt
Alford
Allen
Amodei
Armstrong
Arrington
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Banks
Barr
Bean (FL)
Bentz
Bergman
Bice
Biggs
Bilirakis
Bishop (NC)
Boebert
Bost
Brecheen
Buchanan
Bucshon
Budzinski
Burchett
Burgess
Burlison
Calvert
Cammack
Caraveo
Carey
Carl
Carter (GA)
Carter (TX)
Case
Casten
Chavez-DeRemer
Ciscomani
Cline
Cloud
Clyde
Cole
Collins
Comer
Crane
Crawford
Crenshaw
Curtis
D'Esposito
Davidson
De La Cruz
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Donalds
Duarte
Duncan
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Estes
Ezell
Fallon
Feenstra
Ferguson
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flood
Foxx
Franklin, C. Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Gaetz
Gallagher
Garbarino
Garcia, Mike
Gimenez
Golden (ME)
Gonzales, Tony
Gonzalez-Colon
Good (VA)
Gooden (TX)
Gosar
Gottheimer
Granger
Graves (LA)
Graves (MO)
Green (TN)
Greene (GA)
Griffith
Grijalva
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Harris
Harshbarger
Hern
Higgins (LA)
Hill
Hinson
Houchin
Hudson
Huizenga
Hunt
Issa
Jackson (TX)
James
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (PA)
Kean (NJ)
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Kiggans (VA)
Kiley
Kim (CA)
LaHood
LaLota
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Langworthy
Latta
LaTurner
Lawler
Lee (FL)
Lesko
Letlow
Loudermilk
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Luna
Luttrell
Mace
Malliotakis
Mann
Massie
Mast
McCaul
McClain
McClintock
McCormick
Meuser
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Mills
Molinaro
Moolenaar
Mooney
Moore (AL)
Moore (UT)
Moran
Moulton
Moylan
Murphy
Nehls
Newhouse
Norman
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ogles
Owens
Palmer
Pappas
Pence
Perry
Pfluger
Posey
Radewagen
Reschenthaler
Rodgers (WA)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rosendale
Rouzer
Roy
Rutherford
Ryan
Salazar
Santos
Scalise
Schneider
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Self
Sessions
Sherrill
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smucker
Spanberger
Spartz
Stanton
Stauber
Steel
Stefanik
Steil
Stewart
Strong
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Turner
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Orden
Vasquez
Wagner
Walberg
Waltz
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Westerman
Williams (NY)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke
NOT VOTING--20
Buck
Castro (TX)
Cleaver
Davis (IL)
Garcia (IL)
Joyce (OH)
Kustoff
Lofgren
McHenry
Miller (IL)
Peltola
Perez
Sablan
Sanchez
Sarbanes
Steube
Swalwell
Trone
Wild
Williams (TX)
{time} 1050
Announcement by the Acting Chair
The Acting CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining.
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Stated against:
Mrs. MILLER of Illinois. Mr. Chair, had I been present, I would have
voted ``no'' on rollcall no. 128.
Ms. PEREZ. Mr. Chair, had I been present, I would have voted ``no''
on rollcall No. 128.
=========================== NOTE ===========================
March 1, 2023, on page H986, in the third column, the first
appeared: Mr. PEREZ. Mr. Chair, had I been present, I would have
voted ``no'' on rollcall No. 128.
The online version has been corrected to read: Ms. PEREZ. Mr.
Chair, had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall
No. 128.
