[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 197 (Monday, December 19, 2022)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7274-S7277]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                                 Taiwan

  Mr. SULLIVAN. Madam President, I rise to talk about a very important 
and, I believe, very bipartisan issue. It is the need for us in the 
Senate and the entire U.S. Government to focus on the intensifying 
Chinese Communist Party threat and the People's Liberation Army threat 
to Taiwan and why it matters.
  My remarks will be focusing primarily on the Chinese Communist Party 
and the leader of that party, Xi Jinping, not on the Chinese people, 
who have a proud history, heritage, culture of thousands of years, and, 
as we have seen over the last several weeks, they are very brave people 
who simply want more freedom.
  In March of 2021, in a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, I 
asked the then-INDOPACOM Commander, Admiral Davidson, when he thought 
there would be an invasion of Taiwan by the PLA and the Chinese 
Communist Party.
  He responded to my question by saying this:

       Senator, I think the threat of an invasion of Taiwan is 
     manifest during this decade--in fact, within the next 6 
     years.

  Now, that was 2 years ago almost. His successor, ADM John Aquilino, 
has confirmed this timeline. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, the 
Director of National Intelligence, the CNO of the Navy, and even the 
Secretary of State have recently been ringing alarm bells on this 
timeline as well.
  On the heels of the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist 
Party, Xi Jinping has emerged as the ultimate supreme leader, 
surprising the assessment of even the most seasoned China hands with 
his audacity. He has packed the Politburo Standing Committee with 
loyalists, promoted party stalwarts with military intelligence and 
technology backgrounds, and positioned the Central Military Commission 
to preside over the conquest of Taiwan.
  Take a look at this poster. Those are Chairman Xi and a bunch of his 
comrades I just talked about. Let's face it. They might look ridiculous 
in military fatigues--I think they do--but the message of these kinds 
of propaganda photos is very, very clear, which was just recently sent 
out by the Chinese Communist Party. It is this: China is preparing for 
war.
  Americans and the rest of the world should take this threat very 
seriously. I know that our eyes are on Ukraine, which is something we 
should stay focused on, as defeating authoritarian aggression in Europe 
is essential to deterring it in Asia, but we can't lose sight of the 
threat to Taiwan and of what is at stake.
  So I want to lay out, today, what will be the consequences of a 
potential invasion of Taiwan and why I believe vital American 
interests--security and economic interests--are implicated by that and 
what we should do--all of us together--to work to deter it. But I would 
like to begin my remarks by focusing on a different era in a different 
region of the world.
  In 1948, the Soviets cut West Berlin off from food and fuel, and the 
United States and our allies, led by our powerful military, responded 
with the Berlin Airlift. Many of you have seen this very famous photo 
taken during the Berlin Airlift. At the height of this airlift, allied 
supply flights were landing in West Berlin literally every minute. 
Think about that. We did that for a

[[Page S7275]]

year to save this city--to save it from absorption into the tyrannical 
Soviet orbit and empire. Think about that. With our citizens and our 
country being very tired and exhausted after World War II, just a 
couple of years later, somehow, we understood that the stakes mattered 
in Berlin. Americans look back on the Berlin Airlift as a point of 
pride for our freedom-loving Nation.
  John Kennedy famously visited Berlin in 1963. Before he went, he had 
seen Berlin as an irritant in the Soviet-U.S. relations. But after 
declaring himself a Berliner, he came back and recognized that ``Berlin 
is an asset, not a liability, in the wider struggle for Europe'' and 
global freedom.
  The United States defended the city and the people of West Berlin 
during the 20th century because we understood as a country that this 
city and these citizens of this city stood on the frontline of the 
struggle between the American-led free world and a powerful, 
expansionist, authoritarian regime. The same is true of Taiwan today. 
Taiwan is the 21st century's West Berlin.
  Now, it is not as if American political leaders have disregarded the 
critical importance of Taiwan. To the contrary, starting with President 
Eisenhower, there has been a long and bipartisan consensus focused on 
the security of Taiwan. I have recently been rereading President 
Eisenhower's excellent memoirs, and you will see the importance of 
Taiwan weaved in and out of the pages of these books. And this, of 
course, wasn't just the executive branch. This body in particular, the 
U.S. Senate, has been the ally of Taiwan during its darkest times. When 
the United States switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to 
Beijing, it was congressional leaders, like Senators Barry Goldwater 
and Bob Dole, as well as Democrats, like Representative Lester Wolff, 
who worked on a bipartisan basis to give us the Taiwan Relations Act--
one of the most remarkable pieces of foreign policy legislation the 
U.S. Congress has ever passed, led right here in the U.S. Senate.

