[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 146 (Monday, September 12, 2022)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4529-S4530]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Internal Revenue Service
Mr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, more than a year ago, a news website
by the name of ProPublica published stories that it claims are based on
``a vast trove of Internal Revenue Service data on the tax returns of
thousands of the nation's wealthiest people, covering more than 15
years.'' Since then, ProPublica has continued to publish articles that
appear to use data leaked or hacked from the IRS.
Despite questions from Congress and immediate expressions of concern
from the Treasury Department, as well as the IRS, we don't know any
more today than we did a year ago. Even though these apparent leaks of
confidential taxpayer information appear to target the wealthy, not
just the wealthy but all taxpayers and anyone who cares about effective
tax administration should be very concerned. The fact is, until we get
answers, we don't know if anyone's tax return or other information
submitted to the IRS is actually secure.
At the end of the 2022 filing system, more than 145 million
individual income tax returns had been filed with the IRS. Right now,
we don't know if there is a current vulnerability to the IRS's systems
that makes this personal information accessible within the IRS or to
bad actors outside of the IRS. We do not know if a foreign nation with
hostile intentions is responsible for a leak or a hack of taxpayer
information or the full scope of the IRS's information that may be
involved. Just because ProPublica hasn't found it politically useful to
publicly disclose your private taxpayer information doesn't mean that
your tax information hasn't been compromised.
As I said earlier, in June of 2021, concern was immediately expressed
in the Congress and at the Treasury Department. Almost on that very
day, Commissioner Rettig appeared before the Finance Committee. In
fact, it was on that very day that the first story was published.
Commissioner Rettig said:
I think that trust and confidence in the Internal Revenue
Service is sort of the bedrock of asking people and requiring
people to provide financial information, and we have, as I
said, turned it over to the appropriate investigators,
external and internal.
Attorney General Garland was quoted as saying:
This is an extremely serious matter. People are entitled,
obviously, to great privacy with respect to their tax
returns.
With this level of concern expressed so quickly, now a year ago, you
would expect action to have been taken quickly. If you expected that,
you would be wrong. Despite several letters sent by this Senator and
other Members of Congress, we don't know any more today about what
happened than we did last year on June 8, when this situation began.
When testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee, Secretary
Yellen said:
I am as anxious as you are to find out what happened.
As a strong proponent of congressional oversight--as I am--of the
executive branch, I have always been frustrated when the executive
refuses to share relevant information that we need in Congress and are
entitled under the Constitution to have. Secretary Yellen's statement
suggests a more disturbing possibility where the executive branch
completely lacks the sought-after information. Now, consider how
shocking it is if the Secretary of the Treasury actually has no insight
or any knowledge into a possible massive leak or hack of taxpayer
information that occurred under her watch.
In order to determine if any action had been taken, I, along with
other Republican members of the Judiciary Committee, wrote to Attorney
General Garland and FBI Director Wray on June 24 of this year to ask
what the status was of any investigation. This was the second time we
tried to get this information.
I know the Department of Justice is capable of taking action quickly
when the Department of Justice wants to. I have written to the Attorney
General several times about the memo that he issued in response to a
letter from the National School Boards Association. That school board
letter compared parents to domestic terrorists. It took the Department
of Justice only 5 days,
[[Page S4530]]
which included a weekend, to inject Federal law enforcement into local
debates with concerned parents.
Clearly, the Attorney General is capable of taking action very
quickly, but that seems to only be when an administrative priority is
of concern. I hope the Biden administration and the Garland Department
of Justice would be as concerned about the protection of confidential
taxpayer information as they are about monitoring concerned parents who
testify before a school board.
If the Department of Justice and the FBI want to show that they take
the confidentiality of taxpayer information seriously, they can start
by fully and completely responding to my letter of June 24, which
hasn't yet been responded to. More than a full year, with a complete
filing season, is too much time to have gone by without having any
information on this leaking of taxpayer information being provided to
any extent.
Democrats constantly spoke of the need for fairness in the tax system
as they pushed through partisan tax-and-spending bills. Yet we have
heard barely a peep out of our Democratic colleagues on what may be the
largest unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information in history.
While we continue to wait for answers, we have learned of another
massive breach of taxpayer information.
On the first Friday of September, we learned the IRS mistakenly
published on its website private information from about 120,000
taxpayers. According to Politico, the disclosure consisted of ``details
from business tax returns filed by tax-exempt organizations and
retirement accounts, included people's names, business contact
information and income produced by certain investments.''
Clearly, the ability of the IRS to safeguard taxpayer information is
still an ongoing issue.
This new revelation should light a very big fire underneath the FBI
to get at the bottom of the ProPublica leak or hack. Attorney General
Garland and FBI Director Wray must fully respond to my letter and help
all of us really understand if our tax system is safe and secure.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. Duckworth). The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. MURPHY. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.