[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 9, 2022)]
[Senate]
[Pages S586-S587]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Unanimous Consent Request--S. 3604
Mr. COTTON. Mr. President, for the past 2 years, our Nation's kids
have suffered. They have suffered socially, academically, and
psychologically at the hands of Democratic politicians, the Biden
administration, and their political bosses in the teachers unions.
Although kids are at the lowest risk of hospitalization and death
from the Wuhan coronavirus, they have endured and they continue to
endure some of the most excessive, extreme, and suffocating COVID
restrictions of any population in our country. This treatment has been
nothing short of cruel. The politicians and the neurotic public health
obsessives who enforce these policies should all hang their heads in
shame.
There are few things in a kid's life, outside of family and church,
that are more important to them than their school. For them, open and
happy schools are precious. But for teachers union bosses like Randi
Weingarten, they are just useful hostages.
For the better part of a year, teachers unions shut down our schools
while they shook down politicians for more funding and benefits that
they promised would allow them to reopen safely. Yet they kept schools
closed. They kept kids masked.
Desperate parents watched their socially isolated kids fall behind
while they engaged in Zoom schools, but the unions still dragged their
feet.
When schools finally reopened, our kids faced insane coronavirus
protocols. They weren't allowed to sit with friends at lunch. They
weren't allowed to play at recess. They had to eat outside on freezing-
cold days. And every moment of every day at every school, they were
forced to wear a mask.
Confused and hyper kids naturally often rebelled, and they have been
reprimanded and they have been punished for simply trying to play,
trying to make friends, trying to breathe a little easier.
Some parents may think that masks work for their kids, and that is
fine. If they want to, they can put their kids in a mask. They should
be able to choose. But under Democratic-forced masking policies,
parents have no choice at all. Tragically, but predictably--not just
predictably--predicted--these absurd policies have had severe
psychological effects on our kids. Suicide and mental health problems
have skyrocketed in the past 2 years. Grades have plummeted, while
depression has surged. And as is so often the case, those with the
least have suffered the most.
But when parents dared to complain on behalf of their kids, they were
condemned by teachers union bosses and by Democratic politicians as
anti-science and extremists. They were investigated when Attorney
General Merrick Garland sicced the Feds on parents who were simply
going to school boards to protest these stupid policies. The Secretary
of Education threatened to withdraw Federal funding from States and
schools who did not have mask mandates.
Thankfully, the tide has begun to turn. Sometimes I hear the phrase
``the science changed.'' The science hasn't changed. What has changed
is that there is an election coming and Democrats have seen the polling
on this question. Now they are running scared, and they want to pretend
that they didn't force your kid to wear a mask for 2 years.
You see it in States that are run entirely by Democrats: California,
New Jersey, New York, the President's own Delaware. Just yesterday,
across the river in Virginia, the State senate, to include many
Democrats, voted not just to allow parents a choice but to prohibit
mask mandates by local schools.
Yet, in many places, forced masking remains. Kids as young as 2, 3, 4
are still being forced to wear hot, restrictive, and ineffective masks
for hours on end. Yes, ineffective because almost all those kids are
wearing cloth masks, which don't even work. And that is not me
speaking; that is the CDC speaking. These masks don't even work. Yet
the kids are forced to wear them all day long.
I can tell you that most Democratic politicians don't think they work
either. How do we know that? Look at the candidate for Governor in
Georgia, Stacey Abrams--or maybe I should say the Governor of Georgia,
since she still refuses to concede the 2018 election and many of my
Democratic colleagues have endorsed her view that she is somehow the
shadow Governor of Georgia. Just last week, photos emerged of her
sitting in classrooms with masked kids grinning ear to ear, the only
person not wearing a mask in the classroom.
Also, Gavin Newsom, the Governor of California, was yucking it up at
SoFi Stadium when the Rams played the 49ers, taking pictures--without a
mask--with Magic Johnson and a bunch of other celebrities, while he
enforced one of the most onerous mask mandates in the country.
What about Eric Garcetti, whose nomination to be the Ambassador to
India is in front of the Senate right now, who said that pictures of
him without a mask on are fine because he was holding his breath--I
guess like Bill Clinton, who didn't inhale.
Barack Obama, pictures recently emerged of him standing outside--
outside--on the beach, without a mask, while all the peons who are
building his multimillion-dollar beach compound were forced to wear a
mask in front of him.
And I will let you in on something. The same goes for Democratic
Senators. I was in a hearing this week. It was in a small, closed room.
Not a single Democratic Senator wore a mask in that hearing in that
room. The catch is, the TV cameras weren't on, so there wouldn't be
video of them sitting in that closed room without a mask on.
But masks in school have become symbols of control and fear. They are
not instruments of public health. It is past time for the mask mandates
to end and for parents across this country to have a choice. That is
why I am asking the Senate to pass my legislation today to require
schools that receive Federal funding to give parents a simple choice on
whether their kids should wear a mask.
If my Democratic colleagues will join me, we can get this done now,
today. That is why I urge them to support this bill. And I ask, as if
in legislative session, unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to
the immediate consideration of S. 3604, which is at the desk; further,
I ask unanimous consent that the bill be considered read a third time
and passed and that the motion to reconsider be considered made and
laid upon the table.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
The Senator from Washington.
Mrs. MURRAY. Mr. President, reserving the right to object, I have
said before that we all want to make sure our schools can stay safely
open for in-person learning. But based on this legislation, it is not
clear that is true for all of my Republican colleagues.
Look, this is straightforward. If you want education decisions to
happen at the local level, you do not tie the hands of State and local
officials when they are trying to keep their students and educators
safe. And if you want schools to be able to stay safely open and bring
some stability and certainty back to our classrooms, you don't cut
schools off from the resources they need just because you think you
know better than the parents and local officials about how this
pandemic is progressing in their community or how they should use tools
like masks.
[[Page S587]]
I am a former preschool teacher, parent advocate, and school board
member. But let's be honest, you don't need classroom experience to see
that right now the very last thing we should be doing is denying
schools the tools and resources to help kids learn safely. The data is
clear. We have real work to do to help our students make up for an
incredibly tough 2 years.
Now, Democrats actually passed legislation--the American Rescue
Plan--which invests specifically in helping our students recover
academically and mentally. The proposal from the Senator from Arkansas
would put our students' recovery and safe in-person learning in
jeopardy. It would take those important public health decisions, which
should be based on local conditions, away from those communities and
slash funding for students and schools right when they need us the
most.
Now is not the time to pull the rug out from under students in
schools. Parents, educators, and, most of all, kids have been through
enough. I object.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard.
The Senator from Arkansas.
Mr. COTTON. Mr. President, I would simply reply to the remarks of the
Senator from Washington, she asserted that I or others who oppose these
mask mandates think that we know better. That is the whole point,
though. It is not that we think we know better; I think that you, as a
parent, know better. You know what is best for your child--not some
Democratic politician, not some liberal superintendent, not some
neurotic public health obsessive.
And, apparently, the Democrats have no problem using these Federal
funds when it suits their neurotic policies. After all, the Department
of Education last year threatened Federal funding for States and
schools that did not permit mask mandates. The whole point of this
exercise is this: the Democrats who think they know better than parents
to make the choices for the parents' kids.
I am disappointed today that my Democratic colleagues want to
continue to see kids forced to wear masks in schools across America,
but, trust me, change is coming one way or another. It will be because
Democratic politicians, like Gavin Newsom, run for the hills or because
the American people repudiate them all in November.
I yield the floor.
____________________