  The President of the United States, Jimmy Carter, wanted to abandon a 
longstanding ally, Taiwan, and Congress said no. In the process, 
America's legislative body rewrote our relationship with Taiwan, and 
that is the policy that still exists to this day and drives our 
relationship with the island democracy.
  With this remarkable legislation, Congress laid down the law and 
policy on Taiwan for generations, including up until today. In 1979, 84 
U.S. Senators, including a young Senator named Joe Biden, voted for 
that important--very important--piece of legislation.
  Those stalwart supporters of Taiwan--Republicans and Democrats--
understood that the stakes were more than just about the island itself; 
they encompassed the issues of American leadership in Asia and our 
commitment, like we demonstrated in Berlin, to prevent a communist 
power on the march from devouring an outpost of freedom, this time in 
the Pacific.
  Given this history, it is not surprising that the fate of Taiwan has 
been weaved in and out of the careers of countless Americans, including 
my own.
  Twenty-seven years ago, I was a young marine infantry officer 
deployed to the Taiwan Strait as part of a marine amphibious ready 
group and two U.S. carrier strike groups, all in response to the 
Chinese Communist Party's aggressive military provocations on the eve 
of Presidential elections in Taiwan. The Third Taiwan Strait Crisis 
this period from 1995 to 1996 is now called. This was an important and 
decisive demonstration of America's commitment and resolve to an 
emerging democracy and partner that is still remembered in the region 
by everybody.
  This is a picture of the ship I was on during that time.
  Later, I was part of another demonstration of American commitment and 
resolve when Senators Tammy Duckworth, Chris Coons, and I flew to 
Taiwan on that aircraft--that is a picture of our flight--where we were 
able to bring close to a million vaccines to the Taiwanese people. We 
did this in the face of the Chinese Communist Party's aggressive 
attempts to prevent the citizens of Taiwan from receiving this 
lifesaving medicine from Western countries. And so America responded.
  I will never forget my first trip as a U.S. Senator on a codel led by 
Senator McCain to Taiwan. We were getting on the bus after getting off 
the airplane, and a State Department official from our de facto Embassy 
there--the American Institute in Taiwan--greeted the Senate delegation 
by saying this:

       Welcome to Taiwan, a vibrant Democracy of 24 million 
     people, with one of the most innovative economies in the 
     world. A hub of trade and cutting-edge technology, and the 
     only reason this incredible place exists on a map as such is 
     because of the sacrifice and commitment of [the United States 
     of] America--our military, our government, and our [citizens] 
     . . . . All Americans should be very proud of this!

  That is what he said--very moving, very true. What a powerful 
greeting.
  So American commitment and resolve on Taiwan has been part of our 
law, our heritage, trade, economics, and military deployments for 
decades. But I worry that too few Americans know this history and the 
reason for this commitment. We need to rebuild this understanding to 
ready ourselves for the test of wills that I believe is approaching.
  This starts with all of us doing a better job of explaining to the 
American people collectively why Taiwan matters. In this regard, one 
question that I don't believe has been asked or analyzed enough is a 
difficult question to contemplate, but it is this: What would the world 
look like and how would American interests be implicated by a PLA or 
Chinese Communist Party takeover of Taiwan? So over the last several 
weeks--actually, several months--I have asked different government 
agencies, intel agencies, think tanks, and military commands to help me 
think through this important but little-studied question. Perhaps it is 
little-studied because it is a difficult and depressing assignment to 
contemplate.
  The Chinese Communist Party and the PLA launched a massive, 
multipronged, violent military invasion of Taiwan, and U.S. forces 
either do not get there on time, either decide we are not going to go 
there at all or actually go to the Taiwan Strait and are defeated by 
the PLA in their attempt to defend Taiwan. None of this is something 
that we as Americans want to contemplate; nevertheless, I believe it is 
our job as leaders to help our fellow Americans understand the 
ramifications of precisely this scenario today in order to better 
prevent it from taking place in the future. So let's look at that world 
and what it would look like, particularly with regard to American 
interests.
  A successful PLA military invasion and takeover of Taiwan would be a 
massive blow to the commanding heights of the technology that powers 
our digital age.
  As you can see from this chart, Taiwan dominates the production of 
the world's most advanced semiconductors. Secure supplies of advanced 
computer chips today are as important to our economy and that of our 
allies as the supply of oil has been for us and our allies for decades 
previously.
  To suddenly be deprived of these advanced computer chips would have 
a devastating impact on the U.S. and global economies, negatively 
impacting millions of good-paying jobs. Just look at the impact of the 
current chip shortage. According to the Commerce Department, in 2021 
alone, it cost the U.S. economy $240 billion--one-quarter of a trillion 
dollars--including 7.7 million fewer cars being produced, because of 
the low-end chip shortage we have now. This hasn't just been an 
inconvenience for those in the market for new cars; this has been 
devastating in terms of manufacturing jobs in America.

