[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 60 (Tuesday, April 5, 2022)]
[Senate]
[Page S1964]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
LEGISLATIVE SESSION
______
MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, FOREIGN OPERATIONS,
AND RELATED PROGRAMS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2022--
Motion to Proceed
Mr. SCHUMER. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate
resume legislative session and vote on the motion to invoke cloture on
the motion to proceed to H.R. 4373, under the previous order.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Cloture Motion
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Pursuant to rule XXII, the Chair lays before
the Senate the pending cloture motion, which the clerk will state.
The bill clerk read as follows:
Cloture Motion
We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the
provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate,
do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to
proceed to Calendar No. 310, H.R. 4373, a bill making
appropriations for the Department of State, foreign
operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2022, and for other purposes.
Charles E. Schumer, Jack Reed, Robert Menendez, Michael
F. Bennet, Tammy Baldwin, Tim Kaine, Angus S. King,
Jr., Margaret Wood Hassan, Tina Smith, Gary C. Peters,
Tammy Duckworth, Christopher Murphy, Mark Kelly, Alex
Padilla, Richard Blumenthal, Patty Murray, Elizabeth
Warren.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. By unanimous consent, the mandatory quorum
call has been waived.
The question is, Is it the sense of the Senate that debate on the
motion to proceed to H.R. 4373, a bill making appropriations for the
Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2022, and for other purposes, shall be
brought to a close?
The yeas and nays are mandatory under the rule.
The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk called the roll.
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Jersey (Mr.
Menendez) is necessarily absent.
The yeas and nays resulted--yeas 47, nays 52, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 129 Leg.]
YEAS--47
Baldwin
Bennet
Blumenthal
Booker
Brown
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Coons
Cortez Masto
Duckworth
Durbin
Feinstein
Gillibrand
Hassan
Heinrich
Hickenlooper
Hirono
Kaine
Kelly
King
Klobuchar
Leahy
Lujan
Manchin
Markey
Merkley
Murphy
Murray
Ossoff
Padilla
Peters
Reed
Rosen
Sanders
Schatz
Shaheen
Sinema
Smith
Stabenow
Tester
Van Hollen
Warner
Warnock
Warren
Whitehouse
NAYS--52
Barrasso
Blackburn
Blunt
Boozman
Braun
Burr
Capito
Cassidy
Collins
Cornyn
Cotton
Cramer
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Ernst
Fischer
Graham
Grassley
Hagerty
Hawley
Hoeven
Hyde-Smith
Inhofe
Johnson
Kennedy
Lankford
Lee
Lummis
Marshall
McConnell
Moran
Murkowski
Paul
Portman
Risch
Romney
Rounds
Rubio
Sasse
Schumer
Scott (FL)
Scott (SC)
Shelby
Sullivan
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Tuberville
Wicker
Wyden
Young
NOT VOTING--1
Menendez
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Murphy). The majority leader.
Mr. SCHUMER. For the purposes of reconsideration, I change my vote to
no.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. On this vote, the yeas are 47, the nays are
52. Three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn not having voted
in the affirmative, the motion is not agreed to.
The motion was rejected.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
Motion to Reconsider
Mr. SCHUMER. I enter a motion to reconsider.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The motion is entered.
____________________