[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 184 (Wednesday, October 20, 2021)]
[House]
[Pages H5721-H5724]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
REALITY OF THE ECONOMY
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 4, 2021, the Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arizona (Mr.
Schweikert) for 30 minutes.
Mr. SCHWEIKERT. Madam Speaker, I promise I am not trying to go for
the record of the most boring for half an hour, but if I make it, bless
us all.
Madam Speaker, over the next half hour, I am going to try to walk
through--and a lot of this is just sort of the boiling frustration that
we all go through around here. We are frustrated because I believe a
lot of our brothers and sisters on the left mean well. They say warm,
fuzzy things. They say things that actually should make you feel good.
And then you actually deal with the reality of what is happening in our
economy and around us.
We are going to blast through a bunch of these and see if I can sort
of explain our frustration as conservatives but also as Americans. So
just one quick point. Do you remember all of the rhetoric from the last
election from our Democrat colleagues about how they are going to
actually do all of these things in regard to greenhouse gases, but we
will still have a healthy economy? Well, this is the chart before
President Biden took office, and you see GDP was truly growing and
greenhouse gases had actually made quite a bend and change.
But now, we actually also have some other little facts we are going
to have to deal with. Think about this: The attacks that happened on
President Trump, but in those 4 years, my understanding is use of coal
actually fell 30 percent.
Well, I have to congratulate the Democrats. It looks like this year's
coal usage will go up 23 percent. One more time: Coal usage will now go
up almost 23 percent this year because they have so screwed up the
energy economy.
When you block pipelines, when you block the movement of natural gas,
when you block the much cleaner fuel and you need to produce ions,
called electricity, where do you go? So, congratulations to the
Democrats. They actually took a trend--where they said they wanted
this--and have absolutely reversed it.
It is sort of an amazing thought, isn't it, that the Biden
administration and Democrats did more in the last 9 months for coal
production than the previous President did in 4 years? It is a
fascinating but good example when you don't own a calculator and don't
do economics.
Let's actually walk through a couple of other things. You have also
seen the reports and the analysis of how many poor people are going to
absolutely suffer this winter. Have you seen what energy prices look
like? If your household that uses heating oil--I am sorry, for those of
us in the desert, we don't know what heating oil is, but we are told it
is getting really expensive. Have you seen the numbers of what is
predicted to be paid in cold parts of this country?
If you are angry about it, go talk to your Democrat Representative
because
[[Page H5722]]
they are the ones that basically, through their arrogance and not
owning a calculator, not understanding basic economics, have just, in
many areas of the country, will have doubled, doubled your heating bill
this winter.
But this is what crappy economics looks like. And you start to walk
through it. How about if you are in one of those neighborhoods where
crime is an issue? Well, you have to thank the Democrats once again.
You can see that homicides are up 16 percent in the first 6 months of
this year.
We chose not to use it, but if you actually look at the concentration
of where these homicides are, people of color are the victims here.
You know, once again, we hear these beautiful speeches behind these
microphones of how they are going to help and protect and do this,
except they are killing them. At some point, the math is the math. This
is sort of the Democrat destruction in just the first 9 months, 10
months of this year. And the math is the math. The facts are the facts.
The air is getting dirtier; the power bills have gone up; you are
less safe. But let's keep walking through more of the damage that is
being done to our country, the society.
{time} 1845
In my State, we have a little problem. We are a border State. The
number of adult males that are crossing our border has skyrocketed. If
you actually start to walk through what that actually means--let's
actually take a look.
Oh, but what about the fentanyl and who is that killing? When you
take a look at the pounds--tonnage, actually--of dangerous narcotics,
particularly fentanyl, that is crossing my border in Arizona, thank you
for the absurd policies that have been adopted by the Democrats and
this President.
Is it that you want to kill people? I can't believe that is in your
hearts, but that is what you have allowed to happen.
Let's actually talk about the other side, the economic side, of what
the Democrats have done in regards to the border. Why some of this is
important is I need you to double it up. We are going to come back to
the inflation here in a second.
What are the two things you do in a society if you want to destroy
the working poor? You make the value of their labor less. And unlike
2018 and 2019, which we had records in this country, where if you are
part of the working poor, you are someone that didn't finish high
school and what you sell is your labor, you were getting dramatically
less poor. We know income and equality, wages, were all going the right
direction.
Now, the Democrats take over, and you flood the society with--what
was today's final number, 1.7 million, heading towards 2 million--
people of moderate to low skill, and do you understand the economic
effects of what you just did to the working poor in this country?
We have some data that we did a couple weeks ago on the floor that
showed that by the end of the decade, you will have made the working
poor poorer in this country, substantially, because of opening the
border. Now, add in inflation.
