[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 193 (Tuesday, December 13, 2022)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7120-S7121]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Unanimous Consent Request--Executive Calendar
Mr. SCHATZ. Mr. President, our Navy and Marine Corps are the best in
the world, but we face many challenges across the globe. We need to
build new ships and maintain our current fleet. We need to recruit,
train, and equip a force necessary to deter conflict, especially in the
Indo-Pacific. We need to help keep sea lanes open for commerce and
build deeper relationships with our allies and our partners.
To make sure that the Navy is able to carry out all military and
civilian objectives, we allocate a lot of money for its budget. A
Comptroller is critical to ensuring the accountability of taxpayer
dollars and to keeping the Navy's readiness at the highest level.
Russell Rumbaugh, the nominee for this position, will bring firsthand
knowledge to the job, having previously served as both special
assistant to the Director and as an operations research analyst in the
Secretary of Defense's Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Office.
In having served as an Army infantry officer, Mr. Rumbaugh has had a
unique perspective that will help him to support and strengthen our
Navy, but his nomination is stuck because the Senator from Missouri is
blocking it over disagreements, not with Russell Rumbaugh and not even
necessarily with the Department of the Navy but with the Biden
administration and Afghanistan policy.
I know because we have been here before, actually, Senator Hawley and
I, I think, three times. This is the third time. I know what he is
going to do today. I am going to make a unanimous consent request that
we get the Navy a Comptroller, and he is going to say: No. I want a
special committee on the Afghanistan withdrawal.
I am not the Armed Services chairman, and I am not the majority
leader. I can't authorize that kind of thing. In any case, the House
Armed Services Committee is absolutely, under a presumed Speaker
McCarthy, going to do tons of oversight in this space.
My basic complaint about this tactic is that it is not what this
power is for. It is not what this power is for. We are all given the
ability to block a nominee. It is supposed to be used sparingly and not
in the fashion that it is being used by the Senator from Missouri. The
Senator from Missouri, essentially, has got a total blanket hold.
Sometimes, he allows the body to vote on somebody, but the demand,
which he knows will never be accepted, remains. Otherwise, he will
block the logistics guy at the Army; he will block the fiscal guy at
the Navy; he has blocked numerous Department of Defense nominees not
because of their qualifications and not because of any particular
dispute regarding the nominee but because he is mad about the
Afghanistan withdrawal. Lots of people are mad about the Afghanistan
withdrawal, but only Senator Hawley does this.
I would just submit that the right way to influence foreign policy is
on the floor as an amendment to the Defense authorization or to the
State Department authorization or on the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee or on the Senate Armed Services Committee, but not just by
stomping your feet and disabling the Department of Defense from doing
the work that it needs to do.
I just got out of a meeting. I came right out of this meeting with
the Chief of Naval Operations. We talked a little bit about this
position, and he talked to me about how important it was. So Senator
Hawley and I may have a different view about the Afghanistan
withdrawal, but I don't understand what Russell Rumbaugh has to do with
this. He is an eminently qualified person. I don't even think the
Senator from Missouri is alleging that this guy couldn't do the job or
shouldn't do the job. It is just that he is mad about something else.
So we have got to break this logjam. The Senator from Missouri has
been doing this for, well, more than a year now, and the Department of
Defense itself is suffering. We have exchanged some pretty tough words,
but I just hope that he sees fit to separate his foreign policy
objections around Joe Biden being President and Secretary Austin and
Secretary Blinken. Fair enough. It is a free country. He is a
Republican; I am a Democrat. These are the kinds of fights that we
have. But why block the Comptroller from the Navy? It just makes no
sense to me.
I ask unanimous consent that the Senate consider the following
nomination: Calendar No. 972, R. Russell Rumbaugh, to be an Assistant
Secretary of the Navy; that the Senate vote on the nomination without
intervening action or debate; that if confirmed, the motion to
reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table; and that the
President be immediately notified of the Senate's action.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
The Senator from Missouri.
Mr. HAWLEY. Mr. President, in reserving the right to object, I ask
for permission to hold up this shirt.
Mr. SCHATZ. I object.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard.
[[Page S7121]]
Mr. SCHATZ. It is fine. Go ahead.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. HAWLEY. Mr. President, this is Jared Schmitz, Lance Corporal
Schmitz, from the State of Missouri, Wentzville, MO. His father made
this T-shirt and gave it to me just a couple of weeks ago, when I last
had the chance to visit with him.
Lance Corporal Schmitz was killed in action at Abbey Gate on August
22 of last year. On the back are the 12 other marines who were lost,
along with Lance Corporal Schmitz, on that day.
When I saw his father and he gave me the shirt, he told me about all
they are doing to honor Jared's memory. He asked me to continue to
fight to uphold that memory and to get answers, and I said: That is
exactly what I will do.
The truth is that this family and the families of the other lost
marines and every American citizen have been waiting too long for
answers about what happened at Abbey Gate, over a year ago, as the
Senator from Hawaii rightly notes. We are waiting for answers as to why
the commanders on the ground weren't heeded. We are waiting for answers
as to why the White House wasn't ready to do a proper evacuation. We
are waiting for answers about how the security situation so
deteriorated that 13 servicemembers were killed and hundreds of
American civilians were left behind to terrorists there in Afghanistan.
We are still waiting for answers.
No, I am not willing to pretend that everything is fine at the
Pentagon. Everything is not fine at the Pentagon. I am not willing to
say that business as usual should go on. No, I am not willing to waive
the rules of regular order and expedite nominations without even having
a vote on the floor of this Senate, but I understand my colleague's
sense of urgency here. I understand that he wants to move these
nominations.