  Imagine what would happen if the home to 92 percent of the world's 
most advanced semiconductor production, which is what Taiwan is, were 
taken offline. It would cost us multiple times more than the $240 
billion I just mentioned.
  All in all, a military conflict over Taiwan, launched by Xi Jinping, 
could cost the global economy, according to a recent State Department 
estimate, $2.5 trillion--$2.5 trillion. This sum does not quantify the 
huge strategic advantage the Chinese Communist Party would gain if it 
seized the crown jewels of the global economy, which is what they 
strongly desire, and that is the fabrication of the world's most 
advanced computer chips.

[[Page S7276]]

  This would also present an extraordinary challenge to the United 
States' ability to defend itself not only abroad but at home.
  (Ms. DUCKWORTH assumed the Chair.)
  Madam President, as you know, advanced microchips from Taiwan feed 
directly into our ability to develop and sustain our most sophisticated 
military weapons--F-35s, radars, missile defenses, just to name a few. 
This translates into great risk for our national security and, 
importantly, the men and women in uniform who defend us.
  Second, there is Taiwan's geostrategic value--not just economic 
value--that, of course, would be shattered by a successful PLA invasion 
of the island.
  In his memoirs, President Eisenhower devotes pages and pages to 
Taiwan. At one point, he says:

       If the capture of [Taiwan's] offshore islands should, in 
     fact, lead to the loss of [Taiwan], the future security of 
     Japan, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam . . . even Okinawa 
     would be placed in jeopardy and the United States' vital 
     interest would suffer severely.

  Last year, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security 
Affairs Ely Ratner made essentially the same point in his testimony 
before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Certain critics wrung 
him up for it. Apparently, calling Taiwan ``a critical node within the 
first island chain'' and an ``anchor [of] a network of U.S. allies and 
partners'' in Asia, as Assistant Secretary Ratner did, risks offending 
Beijing's sensibilities.
  But, of course, Secretary Ratner and President Eisenhower were 
correct. Taiwan in the CCP's hands breaks China out of the constraints 
of this area in the Pacific known as the first island chain, as a CCP 
takeover of Taiwan has the potential to further push the United States 
and our forces out into the Pacific to what is called the second island 
chain, out this far. This includes American territories in Guam and the 
Northern Mariana Islands, just to name a few.
  Madam President, as you know, these aren't just points on a grand 
strategist's map; residents in Guam and the Mariana Islands are 
American citizens. They send representatives to Congress. Guam has an 
enormous U.S military presence, with tens of thousands of 
servicemembers and their families. With the first island chain broken, 
these Americans will come under direct threat from an emboldened China 
with a massive and growing military.
  Here is the other thing: It is highly unlikely that the CCP would 
stop simply at Taiwan. If history teaches us anything, it is that the 
appetite of an aggressive authoritarian regime on the march increases 
with each meal.
  For decades, the CCP has focused almost exclusively on building a 
military, with the objective of conquering Taiwan. Take a look at this 
forced posture that currently exists across the Taiwan Strait. It is a 
rather depressing picture. These are the military capabilities in 
numbers of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, and this is that of 
Taiwan. If you look at the additional numbers, what each of these means 
in terms of infantry, naval forces, air forces, it is a massive, 
massive overmatch right now in this area of the world.
  If there is an invasion that is successful, do we really think these 
forces are just going to stay around Taiwan? No. They are going to 
shoot out to all other parts of the Pacific and other parts of the 
world. The Chinese Communist Party and PLA's military will be 
supercharged for expansion.
  President Eisenhower was also deeply concerned about the impact a 
successful CCP invasion of Taiwan would have on American alliances and 
our ability to credibly meet our defense treaty obligations to them. 
This concern continues to today.
  We look at our allies in the region--and I want to commend the Prime 
Minister of Japan, just a few days ago, who stepped up, saw significant 
challenges--primarily this, the Chinese Communist Party--and is saying: 
Japan's military is going to grow significantly. That is a hugely 
important development. It is great news for our national security as we 
work closely with Japan.

