[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 158 (Thursday, September 29, 2022)]
[Senate]
[Page S5895]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SA 6361. Mr. TUBERVILLE submitted an amendment intended to be
proposed to amendment SA 5499 submitted by Mr. Reed (for himself and
Mr. Inhofe) and intended to be proposed to the bill H.R. 7900, to
authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2023 for military activities
of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for
defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military
personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which
was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
At the end of subtitle B of title XIV, add the following:
SEC. 1414. REPORT ON STRATEGIC AND CRITICAL MATERIALS.
(a) Finding.--Congress finds that the annex provided by the
Department of Defense under section 851 of the William M.
(Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283; 134 Stat. 3773) did not
contain every element required under such section.
(b) Report Required.--Not later than June 1, 2023, the
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment
shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and the House of Representatives a report describing
strategic and critical materials requirements of the
Department of Defense, including the gaps and vulnerabilities
in supply chains of such materials.
(c) Elements.--The Under Secretary shall include in the
report required by subsection (b) the following:
(1) The overall annual tonnage of each strategic or
critical material used by the Department of Defense during
the 10-year period ending on December 31, 2021.
(2) An evaluation of the benefits of a robust domestic
supply chain for strategic and critical materials.
(3) An evaluation of the effects of the use of waivers by
the Strategic Materials Protection Board established under
section 187 of title 10, United States Code, on the domestic
supply of strategic and critical materials.
(4) An identification of the improvements to the National
Defense Stockpile that are required to further ensure that
the Department of Defense has access to strategic and
critical materials, aligning the goals of the stockpile with
those of the Department and prioritize existing and future
needs for emerging technologies.
(5) An evaluation of the domestic processing and
manufacturing capacity required to supply strategic and
critical materials to the Department of Defense, including
identifying, in consultation with the Director of the United
States Geological Survey, domestic locations of proven
sources of such strategic and critical materials with
existing commercial manufacturing capabilities.
(6) An identification of all minerals that are strategic
and critical materials, and supply chains for such minerals,
that originate in or pass through the Russian Federation.
(7) An evaluation of the process required to immediately
halt the procurement of minerals described in paragraph (6)
or products by the Federal Government without adversely
affecting national security.
(8) Any limits on the availability of information
preventing or limiting the Under Secretary from fully
addressing an element described in paragraphs (1) through (7)
in the report.
(9) Any legislative recommendations, statutory authority,
or appropriations necessary to improve the ability of the
Department to monitor and address its strategic and critical
materials requirements.
(d) Form.--The report required in subsection (b) shall be
submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified
annex.
(e) Strategic and Critical Materials Defined.--In this
section, the term ``strategic and critical materials'' has
the meaning given such term in section 12 of the Strategic
and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98h-3).
______