If you actually take a look at the real earnings, the real earnings,
they are negative. People in this country, the working poor, the middle
class, they are getting poorer. Do we care? Because it is the math.
It is nice to give these beautiful speeches about how we care, but
then when you so screw up the basic economics of society, when you have
now devalued their labor by flooding the market with similar skill
sets, and now you have so monetized the society that you have cash
chasing products and goods, and then you screw up the incentives to
work, what did you think was going to happen?
You wonder where is the compassion around here? The working class,
that middle class, and the working poor are getting poorer every day in
this country because of Democrat policies.
It is a level of cruelty. Can we stop the hemorrhaging? Can we stop
the cruelty to these populations? It is not enough to give pretty
speeches that you care.
When you start to look at this, when you realize the skyrocketing
inflation--yeah, it is the highest in 13 years. But if you do some of
the core goods, that if you are on that--I hate the term--lower
quartile, where substantial portions of your income go to
transportation, food, and rent, it is even higher than this.
Now, we understand from the economists, it is no longer considered
transitory. This is Democrat policies at work.
A couple weeks ago we tried to do a simple explanation of supply
side, where you use resources, whether they be tax cuts or incentives
or getting regulations right to encourage production, and by
encouraging production, you make people's labor more valuable and they
get paid more. But the society has more goods and products and services
to buy, so you don't set off inflation.
You are now living the Democrat stimulus Keynesian model of throw
lots and lots and lots of cash at it, but you did nothing to stimulate
production. We have lots of cash chasing goods now, but at the same
time, all of that cash also encourages people, saying: Hey, maybe I
don't really have to work right now.
So you have a fall in labor force participation, you have lots of
cash to go buy things, and then you wonder how the supply chains get
screwed up. You wonder how you have inflation set off.
We are reliving the 1970s. Did anyone actually buy a textbook?
Seriously. If you actually loved and cared for the working class, for
the working poor, you would have been embracing 2018 and 2019, which
were miracles of no inflation and dramatic wage growth.
Yes, the pandemic has been miserable, but much of this did not have
to happen. But it is that arrogance, once again, of Democrat policies.
And is it the darkness of, hey, if we send out lots and lots of money
in checks, if we are--as the Democrats so-called Build Back Better
plan, which is to take the majority of our society and put them on
transfer payments--maybe it is great politics. Maybe that is how you
become the majority party forever. It is really crappy economics.
So if you start to take a look at just the last 6 months--you
remember a couple months ago: This is transitory; it is going to stop?
Not stopping, not stopping. Even the Federal Reserve now has updated
their numbers. So the talking heads were saying, oh, it is transitory,
give the administration a pass. Turns out, we have so structurally
screwed up the labor markets, we have so structurally failed to provide
the incentives to produce things in our own country and massive amounts
of this liquidity are functionally now financing the rest of the world
and particularly China. So congratulations once again.
If you actually start to look--and we are going to put up all of
these slides on our website so folks can actually have a chance to sort
of dive into them--but how prices have changed in a year. When you
start to understand--that is gasoline. This is your fuel oil, as we
were just talking about; cars. But you start to go over the things that
are sort of the bare necessities for so much of our community. We are
just kicking them in the head.
Then the arrogance coming out of the White House saying, well, these
are sort of, what was it, high-class problems? Come on. Is that really
where the heads of the left are? Their excuse is, well--because the
basic economics are, if you are a person with assets, you have a house,
you have retirement accounts, you own gold, you own other things, you
are getting richer. Now, your purchasing power is eroding. But if you
don't hold assets or you are a saver, someone trying to save for
retirement, these policies are just destroying your economic future.
So let's continue down the line of misery that the Democrats have
brought us. If you actually take a look at where we were going after
the Tax Cut and Jobs Act and you started to realize what had happened
in wages, particularly for female participation, we had the highest
female labor force participation in U.S. history. It was off the
charts, and their wages had begun to skyrocket.
Do we see anything in the Democrat proposals that will ever bring us
back to that? Actually, no. It is actually just the opposite. The
University of Chicago study now makes it look like they will
incentivize those numbers to continue to go the other direction.
[[Page H5723]]
Let's actually take a look--and we started to touch on this. If you
are part of that working poor, and you start to understand that what
happens on--if you start to break out the world by education level--and
I know sometimes this is uncomfortable, because you sort of segment
your society. But the reality of it is we actually saw amazing wage
growth, just amazing wage growth in 2018, 2019--21-plus percent. And
that is the very population that the pandemic smashed into a wall. Now
the Democrat policies of inflation, opening up the borders,
incentivizing people functionally not to participate in the labor
market, they are going to destroy--as a matter of fact, they have
already begun to destroy.