  But a Chinese PLA takeover of Taiwan, in my view, would threaten and 
call into question our treaty military commitments throughout the 
region: Japan, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines, 
Thailand.
  Of course, it is always hard to predict the future, but there is 
little doubt that a Chinese communist takeover of Taiwan would, in some 
countries' minds, call into question our alliance commitments. It could 
cause some countries to build up their own military capabilities, 
including possibly nuclear deterrence, when they currently don't have 
them, or to choose a much more accommodating ``middle kingdom'' posture 
toward their powerful neighbor.
  This, of course, should concern all Americans. The questioning of our 
Pacific network of alliances that undergird the security of the 
American homeland by our allies and by balancing and deterring dangers 
far away from our shores, I believe, makes Americans less safe.
  Finally, Madam President, a Chinese communist takeover of Taiwan 
would give a global boost to the CCP's model of authoritarian 
governance that Xi has been offering the world.
  In the 1930s, during a time of global upheaval, of which there are 
striking parallels today, many around the world thought that the future 
of the world lay with fascism. Such a future was alluring to millions. 
Democracy can be messy. Disagreement--sometimes ferocious 
disagreement--is the hallmark of representative government. And because 
of the transparency inherent in democracies, it is there for all the 
world to see: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
  The United States, along with other democracies around the globe, 
ultimately prevailed against the rise of fascism during World War II. 
We did so by force of arms but also by appeal to the universal desire 
for freedom and self-governance that we led. But a military takeover of 
Taiwan, in the current global climate, could lead many to believe that, 
as Xi Jinping has put it himself, the CCP's totalitarian vision offers 
a new choice for humanity, one that relies on techno-authoritarian 
control rather than self-governance.
  We cannot be blind to the implications or the extraordinary new 
legitimacy that the CCP would gain at home and abroad, and with that 
would come new forms of CCP aggression throughout Asia and throughout 
the world.
  So, Madam President, the next slide has a summary of a number of 
these issues of why Taiwan matters. It is actually a slide taken from a 
slide back in a briefing out at INDOPACOM command, where I serve as a 
Marine Corps colonel. It is a good summary of what China would gain and 
what the United States would lose. I won't go through each one of 
these. I have talked about a lot of them.
  But the authoritarian world that the CCP is offering is not what Xi 
Jinping bills it as. Look at its manifestations today: concentration 
camps for Uighurs; repression in Hong Kong; prison for peaceful 
dissidents; no freedom of religion, speech, or assembly; mass 
censorship and social control; pandemic lockdowns approximating house 
arrest for millions of citizens guilty of no crime; a cult of 
personality around a leader who brooks no consent. In a world order 
built on CCP power and values, freedom and American interests would be 
unsafe in many parts of the world.
  Take a hard look at that. This is why Taiwan matters.
  So, Madam President, my purpose today was to paint a picture of what 
the world would look like in the face of a successful CCP-PLA invasion 
of Taiwan.
  What I want to talk very briefly about next is what we should do 
about it. I have talked about this slide many times. As a matter of 
fact, the Presiding Officer and I had a lot of discussions.
  But this is where we should be focused. None of us wants a war in the 
Taiwan Strait; and if one is launched, it is going to be by Xi and the 
CCP and the PLA. It won't be launched by the United States of America. 
It won't be launched by Taiwan.
  So what do we do? We need to work to deter it. Now, I have often 
talked about three levels of deterrence that we need in the Taiwan 
Strait. First is Taiwan's own defense capabilities, like the Ukrainians 
are showing the world

