[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 29, 2021)]
[House]
[Pages H5526-H5534]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]


             PROMOTING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY FOR AMERICANS ACT

  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution 688, I call up 
the bill (S. 1301) to provide for the publication by the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services of physical activity recommendations for 
Americans, and ask for its immediate consideration in the House.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Ms. Underwood). Pursuant to House Resolution 
688, an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text 
of Rules Committee Print 117-16, is considered as adopted, and the 
bill, as amended, is considered read.
  The text of the bill, as amended, is as follows:

                                S. 1301

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT.

       (a) In General.--Section 3101(b) of title 31, United States 
     Code, shall not apply for the period beginning on the date of 
     the enactment of this Act and ending on December 16, 2022.
       (b) Special Rule Relating to Obligations Issued During 
     Extension Period.--Effective on December 17, 2022, the 
     limitation in effect under section 3101(b) of title 31, 
     United States Code, shall be increased to the extent that--
       (1) the face amount of obligations issued under chapter 31 
     of such title and the face amount of obligations whose 
     principal and interest are guaranteed by the United States 
     Government (except guaranteed obligations held by the 
     Secretary of the Treasury) outstanding on December 17, 2022, 
     exceeds
       (2) the face amount of such obligations outstanding on the 
     date of the enactment of this Act.
       (c) Extension Limited to Necessary Obligations.--An 
     obligation shall not be taken into account under subsection 
     (b)(1) unless the issuance of such obligation was necessary 
     to fund a commitment incurred pursuant to law by the Federal 
     Government that required payment before December 17, 2022.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The bill, as amended, shall be debatable for 
1 hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Ways and Means or their respective 
designees.
  The gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Neal) and the gentleman from 
Texas (Mr. Brady) each will control 30 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Massachusetts.


                             General Leave

  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and 
to insert extraneous material on S. 1301.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Massachusetts?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Madam Speaker, one of the essential duties of Congress is to preserve 
the full faith and credit of the United States. Today, we will once 
again take action to do precisely that.
  A suspension of the debt ceiling will prevent us from defaulting on 
debt we already owe. This is not about new spending. It is about 
investments that this Congress has agreed to in the past and previously 
approved.
  This is about what the American family does every day. They don't get 
to say: ``I am not going to make my credit card payment this month. I 
am not going to make my mortgage payment this month. Oh, maybe I won't 
make my car payment this month. And I won't honor the personal loan 
that I signed up for.''
  Our vote today is not a novel exercise. Congress has addressed the 
debt limit 78 times since 1960 to prevent default, 29 times with a 
Democrat in the White House and 49 times with a Republican in the White 
House.
  Ensuring that the government can finance its existing obligations is 
a responsibility that we share jointly in this Chamber. Regrettably, 
that apparently is not the case this time.
  Our Democratic Caucus, with some hope and help, I believe, from the 
Republicans at the right moment, will meet the moment and prevent a 
devastating financial catastrophe. We will take the action necessary to 
protect businesses, workers, and families.
  When Americans' jobs and retirement savings are on the line, we are 
going to make sure we do what is necessary to prevent disaster.
  Madam Speaker, I encourage every Member to support this critical 
measure, and I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Madam Speaker, today's debt ceiling issue is a political and economic 
crisis of the Democrats' own making. They have known for 2 years this 
day was coming. They never even bothered to draft a budget for the 
government, much less pass it, and never lifted a finger to start the 
bipartisan discussions on how to raise the debt ceiling while 
addressing America's exploding national debt.
  They have insisted on one-party rule all year, from an unnecessary, 
wasteful $2 trillion COVID stimulus that didn't stimulate the economy 
or defeat the virus to a national takeover of State and local 
elections, bailouts of failing State and local governments, ignoring 
the humanitarian and security crisis at the southern border, and the 
disastrous surrender to the Taliban in Afghanistan.
  House Democrats have made it clear: We are running the place. Just 
sit down and shut up.
  The bottom line on the debt ceiling today: Democrats alone have set 
fire to America's house and are now demanding Republicans put it out 
for them.
  I urged Treasury Secretary Yellen, who I respect and who has 
bipartisan credibility, to do what the congressional Democrats have 
not: engage with Republicans on a reasonable framework of financial 
stability for our Nation.
  There is precedent. Secretary Mnuchin certainly set that, reaching 
out repeatedly to Democrat leadership on these issues.
  Although it should be noted, given the strident blame game now by 
Speaker Pelosi on the debt ceiling, I remember February 2018 when she, 
Leader Hoyer, Whip Clyburn, and 116 other House Democrats voted to 
default on America's debt, shut down the government, and refuse 
disaster relief to devastated communities across America.
  One of the Democrat leaders even said: ``Republicans control the 
House, the Senate, and the White House. The responsibility to govern 
rests squarely on their shoulders.''
  Well, right now, the Democrats control the House, the Senate, and the 
White House. The responsibility to govern rests squarely on their 
shoulders.
  I agree that Congress should not play political games with the debt 
ceiling or

[[Page H5527]]

ignore the danger of making permanent the temporary COVID relief with 
spending that will bankrupt our Nation in the future.
  Democrats control everything--the House, the Senate, and the 
Presidency--and they can easily pass the debt ceiling by including it 
in their $3\1/2\ trillion tax hikes and welfare state expansion, which 
requires no Republican votes.
  But rather than work together, what did Democrats do? As I noted, 
they rammed through a partisan, nearly $2 trillion so-called stimulus 
bill. This was unaccountable, partisan Washington spending that only 
made matters worse, especially rising inflation for working families.
  For example, in that bill, Democrats undid a bipartisan agreement to 
protect taxpayers against the greatest theft of American tax dollars in 
our lifetime, which by now has lost up to $400 billion to fraud.
  They even opened the door to greater fraud by replacing the 
Republican child tax credit that rewarded work with the cash-for-kids 
welfare check program with few safeguards.

  Stopping fraud and taking care of tax dollars should be a bipartisan 
goal that would stretch the spending in the Federal Government. 
Instead, Democrats are demanding this tax and spending binge that will 
kill 3 million U.S. jobs, drive prices even higher, and impose the 
largest expansion to the welfare state in our lifetime.
  I urge my Democrat colleagues: End the brinkmanship. We can achieve a 
bipartisan framework. Just look at the Republicans' repeated efforts.
  In 2016, the House passed a Ways and Means bill called the Debt 
Management and Fiscal Responsibility Act, creating a system that would 
have allowed Congress to make informed decisions about the debt ceiling 
and consider changes before it became a crisis. Yet, the Obama 
administration opposed the bill.
  Today, Democrats are hardly worried about new burdens as they put the 
IRS in charge of workers' paid family and medical leave, or hire 80,000 
new IRS agents, or impose IRS bank surveillance on the personal and 
business accounts of Main Street and working families.
  And Democrats won't take up a similar bill, the Debt Solution and 
Accountability Act, offered by Ways and Means Republican Representative 
Lloyd Smucker from Pennsylvania.
  Democrats' alternatives these days to a bipartisan framework range 
from ridiculous to irresponsible.
  One Democrat Congressman has proposed U.S. Treasury mint a trillion-
dollar coin--a trillion-dollar coin. Why not a quadrillion-dollar coin?
  This farfetched idea sounds about as brilliant as many Democrats' own 
calls to end the debt limit entirely, as the Speaker has sought.
  I think Democrats' best answer to Washington's out-of-control 
spending is to spend more and to tear out the brakes.
  Let's be honest. This is an economic and political crisis of the 
Democrats' own making. There isn't enough money in America to cover 
what Democrats want to spend, and Americans know it.
  That is why President Biden has gone out of his way to sell his $3.5 
trillion bill as not adding to the debt, saying the ``Build Back Better 
agenda costs zero dollars,'' a claim that ranks right up with: ``If you 
like your healthcare plan, you can keep it.''
  Unfortunately for him and for the taxpayers that will have to foot 
the bill, The Washington Post fact-checker found this claim misleading.

