[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 175 (Tuesday, October 5, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Page S6900]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                             Rural America

  Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, there are a few, quote-unquote, winners 
under Democrats' $3\1/2\ trillion tax-and-spending spree--unions, for 
example, and electric vehicle manufacturers.
  But there are a lot more losers, like middle-class families, who have 
to stretch their paychecks to cover higher inflation and higher energy 
bills; workers, who will see jobs and opportunities shrink; and farmers 
and ranchers.
  Agriculture is the lifeblood of my home State of South Dakota, and so 
ag issues are pretty much always on my mind. And I am deeply concerned 
by what Democrats' tax-and-spending spree will mean for South Dakota 
farmers.
  For starters, I am worried that the Democrats' bill could mean the 
end of some farms, thanks to the bill's expansion of the death tax.
  Now, I have long crusaded against the death tax. Death should not be 
a taxable event, and there should be limits on how many times the 
government can tax the same money over and over and over.
  But I get particularly fired up when talking about the death tax when 
it comes to farmers and ranchers, because the death tax can threaten 
the existence of family farms and ranches.
  You ask why.
  Because farming and ranching are often cash-poor operations. Farmers' 
and ranchers' money is tied up in their land, not the bank. So a farmer 
could have land worth as much as several million dollars and still 
struggle to break even in years where the harvest has been poor.
  So when that same farmer dies, the IRS will come in, demanding a 
substantial portion of his or her estate. But since most of that money 
is tied up in the land, there is a good chance that the family will not 
have enough money in the bank to pay the IRS, and so they will have to 
start selling off the land--the lifeblood of their farming operation.
  So give that a couple of generations and the death tax can drive a 
family farm right out of existence.
  I am proud that the tax reform bill we passed in 2017 included death 
tax relief. We successfully doubled the estate tax exemption, which 
lifted the specter of the death tax for most farmers and ranchers and 
helped reduce the need for costly estate planning efforts to try to 
keep the farm or ranch in the family.
  Unfortunately--unfortunately--we were not able to make this relief 
permanent, which is why I have continued to push for eliminating the 
death tax. But at least family farms and ranches were set to have 
relief through the year 2025.
  Well, not anymore. Democrats are set to return the death tax 
exemption to its pre-2017 level starting in January, which means that 
more family farms and ranches will once again be in the tax's 
crosshairs.
  As I said, death should not be a taxable event. The IRS should not be 
coming in to see you at the same time as the undertaker. But the 
government--and the government, I should say, should not be in the 
business of shuttering family farms and family businesses.
  But thanks to Democrats' tax-and-spending spree, a lot of farmers are 
going to have to start worrying about whether they will be able to hand 
their farm on to their children or whether a government tax bill will 
mean the end of an enterprise the family has cultivated, literally, for 
generations.
  The icing on the cake, of course, is that at the same time Democrats 
are planning to expand a tax that threatens family farms, they are also 
planning to include tax relief for their millionaire contributors in 
blue States.
  That is right. Despite the fact that Democrats are scrambling for 
money to fund some of their spending spree, they are preparing to 
provide tax relief for wealthy Democrat donors.
  I am disturbed by the fact that Democrats are willing to jeopardize 
family farms and ranches to help fund their spending spree. But I am 
not all that surprised because it is clear from the bill that farmers 
and ranchers are not high on Democrats' priority list.
  The bill's spending on rail, for example, emphasizes passenger rail, 
which will benefit Amtrak and a handful of east coast cities, but it 
means little to most Americans.
  The rail that matters to Americans in the heartland is freight rail, 
particularly short line railroads, which carry farmers' and ranchers' 
corn and wheat and beef to markets around the United States. But short 
line rail gets short shrift in this bill.
  Biofuels also get short shrift. As this bill makes clear, Democrats 
have picked their preferred winner in the clean energy stakes, and that 
winner is electric vehicles. Biofuels take a back seat in Democrats' 
legislation despite the essential role they played in making American 
energy cleaner and despite the significance of biofuels to the rural 
economy.
  Every few years, Congress passes a major farm bill. For decades, that 
legislation has been the product of bipartisan collaboration and a 
lengthy hearing and fact-finding process that allows for extensive 
input from farmers and ranchers and other ag stakeholders. It is one of 
the last, I would say, truly bipartisan things that we regularly do 
around here.
  But Democrats have decided to use their tax-and-spending spree to 
circumvent the bipartisan farm bill process. Democrats are extending 
farm programs without bipartisan input and without real involvement 
from many in the agricultural community. And, of course, they are not 
expanding all farm bill programs.
  They are not, for example, extending or providing money for the farm 
safety net. Instead, they are targeting money at programs that they 
feel will allow them to advance their climate agenda.
  Farmers are not Democrats' main interest when it comes to the 
agricultural provisions in this bill. Democrats' climate agenda is the 
priority.
  If I am not here in Washington for Senate business, I can usually be 
found back home in South Dakota, where I spend a lot of time talking to 
farmers and ranchers. Most of them haven't shown a lot of interest in 
tax breaks for union dues or electric vehicle tax credits. But I have 
heard from a lot of farmers and ranchers who are worried the Democrats' 
proposed tax policies may threaten their livelihood. And, 
unfortunately, they are right to be worried.
  Speaker Pelosi suggested that this tax-and-spending spree was about 
Democrats' values, but based on what we have seen, I am not too sure 
those values align with those of rural Americans. Democrats' tax-and-
spending spree is a bad deal for rural America and for working families 
around the country, and I will continue to do everything I can to 
protect Americans from the dangers of Democrats' socialist fantasies.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from North Carolina.