[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 175 (Tuesday, October 5, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6902-S6903]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                             Infrastructure

  Mr. HAGERTY. Mr. President, on August 7, I came to the Senate floor 
to oppose the expedited passage of what is known as the bipartisan 
infrastructure bill. I did that for several reasons, including because 
it was obviously going to be taken hostage and used by Democrats to 
impose Big Government socialism on America.
  In those August 7 remarks, I said:

       I am frustrated with this legislation . . . because it is 
     tied to . . . the Democrats' real ambition, which is their 
     multitrillion-dollar march to socialism that they will unveil 
     right after this infrastructure legislation is passed.
       Democrats have admitted this . . . is [their] plan.
       They previewed phase 1 of this scheme in March, when they 
     spent $1.9 trillion in the name of COVID relief. Of course, 
     90 percent of it had nothing to do with COVID. It was really 
     just a payoff to their most loyal political supporters. 
     Sadly, it is now causing the highest inflation . . . in 
     decades . . . [which] is a daily tax on every American who 
     [is buying] goods and services.

  I went on to lay out phase 2, the step-by-step plan some Democrats 
are using to launch their Big Government socialism fantasy.
  Step 1, I said, was to change the conversation to trillions. Make 
billions look small. Condition the Congress. Condition the media. 
Condition people.
  That has happened.
  Step 2, I said, was to tell everyone that the United States needs 
infrastructure.
  That has happened too.
  Step 3, I said, was to redefine the term ``infrastructure'' to 
include Big Government socialism programs. Really muddy it up so that 
no one could understand what they were actually talking about.
  That has happened.
  Step 4, I said, was that when more reasonable Democrats in the Senate 
balk at some of the more extensive or egregious items, promise them a 
two-track process: one for hard infrastructure and one for social 
programs. Confuse the situation even further.
  That has happened.
  Step 5, I said, was to negotiate as much of the Democrats' socialist 
wish list as possible into the infrastructure track. Then, put the rest 
of the wish list into the Big Government socialism wish list bill.
  That also has happened.
  Step 6, I said, was to pass the bipartisan infrastructure bill 
through the Senate as quickly as possible. The Trojan horse would then 
be through the gates.
  Unfortunately, that has also happened.
  Step 7, I said, was to hold that infrastructure bill hostage in the 
House of Representatives until everything they couldn't get into the 
infrastructure bill--meaning the trillions of dollars in Big Government 
spending programs--also passes the Senate.
  That is what we are seeing happening right now, just as I predicted 
in early August.
  Step 8, I said, was for the President to say that he wouldn't sign 
the infrastructure bill into law if it is not accompanied by trillions 
of dollars in Big Government socialism programs.
  This has also happened.
  Step 9, I said, was to get the Big Government socialism part passed 
by circumventing the filibuster in the Senate. This would require 
abusing an arcane loophole called reconciliation to pass trillions of 
dollars in Big Government socialism with only 50 Democrat votes.
  Step 10, I said, was to give more moderate Democrats political cover 
to support the parliamentary trick and Big Government socialism 
spending. To accomplish this, radical Democrats in the House are 
threatening to shoot the hostage--the hostage is the infrastructure 
bill that passed the Senate--a bill that more moderate Democrats more 
strongly support.
  These final two steps have not yet been executed because some 
Democrats see the peril in following the dangerous instincts of the 
most extreme elements of their party.
  On September 27, the most radical House Democrats, backed by Speaker 
Pelosi, stated that they were ``committed to voting for the 
infrastructure bill only after [their Big Government socialism bill] is 
passed.''
  On September 29, one of the most outspoken of that group made it even 
clearer, saying:

       [S]everal months ago, we had an agreement with . . . 
     everybody else throughout the entire party . . . we will move 
     forward on this $3.5 trillion. And we will link the [two 
     bills, meaning the bipartisan infrastructure bill] and the 
     [big government socialism bill].

  In revealing this, she confirmed that the far left has been 
manipulating everyone involved in this process.
  When I laid out Democrats' plans on the Senate floor back in August, 
I used the word ``abracadabra'' to illustrate the sleight of hand 
Democrats were attempting to pull off, saying that the American people 
might not even notice--until it is too late--that their wallet has been 
stolen and their country has been fundamentally changed.
  Fortunately, it seems the American people are wising up to the trick. 
The question I asked at the time--and the question the American people 
should be thinking about--is this: If all of these policies and all of 
the spending is so good, why does getting it done require a 
parliamentary house of mirrors?
  The answer to this question is that many Democrats know that the Big 
Government socialism bill is unpopular; it is bad for the country. 
Otherwise, the hostage-taking wouldn't be necessary.
  This radical dream of Big Government socialism is stalled out at the 
moment. So, at Speaker Pelosi's direction, President Biden drove up to 
Capitol Hill on October 1 and, according to one Representative, told 
House Democrats that in order to get the infrastructure bill done, we 
have to get this agreement on the Big Government socialism bill through 
the reconciliation.
  According to a House Democrat, the President said that he wanted 
``both bills to go at the same time'' and specifically praised the far-
left House Members who were ``exuberant,'' according to a progressive 
congressional caucus member.
  In other words, the far left is in charge, and President Biden 
embraces that fact. His actions made clear that the infrastructure bill 
is merely a tool to pass this Big Government socialism legislation. 
Both must pass or neither will pass. Rather than use his platform to 
defuse the hostage situation, President Biden is egging on the hostage-
taking, and he is demanding Big Government socialism as the ransom.
  Following President Biden's meeting with House Democrats, POLITICO 
quoted a Democratic observer who said:

       The fact that the president came to the Hill and whipped 
     against his own bill is the strangest thing I've ever seen.


