[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 152 (Wednesday, September 21, 2022)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E960-E961]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
STANDING UP FOR DOWNWINDERS UNDER THE RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION
ACT (RECA)
______
HON. PAUL A. GOSAR
of arizona
in the house of representatives
Wednesday, September 21, 2022
Mr. GOSAR. Madam Speaker, I rise today in continued support of the
reauthorization of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA). I
first learned about RECA through my constituents over 10 years ago, and
since then I have been determined to get justice for the victims of
reckless federal government policies that injured thousands.
From 1945 to 1962, the United States government, through its
military, conducted nearly 200 atmospheric weapons development tests as
part of our nation's Cold War security strategy during an era when
other nations were also engaged in nuclear weapons testing and
proliferation. These tests exposed millions of innocent Americans to
potentially cancer-causing ionized radiation from nuclear fallout. It
is hard to believe today, but for over a decade the military was
blasting tons of radioactive material into our skies. And this was the
military that was supposed to protect Americans.
One report, from the University of Kansas, explained that ``enormous
clouds, pinkish-gray in color, rose up into the air, spreading out and
reaching over nearby communities. At the time, not much information
about these tests was available to the public, but the radioactive dust
that fell from the clouds--gathering on people's homes, their cars,
their clothes lines, and their vegetable gardens--caused serious and
harmful long-term medical issues.''
The report further documents just one person's experience with the
radiation delivered over their farm in Utah:
``Not till the 1960s were we really aware of the danger of
those fallout materials. Mom and Dad were told that there was
nothing to worry about, it wasn't going to harm anybody. And
then people started getting sick! And passing away! And
thyroid cancer was a big one, it was huge . . . and then our
family lost that sweet little baby. Dad still thinks that
it's the milk Mom drank, and then Mom later on got colon
cancer, and none of that has ever shown up in her family.
There's no sign of colon cancer anywhere in the family. And
Mom died with colon cancer, and Dad and Warren were plagued
with skin cancer, and I've had a bit of skin cancer myself.
It's always a worry because, the people realized that the
government were lying to them! Literally lying to them. And
it just was sad, it was a sad situation.''
When the injuries were discovered, Congress subsequently provided an
apology on behalf of the nation and passed the Radiation Exposure
Compensation Act of 1990, or RECA, to establish a trust fund for
partial restitution to individuals--commonly referred to as
``Downwinders''--who have contracted certain cancers and other serious
diseases that can be directly attributed to the radiation exposure from
the nuclear weapons testing.
The spread of radioactive material was not limited to Arizona, Utah
and Nevada. It went essentially nationwide. The University of Kansas
states, ``While the areas surrounding test sites in the southwestern
states are some of the most heavily affected, air currents carried the
radioactive particles all over the country, and even beyond the borders
of the U.S.'' This information came from the National Cancer Institute.
RECA was and is an effort to provide some very minimal compensation
for the radiation victims. RECA is all we have now, even though it was
too little and too late for many.
I have long led legislation that would reauthorize RECA and expand
eligibility for Downwinders compensation by including qualified
individuals who were exposed in any part of Clark County, Nevada, or
Mohave County, Arizona--immediately downwind jurisdictions from the
testing site that have been excluded from compensation for decades due
to a drafting error. The exclusion of my constituents in Mohave County,
Arizona is an egregious injustice. It's clear that the original
legislative intent was to include all of Mohave County and that the
partial exclusion is a drafting error in the statutory text: In 1990,
RECA was passed with Mohave County included. Then in 2000, S. 1515
amended RECA expanding qualification to additional counties. The
expansion of compensation to additional counties did not seek to
exclude any jurisdiction. It only sought to ``increase'' Downwinders
compensation to additional counties. In amending the Act, the House of
Representatives stated in the House Report that Congress's goal in
amending the Act was to ``increase'' the existing Downwinder areas to
``include'' additional areas. The House report makes clear that the
drafters sought to increase the area that had been covered under the
prior version and to add new counties. In reality, Congress added new
counties to the affected area but also mistakenly eliminated a large
portion of Mohave County. In short, legal malpractice in drafting
[[Page E961]]
the statute cut out more than half of Mohave County, one of the most
impacted counties in the U.S.
The statutory text is at odds with the stated goals of House Report
106-697 which states ``S. 1515 would increase the Downwinder ``affected
area'' to include . . . the counties of Coconino, Yavapai, Navajo,
Apache, and Gila in Arizona.'' It says nothing about excluding any
county. This drafting error has had a direct impact on people's health
and safety and has cost many of my constituents the compensation they
deserve. I call for immediate rectification of RECA to clarify that the
original text and later amendments never sought to exclude my
constituents in Mohave County, Arizona from qualifying for Downwinders
compensation.
But Madam Speaker, there is more. As the maps demonstrate,
radioactive fallout was documented across the United States. It is not
just Mohave County that should be included under RECA, but all
contiguous 48 states. There is evidence of fallout in every state. Only
the furthest west areas, such as L.A. escaped radiation. But Eastern
California was exposed. For that reason, I am urging an amendment to
RECA as we reauthorize it: RECA should allow claims from any person who
lived in a documented radiation zone during the test years that later
developed a cancer related to radiation exposure.
The government sacrificed its people to test the bombs. Moralists can
argue if that was the right thing to do at the time. But today, 70
years later, the moral debate is irrelevant. The people have been hurt.
Families devasted. They were unwittingly sacrificed as foot soldiers in
a war they did not sign up for. At a minimum, the federal government
today has the moral obligation to recognize their sacrifice and
compensate the victims.
____________________