                              {time}  1430

  They said that it ``would take dubious gimmicks that will help 
disguise the true cost of President Biden's agenda.''
  Again, considering Democrats have not had a single conversation about 
spending, stimulus, or the debt with us to date, I think they, by their 
behavior, have taken responsibility to pass this by themselves.
  It is irresponsible to keep raising the debt limit, keep on spending 
without any framework, or any discussion about this explosion of 
America's debt.
  We need to grow the economy, constrain our spending, work together, 
both parties together, to get our financial house back in order for our 
children and grandchildren.
  Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from 
California (Ms. Pelosi), Speaker of the House, for a firm rebuttal.
  Ms. PELOSI. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding and 
thank him for his masterful leadership of the Committee on Ways and 
Means to address many of the health concerns and climate concerns, 
issues of fairness in our economy in such an important way that has 
been manifested in the rescue package and now in the Build Back Better 
legislation.
  Today, we come to the floor about a very important issue of concern 
on the economic stability and fiscal soundness of our country.
  Madam Speaker, as you recall, last week, House Democrats honored our 
responsibility to the American people by voting on lifting the debt 
ceiling and on a continuing resolution to keep government open to avoid 
a devastating shutdown. Not one Republican voted to lift the debt 
ceiling or to keep government open, even though there were very 
important measures to address the needs of people affected by Ida and 
to help us help the evacuees from Afghanistan, and other issues in 
there of concern to all Americans.
  We all know the full faith and credit of the United States should not 
be questioned. This is in the Constitution. In the Fourteenth 
Amendment, Section 4, states: ``The validity of the public debt of the 
United States, authorized by law, shall . . . not be questioned.''
  Madam Speaker, even by questioning it, our credit rating was brought 
down when the Republicans questioned it when President Obama was in 
office.
  Let's just talk about the consequences. Our distinguished chairman of 
the Committee on Ways and Means talked about what it meant in people's 
personal lives. And that is really what we are here about, for people 
in their personal lives, their financial and health security.
  The consequences of not lifting the debt ceiling would be 
catastrophic. The nonpartisan Moody's Analytics found these 
consequences could include a loss of 6 million jobs, the elimination of 
potentially $15 trillion of household wealth, sending the unemployment 
rate surging to 9 percent, and a decline in the real GDP of our country 
by 4 percent.
  What that means in people's personal lives, according to the Joint 
Economic Committee, default on not lifting the debt ceiling could 
prompt a lasting downgrade in America's credit, drastically increasing 
the cost for car loans--families have car loans--mortgages, student 
loans, credit card bills, and other borrowing. I don't know if there is 
anyone in the country who doesn't have such a loan, certainly among 
America's working families.
  In a larger sense, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon predicted that such 
a default ``could cause an immediate, literally cascading catastrophe 
of unbelievable proportions and damage to America for 100 years. Let me 
repeat that: ``could cause an immediate, literally cascading 
catastrophe of unbelievable proportions and damage to America for 100 
years.''
  As I said before, it would be catastrophic. We must act now.
  Yesterday, Secretary Yellen announced that by October 18, the 
Treasury is set to exhaust extraordinary measures and cash on hand, 
leading us barreling towards a default. This has been going on since 
the end of July when the debt limit expired.
  Addressing the debt limit is not about future spending. This is about 
meeting the obligations that the American government has already 
incurred, including when we worked together on the bipartisan COVID 
relief legislation last December. Only 3 percent of the current debt 
that we are lifting the debt ceiling to accommodate has been accrued 
under President Biden.
  A big chunk of this, though, is attributed to at least $2 trillion in 
the tax scam of 2017 where the Republicans gave 83 percent of the 
benefits to the top 1 percent. And now we have to lift the debt ceiling 
to pay for that.
  The debt limit has long been a bipartisan issue, and you could talk 
about times when Democrats and Republicans voted against it, in part. 
But it is very hard to find a time when they said my vote will take 
down the debt limit. Democrats have never done that.

[[Page H5528]]

  Congress has addressed the debt limit 78 times, as the distinguished 
chairman mentioned, since 1960; 29 times with a Democrat in the White 
House; 49 times under a Republican President.
  More recently, since 2011, each of the seven times that the debt 
limit was addressed, Congress did so on a bipartisan basis. This 
includes three times under the most recent former President when 
Democrats cooperated.
  We did so because the full faith and credit of the United States of 
America cannot be questioned--the Constitution says that--and because 
of all of the consequences that would happen if we did not lift the 
debt ceiling. Republicans' refusal to support a suspension of the debt 
limit now is cynical, hypocritical, and downright dangerous.
  As Mitch McConnell himself has said about the need to address the 
debt limit, this is what he said last time: ``Don't play Russian 
roulette with our economy.'' Yet, that is exactly what he is doing: 
playing Russian roulette--interesting that he is playing 
Russian roulette--with our economy and with the financial security and 
the well-being of America's working families. The kitchen table 
concerns: How are they going to pay the bills? Well, now the interest 
rate will be higher if the Republicans prevail.

  That is why today, we will pass this suspension of the debt limit. 
Democrats are for the people and will never let the full faith and 
credit of the United States be questioned because we take an oath to 
the Constitution of the United States--and that is an oath that we 
always intend to uphold--and because we have a responsibility to the 
health and well-being of America's working families, and this would 
have a disastrous effect on them.
  Madam Speaker, I salute the distinguished chairman once again, and I 
urge--and hopefully--a strong bipartisan vote on this legislation.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I include in the Record this fact-check 
from The Washington Post about this claim we just heard, that 83 
percent of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act went to the top 1 percent. They 
gave that false statement ``3 Pinocchios,'' calling it a ``zombie 
claim'' and ``galling.'' PolitiFact agreed, calling it ``misleading.''

                       [From the Washington Post]