[[Page S6903]]


  It is very strange indeed, but it underscores the sad reality that 
the far left is in charge of the Democratic Party.
  What we have witnessed these past 9 months is the biggest bait-and-
switch in American political history. The American people didn't vote 
for Big Government socialism in 2020. Yet the Biden administration 
proudly proclaims that it is the most radically leftwing administration 
in American history.
  According to POLITICO this morning, President Biden held a call with 
progressive House Members yesterday in which he told them that he was 
``getting more and more frustrated with moderate Democrats.'' For what? 
For refusing to be steamrolled by an agenda that most Americans don't 
want?
  Democrats' extreme politics are eclipsed only by their incompetence, 
from Afghanistan to inflation, from our energy dependence to a border 
collapse. Why? Because far-left radicals are dictating the agenda, and 
they are calling all the shots.
  With respect to this infrastructure hostage situation, the only 
question now is, Will every Democrat pay the ransom of Big Government 
socialism? And what is included in this ransom?
  First, Democrats are currently haggling over the top-line cost. Will 
it be $3.5 trillion, $2.5 trillion, $1.5 trillion, or something in 
between? Again, this is trillions of dollars--with a ``t''--that we are 
talking about.
  The number that they use is actually irrelevant because the bill will 
actually cost far more when you peel away the budget gimmicks. The 
overall cost of the bill is only labeled at $3.5 trillion because 
Democrats are pretending--again, for budget projection purposes--that 
many of these costly programs are simply temporary and they will 
terminate in a few years.
  Ask any Democrat whether this bill just includes some temporary 
spending--spending that will soon phase out. Ask them this: How will 
they vote when it comes time to prevent the program from expiring? You 
know this. Once you turn this sort of spending on, it will be next to 
impossible to turn it off.
  This is like valuing the cost of your home at the initial downpayment 
price and ignoring the 30-year mortgage that follows.
  Current estimates are that $3.5 trillion really will be more like 
$5.5 trillion, and that is just in the first decade alone. Yet all of 
Washington is currently obsessed with negotiations over where this 
phony number is going to land. This is another distraction. It is a 
tactic to divert your eyes from what is in the bill. No matter what 
number is used, the total cost of this bill is vastly higher than they 
claim, tens of trillions of dollars over my children's and your 
children's lifetime. That is before even accounting for inevitable cost 
overruns, waste, and program expansions. Of course, this means most of 
the Big Government socialism bill will be debt-financed because the 
bill will cost far more than projected even in the short run.
  Given our current debt of nearly $30 trillion, allowing the fuse to 
continue to burn on this new, inflation-fueling, economy-crushing level 
of debt borders on insanity. It is the kind of thing that toppled world 
powers in the past.
  Now is the time to get our fiscal house in order or at least avoid 
making it worse. Democrats want to solve the problem of a burning house 
not by throwing water on it but by throwing on gasoline and arguing 
that 50 gallons of gasoline is, well, better than throwing 100 gallons 
of gasoline on it.
  As obscene as Democrats' spending has become, focusing on cost 
obscures the more insidious, destructive nature of Big Government 
socialism.
  Without careful oversight from the American people and their elected 
Representatives here in Congress, government bureaucracy can't help but 
serve its own interests. Over time, the bureaucracy has fed itself, 
becoming ever more powerful, ever more hungry, and ever more present in 
the lives of the American people.
  Many Democrats believe in feeding the bureaucratic beast. They want 
the government to grow, and they want Americans to be ever more 
dependent upon government from cradle to grave. They want permanent 
government control over childcare, over preschool, raising your 
children, over healthcare, over energy, jobs, employers, and the list 
goes on. This will mean that Americans must turn to Big Government for 
more and more of life's necessities.
  Big Government will increasingly control the lives of Americans 
beginning in their formative years. Once the Federal Government is in 
charge of funding preschool and daycare that has crowded out all the 
private competition, you better believe the Federal Government will be 
providing the lesson plans for your children as well.
  This legislation will dramatically expand the welfare entitlement 
state, meaning they will provide even more incentives for American 
workers not to work. At a time when small businesses are desperately 
searching for workers, this is the wrong thing to do. It will fuel 
inflation; it will pile on more debt for our children and 
grandchildren; and it will drastically increase taxes and regulations 
on all Americans. More fundamentally and more sadly, it will move 
America closer to a European socialist model where government 
dependency replaces opportunity and where the dignity of work is lost.
  The strength of America is our unique system--our spirit, our work 
ethic, and our compassion for one another. The foundation for all this 
has been the freedom to pursue our dreams thanks to the system of free 
market capitalism--a system that has spread the American dream across 
the globe. That dream spread because our country offered something 
different.
  This plan to spend tens of trillions of dollars fundamentally 
threatens the American system and the American dream, not only by 
jeopardizing our fiscal stability but by ushering in Big Government 
socialism, which, if history is any guide, tends to crowd out 
everything else and, perhaps, especially opportunity.
  The American people have proven that they will flourish if permitted 
to do so. In this sense, the only thing that can stop the American 
people is the size and the reach of the American Government. For the 
Senate to participate in imposing such self-inflicted wounds on our 
country would be profoundly sad. History will not look kindly upon it.
  However, one point from my remarks this summer remains just as true 
today:

       It only takes one Democrat to end this insanity, to stand 
     up and say he or she won't participate in this scheme.

  The American people and their children and grandchildren will no 
doubt be grateful if one of them chooses to do so.
  I yield the floor.

                          ____________________