[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 126 (Thursday, July 28, 2022)]
[Senate]
[Page S3774]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT
Mr. RISCH. Madam President, I rise today to convey my support for the
Columbia River Federal Power System. The congressionally-authorized
Federal dams on the Columbia River System bring unparalleled benefits
to the Pacific Northwest and stand as an example to other hydropower
projects worldwide. The system's capacity to generate always-on,
baseload carbon-free power is vital to the Northwest. As many other
parts of the country have experienced rolling blackouts, the dams in
the Columbia Basin have consistently kept the lights on.
In the Northwest, we enjoy numerous other benefits from this
infrastructure, including flood control, irrigation, navigation, and
recreation. Due to its remarkable lock and dam system, even my
landlocked home State of Idaho benefits from a seaport, sending Idaho's
agricultural and manufactured products around the world in a cost-
effective, low-carbon manner. As additional challenges have risen,
scientists and managers at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have
adapted under the direction of Congress to ensure the dams are still
simultaneously beneficial to humans and our natural environment.
It is due to these important considerations that I speak on the Water
Resources Development Act before the Senate today. Among a list of
studies that can generally be measured in acres or at most counties is
a sweeping and far-reaching study directed at aquatic habitat
restoration in the Columbia River Basin. The Columbia River Basin spans
nearly 260,000 square miles over seven States. This is not just another
small, localized review, but instead authorizes an exhaustive study on
aquatic restoration in one of the largest basins in the country.
I have long supported improving salmon and steelhead populations in
the Northwest. In fact, I worked tirelessly with colleagues on both
sides of the aisle to pass legislation--ultimately supported by the
entire Northwest delegation--to address the predation that was
devastating salmon populations before they had a chance to go upriver.
However, what I cannot support are the constant efforts to remove the
benefits provided by our hydropower system under the guise of salmon
recovery or ``aquatic restoration.''
We have studied this river and these dams ad nauseam. Most recently,
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers completed the 3-year Columbia River
System Operations review, which intentionally and specifically
considered whether dam breaching was necessary for fish recovery and
determined the opposite. It has been proven, time and again, salmon and
hydropower dams do, can, and should coexist. It is futile and
irresponsible to spend further taxpayer dollars considering dam
breaching. But this reality has not prevented the administration or
other political actors from continually pushing against the intent of
Congress to protect both the species and the numerous benefits from the
Columbia River Federal Power System.
With this in mind, let us revisit the ecosystem study in title II. I
deeply appreciate the chairman and ranking member's attention to this
issue and work to create suitable limitations to ensure this study will
be held strictly to the congressionally authorized purposes of the
system and considerations that would maintain the energy, flood
control, navigation, irrigation, and other benefits it currently
provides. While I still regard this study as too far-reaching and
unfocused to result in timely proposals for anadromous fish recovery--
yet again wasting taxpayer dollars better utilized elsewhere in the
region--with this vital check, I am able to support this version of
WRDA overall and the many essential water infrastructure priorities
contained within it. Should this proposed study be signed into law, I
will take special notice and trust that it meets congressional intent
of preserving the Columbia River Federal Power System, all of its
current infrastructure as authorized by Congress, and its innumerable
benefits.
Despite political maneuvering from the administration, it is an
irrefutable fact that decisions regarding the Columbia River Federal
Power System are solely the responsibility of Congress. I look forward
to continue working with my colleagues to identify solutions to salmon
recovery that do not inhibit the clean energy, flood control,
navigation, agricultural, and recreation benefits of our Federal Power
System.
____________________