[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 124 (Tuesday, July 26, 2022)]
[House]
[Page H7076]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DEFINITION OF RECESSION
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Tennessee (Mr. Rose) for 5 minutes.
Mr. ROSE. Madam Speaker, on Thursday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis
will release its second quarter gross domestic product numbers, an
overall measure of our country's economic output from April through
June.
For decades, a ``recession'' has been defined as two consecutive
quarters of negative economic growth. Therefore, if Thursday's second
quarter GDP number is in the negative, then by definition, the United
States economy will be in a recession.
However, that won't stop the White House from doing everything it can
to deny the obvious. In fact, the White House Council of Economic
Advisers is actively trying to change the definition of the word
``recession.''
In a blog published on July 21 titled: ``How Do Economists Determine
Whether the Economy is in a Recession?'' the White House argues that
``it is unlikely that the decline in GDP in the first quarter of this
year--even if followed by another GDP decline in the second quarter--
indicates a recession.''
I hope those students who will be taking economics 101 in the fall
are taking notes because the Biden administration is attempting to
change the decades-old answers to the test questions for purely
political purposes.
Instead of President Biden and his administration attempting to bait
and switch the public on the definition of a recession, they should
change course on their policies that are crushing our economy and
creating significant pain for millions of Americans.
President Biden's disastrous economic policies are having a ripple
effect on the housing market, on gas and food prices, real wages, and,
of course, overall inflation. Now, we will find out on Thursday
whether, by definition, we are in a recession.
Madam Speaker, it didn't have to be this way. We didn't have to
borrow and spend ourselves into this mess. The President didn't need to
cancel the Keystone Pipeline. He didn't need to restrict new oil and
gas leases on public lands. He didn't need to create new regulations on
every sector of the economy through the Securities and Exchange
Commission and other bureaucratic government agencies.
Thankfully, the days of complete Democratic Party rule in Washington
are likely coming to an end. The American people are fed up with their
leftwing economic policies and will reject them soundly at the voting
booth in November.
Until then, Republicans like me who stand for fiscal conservatism
will continue to call them out and hope for more accountability.
At the end of the day, the President is responsible for this economic
mess he created. He must do better. If he can't, Republicans will.
____________________