      The Pinocchio Six: Myths, Lies & Debunked Claims About Taxes

       1. False: Biden: ``All of [GOP Tax Cuts] went to folks at 
     the top and corporations that pay no taxes.''
       The Washington Post fact check gave this ``4 Pinocchios,'' 
     saying this is ``simply wrong'' and ``clearly false.''
       Three of every four dollars in the 2017 tax cuts went to 
     individuals, cutting taxes for the lowest-income Americans by 
     10% while cutting taxes for the top 1% by less than one-half 
     of 1%.
       In the 2017 GOP tax reform, corporations effectively paid 
     for 85% of their tax cuts thanks to eliminating special tax 
     provisions and broadening the U.S. tax base.
       2. Myth: ``The wealthy don't pay their `fair share.' ''
       America has long had one of the most progressive tax codes 
     among developed nations, with higher-income people paying 
     higher tax rates, say the Organization for Economic 
     Cooperation & Development (OECD).
       The top 1% pay 40% of all income taxes, and the top 10% 
     pays 70% of all income taxes, according to the Tax 
     Foundation.
       After the GOP Tax Cuts, the rich pay a larger, not smaller, 
     share of income taxes.
       3. False: ``83% of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) tax cuts 
     went to top 1%.''
       The Washington Post gave this false statement ``3 
     Pinocchios,'' calling it a ``zombie claim'' and ``galling.'' 
     Politifact agreed, calling it ``misleading.''
       4. False: ``Corporate tax receipts declined by 40% after 
     GOP Tax Cuts.''
       Like government revenue that reached record levels in the 
     two years after GOP tax reform, corporate tax receipts are 
     higher and growing after TCJA, despite Democrats' claims.
       Corporate tax revenues this year are $285 billion, 22% 
     higher than the Obama-Biden Admin's last year.
       The Congressional Budget Office projects corporate tax 
     revenues under TCJA will increase to $379 billion in 2023--a 
     record high.
       Biden's own budget scorers project U.S. corporate tax 
     revenues under TCJA will reach 1.63% of GDP by 2025, higher 
     than the 1.55% average in the decade before the GOP tax cuts.
       5 Myth: ``55 profitable U.S. corporations paid no taxes 
     last year.''
       This is an unverifiable claim by a far-left group (ITEP) 
     using flawed methodology. It is not based on actual tax 
     data--taxpayer data is private and most 2020 tax corporate 
     returns have yet to be filed.
       This group confuses the difference between taxable income 
     and financial statement reports.
       Similar reports that U.S. multinational corporations only 
     pay very low tax rates on their earnings overseas are flawed 
     either by double-counting, faulty methodology, or cherry-
     picked data.
       6. Myth: ``The Death Tax only impacts two of every 1,000 
     taxpayers who die.''
       Relatively few estates pay the Death Tax, but many more 
     file estate tax returns, and millions of farms and other 
     family businesses are forced to waste precious time and money 
     to avoid a mistake that will result in a confiscatory tax 
     bill from the IRS.
       The Death Tax crushes investment in workers & expanded 
     operations, harms growth & opportunity.
       The Death Tax ranks as a devastatingly inefficient tax 
     since it raises a very small amount of revenue while placing 
     a very large burden on farms and other family businesses. In 
     fact, the Cato Institute says the Death Tax ``is anti-saving 
     and anti-investment,'' encourages ``wealthy folks to consume 
     their wealth before death,'' and does nothing for U.S. long-
     term growth.
       A growing number of women- and minority-owned businesses 
     are finding themselves subject to the Death Tax as they try 
     to build wealth for the first time and pass it on to the next 
     generation.

  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
California (Mr. Nunes).
  Mr. NUNES. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Texas (Mr. 
Brady) for yielding.
  Madam Speaker, I rise today and oppose the Democrat's latest 
socialist spending spree.
  Today, the Federal Government presides over nearly $30 trillion in 
debt and $100 trillion of unfunded liabilities in Medicare, Social 
Security, and Medicaid.
  These catastrophic debts are growing increasingly unsustainable. And 
now the Democrats are using the debt ceiling as a blackmail to enable 
passage of an unaffordable so-called human infrastructure bill. I still 
don't quite understand what that means, but maybe they will enlighten 
us during the debate.
  The Democrats, themselves, can't honestly tell us how much this bill 
would cost. First, they said it was $3.5 trillion, then the amount was 
raised to over $4 trillion. And both figures, obviously, underestimate 
the true cost by trillions of dollars.
  Then with an amazing message discipline, Democrats in the House, 
Senate, and White House, along with their media cheerleaders, suddenly 
began claiming, in unison, that the bill won't cost anything at all.
  They previously argued that ``tax the rich'' would pay for 
everything. But now, they have apparently conjured a true economic 
miracle:
  No one will have to pay for the astronomical cost of this bill. It is 
Congress' first self-financing, multi-trillion-dollar spending plan. It 
is amazing that no Member of Congress ever figured this out before.
  Now that the Democrats are full of their new socialist colleagues, 
you have finally achieved the Marxist dream of abolishing money.
  The bill itself is the mother of all socialist spending programs. It 
is as if the Democrats are rejecting all fiscal restraint and decided 
that they had one shot to turn America into a socialist welfare state.
  Madam Speaker, I reject that transformation and the spending gimmicks 
needed to enact it. I urge all Members to vote against this scheme and 
vote down the increase in the debt limit.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
California (Mr. Thompson), a very capable member of the Committee on 
Ways and Means.
  Mr. THOMPSON of California. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman for 
yielding and his great leadership in regard to the issues that we are 
dealing with today.
  Madam Speaker, I rise in support of this legislation.
  Madam Speaker, our national debt rose $7.8 trillion under the last 
President, a Republican President. My Republican colleagues voted for 
that spending; raising the debt ceiling is about paying those bills. 
But my Republican colleagues who claim to be the party of fiscal 
responsibility don't want to pay their bills.
  Well, the Republicans are risking economic Armageddon to score 
political points against a Democratic President. If we don't pass this 
bill, unemployment numbers will skyrocket, markets will tumble, Social 
Security payments will be delayed, borrowing costs will go up, so that 
means for car

[[Page H5529]]

loans, for home loans, for farm loans--all of that, because of their 
irresponsibility--will be out of reach for most Americans. It will be a 
catastrophe.
  Madam Speaker, it is time to stop playing games, political games, and 
raise the ceiling, as we have done many times before in a bipartisan 
way.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from 
West Virginia (Mrs. Miller).
  Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia. Madam Speaker, let us be clear. My 
colleagues across the aisle want to raise the debt ceiling to pay for 
their 3.5 trillion tax and spending spree.
  In my home State of West Virginia and across the country, people are 
paying more for gas, groceries, and other everyday items because of the 
liberals' reckless spending.
  Taxpayers are sick of footing the bill for the terrible policies 
which continue to make the problem of inflation even worse.
  Americans shouldn't have to pay for the consequences of Democrats' 
out-of-touch actions. Democrats are responsible for the spending, and 
they need to take responsibility for the borrowing. This entire 
Congress, House Democrats have chosen to go it alone and push through 
liberal items without any Republican input.
  The liberals have managed to spend trillions by themselves. They can 
raise the debt ceiling alone, too. Socialism has a price tag. It is 
time the Democrats learn that lesson.