========================= END NOTE =========================
Amendment No. 9 Offered by Mrs. Lee of Nevada
The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Nevada
(Mrs. Lee) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the
ayes prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 364,
noes 56, not voting 19, as follows:
[Roll No. 129]
AYES--364
Adams
Aderholt
Aguilar
Alford
Allen
Allred
Amodei
Armstrong
Arrington
Auchincloss
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Balint
Banks
Barr
Barragan
Bean (FL)
Beatty
Bentz
Bera
Bergman
Beyer
Bice
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Blumenauer
Blunt Rochester
Bonamici
Bost
Bowman
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Brownley
Buchanan
Budzinski
Burgess
Bush
Calvert
Cammack
Caraveo
Carbajal
Cardenas
Carey
Carl
Carson
Carter (GA)
Carter (LA)
Carter (TX)
Cartwright
Casar
Case
Casten
Castor (FL)
Chavez-DeRemer
Cherfilus-McCormick
Chu
Cicilline
Ciscomani
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Cloud
Clyburn
Cohen
Cole
Comer
Connolly
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Craig
Crawford
Crenshaw
Crockett
Crow
Cuellar
Curtis
D'Esposito
Davids (KS)
Davis (NC)
De La Cruz
Dean (PA)
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
Diaz-Balart
Dingell
Doggett
Duarte
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Escobar
Eshoo
Espaillat
Estes
Evans
Ezell
Feenstra
Ferguson
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Fletcher
Flood
Foster
Foushee
Foxx
Frankel, Lois
Frost
Gallagher
Gallego
Garamendi
Garbarino
Garcia (TX)
Garcia, Mike
Garcia, Robert
Golden (ME)
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Gonzales, Tony
Gonzalez, Vicente
Gonzalez-Colon
Gooden (TX)
Gottheimer
Granger
Graves (LA)
Graves (MO)
Green, Al (TX)
Grijalva
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Harder (CA)
Harshbarger
Hayes
Higgins (NY)
Hill
Himes
Hinson
Horsford
Houchin
Houlahan
Hoyer
[[Page H987]]
Hoyle (OR)
Hudson
Huffman
Huizenga
Hunt
Issa
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jackson (NC)
Jackson Lee
Jacobs
James
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (PA)
Kamlager-Dove
Kaptur
Kean (NJ)
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kelly (PA)
Khanna
Kiggans (VA)
Kildee
Kiley
Kilmer
Kim (NJ)
Krishnamoorthi
Kuster
LaHood
LaLota
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Landsman
Langworthy
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latta
LaTurner
Lawler
Lee (CA)
Lee (FL)
Lee (NV)
Lee (PA)
Leger Fernandez
Lesko
Letlow
Levin
Lieu
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lynch
Mace
Magaziner
Malliotakis
Mann
Manning
Mast
Matsui
McBath
McCaul
McClain
McClintock
McCollum
McGarvey
McGovern
Meeks
Menendez
Meng
Meuser
Mfume
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Molinaro
Moolenaar
Mooney
Moore (UT)
Moore (WI)
Morelle
Moskowitz
Moulton
Moylan
Mrvan
Mullin
Murphy
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Neguse
Newhouse
Nickel
Norcross
Norman
Norton
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ocasio-Cortez
Omar
Owens
Pallone
Palmer
Panetta
Pappas
Pascrell
Payne
Pelosi
Peltola
Perez
Peters
Pettersen
Pfluger
Phillips
Pingree
Plaskett
Pocan
Porter
Pressley
Quigley
Radewagen
Ramirez
Raskin
Reschenthaler
Rodgers (WA)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Ross
Rouzer
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Rutherford
Ryan
Salazar
Salinas
Santos
Scalise
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Scholten
Schrier
Scott (VA)
Scott, Austin
Scott, David
Self
Sewell
Sherman
Sherrill
Simpson
Slotkin
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (WA)
Smucker
Sorensen
Soto
Spanberger
Spartz
Stansbury
Stanton
Stauber
Steel
Stefanik
Steil
Stevens
Stewart
Strickland
Strong
Sykes
Takano
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Timmons
Titus
Tlaib
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Turner
Underwood
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Orden
Vargas
Vasquez
Veasey
Velazquez
Wagner
Walberg
Waltz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson Coleman
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Westerman
Wexton
Williams (GA)
Williams (NY)
Wilson (FL)
Wilson (SC)
Womack
Yakym
Zinke
NOES--56
Babin
Biggs
Bishop (NC)
Boebert
Brecheen
Bucshon
Burchett
Burlison
Cline
Clyde
Collins
Crane
Davidson
DesJarlais
Donalds
Duncan
Emmer
Fallon
Franklin, C. Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Gaetz
Gimenez
Good (VA)
Gosar
Green (TN)
Greene (GA)
Griffith
Hageman
Harris
Hern
Higgins (LA)
Jackson (TX)
Johnson (LA)
Kelly (MS)
Loudermilk
Luna
Luttrell
Massie
McCormick
Miller (IL)
Mills
Moore (AL)
Moran
Nehls
Ogles
Pence
Perry
Posey
Rosendale
Roy
Schweikert
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Wittman
NOT VOTING--19
Buck
Castro (TX)
Cleaver
Davis (IL)
Garcia (IL)
Joyce (OH)
Kim (CA)
Kustoff
Lofgren
McHenry
Sablan
Sanchez
Sarbanes
Sessions
Steube
Swalwell
Trone
Wild
Williams (TX)
{time} 1055
Ms. MALLIOTAKIS changed her vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
So the amendment was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Amendment No. 14 Offered by Mr. Roy
The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a
recorded vote on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Texas (Mr.
