[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 23 (Friday, February 4, 2022)]
[House]
[Pages H971-H973]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                           ISSUES OF THE DAY

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 4, 2021, the Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas (Mr. 
Roy) for 30 minutes.
  Mr. ROY. Madam Speaker, I appreciate my colleague from Arizona (Mr. 
Schweikert), as he always does, making such a strong case for the need 
for this body to do the hard work that we are supposed to do and 
actually using not just taxpayer money but borrowed money remotely 
effectively.
  He has made the case for a long time about how mandatory spending, 
the spending that we had promised to people through Medicare, Social 
Security, and other programs, is blowing the lid off of our budget and 
the need for us to get right and that there are ways that we can solve 
the problem. There are ways that we can take dramatic steps to lower 
the costs of healthcare, which the gentleman from Arizona talks about 
regularly, about the need for us to do to drive down the costs of 
healthcare so that we can actually contain this beast that is consuming 
our expenditures and causing us to have to borrow so much money, weaken 
ourselves against China, and so forth.
  So, I thank the gentleman from Arizona for his consistency on this 
matter. Would that our body or even our own Conference be so consistent 
in having an interest in having that conversation.
  I would note again for my constituents, for those people across the 
country, all of you that are watching this on C-Span, that I am 
speaking to an empty Chamber.
  This is what we do. This is debate on the floor of the United States 
House of Representatives. We come down, and we had five votes earlier 
today--I think four. One got wiped off. We have four votes on two 
amendments.
  Amendments, right? They are amendments that are offered in the Rules 
Committee, where the powers that be decide what we get to debate on the 
floor of the House.
  I am a Member of the United States Congress with an election 
certificate for the some 700,000-odd people in central Texas that I 
represent, yet I have never had the opportunity to offer an amendment 
on the floor of the House of Representatives.
  This is not the people's House. This is a House of a handful of hand-
selected individuals on both sides of the aisle who sit in a back room 
and decide what we get to debate about and what we get to discuss and 
what we get to vote on. My colleagues on both sides of the aisle know 
this, yet this is what we continue to do.
  I gave a speech a little while back in December about the United 
States House of free stuff because that is what we are. Neither party 
has ever met a bill that they are not willing to vote for because it 
sounds good, right?
  It doesn't matter how much it costs. It doesn't matter what it means 
in terms of debt, as my colleague from Arizona was just talking about 
in terms of debt. It just doesn't matter because we are the United 
States House of free stuff.
  You got a bill that sounds good? You got a problem that you want to 
solve? Come to Congress. We will write you a bill. We will print you 
some money because there is no consequence to printing the money.
  In what world is that a way to govern? The world is supposedly 
looking at us being this august institution, the people's House, and 
here I sit alone. My colleagues have headed off to the airport to fly 
home. We will come back on Monday. We will punch through a no doubt 
really important list of predetermined items decided by some Rules 
Committee people dropped on the floor and say: Take it or leave it. 
Vote yes or no.
  Boy, that is inspirational, looking at how a bill becomes a law. 
Schoolhouse Rock laughs at us because there is no debate. There is no 
amendment. Both sides just come down here and vote to spend more money 
we don't have in order to buy your votes.

  Well, our message to the American people is, are you for sale? Are 
the American people for sale by listening to every Member of this body 
go home and tell you all of the stuff they are bringing back home for 
you with borrowed money?
  Well, we have a decision to make about how we are going to spend the 
people's money in the next 14 days.
  Do we have a debate this week? Do we have a debate this week about 
the continuing resolution? No. That is the bill that is continuing to 
fund government that expires on February 18.
  Did my Democratic colleagues, did the Speaker, come down and offer an 
appropriations package or bill and say: Hey, let's have a debate and a 
discussion about how we should spend the people's money and borrow more 
money in order to carry out the functions and our obligations. No, we 
haven't had that debate.
  We voted on a garbage piece of legislation today that will do nothing 
to check China while we are sending our athletes over to bow down to 
the Chinese and allow them to take center stage on the world's stage. 
China. Never mind all the slave camps. Never mind what they are doing 
around the world. Never mind the espionage. Never mind the 
cyberattacks. Never mind what they are doing in working with Iran, 
working with our enemies.
  Ignore all of that. Ignore the slave labor. Ignore the persecution. 
Ignore what they did to doctors trying to tell the truth about what 
happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Ignore the virus born in 
China. Ignore all of that.
  Just send our athletes over there, and then pass a bill on the floor 
of this House that has literally no chance of checking China, holding 
them to account, ensuring that they no longer continue to carry out the 
atrocities that they are carrying out and continue to attack the United 
States of America on a daily basis.
  No, no, no, you just pass a bill, and you go give some speeches 
about: Oh, we are focusing on China. Oh, but rally around the TV 
tonight and watch our athletes hanging out over in China.
  And then have the Speaker of the House say: Oh, don't speak out. 
Don't say anything. Something bad might happen to you.
  Where is the spine or backbone of the woman from Texas sending the 
message to the coach of the Miracle on Ice hockey team that said beat 
those commie bastards? We don't have any of that here.
  In 14 days, the funding of government expires, and what will we do? 
We will come down here on the floor with some forced, last-minute CR, 
and then each side will go out and give their talking points about how 
the other side's priorities are wrong, and you are going to borrow more 
money as we have now surpassed $30 trillion.
  More important than that, when Members of this body or the United 
States Senate vote for a continuing resolution--I want every American 
to listen to me. When they vote for a continuing resolution to fund 
government, they are voting to fund the enforcement of vaccine mandates 
that are causing our men and women in uniform to be forced out of 
service, to be discharged. They are enforcing laws against our men and 
women who are serving so valiantly on the front lines in healthcare, 
nurses and doctors that are getting forced out of service, forced out 
of the ability to care for people after a lifetime of work, doctors in 
the

