[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 206 (Tuesday, November 30, 2021)]
[House]
[Pages H6707-H6708]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                        SHORTAGES IN FOOD CHAIN

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 4, 2021, the Chair recognizes the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. 
Grothman) for 30 minutes.
  Mr. GROTHMAN. Madam Speaker, prior to talking about the 
reconciliation bill that passed last time we were here, I want to spend 
just a second to talk about possible shortages in the food chain that 
have been brought to my attention. I am not sure the administration is 
doing enough to deal with the problem.
  As with so many other things in today's world economy, critical 
ingredients, including glucosaminide, are produced abroad in China and 
Europe. These chemicals, including other things such as potash 
fertilizer, are sitting in ships and not available for the United 
States.

                              {time}  2045

  Our farmers only have one time a year to plant their crops. It is not 
like a factory when something is not available, you can just start up 
the factory again in 3 months. And we have real problems out there that 
I think have some farmers very concerned and some feed co-ops very 
concerned. I have not heard about this a lot. Though, whenever I tour 
my manufacturers, I hear the same thing.
  It is not unusual that some of these chemicals, which are very 
important to today's agriculture, have gone up five times over what 
they were this time last year. Well, you can see what that is going to 
do to the cost of food, even if we get stuff. But I strongly encourage 
the Biden administration to educate themselves on shortages, which are 
hurting agriculture right now, to do something at the docks, to see if 
he could bring Congress in to maybe change the laws or do something 
about the draconian new laws they passed in California, making it more 
difficult to get these chemicals on trucks.
  But I do this just to warn people, in case anybody is listening from 
the Biden administration, and we will send them letters as well, if you 
want to avoid possible food shortages, dramatic increases in the cost 
of food, you have got to act now because farmers who are producing the 
corn and producing the soybeans are getting worried. And as far as I 
can see, rightfully so.


                               Vitamin D

  Mr. GROTHMAN. Madam Speaker, the next issue that I am going to bring 
up is concerning vitamin D.
  I haven't talked about vitamin D from this platform for quite a 
while. I know some people are worried that if you talk about it, it 
might discourage people from getting a vaccine, but I know somebody 
else who passed away in the last few weeks and I don't believe they 
were taking the amount of vitamin D that is recommended.
  Vitamin D is very important for a variety of things: Bone health, 
preventing a variety of diseases. But the evidence suggests it could be 
very important in reducing both the severity and the amount of COVID. 
The number of Americans who are vitamin D deficient is very high. I 
don't normally like to talk about racial things, but I want to read 
some statistics that some people back home can take.
  Right now, there is disagreement as to the appropriate amount of 
vitamin D a person should have in their system, the number of nanograms 
per milliliter. Some people feel it is 20. Some people feel it is 30. 
But let's assume, for the sake of an argument, that it should be 30. 
Right now, 65 percent of the White population of this country would be 
considered vitamin D deficient; 80 percent of the Hispanic population 
would be considered vitamin D deficient; and 96 percent of the Black 
population would be considered vitamin D deficient.
  It is my opinion, and the opinion of the experts, that one reason 
certain groups have more people dying of this horrible disease is 
because of the much-elevated vitamin D deficiency. The way to handle it 
is simple: You should be taking vitamin D on a daily basis. We are told 
that Anthony Fauci takes 6,000 units a day. I don't know if that is 
true or not. I wish he would talk about it a lot more, if he does.
  But you have to remember, when you begin to take vitamin D, it 
doesn't get in your system right away. If you begin to take vitamin D 
today, it may get in your system 4 weeks from now. It may not get in 
your system until 30 weeks from now.
  There is a more expensive form of vitamin D called calcifediol, which 
works in hours, not weeks or months. Unfortunately, that formula, which 
is readily available, I am told, in Australia, is quite expensive. I 
would encourage people who are interested in it to familiarize 
themselves with how to get ahold of it and educate their own doctors as 
to how to get ahold of it, because if you do get COVID, a lot of times 
doctors now are prescribing vitamin D for people. But despite 
prescribing it for people, if they give them like 5,000 units a day, 
you are not going to have that kick in for a month. So you should 
familiarize yourself with how to get this fast-acting vitamin D, which 
will help people quite a bit quicker.
  There are a couple things I will point out to the public health 
establishment that the experts in vitamin D can't understand. First of 
all, if you come in for an annual checkup, particularly an older 
person, you ought to be tested for vitamin D to find out whether you 
are deficient or not. It is not that expensive. It is something that 
should be done automatically. And if you are diagnosed with COVID, 
again, you should right away be tested for vitamin D deficiency, 
because if you are deficient, things can be done. People suggest taking 
as many as 50,000 units in a week if it is determined you are vitamin D 
deficient.
  But in any event, I would strongly encourage the CDC and NIH to do 
more research regarding vitamin D. Again, I would strongly encourage 
them to make a vitamin D test both in the annual checkup and it is 
something all hospitals should be doing if people come in and they find 
out they are COVID positive.
  I will also point out, we do not know yet whether this omicron 
variant, there are indications that it is going to be a little bit more 
difficult to be taken care of with a vaccine. And it is another reason 
why people ought to be paying more attention to vitamin D.
  It is my personal opinion--nobody knows the amount of lives that can 
be saved, but depending upon who the experts are that you are talking 
to, to guess maybe on the low side, maybe 25 percent; on the high side, 
over 50 percent. And the fact that this relatively cheap vitamin has 
been out there for 2 years and has been left relatively untouched by 
the public health establishment is, I think, a scandal. But I would 
strongly encourage anybody that is listening today to familiarize 
yourself with vitamin D, talk it over with your doctor, and get a 
vitamin D test.


