[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 171 (Thursday, September 30, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6820-S6821]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Nomination of Tracy Stone-Manning
Mr. ROMNEY. Mr. President, from Utah's red rock canyons to our alpine
meadows, from the sprawling salt flats to the towering mountain peaks,
it is hard to overstate the beauty of Utah's majestic landscapes.
So much about being a Utahn is our connection to and care for our
land. These values have been engrained in our culture since the
pioneers found refuge here in 1847. We take great pride in the fact
that folks from all over the country and all over the world travel to
our State to experience these rich and diverse landscapes.
Utah has nearly the highest percentage of its land owned by the
Federal Government--nearly two-thirds of our 52 million acres. And of
that Federal land, more than 23 million acres is managed by the Bureau
of Land Management.
This land has been cared for and used by Utahns for generations--
recreationists and sportsmen who take advantage of the access to hike,
hunt, mountain bike, ATV, and camp; the ranchers who graze their
livestock to provide our food and fiber; the communities that rely on
the oil and gas development in the Basin or the coal mines and
powerplants to provide more than 70 percent of our electricity;
individuals interested in exploring the cultural anthropology of our
land; and simply the residents who look to our open spaces for
solitude.
Utahns deserve and demand that our public lands be managed by someone
they can trust. It is quite obvious that the President's nominee for
the Director of Bureau of Land Management, Tracy Stone-Manning, is not
worthy of our trust.
Ms. Stone-Manning's history of aiding ecoterrorism is extremely
troubling and alone should be disqualifying for the position to which
she has been nominated. It would be like nominating Bernie Madoff to
serve as Treasury Secretary.
For those who aren't familiar with tree spiking--an action with which
Ms. Stone-Manning has been associated--let me offer a brief synopsis.
Tree spiking involves hammering a metal or ceramic rod into a tree
trunk. Loggers could be seriously harmed or even killed when they cut
into the trunk of a tree that has been spiked. And the same goes for
sawmill operators who are processing the log in the mill. Ecoterrorists
who engage in tree spiking are willing to cause the gruesome injury or
death of hard-working Americans who are simply trying to provide for
their families.
But it is not only her efforts assisting ecoterrorists that are of
concern. Ms. Stone-Manning's blatant dishonesty about being
investigated over a tree-spiking incident to the Senate should
disqualify her serving as BLM Director.
I take my constitutional duty to provide advice and consent with
regard to Presidential nominees very seriously, as we all do. And with
limited exception, I believe Presidents, regardless of party, should be
able to put into place qualified individuals to lead their team. I have
supported several of President Biden's nominees even though I have
disagreed with them on particular policy issues because I believe they
were basically qualified for the position to which they had been
nominated.
Simply put, however, Tracy Stone-Manning's past involvement in
ecoterrorism and her attempt to conceal that participation before the
Senate make her unfit to serve as Director of the Bureau of Land
Management.
I will be opposing her nomination and urge my Democratic friends--
especially those who represent States with large amounts of Federal
land--to oppose her nomination as well.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Utah.
Mr. LEE. Mr. President, back in 1987, a 23-year-old mill worker named
George Alexander struck a tree spike--a tree spike like this one--in
the log that he was processing. His sawblade shattered, and it caused a
wound
[[Page S6821]]
stretching from his eye all the way down to his chin. His teeth were
smashed, and his jaw was brutally dashed in half. The incident made
national news.
Just 2 years later, Tracy Stone-Manning rented a typewriter to
disguise her identity. She then typed and sent a letter to the U.S.
Forest Service on behalf of an ecoterrorist group. She conspired to
spike trees with spikes just like this one--hundreds and hundreds of
pounds of spikes just like this one. In so doing, endangered the lives
of foresters, of loggers, and of firefighters. She ended the letter
with the following words:
You bastards go in there anyway and a lot of people could
get hurt.
Unfortunately, it wasn't until after her nomination hearing that we
learned of her work with the ecoterrorist organization EarthFirst!. It
wasn't until after her hearing that we learned that she had been issued
a target letter by a Federal grand jury and had hired an attorney to
negotiate an immunity deal prior to testifying in the tree-spiking
case.
It wasn't until after her hearing that we read her words in a
newspaper saying that she ``could have been charged with conspiracy
were it not for her agreement with the U.S. attorney.'' It wasn't until
after her hearing that we learned that she was compelled by that same
Federal grand jury to submit fingerprints, writing samples, and hair
samples.
Now, beyond her involvement with the ecoterrorist group, since her
hearing, we learned of public statements she made just months ago
calling for homes to burn in forest fires. We learned of statements she
made saying grazing is destroying the West and calling for population
control measures and even labeling children as environmental hazards.
After all of this, a White House official called her nomination a
``massive vetting failure.'' It was that, but it is so much worse than
that. She was and is a radical. She supported a criminal conspiracy to
engage in ecoterrorism.
Our committee asked her if she had ever been the subject of a
criminal investigation. She, in a sworn statement, lied. Our committee
never had the opportunity to ask her about these shameful acts. Her
past actions, her positions, her statements, and her goals would each,
individually, disqualify her from service. But combined, they make her
a, frankly, offensive candidate to the countless people in Utah and
throughout the West and beyond who rely on Bureau of Land Management
cooperation for their livelihoods and for their way of life.
Now, inexplicably, President Biden has not withdrawn this nomination,
though Ms. Stone-Manning has seemingly gone into hiding. She has left
unanswered dozens of questions formally posed to her by me and by my
colleagues. If confirmed, she will lack the credibility with
constituents throughout the Nation that she would otherwise need to
perform this job. She just won't have it. And any accomplishments made
by the Biden administration to steward our lands will be overshadowed
by her specter of deceit.
The Bureau of Land Management controls 42 percent of the land in
Utah. In fact, the BLM controls more land in Utah than Utahns do--a lot
more.
So I speak for a lot of people back home today, people who are
insulted by President Biden's nomination of Tracy Stone-Manning to run
the Bureau of Land Management. Her confirmation would be bad for Utah,
bad for the Bureau of Land Management, and bad for honesty and
accountability in government.
Needless to say, she will not receive my vote. It defies logic,
reason, and the greatest traditions of this body to think that we would
confirm her today. I urge my colleagues to reject this nomination.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Nevada.