Let's look also at the brilliance of the left's proposals of
functionally: Let's throw lots and lots and lots of cash at the problem
and then try to figure out why that cash functionally is on its way to
China to buy things. It was not designed to create a robust
manufacturing backbone in this country. You actually incentivize
people, saying, well, go out and buy lots of things, engage in
consumer--oh, by the way, we did nothing in those policies to have that
become the new backbone of productivity and opportunity and jobs in our
own country.
The simple proof of this is--have you seen the pictures of the
container ships lined up at the port of Long Beach? What do you think
is in those? I mean, we are living it; we are looking at it. Yet the
talking heads are incapable of trying something new around here, and
that would be tell the truth.
So let's do something that is even a little more uncomfortable to
talk about. Remember when Vice President Biden was running for
President, and repeatedly we were told how if we just had a Democrat
Presidency and Democrat unified government, we would see the deaths--
and the deaths are miserable and horrible. I have had a couple friends
die of COVID--but they would come to an end and the world would be
better.
So we have a new President. He is handed multiple vaccines. But how
is it possible? How is it possible to have vaccines available to this
administration, functionally financed and brought in policy-wise by the
previous administration, and then there are more deaths this year than
there were last year? Are the Democrats ready to stand up and say: We
lied. We made crap up. And the results of not telling the truth and the
way they have approached the American people about the vaccines? Are
they going to take responsibility for the deaths? Because they sure
beat the crap out of Republicans and the last President over this.
Should they live by their own words?
Let's talk about the Democrats' tax policy now. We need to tax the
rich, right? We have done multiple presentations here on the floor
saying maybe we should stop subsidizing the rich. We showed a couple
months ago $1.4 trillion over the next 10 years of subsidies that go to
the rich. In this case, Democrats actually have something brilliant,
saying--this is a great scam--we are going to tax the wealthy, but
wink, wink, nod, nod, we are going to actually hand it back to the
wealthy in tax credits and subsidies.
Here is a simple example of a family that makes $800,000 a year. The
Democrats' tax bill, tax proposal, will hand them $118,000 in tax
credits, if you just buy the right electric vehicle and the right solar
panels and these things.
This is absurd. You are taking the wealthy in society, you are
actually blaming them for not paying their fair share, even though you
already saw--I am sure if anyone is literate around here, you saw
today's Wall Street Journal talk about you are not actually even
getting to the super rich; you are actually attacking the high-income
earning rich, because we tax income; we don't tax wealth. But in this
case, we are going to build a tax bill saying we are going to raise
your taxes, but wink, wink, nod, nod, we are going to hand it back to
you in tax credits, as long as you buy what the Democrats tell you to
buy.
Yet, if you actually look at what the design of the Democrats' tax
plan is, you must understand by the end of the decade, we are all
poorer. The society is poorer. The working poor are poorer. The middle
class is poorer.
We now have multiple studies--and we are going to talk about these on
a number of the slides--where the size of the economy actually shrinks.
The number of people working actually shrinks. If you understand our
debt problem, if we do not have an incredibly robust economic
expansion, we are in real trouble. Yet, this is sort of the dystopian
future the Democrats are planning for my 6-year-old daughter and for
every American.
You understand, when you add in the spending proposals, in less than
10 years, we are going to be running $2.6 trillion of borrowing every
single year. So think of that. Nine years from now when we are working
on the budget, just the borrowing package--so in 9 years, the borrowing
package, just to finance the spending of baseline government, the
entitlements, and the expansion of entitlements, we will be borrowing
$2.6-plus trillion every single year. This is the healthy economy we
were promised?
{time} 1900
So, understand what that means is, in less than 9 years, if the
Democrats get their way, we are at 129 percent of debt to GDP, and that
is publicly held debt.
Now, you all understand why that number is so incredibly important.
When you strip capital out of society, how does the small business get
a loan? How does the entrepreneur here get a loan? How about the person
who just has a dream and wants to start a business in their garage?
They have to compete with government.
Is there this bizarre fantasy that somehow we are going to monetize
it? Maybe the fantasy of modern monetary theory, which, as you
understand, has been tried many, many, many, many times over history,
and it has always ended up very badly.
Do you remember the inflation numbers a few boards ago? Welcome to
the dystopian future that the left is bringing us. Look, the baseline
number was already crappy. It was over 106 percent of GDP. With the
Democrats' additional proposal, it goes from about 106 to 129 percent.
This is a miserable future for this country, and this is being brought
to you by Joe Biden and our beloved Democrat friends.
I know they mean well; at least, I like to believe they do. But they
have to see these same numbers. Most of these are based on CBO
projections. You start to see other things happening in society because
of Democrat policies that really, really are starting to take effect
right now. We are seeing some numbers that we need to understand
between now and the end of the year. There are some economic numbers
from us on the Joint Economic Committee that are becoming incredibly
uncomfortable.
