[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 116 (Thursday, July 14, 2022)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3287-S3288]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                           U.S. Supreme Court

  Madam President, on an unrelated topic, the majority leader comes to 
the floor and characterizes the Supreme Court as the best in history. 
He refers to decisions they have made and compares them to Brown v. 
Board of Education.
  For those who have forgotten, in 1954, the Supreme Court, in Brown v. 
Board of Education, basically said that separate but equal does not 
work in America anymore; that we are going to provide real equality and 
real opportunity when it comes to education. It was a historic 
decision.
  The Senator from Kentucky compares it to the Dobbs decision on a 
woman's right to choose, but there is a critical difference. Brown v. 
Board of Education expanded the constitutional protections of 
Americans. It expanded the constitutional rights of Americans. Those 
are historic, and those are consistent with the most celebrated 
decisions in our Supreme Court's history. Dobbs did just the opposite. 
For the first time ever in recorded history, the U.S. Supreme Court 
removed a constitutional protection for its citizens. And what was that 
protection? The right of women to make their choices for their own 
reproductive health.
  So it is very painful to hear a comparison between Brown, which 
extended the constitutional protection and rights of individuals, and 
Dobbs, which, in overturning Roe v. Wade, went in exactly the opposite 
direction.
  It is interesting to me to hear the Court being described by the 
Senator from Kentucky as a Court that is originalist; that it just 
looked to the Constitution; that it just looked to history. Well, they 
also looked to something else. Every single nominee on the Supreme 
Court who had been installed under the Trump administration, with the 
facilitation of the Senator from Kentucky, had to check one important 
box: approved by the Federalist Society.
  What is the Federalist Society?
  You can search the Constitution, and you will see no reference to it 
whatsoever, but it is very real.
  President Trump made no bones about it. He wouldn't consider a 
Federal court judge, particularly for the Supreme Court, who had not 
been approved by the Federalist Society. The Federalist Society is an 
extreme rightwing conservative group that approved judges during the 
Trump administration and the three judges who were approved for the 
Supreme Court.
  So the loyalty of these Justices may be to the Constitution, but it 
is also to the Federalist Society's agenda, and that agenda applauds, 
of course, the Dobbs decision in overturning Roe v. Wade.

  Madam President, I want to make a point about attacks on Supreme 
Court Justices: unacceptable, unforgivable, and we should do something 
about it.
  Now, here is what the Senator from Kentucky failed to mention: The 
Senate Judiciary Committee, which I chair, has enacted a law and has 
sent it to the floor, which would extend the protection of Federal 
judges in the Anderl Act so that there are more resources put into 
their protection. It passed overwhelmingly, on a bipartisan basis, in 
the Senate Judiciary Committee.
  You would think, with all of the speeches that we are hearing on the 
floor about the safety of judges and how we should take care that they 
are not in danger, that we would have passed that law on the floor of 
the Senate immediately, right? Wrong. That bill, which gives more 
resources to protect Federal judges, has been stopped by one Senator, 
and he has announced publicly that he has done it.
  Can you guess where that Senator is from? He is from the same State 
as the minority leader--Kentucky.
  Senator Rand Paul has held up this bill for additional resources to 
protect Federal judges for weeks on end. Why? Why don't we want to 
protect them? He objects to the way we have done it, and he has held up 
the bill. He won't even let us vote on it.
  So I would say to the minority leader from Kentucky: If you really 
care about the security of judges in the Federal system, pick up the 
phone and call your colleague from the State of Kentucky and ask him to 
withdraw his hold on this bill.
  We should pass that bill this week. If something terrible happens to 
a Federal judge, God forbid, how in the world can we explain that one 
Senator from Kentucky has held up the bill that might have created the 
resources to protect that Federal judge? That is the reality.
  So when you talk about judicial safety, start at home. Start with the 
State of Kentucky--one Senator for it; the other Senator blocking it. 
If both of them would be for it, we would do it this afternoon.


             Freedom to Travel for Health Care Act of 2022

  Madam President, I would also like to address one of the aspects of 
the Dobbs decision in overturning Roe v. Wade which will be addressed 
by our colleagues a little later this morning.
  Our Nation is in the midst of a healthcare crisis because of this 
Dobbs decision. In the weeks since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. 
Wade--erasing a longstanding constitutional right to abortion--pregnant 
women across America have been thrust into chaos. From the moment this 
decision came down, abortion was declared illegal in nearly 12 States. 
Some of these States' abortion bans make no exception even in cases of 
rape and incest. Even when exceptions are made to save the life of a 
mother, they are confusing and leave medical professionals uncertain of 
their legal status.
  The sad reality is that these laws will most certainly result in 
there being pregnant women in danger, especially women of color who are 
more likely to experience severe and even deadly complications as a 
result of pregnancy.
  Earlier this week, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing to 
examine the damage that has been created by overturning Roe.
  During that hearing, we heard testimony from Dr. Colleen McNicholas. 
She is an OB-GYN doctor and abortion provider who practices in both my 
home State of Illinois and the neighboring State of Missouri.
  Dr. McNicholas told the committee:

