[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 120 (Wednesday, July 20, 2022)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E760-E761]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
TRANSPORTATION, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES
APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2023
______
speech of
HON. PATRICK T. McHENRY
of north carolina
in the house of representatives
Tuesday, July 19, 2022
Mr. McHENRY. Mr. Chair, the report accompanying the FSGG
appropriations bill includes ``an increase of $6 million above the
budget request for USPS to carry out pilot programs to modernize its
current postal banking services, including surcharge-free automated
teller machines, wire transfers, check cashing, and bill payment.''
This ``Postal Non-banking Financial Services Modernization Pilot
Program'' is yet another attempt by progressives in Congress to expand
the U.S. Postal Service's core mission into the financial system. This
concept is ultimately harmful to American consumers because it will
crowd out private sector financial innovation to reach underserved
communities.
That's why Rep. Luetkemeyer and I offered an amendment to prohibit
funding in this bill from being used to carry out the Postal Non-
banking Financial Services Modernization Pilot Program. Unfortunately,
our amendment was not made in order to the bill we're considering
today.
Democrats have long called for USPS to be able to offer consumer
banking services such as checking and savings accounts and extensions
of credit to consumers and small businesses. These functions are beyond
the Post Office's core competencies, will subject taxpayers to
potential losses, will undermine the private sector's ability to
compete with taxpayer-subsidized banking services, and pose a threat to
consumers' privacy when it comes to financial data.
In 2018, the previous Administration created a special task force to
specifically review the Post Office and identify necessary reforms. The
Treasury Department was directed to release the Task Force's
recommendations, which it did in its report, ``United States Postal
Service: A Sustainable Path Forward.'' The Task Force's recommendations
were clear: ``given the USPS's narrow expertise and capital
limitations, USPS should not pursue expanding into new sectors, such as
postal banking, the USPS does not have a demonstrated competency or
comparative advantage, or where balance sheet risk would be added.''
Moreover, the Post Office agreed. In response to a widely criticized
and highly unusual report by the United States Postal Service Office of
Inspector General (OIG), the Post Office made clear that despite any
recommendations to the contrary from the OIG, the Post Office's core
mission ``is delivery, not banking.'' Postmaster General DeJoy
reiterated this position.
Progressives argue postal banking is needed to address the decreasing
number of bank branches and the rise in the number of people without
access to a checking account or short-term credit. Democrats
automatically believe that means that the government should provide
these banking services, including through the Post Office. What
Democrats fail to acknowledge is financial institution branch closures
and consolidations result from overly burdensome government regulation,
which won't be reconciled using more government.
Postal banking has been tried before. From 1911 to 1967, the United
States had the ``Postal Savings System,'' run by the USPS' predecessor.
The system provided savings accounts with interest rates set by the
USPS and funds deposited in national banks near depositors' post
offices. The system failed. Postal banking couldn't compete with
private sector banking institutions. It did not have the flexibility to
meet the needs of customers.
Moreover, American consumers demonstrated recently that they are not
interested in banking with the USPS. Just last year, the USPS took it
upon itself to create a pilot program to offer check cashing services
in the form of gift cards. According to documents submitted to the
Postal Regulatory Commission, only six gift cards were issued under the
pilot program and total fee revenue was $35.70. The failure of the
pilot program demonstrates the fact that it was not designed in
response to customer demand and that consumers are not interested in
banking with the federal government, including USPS.
Private sector financial institutions are highly regulated and
operate competitively and flexibly in a market-based system. The
ensures
[[Page E761]]
consumers' demands for innovative financial products and services are
met, and they receive the best pricing for them. Congress should not
stifle private sector innovation by financial institutions and fintech
firms that have already shown promise for reaching underbanked and
rural consumers.
The USPS should remain focused on its core mission. The fact that
only six people used the postal banking pilot confirms that consumers
remain supportive of the free market and look to private firms for
technological solutions to meet their banking needs.
Postal banking is harmful to the financial system and ultimately
harmful to consumers. It will crowd out private sector financial
innovation and ultimately fail to reach the very underserved
communities Democrats claim they want to reach.
The USPS should remain focused on its core mission, not creeping into
the provision of consumer financial services.
____________________