This is sort of an odd one that popped up the other day. It turns
out, we are having this sudden huge spike of individuals dropping out
of the labor force. But what happens when you have a substantial spike
of folks who are just saying, ``I am going to retire''?
One of the miracles of 2018, 2019 is we saw our brothers and sisters
coming back into the labor force because wages were going up, and there
were so many opportunities. How can there be a world right now where we
say we have over 10 million open jobs, yet we are seeing huge dropouts
of the labor market?
This is a chart that basically says we had, what is it, 1\1/2\
million-plus older Americans decide, ``I am going to take early
retirement.'' What is so dark about this number is a huge, huge, huge
portion of those have almost no savings.
They are taking early retirement, going to live on Social Security
instead of what we were seeing in 2018, 2019 as the economy grew. We
were actually seeing poverty of seniors falling because many of them
had taken part-time or had taken some work. Now the reverse trend has
happened.
What has happened in the psyche of Americans, of our brothers and
sisters out there? We are already seeing millions of Americans of
traditional working age disappearing from the labor pool, so they are
not counted in unemployment because they are not looking. But they are
in that baseline number we call labor force participation. I know this
is geeky, but it is really important.
You cannot have a growing, healthy, prosperous society if you build
so many disincentives in your public policy that not working or
dropping out or retiring early is where your head is at.
[[Page H5724]]
According to the University of Chicago, the Democrats' plan to expand
the child tax credit would cause a million and a half workers to exit
the labor force. On the conservative side, we have actually made
multiple proposals of how to do some creative things with the earned
income tax credit so you actually help the working poor and you make
working more valuable, more attractive.
But the Democrats' proposal is now to delink a monthly check from
participating in society, participating in the economy, building skill
sets, building an economic future for yourself, your retirement, for
your children.
And now we actually start to see the academic studies coming in that
we are going to lose a million and a half workers just on this one line
item.
It truly is almost dystopian that the left can get behind the
microphones, say these warm, fuzzy things, but the economists are
sitting there shaking in their boots, saying we tried versions of this
in the 1970s, and it did not work well. And now we are doing it in a
time where our demographics are a real headwind and our debt load is
crushing.
We actually have some proof that also demonstrates that the President
and the Democrats said a lot of things that just weren't true because
the data now is in on the States that ended the early, we will call it
the SPIF on unemployment. It turns out they represent a small portion
of this country's population because I think there was only, what, 13
States that did it, and there are like 20, 23, whatever they are, a
small percentage of the Nation's population, but they are over half the
job growth.
The data is absolutely clear. The States that actually ended the
unemployment SPIF, the enhanced unemployment, had dramatically better
economic growth, job growth.
Once again, is having a job, is economic prosperity, is economic
growth moral? Because if it is, then what the Democrats are doing is
absolutely immoral.
You start to see the Byzantine structure of all the tax hikes that
the left is proposing, and we may do some of this next week. What is so
crushing about this is to even get close to their spending
requirements, it doesn't produce enough revenues.
I keep getting asked over and over, and saying okay, the Democrats
aren't dumb. There are probably a few of them that actually do own
calculators. They have to understand that their spending proposal in
this environment will be incredibly destructive to opportunity in
society.
We have lots of charts. You need to go through these other studies
that basically show the transfer payment model the Democrats are
pushing ends social mobility in this country. If you are poor, you are
going to stay poor. If you are middle class, you stay middle class.
In this country, do you really think our societal social fabric is
going to hold when you have no opportunity to move upward and sometimes
even downward, that we are going to basically become a European
transfer payment, socialist society; that the class you are born into
is where you stay, no matter how hard you work, the schooling you go
to, because that stagnation is what every study says?
The other part that is also perverse is the Democrats have to also
understand the receipts, revenues, that would be produced by all these
taxes don't come close to covering all their spending.
It is obvious. They are setting up our country to actually have to do
other layers of taxes. Are they going to sweep retirement accounts?
Well, that is where a bunch of the cash is. Are we basically going to
move to a VAT, a value-added tax, so each step of production we tax?
Are you going to have to add some sort of tariff or border tax? Because
right now, none of this works. None of the math works.
The final slide here is a congratulations to President Biden and the
Democrats' policies because they did something none of us thought was
possible. Remember when we started this year in January, this was going
to be one of the most robust economic growth years in history? There
were discussions that we were going to be 6-plus percent GDP growth.
As of yesterday, GDP growth from the Atlanta Fed calculator is 0.5.
One-half of one percent is our economic GDP projection for this
quarter, proving at some point policies really do matter, the people
you elect really do matter, and the amount of pain this is going to
cause to so many people because the opportunity, the growth in their
wages has now been crushed by these policies.
Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
____________________