                              {time}  1445

  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer), whose work on infrastructure is a model for 
the Nation.
  Mr. BLUMENAUER. Madam Speaker, I appreciate the gentleman's courtesy 
and his leadership on this issue. I agree with his comments earlier.
  The notion that somehow this is a wild, Democratic, socialist 
spending spree and we need to raise the debt ceiling to deal with it is 
patently false. I just note that there was $5 trillion that was spent 
recently in the end of the Trump administration and recently here 
dealing with the COVID crisis.
  Much of that spending was passed on a bipartisan basis. It wasn't 
wild socialist spending. These are funds that the American people 
desperately needed.
  The dismissive comment about cash for kids--give me a break. Being 
able to provide 69 million American children with monthly payments has 
resulted in lifting almost half of poor children out of poverty, and it 
is wildly popular by the American public. This is not reckless. This is 
reasonable. It is more necessary now than ever.
  I do hope we are able to move forward with the broad outline of 
programs moving forward for infrastructure, the environment, and 
fighting the climate crisis. In the meantime, we must and we will meet 
our obligations to pay for money that the Congress has already spent.
  Now, I see my colleague Brendan Boyle here who has an idea to stop 
the lunacy of the debt ceiling charade for a long-term solution. But 
unless and until we do that, we need to meet our obligations and be 
able to protect the full faith and credit of the United States, and I 
hope we do that in a more honest basis.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Missouri (Mr. Smith), the ranking Republican of the Budget Committee.
  Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Madam Speaker, I truly hope that my Democrat 
colleagues don't believe the garbage that they have been spouting, but 
I would say that they probably do. Unfortunately, for months Democrats 
have been pursuing a radical partisan agenda that contains the most 
expensive piece of legislation in the history of Congress, all while 
ignoring our Nation's debt. Now they are scrambling.
  First they claimed it was Republicans' responsibility to cosign a 
loan for their reckless spending bill, even though they control the 
White House, the House, and the Senate. Then they tried adding a debt 
ceiling increase to a bill to keep the government open, knowing it 
would fall on its face in the United States Senate.
  Then they argued there wasn't enough time to raise the debt limit on 
their own, even though they have time and they have tools to do it. In 
fact, last weekend the House Budget Republicans gave Democrats a chance 
to address the debt limit by demanding their budget in a markup be 
revised. They refused. Then we offered to postpone the markup for just 
48 hours to allow them to address the debt limit in reconciliation.
  Since you love to do everything else in reconciliation, why not to 
raise the people's debt? You are spending it. It is time for you to get 
a loan for it. Folks, we are in a crisis right now. My counterpart on 
the House Budget Committee made the statement: We should raise the debt 
a gazillion dollars.
  This is what we are dealing with, folks. The America people are fed 
up. They want fiscal accountability. We need a reasonable body in this 
House.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Illinois (Mr. Danny K. Davis), a member of the Ways and Means 
Committee, a champion of the underserved.
  Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong 
support of this legislation.
  This is legislation that protects the full faith and credit of our 
Nation; that protects the well-being of millions of our most vulnerable 
citizens, including seniors receiving Social Security, veterans, 
servicemembers, small businesses, as well as physicians treating 
Medicare and Medicaid patients; and that protects our economic recovery 
and the global financial system.

  The refusal of Republican leadership to extend the debt limit 
threatens catastrophic damage to America and Americans. Economists 
estimate that default could cost to United States' economy up to 6 
million jobs; wipe out as much as $15 trillion in household wealth; 
cause the unemployment to surge to 9 percent; and send global financial 
markets into chaos.
  Republicans must work and be real with Democrats to address the debt 
limit to ensure that hardworking Americans, businesses, and communities 
across the country do not pay the price.
  Raising the debt limit is the only responsible thing to do.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Kansas (Mr. Estes).
  Mr. ESTES. Madam Speaker, I rise today to oppose this disastrous 
attempt to suspend the debt ceiling.
  For the past 9 months, the Democrat-led House has made spending 
trillions of dollars on Big Government socialist and Green New Deal 
programs their priority. They have done this while ignoring so many 
critical needs of our country, which has led to a crisis at our 
southern border, runaway inflation, rising crime, workforce shortages, 
and a disastrous retreat from Afghanistan.
  For the most part, my colleagues on the left have simply ignored 
these crises, while Republicans have introduced commonsense legislation 
and pushed the administration to answer for these very real and 
concerning issues.
  But today we are facing a crisis by their own creation that they 
cannot ignore: suspending the debt ceiling when we already have $28 
trillion in debt. Some of my colleagues have even suggested that we 
should abandon the debt limit altogether, giving the Federal Government 
no safeguards to prevent ballooning debt and damaging the United 
States' credit rating.
  Families, farmers, businesses, and even State and local governments 
have to live within their means and make responsible financial 
decisions to be successful, but the attitude in Washington continues to 
pass on massive debt to future generations in exchange for our current 
lifestyle.
  But we aren't looking at this debt crisis in a vacuum. We could be 
voting on $5.5 trillion in more spending soon if Speaker Pelosi can 
pull together her caucus.
  Suspending the debt ceiling while also proposing trillions in new 
spending is reckless. Every American, adult and child, already bears 
the burden of about $85,000 each. Raising the debt ceiling is about 
future spending. An unlimited debt ceiling until December of 2022 would 
result in a massive increase in spending by the Democrats.
  The last debt ceiling increase covered all of the spending done 
during the Trump administration and for the first 7 months of the Biden 
administration. We can't just keep kicking the can down the road for 
future generations to figure out. We need to stop the reckless 
spending, taxing, and borrowing now.

[[Page H5530]]

That is the best way to protect the full faith and credit of the United 
States.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New 
York (Mr. Higgins), a very capable member of the Ways and Means 
Committee.
  Mr. HIGGINS of New York. Madam Speaker, the Republican Party is, in 
fact, the party of debt and deficit. Ronald Reagan, a Republican, grew 
the deficit to $152 billion. Bush 1, a Republican, grew that deficit to 
$290 billion. President Clinton, a Democrat, wiped out the entirety of 
the deficit and gave $128 billion surplus to Bush 2, a Republican, who 
turned that $128 billion surplus into a $1.4 trillion deficit. Obama, a 
Democrat, cut the Bush deficit of $1.4 trillion to $600 billion, from 
which Trump, a Republican, grew that deficit to $1 trillion.
  Over the past 60 years, Democrats have created 21 million more jobs 
than Republicans. Annual economic growth is almost double. The 
Democratic Party continues the clean up the mess that the Republicans 
have made. And the Republicans are running away from the mess that they 
are responsible for.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Pennsylvania (Mr. Smucker).
  Mr. SMUCKER. Madam Speaker, there are several problems with what I am 
hearing on the floor today. One, this is a blank check for Democrats to 
continue to spend at unprecedented levels. They talk about this 
spending for previous expenditures. Not true. This doesn't even set a 
limit. This would suspend completely the debt limit until December 16, 
2022. They can spend as much as they want. It is a big problem.
  Number two. Democrats aren't talking about finding ways to reduce the 
debt. We must tackle that problem. Rather, they believe that they can 
spend their way into a prosperous economy. In fact, they are attempting 
to completely erode the foundation of our society that has been built 
on individual freedom and personal responsibility, and they want to 
pave the way for the radical socialist agenda.
  Unfortunately, we are already seeing the economic damage from their 
disastrous policies. Inflation is showing a 4 percent increase year to 
date. Consumer price inflation is higher than that. That is more than 
double the Federal Reserve's 2 percent goal. Those increases are being 
felt in my district; they are being felt across the country; and they 
are essentially a hidden tax on the American people.
  Another problem we have, while they are attempting to spend even more 
money, cause even more economic harm, they will further degrade 
confidence in the dollar.
  And, finally, another problem. This is an exercise in futility, and 
they know it. They know that this bill is very unlikely to pass in the 
Senate. So this is simply to score cheap political points today.
  Democrats are in full control of the House, Senate, and the 
Presidency. They can raise the debt at any time. In fact, they passed 
up another opportunity to amend their budget resolution to include a 
debt ceiling increase, and they refused to do so.
  Madam Speaker, I am strongly opposed to the Democrats' radical 
socialist agenda, and I oppose this bill which will help them advance 
that agenda.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman 
from Washington (Ms. DelBene), a member of the Ways and Means 
Committee, chief architect of the child credit expansion.
  Ms. DelBENE. Madam Speaker, I rise today and ask this body to keep in 
mind four numbers: 6 million, 9, 15 trillion, and 4. Moody's predicts 
that if Congress fails to address the debt ceiling, we will lose 6 
million jobs, reach a 9 percent unemployment rate, wipe out $15 
trillion in household wealth, and see a decline in real GDP of 4 
percent.
  That would trigger a global market panic not seen since the 2008 
financial crisis. The brinkmanship that has been displayed by my 
colleagues on the other side of the aisle is really incomprehensible, 
but also dangerous.
  The debt limit has long been a bipartisan issue. Each of the last 
seven times the debt limit has been addressed, it was on a bipartisan 
basis. Putting politics ahead of the country is the exact kind of 
cynicism that makes American people sick. And as a former business 
leader, these are the games that keep our business community from being 
able to invest, to innovate, and grow.
  So I say to my colleagues, it is your duty to extend the debt ceiling 
and protect the American people from an economic crash. The Joint 
Economic Committee, which we all depend on for advice and guidance, 
predicts a default will result in a lasting downgrade of America's 
credit, drastically increasing costs for car loans, mortgages, student 
loans, and credit.
  Six million jobs, a 9 percent unemployment rate, $15 trillions in 
household wealth, and a decline in real GDP of 4 percent is what is at 
stake. We must vote ``yes.''