Roy) on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the ayes
prevailed by voice vote.
The Clerk will redesignate the amendment.
The Clerk redesignated the amendment.
Recorded Vote
The Acting CHAIR. A recorded vote has been demanded.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The Acting CHAIR. This will be a 2-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 199,
noes 226, not voting 14, as follows:
[Roll No. 130]
AYES--199
Aderholt
Alford
Allen
Amodei
Armstrong
Arrington
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Banks
Barr
Bean (FL)
Bentz
Bergman
Bice
Biggs
Bishop (NC)
Boebert
Bost
Brecheen
Buchanan
Bucshon
Burchett
Burgess
Burlison
Calvert
Cammack
Carey
Carl
Carter (GA)
Carter (TX)
Ciscomani
Cline
Cloud
Clyde
Cole
Collins
Comer
Crane
Crawford
Crenshaw
Curtis
Davidson
De La Cruz
DesJarlais
Donalds
Duarte
Duncan
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Estes
Ezell
Fallon
Feenstra
Ferguson
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fleischmann
Flood
Foxx
Franklin, C. Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Gaetz
Gallagher
Garcia, Mike
Good (VA)
Gooden (TX)
Gosar
Granger
Graves (LA)
Graves (MO)
Green (TN)
Greene (GA)
Griffith
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Harris
Harshbarger
Hern
Higgins (LA)
Hill
Hinson
Houchin
Hudson
Huizenga
Hunt
Issa
Jackson (TX)
James
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (PA)
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Kiggans (VA)
Kiley
Kim (CA)
LaHood
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Langworthy
Latta
LaTurner
Lee (FL)
Lesko
Letlow
Loudermilk
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Luna
Luttrell
Mace
Mann
Massie
Mast
McCaul
McClain
McClintock
McCormick
McHenry
Meuser
Miller (IL)
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Mills
Moolenaar
Mooney
Moore (AL)
Moore (UT)
Moran
Moylan
Murphy
Nehls
Newhouse
Norman
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ogles
Owens
Palmer
Pence
Perry
Pfluger
Posey
Radewagen
Reschenthaler
Rodgers (WA)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rosendale
Rouzer
Roy
Santos
Scalise
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Self
Sessions
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smucker
Spartz
Stauber
Stefanik
Steil
Stewart
Strong
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Turner
Valadao
Van Duyne
Van Orden
Wagner
Walberg
Waltz
Weber (TX)
Wenstrup
Westerman
Williams (NY)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke
NOES--226
Adams
Aguilar
Allred
Auchincloss
Balint
Barragan
Beatty
Bera
Beyer
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Blumenauer
Blunt Rochester
Bonamici
Bowman
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Brownley
Budzinski
Bush
Caraveo
Carbajal
Cardenas
Carson
Carter (LA)
Cartwright
Casar
Case
Casten
Castor (FL)
Chavez-DeRemer
Cherfilus-McCormick
Chu
Cicilline
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Craig
Crockett
Crow
Cuellar
D'Esposito
Davids (KS)
Davis (NC)
Dean (PA)
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
Diaz-Balart
Dingell
Doggett
Escobar
Eshoo
Espaillat
Evans
Fitzpatrick
Fletcher
Foster
Foushee
Frankel, Lois
Frost
Gallego
Garamendi
Garbarino
Garcia (TX)
Garcia, Robert
Gimenez
Golden (ME)
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Gonzales, Tony
Gonzalez, Vicente
Gonzalez-Colon
Gottheimer
Green, Al (TX)
Grijalva
Harder (CA)
Hayes
Higgins (NY)
Himes
Horsford
Houlahan
Hoyer
Hoyle (OR)
Huffman
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jackson (NC)
Jackson Lee
Jacobs
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Kamlager-Dove
Kaptur
Kean (NJ)
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Khanna
Kildee
Kilmer
Kim (NJ)
Krishnamoorthi
Kuster
LaLota
Landsman
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lawler
Lee (CA)
Lee (NV)
Lee (PA)
Leger Fernandez
Levin
Lieu
Lynch
Magaziner
Malliotakis
Manning
Matsui
McBath
McCollum
McGarvey
McGovern
Meeks
Menendez
Meng
Mfume
Molinaro
Moore (WI)
Morelle
Moskowitz
Moulton
Mrvan
Mullin
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Neguse
Nickel
Norcross
Norton
Ocasio-Cortez
Omar
Pallone
Panetta
Pappas
Pascrell
Payne
Pelosi
Peltola
Perez
Peters
Pettersen
Phillips
Pingree
Plaskett