       When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, they 
     effectively created two nations: one where those reproductive 
     freedoms belong to themselves, and those whose reproductive 
     freedom belongs to a small group of

[[Page S3288]]

     politicians who effectively appointed themselves as the 
     decision-makers over the bodies, lives, and futures [of 
     women].

  Dr. McNicholas informed us that the demand for care at her facility 
in Illinois has tripled since the Roe v. Wade decision was overturned 
by the Supreme Court. She said:

       The Supreme Court's decision has already pushed people--the 
     people each one of you represent--into extreme, and sometimes 
     dangerous, circumstances in order to access one of the safest 
     and most common healthcare procedures.

  The radical, far-right majority on the Alito Supreme Court has put 
lives at risk by revoking a constitutional right, which was on the 
books for almost 50 years. Now, Members of this Senate must act to 
protect another constitutional right related to this debate: the right 
to travel across State lines to access healthcare, in this case, 
reproductive care.
  That is why I am joining my colleagues Senators Cortez Masto, Patty 
Murray, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Kirsten Gillibrand in cosponsoring the 
Freedom To Travel Healthcare Act of 2022.
  Women and their health providers are counting on us to pass this 
bill. They find it hard to imagine that State legislators, and even 
some Federal officials, would try to restrict the right to cross a 
State boundary for medical care because the anti-choice legislators who 
have already outlawed abortion in their State are not content with what 
they have done already. In fact, right now, they are proposing 
legislation that would turn many State borders into Checkpoint Charlie 
in America. These lawmakers are hell-bent on denying women fundamental 
freedoms, no matter how many constitutional rights they infringe upon.
  The question is, How far are we willing to let them go? Will we allow 
them to penalize and prosecute healthcare professionals who provide 
essential care to their patients in States where abortion remains 
legal? Are we going to allow these lawmakers to hold American citizens 
hostage in their own States, forcing them to give birth? Does that 
sound like the America that we know? No, it doesn't. And we need to 
draw the line here and now by passing the Freedom To Travel for 
Healthcare Act of 2022.


                            2022 NATO Summit

  Madam President, during the first part of the July recess, I traveled 
with several of my Senate colleagues to the historic NATO summit in 
Madrid, Spain.
  On Tuesday, several members of our bipartisan group--Senators 
Shaheen, Tillis, Coons, Ernst, and Blunt--spoke on the floor about the 
trip. Senator Fischer was also with us at that summit meeting.
  I think Senator Tillis of North Carolina said it best, that despite 
policy differences within our group of Senators, there was no daylight 
between us on two profoundly important matters: We agree, Finland and 
Sweden should be welcomed into NATO. And we also agree that the 
illegal, barbaric war on Ukraine by Russian dictator Vladimir Putin 
must not succeed.
  At the summit, we met with leaders from a number of our allies, 
including, for the first time, leaders from the Indo-Pacific region who 
joined the NATO summit.
  Japanese Prime Minister Kishida was clear when he told us:

       The security of Europe and the Indo-Pacific are 
     inseparable.

  And German Chancellor Scholz expressed an unwavering commitment to 
take as long as needed to make sure Ukraine retains its sovereignty 
against Russia's barbaric aggression.
  But perhaps what was most notable was the overwhelming sense of unity 
and defense of common values found among our NATO allies in the face of 
Russian aggression. For that, I want to give President Biden credit. He 
spent an hour or more with our bipartisan delegation at the summit 
meeting. He and his able team, Secretary of State Blinken, Secretary of 
Defense Austin, and others, met with us and discussed in detail what 
was being debated at the summit.
  I have been traveling to Eastern Europe and meeting with allies for 
many years. I can tell you, I have never felt such a shared sense of 
purpose and determination to stop the Russian threat.
  As Senator Tillis noted on Tuesday, our safety at home is 
inextricably linked to the security of Europe. Our bipartisan 
delegation understood this. The world leaders at the NATO summit 
understood it, and President Biden certainly understands it. Vladimir 
Putin would serve his people well by understanding it as well.
  In the Senate, we can help Putin understand the unbreakable unity and 
resolve of the world's democracies by being one of the first NATO 
members of nations to approve Finland and Sweden's membership. We 
should do that without delay.