                              {time}  1500

  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
west Texas (Mr. Arrington).
  Mr. ARRINGTON. Madam Speaker, it is not our duty to raise the debt 
limit; it is our duty to not spend so recklessly and so egregiously and 
irresponsibly that we bankrupt this country, and we rob our children of 
their freedoms and the opportunities that we have all been blessed with 
as Americans. That is our duty.
  I won't give Republicans a pass on this, Madam Speaker. This place is 
broken. We play by a different set of rules--if we are honest--than the 
American people. The pay-fors just for the infrastructure bill are 
total jokes. It is a gimmick. It is Enron accounting scams. People in 
our country who operate that way would be thrown in prison. So we are 
all accountable.
  But I have never seen this kind of spending spree to accelerate the 
curse that we are putting on the heads of our children. James Madison 
said: `` . . . a public debt is a public curse, and in a Republican 
Government a greater curse than any other.''
  Trillions of dollars have been spent. We were promised bipartisanship 
and restoration of unity in this place. We are jamming more bipartisan 
spending bills starting with COVID, which was a bailout of union 
pensions and which was a bailout of blue States and Democrat-run 
cities. Very little went to COVID. That is deception.
  We are accelerating what Admiral Mullin said was the greatest threat 
to the United States. He said that the greatest threat to our national 
security was our national debt. So we promised the cradle-to-grave 
cash, entitlements, and more handouts without any regard to 
responsibility and without any requirement for work, and we are going 
to bankrupt the next generation. We are going to steal from them what 
we have enjoyed.
  This is not a profile in courage.
  Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to reconsider all of this 
spending that is bankrupting the country, and I urge them to vote 
``no'' on the reconciliation bill.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from 
California (Ms. Chu), who is a very capable member of the Ways and 
Means Committee.
  Ms. CHU. Madam Speaker, I rise today in support of doing what every 
adult is expected to do: pay their bills. That means raising the debt 
limit.
  Let's be clear: this is not about new spending. This has nothing to 
do with any of our plans for new investments in infrastructure. Those 
plans are all paid for through other means. When we raise the debt 
ceiling, it is so we can pay the bills for money we have already spent. 
That means the reason we need to raise the debt ceiling right now is to 
pay Donald Trump's bills--which, as usual, he would rather leave 
unpaid.
  Under the last administration, the deficit grew every year, totaling 
over $7 trillion in debt increases, requiring Congress to raise the 
debt ceiling three times.
  And why was that?
  Because the 2017 GOP tax scam used the reconciliation process to 
spend $2 trillion on tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy that 
were not paid for. The American people were told that the tax cuts 
would pay for themselves, but that was a lie. And now the bill comes 
due. Again.
  But this time the Republicans are refusing to even allow a vote. It 
is not that they are choosing to vote ``no'', which would be their 
prerogative, even if it is political and insincere. Instead, they are 
filibustering to prevent us

[[Page H5531]]

from even voting to stop the U.S. from defaulting; something they all 
said would be terrible.
  We are not children who flip a game over when we lose. It is our 
responsibility to pay the government's bills no matter who is in 
charge.
  Madam Speaker, if you can vote to give tax cuts to billionaire 
amateur astronauts like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk, then you can vote to 
pay the bill for it. It is that simple.
  Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this legislation.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Nebraska (Mr. Smith), who is the ranking member of the tax policy 
subcommittee.
  Mr. SMITH of Nebraska. Madam Speaker, I would like to state for the 
record the prior remarks shared were inaccurate.
  The fact of the matter is, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act actually 
resulted in more revenues to the Treasury. Let's not forget that. And 
the fact of the matter is, a growing economy will do far more for the 
American people than new government programs that we can't afford.
  We are standing here now, and of course, I think we should make good 
on our debts and make good on our obligations. This bill is not the 
solution. Instead of focusing on basics of governing, the majority has 
chosen to spend the past 10 months kind of arguing here and there--a 
lot actually--first passing their $2 trillion inflation catalyst at the 
beginning of the year, and now arguing among themselves how to spend 
another $5 trillion.
  This bill is clearly not the solution. This bill isn't bipartisan. It 
was brought to the floor solely by Democrats and reflects their take-
it-or-leave-it approach to governing. It does nothing to address our 
Nation's spending problem. It is a blank check which allows the 
majority to spend as much as they want in the coming months 
unrestrained by a true debt limit for the duration of this Congress.
  Democrats control government and can immediately raise the debt 
ceiling right now. There is a better way, however, than this particular 
bill.
  Madam Speaker, I urge a ``no'' vote.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from 
Wisconsin (Ms. Moore), who is always the great champion of expanding 
the earned income tax credit.
  Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin. Madam Speaker, I rise today to urge my 
colleagues to support raising the debt limit and to keep the main thing 
the main thing.
  I really don't have time to address the Taliban, Afghanistan, the 
southern border, socialism, and all the rest of the stuff that has been 
raised. But I do have time to talk about blackmail that was raised 
here. This is the failure to join the Democrats in raising the debt 
ceiling to pay for one thing: the $2 trillion that Republicans ran up 
providing tax cuts to the wealthiest corporations and individuals.

