[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 188 (Tuesday, October 26, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7356-S7357]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Unanimous Consent Request--S. 2841
Mr. LEE. Mr. President, I will be delivering remarks in a moment
regarding the unanimous consent request that I am about to make. In
deference and as a courtesy to my colleague from Washington, I will
make the request first rather than speaking first.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent, as if in legislative session,
that the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions be
discharged from further consideration of S. 2841 and the Senate proceed
to its immediate consideration. Further, I ask unanimous consent that
the bill be read a third time and passed and that the motion to
reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
The Senator from Washington.
Mrs. MURRAY. Mr. President, reserving the right to object, I do have
good news for my colleague and everyone looking for information about
the safety of vaccines: The CDC already collects and publicly releases
data like what this bill proposes. So anyone who is curious about
whether they should get a COVID-19 vaccination can go to the CDC
website right now at cdc.gov.
And some more good news: The data overwhelmingly shows these vaccines
meet FDA's rigorous standards of safety and effectiveness.
So now that that has been cleared up, I hope instead of wasting any
more time on bills like this--bills which threaten to undermine public
confidence in vaccines and trust in our public health experts by
ignoring the thorough work they already do to provide clear, scientific
data--we can instead focus on what we can all do to finally end this
pandemic, which has now killed over 730,000 people and counting, and
rebuild our country stronger and fairer.
I object.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard.
The Senator from Utah.
Mr. LEE. Mr. President, in recent years, particularly those on the
other side of the aisle have called for, declared, and demanded that we
rebuild what they call trust in government. While I believe that
Americans must have a healthy distrust of the idea of government and
any expansion of the necessarily limited powers of the Federal
Government, that does not exempt government from the obligation of
being trustworthy. That is why I find the position that so many of my
colleagues across the aisle are taking to be so confusing: trust, but
verify; trust your neighbor, count the cards.
People need information with which to analyze the faithfulness of
government and to accept the facts as they deem appropriate. Now they
claim that Americans must be forced, coerced, prodded, cajoled,
threatened into making the government-approved medical decision. But
heaven forbid if someone resists, objects due to moral or religious
beliefs, or opts out of being vaccinated due to specific unique health
concerns, she is derided and ignored, and--if the current Presidential
administration has its way--forced out of her job.
All of this is supposed to build a safer and more trusting society?
This argument is totalitarian, and it is wrong. The United States is
an open society, and the only way by which government can build trust
with the American people is to earn it. The government will earn that
trust only through transparency.
I have come to the Senate floor now nine times to oppose President
Biden's immoral, unwise, and damaging vaccine mandate. I am committed
to keep this going for as long as it takes to beat the mandate. I have
introduced, now, a dozen bills to counteract, restrict, or limit the
mandate. I do all this because I have heard from over 300 Utahans from
one end of the State to the other, who are at risk of losing their
livelihoods due to this aggressive government overreach.
Overreach of the government is staggering in here. It is an overreach
the likes of which we haven't seen in this country in a long time; the
likes of which we arguably haven't seen since April 8, 1952, when
President Harry Truman seized every steel mill in America in order to
support the Korean war effort. Fortunately, within a couple of months,
the Supreme Court of the United States acted and invalidated that
maneuver as unlawful, unconstitutional, which, of course, it was.
In this instance, that hasn't happened because, with respect to the
OSHA mandate, the employer mandate--one saying all employers with more
than 99 employees have to comply, have to fire people who aren't
vaccinated--there is nothing there because the authority doesn't exist.
But, in the meantime, corporate America is picking up the slack and
doing the President's dirty work for him.
But it is a government overreach, and it is an overreach that is
harming good people, people who are not enemies of the United States.
No, they are not enemies to anyone. They are our neighbors, our fellow
citizens, and our friends. Their stories are as tragic as they are
moving, yet this administration seems bent on assuming that they have
no voice, on giving them no voice.
Don't get me wrong, I am not against the mandate--I am against the
mandate. I am not against the vaccine, not in any way. I am fully
vaccinated. My entire family has been vaccinated. I have encouraged
people to get vaccinated for the specific reason that I see the
vaccines as miracles and miracles that are protecting many, many
millions of Americans from the harms of COVID-19.
But if government is trying to encourage Americans to get vaccinated,
hiding information about their concerns with the vaccine is the worst
possible way to build trust. It has the exact opposite of what they
claim they are trying to do. Existing concerns, make no mistake, are
not just going to evaporate if they are ignored.
And the government's lack of transparency should be just as
concerning to Americans who aren't worried about the vaccine as it is
to those who are. Government should never be in the business of hiding
information about the adverse effects and risks involved, no matter how
infrequent or uncommon they might be.
And the government has--let's face it--been less than forthright with
information about vaccine complications. Adverse reactions to the
vaccine have been documented since the COVID-19 shot became available.
The administration's message has been: Get the vaccine; it is safe,
period.
If individuals pose questions about possible risks, about its
interactions
[[Page S7357]]
with other medical treatments, or about rare reactions seen directly
after its administration, they are often pushed aside, denied proper
care, or deemed crazy conspiracy theorists for trying to scare the
public away from the vaccine.
Sadly, this breeds distrust and it threatens the ability of those who
experience rare vaccine injuries, the ability to access the proper
treatment, care, and respect they deserve.
We should all be able to agree this type of governmental deception
has no place in the United States. That is why today I came to the
floor to offer the Transparency in COVID-19 Vaccination Act.
This bill would require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to
publicly disclose all information regarding adverse effects of the
COVID-19 vaccines. This sunshine would help clear the air and allow
individuals and the medical community the opportunity to make informed
decisions.
This clarity would also be an important step toward building trust
with the American public. Americans have the best, most accurate
information when they make medical decisions--at least they try to.
They deserve to have the best and most accurate information when they
make medical decisions. This bill would ensure that happens. That is
why I came to the floor to offer it today, offer that we pass it and
offer the protections.
My friend and distinguished colleague, the Senator from Washington,
regrettably objected to it. In doing so, she argued that it is not
necessary because, according to the Senator from Washington, all the
information that they need is now available. In many instances, it is
not. This bill would require that be made available--all of it.
The CDC does collect information on it, but the American people don't
have full access to that information, and they should.
That begs the question: Why? Why would anyone want to do that?
I don't know why. To me, it doesn't make sense, especially if one
wants to increase the number of people getting the vaccine as I do.
I would like to see more people getting vaccinated because I think
the vaccine is something of a medical miracle and it is protecting
many, many millions of Americans from the harmful effects of COVID-19.
That is a good thing.
We want them to be protected. To be protected, we want them to get
vaccinated. It doesn't mean government should force it on them, and it
certainly doesn't mean that government should be perceived in any way
as being less than forthcoming with information that it gains access
to.
That is all this bill would require. It is not hard. There is nothing
wrong with doing that. In fact, my colleague from Washington insists
that it is already done.
If that is the case, what is wrong with putting that into law?
There isn't anything. We should do it.
I will be back on this and other topics related to the COVID-19
vaccine mandates.
All this is unfortunate. No one is happy about the fact that COVID-19
has touched our country in the way that it has. It has been painful. It
is devastating. The 730,000 Americans who have died with COVID are
tragedies, each and every one of them.
There is nothing about government overreach that will bring them
back. There is certainly not anything about government overreach that
is going to have a proper influence than the American people. There is
certainly not anything about government hiding the ball when it comes
to data that the American people deserve and want to have access to
that is going to make people better.
We want more people to get vaccinated. Because of that, we want them
to have the facts. We should do that.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Texas.