[[Page H972]]

Defense Department daring to say they want to have informed consent 
getting fired, getting fired for daring to question a politicized 
vaccine, if you can even call it a vaccine. It is a shot for a 
politicized virus.
  And we all know it is a sham, just like all the mask mandates, 
sitting here on the floor of the House Chamber, are a sham, just like 
all the mask mandates on our kids in schools are a sham.
  They are forcing our kids into the corners and forcing kids out of 
their schools and causing mental health issues and causing health 
issues and causing suicide rates to go up, all of which was entirely 
predictable.
  And this body cowers in fear, running around here. If you dare walk 
down the hallway not wearing a mask, people say: Get away. Get away.
  What kind of a country are we? Putting our children in the corner in 
masks when there is zero science to back up that it in any way, shape, 
or form is good for them or their families or the teachers that are 
allegedly teaching them.
  God bless the woman at Prince George County, Virginia, who yesterday 
took the school board to task for their duplicitous lies about masks, 
blaming the Governor. And now you got a new Governor. Now you have got 
a new Governor who has changed the law. And what is that school board 
doing? Finding every reason in the world to force those kids to be 
masked because that is what this is about. It is about power and force.
  Well, the American people have had it. Parents across this country 
have had it. They have had it with school boards that are forcing 
critical race theory on their kids. They have had it with school boards 
that are forcing their kids to be masked. They have had it with the 
inability to get healthcare and the inability to get treatments when 
they know full well there are treatments that will help people, and we 
refuse to allow them to exist.
  We have the FDA shutting down monoclonal antibody treatments in Texas 
and in other parts around the country when there is no basis to do so 
when you have the omicron burning through with very reduced lethality, 
with very little indication that it would impact our children. You have 
study after study demonstrating that the risk for our children of dying 
from the virus is so statistically insignificant relative to the need 
for a so-called vaccine and/or the dangers posed by a vaccine in kids.
  Then everybody throws back and says, oh, Chip, we have had vaccine 
mandates forever. Hold on a second. We have never had a Federal vaccine 
mandate like this administration is cramming down the throats of the 
American people.
  Show it to me. We haven't had a vaccine that was adopted across the 
country even by local governments and school boards that didn't have 
exceptions or didn't have a significant amount of time, science, 
evidence, and studies behind it. That is the truth.
  My dad had polio. He got polio in 1949 before the Salk vaccine 5, 6 
years later.