                          Reconciliation Bill

  Mr. GROTHMAN. Now, the reason I originally asked to speak today was 
with regard to the reconciliation bill. I think it is something that 
Americans should be paying attention to, not because of the cost, 
though the cost is horrific, and it is going to result in still more 
inflation and still more destruction of the value of the dollar. I 
think there are three areas that would permanently change America. I 
hope it is something that the public can bring up prior to the Senate 
taking up the bill.

  The number one issue is immigration. We are at a time where, 
depending on the month, over 100,000 people can come cross our southern 
border. The bill responds by changing the law and making up to 7 
million people who

[[Page H6708]]

are currently in this country illegally, setting them on a path to 
citizenship. It is changing things so it will be more difficult to 
deport felons, even felons who have committed felonies.
  My goodness, if you are not going to deport a felon who has committed 
a felony, who are you going to deport? You are taking away the 
flexibility as to whether you can deport them or not.
  In this bill, we are giving free Pell grants, which are the grants we 
give to people to go to college. We are giving these away to illegal 
immigrants. I think this is such a bizarre decision because it is not 
difficult to find Americans who are $30,000, $40,000, $50,000 in debt 
because they are regular, middle-class, hardworking families, but we 
are giving the people who come here illegally free college.
  I just think that it is such a bizarre decision, but it goes to the 
apparent attempt of the Biden administration and the majority party to 
do all they can to get as many people here as possible. I will point 
out, in this bill there was no money for new Border Patrol agents, 
which is another green light to have more people come here.
  Right now, the drug gangs will use this information, perhaps on ads 
on Central American television, to tell people now is the time to give 
the drug gangs $3,000, $5,000, $8,000 to come to the United States.
  A couple other comments on what is going on at the border: Last time 
I was down there, I saw on the path leading to this country, thrown-
away identifications--like driver's licenses being thrown away.
  You have to ask yourselves, if people are coming to this country and 
throwing away their identification from Honduras, from Venezuela, from 
Brazil, wherever, why are they doing that? Why do you not want people 
to know what name you operated under in your prior country is? I can 
only think because you are running away from something in the past. 
This is common among the people that are coming here now.
  There are two other things I am going to point out for America, one 
is: They should weigh in with Congress on this significant bill. We are 
having the government take care of all the three- and four-year-olds.
  As I said before, insofar as we have flaws in our education system, 
it is more in the middle-school area, not the preschool area. 
Traditionally, in this country we are supposed to be a country of 
strong families in which parents raise their children. It is a 
fundamental change, I think, in the role of government for Congress to 
pass a law saying from here on out it is up to the government to take 
care of the three- and four-year-olds.
  The other thing I want America to look out for is 85,000 IRS agents. 
That is such a massive amount. I used to do taxes. I am somewhat 
familiar with audits. It is not going to be pleasant for Americans, and 
at a time when every business I can think of--manufacturing, tourism, 
agriculture, medical field--everybody is short of people to work.
  And how are we responding? Let's take 85,000 people and have them 
work for the IRS. Manufacturing needs those people. Hospitals need 
those people. Why in the world, 85,000 IRS agents? And, of course, the 
amount of jobs that will be necessary is multiplied because if you have 
more IRS agents poking around the businesses, you have to hire more 
accountants to deal with the IRS agents.
  So that is a very strange decision. But to me, it shows that this 
administration wants to be the surveillance administration. And that is 
another fundamental change in the way I think our forefathers imagined 
this country or the way this country should be.
  Madam Speaker, I yield back the remainder of my time.

                          ____________________