  The blackmail is that they want to force us to restore those cuts to 
the wealthiest people and to raise taxes on regular Americans by trying 
to upend our initiative to provide, for example, the child tax credit 
and to blackmail us into not providing those benefits.
  We have heard a great deal, Madam Speaker, about how this will hurt 
the markets and how this will create chaos, but who will really pay the 
price?
  It is everyday people and ordinary people, those Social Security 
recipients and veterans whose benefits will be delayed; people who 
won't be able to get a car or a washer and dryer at a reasonable 
interest rate; and those thousands of people who will lose jobs. That 
is where the damage will come in.
  Madam Speaker, instead of paying these partisan games, I urge my 
colleagues across the aisle to act responsibly. The full faith and 
credit of the United States should never be put in jeopardy. And by the 
way, people are not leverage.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
Michigan (Mr. Kildee), who is always a champion of the industrial 
heartland.
  Mr. KILDEE. Madam Speaker, I thank my friend and chairman for 
yielding time.
  Madam Speaker, I rise today in support of this legislation to protect 
the American economy, to save it from catastrophe, and to prevent a 
default on the obligations of the United States of America. The full 
faith and credit of the United States can't be questioned. The full 
faith and credit of the United States should never be a partisan 
question.
  We have passed action to address the debt limit 78 times--29 times 
with a Democrat in White House and 49 times with a Republican in the 
White House. In fact, when President Trump was in office, Democrats 
helped. We cooperated, and we helped to address this issue three times.
  Yet now they are refusing to vote and refusing to support, meeting 
obligations that we already have. A robust debate about the future is 
fine, and we should have that, and we will have disagreements. But we 
should never, ever, ever question, let anyone question the promises 
made by the United States Government.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Pennsylvania (Mr. Brendan F. Boyle), who is a champion of very 
complicated issues relating to the debt ceiling.
  Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania. Madam Speaker, I will attempt 
to address two things: the present and the future.
  First, on the present, there is no question, none--and let's not let 
the other side get away with this conflating of two different things--
this is not about adding new debt. It is about whether or not we are 
going to pay the bills for the old debt that was already rung up under 
all of the previous administrations combined, including, and 
especially, the last one.
  That is what this is about.
  Are we going to pay our bills?
  Of course, the answer is yes. I have voted to raise the debt ceiling 
under a Democratic administration, and I have done it under a 
Republican administration because it is the responsible thing to do.
  But the second thing is the future.
  Why do we constantly keep finding ourselves in this rather bizarre, 
counterproductive debate that achieves nothing?
  We always know the debt ceiling is ultimately going to be raised.
  The question is: How much of a political game of chicken will we have 
to go through?
  And that game of chicken comes at a real cost. The last time the 
United States came close to not raising the debt ceiling was exactly 10 
years ago. The GAO found the cost at $1.3 billion, and, my God, just 
imagine if ever a miscalculation brought about an occasion in which by 
accident we truly didn't raise the debt ceiling.
  When on the Ways and Means Committee I asked Secretary Mnuchin what 
would happen, he replied that the consequences would be so dire he 
couldn't even imagine them.
  So let's fix this. I have a piece of legislation with Budget 
Committee Chairman Yarmuth that would take this out of the political 
sphere. It would depoliticize it. And instead, make this the 
responsibility of the Treasury Secretary--Democratic Treasury Secretary 
today, Republican Treasury Secretary tomorrow. That would be the 
responsible approach and end this game once and for all.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Pennsylvania (Mr. Evans), who is a very capable gentleman. He is 
champion of all things Philadelphia, as well as quite knowledgeable 
about the debt ceiling.
  Mr. EVANS. Madam Speaker, I proudly rise in strong support of this 
bill. We have to pay our bills and uphold the full faith and credit of 
the United States. My constituents in Philadelphia don't get a choice. 
They have to pay their bills. Congress must do the same.
  We are working together to finalize legislation to advance the Build 
Back Better agenda that we share with President Biden. As we do that, 
we must remember we are elected to govern. Let me repeat that. We are 
elected to govern.
  Yes, the Senate needs to act, but we also must be responsible in this 
House. We are responsible for protecting the recovering economy against 
the threat

[[Page H5532]]

of severe financial damage. This will clear the way to focus on bold 
opportunities to support American families.

  Madam Speaker, I call on my colleagues to act responsibly and join me 
by voting ``yes'', ``yes'' to avoid the first-ever default in the 
Nation's debt.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Illinois (Mr. Schneider), who is a member of the Ways and Means 
Committee and well-known for his midwestern values.
  Mr. SCHNEIDER. Madam Speaker, today is my dad's 88th birthday. As a 
CPA he taught me about financial responsibility. He taught me about 
paying our bills on time. I am sure he never could imagine our Congress 
would or could possibly put the full faith and credit of the United 
States at risk, but that is exactly the path my colleagues on the other 
side of the aisle are advocating today.
  The stakes could not be higher. Secretary Yellen has said that it 
would be catastrophic for the United States to default on its debt. 
There would be chaos in the financial markets, higher interest rates, 
slowed economic growth, an estimated 6 million lost jobs, and $15 
trillion of people's wealth disappeared.
  For the last 4 years the Republicans have run up our Nation's debt. 
The bill is now due, and the Republicans want to tear up the statement 
and throw away the checkbook.

                              {time}  1515

  Burying our heads in the sand won't solve our problems, and it won't 
keep our creditors at bay. It will, however, cause catastrophic damage 
to our Nation's credibility, damage to our Nation's economy, damage to 
our Nation's future, to our children's future.
  I urge my colleagues to put the partisanship aside, put the country 
first. Let's vote ``yes'' on this bill and make sure that our country 
pays its debts.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from 
California (Mr. Panetta) again, a very knowledgeable member of the Ways 
and Means Committee.
  Mr. PANETTA. Madam Speaker, I rise today to urge all of my colleagues 
in Congress to fulfill our obligation, not just to the people of our 
districts, but to the people and the economy of our Nation.
  Suspending and raising the debt limit simply lets our government pay 
our bills. It is a very simple responsibility that has been done 78 
times since 1960, including 49 times under Republican administrations, 
and that includes three times during the Trump administration.
  We raise the debt ceiling because we have to take into account the 
spending that we have already committed to, including this time, where 
97 percent of the spending was done during the Trump administration.
  If my colleagues are concerned with fiscal responsibility, they 
should know that breaching the debt ceiling will raise borrowing costs 
and add hundreds of billions of dollars to our debt.
  Failure to act on the debt ceiling will not just result in economic 
catastrophe. It will affect every American family, as borrowing costs 
and unemployment will rise and markets will crash.
  Provoking such a financial crisis through such a sovereign default 
would be self-sabotage, and it is flirting with brazen 
irresponsibility. We are better than that. Let's act responsibly, do 
our job, and raise the debt ceiling.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, it is a pleasure to yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Gomez), whose work on USMCA was 
outstanding.
  Mr. GOMEZ. Madam Speaker, I rise because I have had enough of the 
games. I have had enough of the bad faith arguments and enough of the 
hypocrisy when it comes to the debt limit from the other side of the 
aisle.
  Increasing or suspending the debt limit enables us to fulfill our 
existing financial obligations, and part of that includes the 
Republican Donald Trump tax cuts from 2017, the tax cuts that went to 
the top one-tenth of 1 percent and the largest corporations.
  That shows who they prioritized, by giving corporations permanent tax 
cuts while giving tax cuts to the middle class that expire in 2025 and 
were so small people didn't even notice that they were given a tax cut 
in their paychecks.
  So, we are trying to fulfill the obligation of their tax cuts, and it 
does not authorize new spending. It doesn't authorize new spending. It 
doesn't authorize new spending. What it does is helps pay for that 
previous spending that has already occurred.
  I know my colleagues over here love to talk about the Pinocchios, but 
I want to say that they sit on a throne of lies, based on the arguments 
they have been making not only in the Ways and Means Committee but the 
ones they are trying to fool the American public with today.
  If we default, it ruins the creditworthiness of the United States. It 
causes our credit rating to be downgraded, interest rates to increase, 
and will make things a lot more expensive. But for them, it is okay as 
long as they score their political points and put the blame at the feet 
of the Democrats.
  But that is not something that we should be playing with, and that is 
for both Republicans and Democrats. Do not play with the full faith and 
credit of the United States. It is irresponsible, and it is beneath you 
to do that.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the 
gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee), the very capable 
Congresswoman.
  Ms. JACKSON LEE. As a member of the Budget Committee, we sat for many 
hours on Saturday giving this Congress and the American people a 
budget. So I know that the discussions of my good friends are purely 
political, and the reason is this. In 2019, during the Trump 
administration, Majority Leader McConnell, the very person who stood up 
with such great profoundness and did not want to vote to raise the debt 
ceiling in order to adhere to the Constitution, as the leader, he voted 
to raise the debt ceiling, and he said: ``We will raise the debt 
ceiling because America can't default. That would be a disaster.''
  Is there any poorer recollection?
  Then for those of us who are historians or love history, in 1789, 
Alexander Hamilton, the Nation's first and greatest Treasury Secretary, 
understood that the path to American prosperity and greatness lay in 
its creditworthiness, which provided the affordable access to capital 
needed to fund internal improvements and economic growth. That is why 
we are known as the greatest economy in the world.
  I would venture to say to my colleagues that the importance of what 
we do stands on the premise of the Constitution. We the people have 
formed to create a more perfect Union and for the general welfare of 
our people.
  Vote to increase the ability to pay our bills and stand worthy in the 
world's eye.
  I want Leader McConnell to remember his words. We need to do this on 
behalf of the American people.
  Madam Speaker, as a senior member of the Committees on the Judiciary, 
on Homeland Security, and on the Budget, I rise in support of the rule 
governing debate for RCP 117-16, S. 1301, the ``Temporary Extension of 
Public Debt Act,'' which provides funding to extend the national debt 
limit through December 16, 2021 and avoids a wasteful, irresponsible, 
reckless threatening of one of the nation's singular indispensable 
assets: the full faith and credit of the United States.
  Madam Speaker, American families do not get to choose which bills to 
pay and which ones to ignore; neither can the United States Congress 
without putting the nation into default for the first time in its 
history.
  Long ago, in 1789, Alexander Hamilton, the nation's first and 
greatest Treasury Secretary, understood that the path to American 
prosperity and greatness lay in its creditworthiness which provided the 
affordable access to capital needed to fund internal improvements and 
economic growth.
  The nation's creditworthiness was one of its most important national 
assets and according to Hamilton: ``the proper funding of the present 
debt, will render it a national blessing.''
  But to maintain this blessing, or to ``render public credit 
immortal,'' Hamilton understood that it was necessary that: ``the 
creation of debt should always be accompanied with the means of 
extinguishment.''
  In other words, to retain and enjoy the prosperity that flows from 
good credit, it is necessary for a nation to pay its bills.
  Madam Speaker, if our friends across the aisle really want to shrink 
the deficit, reduce the national debt, practice fiscal responsibility, 
and bring about sustained economic growth and prosperity, there is a 
much better, easier, and more certain way to achieve these goals than 
by tampering with the U.S. Constitution.