Pocan
Porter
Pressley
Quigley
Ramirez
Raskin
Ross
Ruiz
Ruppersberger
Rutherford
Ryan
Salazar
Salinas
Sanchez
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Scholten
Schrier
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Sewell
Sherman
Sherrill
Slotkin
Smith (NJ)
Smith (WA)
Sorensen
Soto
Spanberger
Stansbury
Stanton
Steel
Stevens
Strickland
Sykes
Takano
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tlaib
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Trone
Underwood
Van Drew
Vargas
Vasquez
Veasey
Velazquez
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson Coleman
Webster (FL)
Wexton
Williams (GA)
Wilson (FL)
NOT VOTING--14
Buck
Castro (TX)
Cleaver
Davis (IL)
Garcia (IL)
Joyce (OH)
Kustoff
Lofgren
Sablan
Sarbanes
Steube
Swalwell
Wild
Williams (TX)
[[Page H988]]
Announcement by the Acting Chair
The Acting CHAIR (during the vote). There is 1 minute remaining.
{time} 1104
Ms. CROCKETT changed her vote from ``aye'' to ``no.''
So the amendment was rejected.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
Stated for:
Mr. McCORMICK. Mr. Chair, I missed rollcall 130 due to distraction.
Had I been present, I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 130.
The Acting CHAIR. The Committee of the Whole House on the state of
the Union has had under consideration H.R. 347, and pursuant to House
Resolution 166, I report the bill back to the House with sundry
amendments adopted in the Committee of the Whole.
Under the rule, the Committee rises.
Accordingly, the Committee rose; and the Speaker pro tempore (Ms.
Malliotakis) having assumed the chair, Mr. Lawler, Acting Chair of the
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union, reported that
that Committee, having had under consideration the bill (H.R. 347) to
require the Executive Office of the President to provide an inflation
estimate with respect to Executive orders with a significant effect on
the annual gross budget, and for other purposes, and, pursuant to House
Resolution 166, he reported the bill back to the House with sundry
amendments adopted in the Committee of the Whole.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the rule, the previous question is
ordered.
Is a separate vote demanded on any amendment reported from the
Committee of the Whole? If not, the Chair will put them en gros.
The question is on the amendments.
The amendments were agreed to.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the engrossment and third
reading of the bill.
The bill was ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, and was
read the third time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on passage of the bill.
The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that
the ayes appeared to have it.
Recorded Vote
Mr. RASKIN. Madam Speaker, I demand a recorded vote.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 272,
noes 148, not voting 14, as follows:
[Roll No. 131]
AYES--272
Aderholt
Alford
Allen
Amodei
Armstrong
Arrington
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Banks
Barr
Bean (FL)
Bentz
Bera
Bergman
Bice
Bilirakis
Bishop (NC)
Boebert
Bost
Brecheen
Brownley
Buchanan
Bucshon
Budzinski
Burchett
Burgess
Burlison
Calvert
Cammack
Caraveo
Carey
Carl
Carson
Carter (GA)
Carter (TX)
Case
Chavez-DeRemer
Cicilline
Ciscomani
Cline
Cloud
Clyde
Cole
Collins
Comer
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Craig
Crane
Crawford
Crenshaw
Cuellar
Curtis
D'Esposito
Davids (KS)
Davidson
Davis (NC)
De La Cruz
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Donalds
Duarte
Duncan
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Estes
Ezell
Fallon
Feenstra
Ferguson
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flood
Foster
Foxx
Franklin, C. Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Gaetz
Gallagher
Garbarino
Garcia, Mike
Gimenez
Golden (ME)
Gonzales, Tony
Gonzalez, Vicente
Gooden (TX)
Gosar
Gottheimer
Granger
Graves (LA)
Graves (MO)
Green (TN)
Green, Al (TX)
Greene (GA)
Griffith
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Harder (CA)
Harris
Harshbarger
Hern
Higgins (LA)
Hill
Himes
Hinson
Houchin
Houlahan
Hoyle (OR)
Hudson
Huizenga
Hunt
Issa
Jackson (NC)
Jackson (TX)
James
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (PA)
