[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 43 (Thursday, March 10, 2022)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1074-S1075]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Mr. GRASSLEY. Mr. President, it has been a year since we in the
Senate confirmed Merrick Garland to be Attorney General.
During his confirmation hearing, I outlined what a successful
Department of Justice looks like and what I expected of him as our new
Attorney General. I gave him the answers to the tests. By this rubric,
he has failed. For instance, I urged him to build off the successes
from the previous Justice Department to reduce crime, maintain the rule
of law, and protect our civil liberties. But violent crime continues to
rise, the rule of law is undermined, and our civil liberties are in
danger.
Instead of condemning all violent crime, Attorney General Garland's
Justice Department targets lawful gun owners and blames those gun
owners for the rising murder rates, carjackings, and attacks against
law enforcement.
But the explosion of crime in blue cities is actually tied to
depolicing measures, hiring progressive prosecutors, and enacting
disastrous bail reform policies. Lawful gun owners are not to blame for
this rise in crime.
And in the midst of a crime spike, a number of Biden appointees and
judicial nominees strongly backed by Attorney General Garland have
supported radical ideas in the past, like defunding the police or at
least reducing funding for police. And some have even advocated not
prosecuting certain crimes. So how do you expect to effectively fight
crime with the lineup that I just gave you?
Instead of tackling the opioid crisis, the Garland Justice Department
wants to make it easier for fentanyl traffickers to spread their
poison. Fentanyl analogs are responsible for most overdose deaths and
are lethal in very tiny amounts, as we all know. But the Garland and
Biden administration support eliminating mandatory minimums for these
fentanyl analog dealers. Really?
In addition, Garland has wielded his power to undermine the rule of
law and cave to political pressures. The Attorney General has summarily
reversed a number of decisions issued by Attorneys General Sessions and
Barr that helped enhance the integrity of our asylum system.
This Attorney General has also issued memos, interpretations, and
filings to the Supreme Court that contrast with previous Department of
Justice positions.
Let me give you an example. His Department of Justice reinterpreted
the law to make sure that inmates released to home confinement under
COVID relief stay there. His Solicitor General also switched positions
on a cocaine sentencing case that was before the Supreme Court. Now, it
happens that both of these policy outcomes align with my positions. I
agree with those outcomes. But his way of getting there is political.
Rule of law must be consistent and not political.
So Garland's flip-flopping also jeopardizes our Nation's security.
Instead of protecting the American people from the Chinese Communist
Party's espionage, he disbanded the previous administration's
successful China Initiative. This program prioritized investigations of
national security from China, which is still a very serious threat
given that the FBI opens a new Chinese espionage case every 12 hours.
So I don't know why this would be disbanded. This move is concerning
and dangerous to our national security and reflective of partisan
pressures trumping smart law enforcement.
Also, political decisions are getting in the way of the consistent
application of the rule of law. For example, Attorney General Garland's
Department of Justice is politically selective about which cases to
pursue and which cases to dismiss. Despite the 100-night siege against
the Portland courthouse in 2020 and 96 people being charged as violent
rioters, almost half of those charged have been dismissed.
Compare this to the Department of Justice's own statement on the 1-
year anniversary of January 6:
The Department of Justice's resolve to hold accountable
those who committed crimes on Jan. 6, 2021, has not, and will
not, wane.
Now, we all know that those who break the law should be held
accountable--no question about that. And as our Nation's top law
enforcement officer, it is incumbent upon him to enforce the rule of
law. He cannot pick and choose when the rule of law is politically
convenient or easy.
Under Garland's leadership, the Department of Justice is also
undermining valuable civil rights. This is something that he and I have
had a lot of discussions on as he has appeared before our committee.
So undermining valuable civil rights, instead of prioritizing that,
Attorney General Garland has killed the speech of American parents. He
sent a memo to the FBI and the U.S. attorneys around the country to be
on the lookout for upset parents at school boards. He did this after
the National School Boards Association suggested that some people
should be branded domestic terrorists. Imagine that charge--that you go
to a school board meeting, you might be a domestic terrorist.
What is even worse, there seems to be some evidence that the
Secretary of Education may have asked the National School Boards
Association to write that awful letter, which the association later had
to apologize for. Garland says his memo was just about violence and
threats of violence; but sure enough, whistleblower reports show that
the FBI's counterterrorism division was looking way beyond only
violence and threats. Parents' ability to voice their concerns,
especially now, is a precious right, and the Department of Justice's
actions cannot kill such vital speech constitutionally protected by the
First Amendment.
Also, instead of being responsive, the Attorney General has been
evasive. Last year, I sent approximately 50 letters to the Department.
That is one-third of all letters that they received from Members of the
U.S. Senate.
The Attorney General wanted me to know that I sent one-third of all
the letters he got from the other 99 Senators. So when the Attorney
General told me that, I don't think he meant it as a compliment.
I received some letters in response. However, when I am told that
they have responded to me, simple or lots of words on a piece of paper
don't, in and of themselves, make a letter responsive.
Furthermore, the Department has failed to provide responsive records,
with the exception of one or two small productions. By way of example,
I received a 30-page production of records from the Department. It
included improper FOIA redactions and failed to
[[Page S1075]]
include the necessary spreadsheets. Accordingly, that production is a
failed production because FOIA does not apply to documents going to the
Congress of the United States, so you shouldn't have that redaction.
Also, I have repeatedly asked if Nicholas McQuaid is recused from the
Hunter Biden criminal investigation, and that is an important thing
because he seemed to work in the law firm that was representing Hunter
Biden. And it ought to be a simple question to answer, but Attorney
General Garland refuses to tell me whether McQuaid is recused from
those cases.
At the Judiciary Committee's October 27, 2021, Justice Department
oversight hearing, I said to Attorney General Garland:
When I placed holds on your nominees for the Department's
failure to comply with Republican oversight requests, I said
either you run the Department or the Department runs you.
Right now, it looks like the Justice Department is running
you.
That ends my quote of October 27 last year.
So that statement still holds true. Instead of protecting the
American people, the Attorney General is sacrificing our Nation's top
law enforcement agency to politics during a violent crime spike.
Instead of being stewards of our Nation's laws, the Attorney General is
leading the charge upending the rule of law. Instead of fighting for
civil rights, he is chipping away at those civil rights.
Attorney General Garland, there is still time to change. You have 3
years left in this administration. I urge you to change course. I urge
you to bring the Justice Department back to a place of leadership:
leadership in reducing violent crime, leadership in maintaining the
rule of law, and leadership in protecting our civil liberties.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Republican whip.
____________________