[[Page H5533]]

  The easier and better way is for the American people to keep a 
Democrat in the White House and place Democratic majorities in the 
House and Senate.
  In the 1990s under the leadership of President Clinton the budget was 
balanced for four consecutive years, the national debt was paid down, 
the national debt, 23 million new jobs were created, and projected 
surpluses exceeded $5 trillion.
  Under President Obama the financial crisis and economic meltdown 
inherited from his Republican predecessor was ended, the annual deficit 
was reduced by 67 percent, the auto industry was saved from collapse, 
and 15 million jobs were created.
  In contrast, under every Republican administration since President 
Reagan the size of the deficit bequeathed to his successor was 
substantially larger than the one he inherited, a major economic 
recession occurred, and economic growth was lower than it was at the 
beginning of his administration.
  According to Moody's Chief Economist Mark Zandi, it would be 
``cataclysmic'' for the United States to default.
  Republicans know the debt ceiling needs to be raised; in 2019 during 
the Trump Administration, Majority Leader McConnell and Senate 
Republicans voted to raise the debt ceiling, ``We raised the debt 
ceiling because America can't default[,] that would be a disaster.''
  Madam Speaker, this debate over extending the debt limit is not about 
restraining future spending, it is about paying the bills piled up 
already under both Republican and Democratic administrations.
  To preserve the sanctity of the full faith and credit of the United 
States, protect American jobs and businesses of all sizes, and ensure 
the continued growth of the economy, I strongly support the provision 
in the bill before extending the public debt limit to December 16, 
2021.
  I strongly support this legislation and urge all Members to join me 
in voting for S. 1301, the ``Temporary Extension of Public Debt Act.''
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I yield myself 30 seconds, and I can't help 
but remember that, in February 2018, my colleague from Houston, Texas, 
voted to default on America's debt, to shut down the government, and to 
withhold disaster funding for Hurricane Harvey in our region.
  I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I am very pleased to yield 1 minute to the 
gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Hoyer), the majority leader, one of the 
most capable legislators I have known.
  Mr. HOYER. Madam Speaker, I thank the chairman of the Ways and Means 
Committee for yielding. As you can tell, he is a good friend of mine, 
and he uses hyperbole in introducing me. I appreciate that.
  The ranking member of the Ways and Means Committee just made a 
comment. I don't think anybody has clean hands on this issue. I tell 
the ranking member, I don't think anybody has clean hands. I don't know 
the exact voting pattern of the ranking member. I think he probably has 
been on both sides of this issue himself. I think I have been.
  But I will tell the ranking member, if I am here when there is a 
Republican President--and I do not wish for that end, of course. But if 
I am here, I want to guarantee you that I will vote to lift the debt 
limit--guarantee you.
  I said 3 years ago, I would never vote against raising the debt limit 
and keeping America's creditworthy status, never. In my view, it is 
intellectually dishonest to do so.
  This is a phony issue, and anybody who is intellectually honest with 
themselves knows it is a phony issue because it has no relationship to 
what the debt is. The debt relates to when we cut revenues or spend 
money, not some arbitrary limit that we theoretically put on our debt. 
We ought to be honest with the American public because too many people 
demagogue about this issue.
  Madam Speaker, on Monday, Senate Republicans voted against keeping 
the government open and paying the bills that our Nation has already 
incurred. That was not a reflection of responsible opposition in a 
democracy.
  We talk about the loyal opposition. The loyal opposition ought not to 
be loyal to the majority, but they ought to be loyal to the country. 
Instead, their vote is a reckless and irrational action that signaled 
very clearly to the American people, the financial markets, and the 
international community that Republicans would choose to precipitate an 
economic catastrophe for American businesses and families to score 
political points against President Biden and Democrats. That is what is 
happening here today.
  Three times over the past 4 years, House and Senate Republicans voted 
to suspend the debt limit when President Trump asked them to do so. I 
have no idea what President Trump is asking people to do at this point 
in time, but my experience is it is not the responsible thing.
  Madam Speaker, when they asked Democrats for our help taking that 
needed step in order to prevent a catastrophic default, we joined with 
them to vote for it.
  When Speaker Boehner could only get 78 of his colleagues to vote with 
him to maintain fiscal responsibility in this country, only 78--I guess 
77 because he was the 78th--would follow. And how did those bills 
carry? Because we, in the minority, joined with Speaker Boehner.
  When Speaker Ryan did the same thing, couldn't get the majority of 
his own colleagues to back him, we gave the necessary votes to pursue 
and to ensure fiscal responsibility. Why? Because it was the right 
thing to do, because it was the necessary and responsible thing to do.
  Treasury Secretary Yellen told us yesterday that we will run out of 
extraordinary measures to forestall a default on October 18. That is 
fewer than 20 days from today.
  Yet, we talk about partisanship, and we accuse others of not doing it 
one time or not doing it another time. This is the one time. This is 
our time. This is the time that the vote presents itself to us to keep 
America's creditworthy status and to prohibit a national and 
international crisis.
  There is an urgency to our action, and we twiddle our partisan 
thumbs.
  Leader McConnell, I am sure, has been quoted frequently. I haven't 
heard all the debate, but frequently. ``Let me make it perfectly clear. 
The country must never default. The debt ceiling will need to be 
raised.'' That is his quote.
  Now, what he didn't add was: But I am not going to help. But I am 
going to ask my party to be irresponsible. But I am going to ask my 
party not to do what I say should never happen and allow the country to 
default.
  I don't know how you rationalize that. I don't know how anybody with 
intellectual honesty rationalizes that, Madam Speaker, that you think 
we must never default, but by the way, I won't vote for it.
  What does that mean? What kind of language is that? What kind of lack 
of principle is that?
  In order to give him and his fellow Republicans one last opportunity 
to prevent a default at a time when our recovery from the pandemic is 
not yet complete and still quite fragile, today, we are considering a 
clean debt limit suspension, not a number, just a date, which is, by 
the way, what both Republicans and Democrats have used in the past.
  The bill before us simply says the United States of America will pay 
its bills on time. What a radical proposition.
  Yet, our Republican friends cannot summon the intention to do just 
that. If Senate Republicans still cannot be consistent with their own 
votes from the past 4 years, they can stand aside and, as Leader 
McConnell has suggested, vote for cloture to allow Democrats to pass 
the bill with 51 votes. At least do that. At least have the courage to 
allow others to display the courage of standing up and voting for what 
they know is absolutely essential and what they have said is absolutely 
essential.
  But if you believe that the full faith and credit of our country is 
worth safeguarding, that our businesses and working families deserve to 
be spared unnecessary economic pain, then vote ``yes'' on both sides of 
the aisle.
  This is not a partisan vote. This is an American vote. This is for 
our country. This is for our fiscal responsibility. This is for fiscal 
stability. This is for families.