                              {time}  1300

  Go study how that vaccine got rolled out. It didn't get rolled out 
crammed down by the Federal Government in less than a year. People 
figured out to adopt it, take time, roll it out. And by the way, we 
rolled out this vaccine exponentially faster than the polio vaccine.
  And all those people would come and say, Oh, Chip Roy would cause 
polio to come back. These are all lies. They are all said to create and 
intimidate and cause fear. I am not going to play the, Oh, I am going 
to tell you absolutely I love the vaccine, go get vaccinated. I just 
don't want a mandates' game because that is all my side wants to do 
because they don't want to take this issue head-on.
  This is about power, and this is about limiting freedom. This is 
about undermining the ability of the American people to make choices 
for themselves. And it is causing harm. It is killing people by taking 
away our ability to focus on therapies and treatments because we have 
gotten so focused on a vaccine and cramming that vaccine down the 
American people. And it is political. And we should be ashamed of 
ourselves. And we shouldn't fund it.
  We should not fund a government enforcing vaccines on the American 
people. We shouldn't force them on our doctors. We shouldn't force them 
on our nurses. We shouldn't force them on our students. We shouldn't 
force them on our brave men and women in uniform. We shouldn't force 
them on Border Patrol--all of whom, having these forced mandates, are 
causing some of them to lose their job, lifetime public servants; 
people that have served their country honorably for years.
  We are standing here in the House Chamber, and I am looking up at the 
13 stripes, the 50 stars, in a country that says, ``the land of the 
free.'' And yet, this government, through the power of government, is 
forcing people to get vaccinated against their will when we know it is 
absolutely true that natural immunity is real, that natural immunity, 
if you had the virus, is every bit as strong or stronger than vaccine 
immunity. So you are forcing an individual to take a shot, even if they 
have natural immunity, or lose their job, in America.
  I, for one, will not abide that, and I am going to take every step I 
can in the next 14 days to make everybody up here in Washington 
understand, if you vote to fund this government without stopping the 
vaccine mandates, you are voting for those vaccine mandates being 
applied to doctors, healthcare workers, our men and women in uniform, 
Federal contractors, Border Patrol--all of those people that are 
serving publicly and trying to serve their country.
  I see the gentleman from California here.
  Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California (Mr. Issa).
  Mr. ISSA. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
  The passion with which you speak is the passion that the American 
people feel right now. One of the things that you said in the mandate 
that particularly I have seen for the men and women in uniform, for my 
chief warrant officer, who after 23 years is being forced out, for my 
Lutheran minister, who has 16 years and they will not accept his 
religious exemption--what I am seeing, though, that I think the 
American people need to understand is, it is not going to change the 
number of people who are vaccinated.
  Firing somebody simply means they go from being an employed person to 
an unemployed person, a productive person to somebody less productive. 
We are literally making, as you and I speak, our military less 
productive at a time in which the Russians are at the Ukrainian border 
prepared to snuff out a democracy.
  So your passion is the passion of the American people. You must 
continue for the next 14 days. We cannot fund this kind of a power 
play, particularly when, as you said so eloquently, it doesn't reduce 
the spread of the virus. It is dubious as to whether it actually 
reduces the impact when you get it. And lastly, if you don't get it, 
what they do is they choose to fire you, fire our first responders, 
fire our military people, and it is not going to change anything. 
Because if somebody believes it is either unhealthy for them, or for 
religious reasons doesn't want to, firing them isn't going to change 
it.
  What it is going to change is it is demoralizing our military, it is 
demoralizing our police, and it is creating a situation in my own 
district in which our hospitals are saying that they cannot treat the 
patients. But the reason they can't treat them is people are sitting at 
home, and they are sitting at home, even if they are vaccinated, 
because it isn't working.
  So keep it up. I just wanted to come to the floor and say nobody 
could be more proud of what you are doing and more in belief that these 
are dubious how they're working. The vaccine now has become more about 
a religion of power than anything else, and I want you to just know 
that you have the entire Republican Conference behind you.
  Mr. ROY. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman from California. That 
means a lot coming from him and his great service here in this body, as 
well as his experience in the private sector, working in the healthcare 
industry, a great expertise that I don't have. My expertise is mostly 
on the other end of that as a cancer survivor and watching my dad deal 
with polio and those other issues.
  But I find it astonishing, whether you are talking about people 
getting fired from their job--or using a slightly

[[Page H973]]

different example--if you look at the vaccine mandates that are being 
applied at our Nation's capital in the seat of liberty, here in the 
United States of America, if you are in the District of Columbia and 
you go to a restaurant and you show them that you took a test that 
afternoon and are negative for COVID but you are not vaccinated, you 
can't go in. But if you are vaccinated and you are positive for COVID, 
you can go in.
  In what universe does that make sense? But that is what we are doing. 
We are turning logic and common sense on its head. And we are doing so 
because--I agree with my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, by 
the way--we politicize the virus, and we politicize our response to it.

  Our friends in Japan, they put out their public policy as: There is a 
vaccine. We think it is good. We think you ought to consider taking it 
or strongly encourage you to take it. There are some risks that we are 
studying. We are not going to mandate it.
  And their vaccination rates are higher than ours. Now maybe they are 
a more compliant society. There are all sorts of reasons behind it; we 
are bigger. But it tells you something. Why is that not our position as 
a country. Right? Encouraging people.
  My dad is 79 years old and a polio survivor. I wanted him to get the 
vaccine; I wanted him to get the boost. He is particularly vulnerable. 
My mom. But it ought to be up to us. We ought to be able to decide for 
our families. I assume the gentleman agrees.
  Mr. ISSA. Not only do I agree, but I just want to share something 
about this body.
  You know, you and I get into elevators and sometimes our colleagues 
get out of the elevator, particularly if we are not wearing a mask. One 
of those people, one of my dear friends, Sara Jacobs had two shots, the 
booster, she always wears two masks and she is extremely careful. And 
she is at home with a positive on this virus.
  So one of the things that we just have to ask ourselves is, Are we 
mandating to the United States military, where there is a 99 percent 
vaccination rate, are we throwing out 1 percent because it is going to 
make a difference? Or are we throwing out 1 percent based on some 
theory that an order is an order from the Commander in Chief, even if 
it no longer makes any medical sense whatsoever?
  So keep it up. Fight for our men and women in uniform, and you will 
have us at your side. I thank the gentleman for yielding me time.
  Mr. ROY. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman from California. I am 
just going to wind down here and say this is our time to lead. It does 
not matter who is the majority in this body. This is the people's 
House, and this is the people's House whether the Democrats are in 
charge or the Republicans are in charge.
  And we have a question before the body, and the Senate will have a 
question before that body: Will you continue to fund the enforcement of 
mandates and vaccines in a way that is causing the best among us, of 
our public servants, in our military, in our hospitals to lose their 
jobs with no basis in science for continuing to do so?
  If this is the land of the free, then let us stand up. Let's stand up 
for freedom and let us reject these mandates.
  Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

                          ____________________