Kaptur
Kean (NJ)
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Kiggans (VA)
Kiley
Kilmer
Kim (CA)
Kim (NJ)
Krishnamoorthi
Kuster
LaHood
LaLota
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Landsman
Langworthy
Latta
LaTurner
Lawler
Lee (FL)
Lee (NV)
Leger Fernandez
Lesko
Letlow
Levin
Loudermilk
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Luna
Luttrell
Mace
Magaziner
Malliotakis
Mann
Manning
Massie
Mast
McCarthy
McCaul
McClain
McClintock
McCormick
McHenry
Meuser
Miller (IL)
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Mills
Molinaro
Moolenaar
Mooney
Moore (AL)
Moore (UT)
Moran
Morelle
Moskowitz
Murphy
Nehls
Newhouse
Nickel
Norman
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ogles
Owens
Palmer
Pappas
Peltola
Pence
Perez
Perry
Pettersen
Pfluger
Phillips
Posey
Quigley
Reschenthaler
Rodgers (WA)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rouzer
Ruiz
Rutherford
Ryan
Salazar
Salinas
Santos
Scalise
Scholten
Schrier
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Self
Sessions
Sherrill
Simpson
Slotkin
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smucker
Sorensen
Soto
Spanberger
Spartz
Stanton
Stauber
Steel
Stefanik
Steil
Stewart
Strong
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Titus
Tonko
Trone
Turner
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Orden
Vasquez
Wagner
Walberg
Waltz
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup
Westerman
Williams (NY)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke
NOES--148
Adams
Aguilar
Allred
Auchincloss
Balint
Barragan
Beatty
Beyer
Biggs
Bishop (GA)
Blumenauer
Blunt Rochester
Bonamici
Bowman
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Bush
Carbajal
Cardenas
Carter (LA)
Cartwright
Casar
Casten
Castor (FL)
Cherfilus-McCormick
Chu
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly
Crockett
Crow
Dean (PA)
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
Dingell
Doggett
Escobar
Eshoo
Espaillat
Evans
Fletcher
Foushee
Frankel, Lois
Frost
Gallego
Garamendi
Garcia (TX)
Garcia, Robert
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Good (VA)
Grijalva
Hayes
Higgins (NY)
Horsford
Hoyer
Huffman
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee
Jacobs
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Kamlager-Dove
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Khanna
Kildee
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Lee (PA)
Lieu
Lynch
Matsui
McBath
McCollum
McGarvey
McGovern
Meeks
Menendez
Meng
Mfume
Moore (WI)
Moulton
Mrvan
Mullin
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Neguse
Norcross
Ocasio-Cortez
Omar
Pallone
Panetta
Pascrell
Payne
Pelosi
Peters
Pingree
Pocan
Porter
Pressley
Ramirez
Raskin
Rosendale
Ross
Roy
Ruppersberger
Sanchez
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schneider
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Sewell
Sherman
Smith (WA)
Stansbury
Stevens
Strickland
Sykes
Takano
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tlaib
Tokuda
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Underwood
Vargas
Veasey
Velazquez
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson Coleman
Williams (GA)
Wilson (FL)
NOT VOTING--14
Buck
Castro (TX)
Cleaver
Davis (IL)
Garcia (IL)
Joyce (OH)
Kustoff
Lofgren
Sarbanes
Steube
Swalwell
Wexton
Wild
Williams (TX)
{time} 1114
Mr. SOTO changed his vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
So the bill was passed.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
Stated for:
Mr. JOYCE of Ohio. Madam Speaker, I regrettably missed rollcall No.
131. Had I been present, I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No.
131.
Stated against:
Ms. WEXTON. Madam Speaker, had I been present, I would have voted
``no'' on rollcall No. 131.
PERSONAL EXPLANATION
Mr. SARBANES. Madam Speaker, due to testing positive for COVID-19 and
following recommended isolation protocols, I was unable to vote. Had I
been present, I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 125, ``aye''
on rollcall No. 126, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 127, ``aye'' on rollcall
No. 128, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 129, ``no'' on rollcall No. 130 and
``no'' on rollcall No. 131.
____________________