                              {time}  1530

  Don't twiddle your thumbs and say it is a partisan vote. It is not.
  A ``yes'' vote on this bill is not a victory for Democrats or for the 
President. It is the responsible thing to do and a victory for our 
country. Although we ought never to get to this place, we get to it all 
time, because we

[[Page H5534]]

play these silly, partisan, pedantic, weak, meritless arguments.
  Everybody knows we have to do this. To sit there and say, ``Well, I 
am not going to do it'' is not fulfilling the oath to defend and 
protect this great Nation and this great democracy.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  What a bunch of nonsense that we just heard. I respect the majority 
leader. I love his talk about courage and principle and language and 
all of that.
  But what he didn't tell you was that in February of 2018, Speaker 
Pelosi, he, Whip Clyburn, 119 House Democrats, voted to shut down this 
government, to default on America's debt, and deny hurricane assistance 
to communities not just in Texas, but across the country. He played 
politics with America's debt. So did many Democrats that day.
  While they lecture us about irresponsibility, here is what we do 
know. This is a dangerous, irresponsible charade. Democrats are 
desperate to blame the GOP for this when, in fact, they created this 
economic crisis.
  For 2 years, our Democrat colleagues have known this day was coming 
and never even passed a budget. They didn't even try to pass a budget 
to deal with this. They never sat down with Republicans. They have 
rammed everything through this House this year.
  Now, even though they have all of the votes they need, they are just 
playing political games, willing to shut down this government, willing 
to deny disaster aid, willing to harm our economy and working families 
so they don't have to raise this debt ceiling.
  The truth is, they don't want to. They can. They don't want to. They 
are manufacturing this crisis. They have all the votes they need. They 
are willing to bring this economy to the brink. They have got all the 
votes they need. All they have to do is include it in reconciliation. 
They just don't want to. They just don't want to.
  We could fact-check so much of what we heard today. We could spend 
the next 2 hours on this, and we could talk about all of the tax breaks 
for the billionaires and the wealthy in the new spending bill that is 
being brought to the floor. Trust me, this isn't just about past debts. 
This is about a green light to spend America deeper and deeper and 
deeper into debt.
  To quote our Democrat leaders in 2018: ``Republicans control the 
House, the Senate, and the White House. The responsibility to govern 
rests squarely on their shoulders.''
  Democrats control the House, the Senate, and the White House. This 
responsibility rests on their shoulders.
  I will tell you, Madam Speaker, at the end of this debate, I intend 
to offer a motion to commit the bill to the Committee on Ways and Means 
and include a provision that would prohibit the IRS from implementing a 
bank surveillance scheme.
  The reason I am doing this is because Democrats are leading a 
campaign to impose bank surveillance on your personal bank account and 
your business bank account. They are targeting families and farmers and 
America's small businesses.
  They want to give the IRS unfettered access to individual and 
business bank accounts. It is an outrageous intrusion into the private 
lives of all Americans. And they want to do that because they think 
they can raise money to lift the SALT cap, to give tax breaks to 
millionaires, to create tax havens for billionaires against the very 
tax hikes that they are proposing. Penthouse occupants are cheering. 
The building janitor gets nothing.
  This is why they don't want to take responsibility for lifting the 
debt ceiling, because they have huge plans to really harm middle-class 
Americans while giving huge tax breaks to their friends.
  When Democrats want to sit down with Republicans and have a serious 
conversation about how we raise the debt ceiling, how we address the 
financial stability of this country, let me tell you, I am in, a lot of 
us are in. I am hopeful someday we can get to that because that is what 
our country deserves. I will oppose this debt ceiling.
  Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include the text of my 
amendment in the Record immediately prior to the vote on the motion to 
commit.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Texas?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. NEAL. Madam Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
  Madam Speaker, we keep hearing from our colleagues that somehow we 
are asking them to cosign a loan. I am prepared here to vote to lift 
the debt ceiling. That is the responsible position.
  We have heard a lot today from the other side about why Democrats 
should shoulder the responsibility of acting responsibly in terms of 
governance, but that is not how governing simply works.
  We have been given great responsibility and privilege to serve this 
great country, and that responsibility means making hard decisions and 
putting the good of the Nation ahead of all else, including day-to-day 
politics.
  So in my hand, Madam Speaker, I have a $1 bill. For anybody in this 
Chamber or who is watching or who has ever had a chance to travel this 
great country of ours, you know that wherever you go, you can redeem 
this dollar. The purchasing power of this dollar is well known to all.
  But you know what is even more fascinating about this? No matter 
where you travel in the world, to any nook or cranny of this globe, you 
put the dollar on the table and they figure out how to redeem it. This 
argument today is about the full faith and credit of the United States 
of America. This is signed by the Secretary of the Treasury and the 
Treasurer of the United States of America. The basis of redemption is 
the trust that we might even have in strangers as it relates to the 
transaction of using this dollar to pay our bills.

  We have always come together to pay our bills. In 2017, when the debt 
ceiling was reached, 183 Democrats, every Democrat present, voted to 
lift that limit, joining 133 Republicans.
  Resist the ill-considered parts of the argument that have been 
offered today and vote for the responsible position to raise the debt 
ceiling based upon the full faith and credit of the dollar bill that we 
know is redeemed everywhere across the globe.
  Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The previous question is ordered on the 
bill, as amended.
  The question is on the third reading of the bill.
  The bill was ordered to be read a third time, and was read the third 
time.


                            Motion to Commit

  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, I have a motion to commit at the desk.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the motion to commit.
  The Clerk read as follows:

  Mr. Brady moves to commit S. 1301 to the Committee on Ways and Means.

  The material previously referred to by Mr. Brady is as follows:

  Strike section 1 and insert the following:

     SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN 
                   INFORMATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

  Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no funds appropriated to 
the Department of the Treasury shall be used to implement any new 
information reporting requirements on inflows or outflows of deposits 
and withdrawals in individual and business banking accounts and other 
financial accounts.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX, the 
previous question is ordered on the motion to commit.
  The question is on the motion to commit.
  The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that 
the noes appeared to have it.
  Mr. BRADY. Madam Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution 
8, the yeas and nays are ordered.
  Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this question 
are postponed.

                          ____________________