[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 24 (Monday, February 6, 2023)]
[House]
[Pages H686-H687]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FUNDING UKRAINE
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Florida (Mr. Gaetz) for 5 minutes.
Mr. GAETZ. Madam Speaker, how much more for Ukraine? Is there any
limit? Which billionth dollar really kicks in the door? Which redline
that we set will we not later cross?
China reminds us that we have real issues. China began its offensive
against our homeland by infiltrating our universities, stealing our
innovations, buying off our politicians, and surveilling our citizens,
all the while capturing the loyalty of America's most powerful
corporations. China's influence is overtaking ours, even in our own
hemisphere.
Our conflict with China may turn very hot very soon. Many believe we
are currently in the window of a possible invasion of Taiwan. If not
deterred, such an invasion would immediately make life worse for
virtually every American.
Tomorrow, President Biden will tell us how much more we must do for
Ukraine. Look around your house. How much stuff is made in Ukraine or
even Russia, for that matter? Next, do China. If you are watching this
speech on a smartphone, you are likely using Taiwanese technology.
So why Ukraine, a country that just rounded up dozens of senior
leaders in its government over overt corruption? Perhaps the answer is
as simple as the Hunter Biden life motto: a grifter's gotta grift.
The amount of money we now pour into Ukraine makes Burisma's wildest
dreams of wealth through Biden family influence seem meek by
comparison.
Defense contractors need there to be a war going on somewhere,
whether the arms end up in the hands of ISIS, the Taliban, the Azov
battalion, or on the black market. They get rich in the business of
weapons supply, but only when there is weapons demand.
A serious nation would never let foreign interests abroad or special
interests here at home dictate its foreign policy. The interests of our
countrymen must morally compel our greater attention. As the war slogs
on in Ukraine, the benefits to Americans are unclear.
Bandits in the Sinaloa mountains hurt more Americans than the men in
Crimea, but foreigners come to Washington to lecture us about spending
our constituents' money on a conflict thousands of miles away, and my
colleagues are eager to oblige.
On this floor, Zelenskyy's demands got bipartisan standing ovations--
from most. Stingers, HIMARS, tanks, at first, we said no to all of
these things. President Biden even said that some of these things might
lead to world war III, yet we sent all of them.
F-16s are likely still. Lockheed Martin sure is confident that
Ukraine will get F-16s. They told the Financial Times recently that
they are already ramping up production. Create the demand; provide the
supply.
This is escalating. We are placing trust in leaders who do not
deserve trust.
John Kirby, the Pentagon spokesman who assured us the Afghan military
would withstand the Taliban offensive, now says that there is no risk
that Putin will go nuclear.
The risk of miscalculation in Ukraine is much, much higher than
getting it wrong in Afghanistan. A nuclear war between Russia and the
United States would end human life as we know it.
{time} 1215
Yet, President Biden is doing everything possible to provoke such a
disaster.
And for what?
The actions we are taking are not going to end the war in Ukraine. In
fact, we are probably prolonging the killing. Tens of thousands of
Ukrainians and Russians will die this year because Congress feels good
when it sends instruments of death and billions in cash.
[[Page H687]]
Many dollars meant for the war in Afghanistan ended up in bank
accounts in Switzerland and Dubai.
To where will we trace the bounty of the Ukrainian grift?
This war could end tomorrow if we pursue negotiation, but Biden
refuses. Not only do we arm the Ukrainian military, we pay their
politicians' salaries. The $113 billion in aid included funding of the
Ukrainian Government.
We can and must push for peace. You don't really hear that from many
people these days with the exception of President Trump. Trump is right
to recognize that we are on the brink of world war III and that
immediate action for peace is necessary to stop disaster.
Unfortunately, there is a bipartisan coalition working to continue
the war. When Elon Musk proposed a peace plan, Nikki Haley attacked him
saying that we ``shouldn't push our weight on them.''
This is, of course, nonsense. We have pushed billions of dollars on
them. We can simultaneously pressure North Korea and China from
supplying Russia, and we ought to do so.
____________________