[[Page S7277]]

bravely, heroically right now that smaller countries committed to their 
own self-governance and self-rule can fight and take on giant 
authoritarian regimes. As the Ukrainians are showing the world today, 
we need to make sure Taiwan has the capability to do that itself.
  As a matter of fact, there are discussions going on right now in the 
omnibus, and I sure hope the administration weighs in heavily about 
more assistance for Taiwan to build up its own military and weapons 
capability.
  The second level of deterrence, of course, Madam President, is our 
ability as a country, with our allies, to come to Taiwan's aid if the 
President so orders. That has been a constant in the decades-long 
history. During these different crises when there have been threats by 
the CCP, the Chinese Communist Party, the PLA, to invade Taiwan, the 
United States has shown up every time. That is going to be increasingly 
important. We need the capability to do that.
  And, finally, Madam President, a topic you and I have spoken about 
quite a lot is a third level of deterrence, which actually isn't talked 
about that much but, in my view and in the view of many of our Intel 
analysts, could be the most powerful, and that is devastating economic 
and financial consequences that we should let the Chinese Communist 
Party know about now that would ensue if they invaded Taiwan: economic, 
financial, energy.
  Madam President, that is why I have been pushing my legislation 
called the STAND with Taiwan Act. It is legislation that would have 
very broad-based sanctions that would be triggered against all aspects 
of the Chinese Communist Party's economy and its leadership, that would 
be triggered by an invasion of Taiwan by the PLA. This is something I 
believe we, as the Congress, need to pass. It is something that I have 
pitched to many of our allies in Europe, in Asia, and it is something 
that I think could have an enormous, positive deterrent effect in the 
Taiwan Strait.

  So let me conclude with this. With the invasion of Ukraine, it is 
clear that we have entered a new era of authoritarian aggression led by 
Xi Jinping and Putin like we saw in the 1930s. For nearly a century, 
American Presidents have seen Asia and Europe as theaters that, if 
under hostile control, would put U.S. national security at extreme 
risk. And generations of Americans have fought and died so that East 
Asia in Europe would not fall under the dictatorial control of U.S. 
adversaries.
  Both of these theaters are at risk today. The world cannot be neutral 
in this contest between freedom and authoritarianism, especially in the 
Indo-Pacific region. American alliances, power, and ingenuity have 
helped build a world that has provided more freedom and prosperity to 
more people than ever before.
  In fact--think about it, Madam President--the United States 
democracy, bolstered by our strong military, has done more to liberate 
humankind from oppression and tyranny--literally, hundreds of millions 
of people--than any other force in human history.
  The Chinese Communist Party has clear plans to reverse all of this. 
It knows exactly what it wants to accomplish: to make the world safe 
for its tyrannical government, to profit off the export of its 
authoritarian model to other countries, to separate America from our 
democratic allies, and to erode U.S. leadership.
  A world governed by Xi Jinping's totalitarian vision would be a world 
unsafe for America and our friends, and that is why Taiwan is so 
important and central to the future of the free world. It is a 
thriving, prosperous Chinese democracy that holds free elections with 
power bounded by the rule of law. For that reason, it threatens the 
CCP's central premise that one man ruling in perpetuity by crushing all 
dissent knows what is best for 1.4 billion people.
  The Chinese Communist Party has already crushed Hong Kong, once a 
bastion of liberty, and the free world barely raised its voice in 
protest. Should America and the world stand by as China does something 
similar to Taiwan, a peaceful democracy of 24 million people, that 
would not simply undermine the security of the Western Pacific, as the 
Taiwan Relations Act says, but would undermine America's role in the 
world and the values we as Americans have infused into it? And I 
believe it would deeply and adversely affect concrete American national 
security and economic security interests.
  So I am committed to working with all of my colleagues--the Presiding 
Officer has been a leader on many of these issues--working with her and 
others to make sure that that world never comes to pass. This is why 
Taiwan matters and we need policies of deterrence--all of them--to 
prevent its violent takeover by the Chinese Communist Party.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Iowa.