[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 168 (Monday, September 27, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6684-S6694]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                          LEGISLATIVE SESSION

                                 ______
                                 

 EXTENDING GOVERNMENT FUNDING AND DELIVERING EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE ACT--
                           MOTION TO PROCEED

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Senate will 
resume consideration of the motion to proceed to H.R. 5305, which the 
clerk will report.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

       Motion to proceed to Calendar No. 137, H.R. 5305, a bill 
     making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending 
     September 30, 2022, and for providing emergency assistance, 
     and for other purposes.


                   Recognition of the Minority Leader

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Republican leader is recognized.


                              Vaccinations

  Mr. McCONNELL. Madam President, I am glad to share that, a few 
minutes ago, I received a booster vaccination for COVID-19. All 
throughout the pandemic, I have followed the best advice from experts 
and especially from my own healthcare providers. It was an easy 
decision to receive a booster.
  I am a survivor of childhood polio from before vaccines--before 
vaccines eradicated that disease here in our country and around the 
world now. So I have been a lifelong champion of vaccinations.
  Mountains of evidence tell us these shots are safe, effective, and 
dramatically shrink the odds of severe disease or death from COVID. 
Like I have been saying for months, these safe and effective vaccines 
are the way to defend ourselves and our families from this terrible 
virus. They are also how we stay on offense against COVID as a country. 
All Americans should speak with their doctors and get vaccinated.


                                Economy

  Madam President, now, on a completely different matter, it is not 
unusual for a President to have a rough spell. Every administration 
faces a stretch of time where nothing seems to go their way. But what 
we are witnessing today is entirely different.
  President Biden has not been dealt a bad hand by forces outside his 
control. This White House is not sailing through some unavoidable patch 
of choppy water. No, the Democrats have steered our country straight 
into a storm of serious crises all of their own making.
  On issue after issue, Americans are hurting because of specific 
policy choices that Democrats have made over the objections of people 
who actually knew better. Democrats did not inherit most of the painful 
inflation that is hammering working families. Their decisions have 
fueled it. Even liberal economists warned the President that runaway 
liberal spending could send costs soaring--soaring--for the middle 
class. Now working Americans are paying dearly at the grocery store, at 
the gas station, and practically everywhere that matters to families.
  And what are Democrats doing today? Putting together yet another 
reckless taxing-and-spending spree behind closed doors that would make 
inflation even worse.
  Now, President Biden did not inherit humiliation in Afghanistan 
either; he deliberately chose that as well. The Biden administration's 
own experts warned the White House that a reckless withdrawal would 
embolden terrorists and harm our ability to gather intelligence that 
keeps us safe. But the President clung to his made-up deadline, handed 
huge momentum to the Taliban and their terrorist friends, and broke his 
explicit promise to leave no American behind who wanted out. As one 
former Democratic Member of Congress said last week, ``The way the 
administration executed that withdrawal last week has been an utter and 
abject disaster.''
  Democrats did not inherit this border crisis either. This security 
nightmare and human tragedy is yet another direct result of their own 
policies. President Biden and his allies spent 2 years campaigning on 
the concept of Big Government giveaways to people here illegally. Then 
they took office and began dismantling enforcement on the border. So 
what do they expect? Wave after wave of vulnerable people have been 
lured into hellish conditions by the mirage the Democrats have set up--
cruelty masquerading as compassion. Untold thousands of people have 
simply been released into our country with what amounts to a polite 
invitation to show up--show up--for a hearing. Even before the Biden 
surge, only about half of individuals actually showed up.
  One self-created crisis after another from our unified Democratic 
Party government. The latest additions are their confusion about how to 
fund the government and raise the debt ceiling. For more than 2 months 
now, Senate Republicans have been completely clear about how this 
process will play out, so let me make it abundantly clear one more 
time.
  We will support a clean continuing resolution that will prevent a 
government shutdown, get disaster relief to Louisiana, help properly 
vetted Afghan refugees who put themselves on the line for America, and 
support the Iron Dome assistance for our ally Israel. We will not 
provide Republican votes for raising the debt limit.

[[Page S6685]]

  As we speak, Democrats are behind closed doors, assembling a 
multitrillion-dollar reckless taxing-and-spending spree. There is no 
chance Republicans will help lift Democrats' credit limit so they can 
immediately steamroll through a socialist binge that will hurt families 
and help China.
  There is no particular tradition that the minority will always vote 
for debt limit hikes during united government. When Republicans had 
unified control in the early 2000s, then-Senators Biden and Schumer 
voted no on a debt limit increase and made the party in power handle it 
on their own--exactly the situation we are in now. The roles were 
reversed. Bipartisanship is not a light switch--a light switch--that 
Democrats get to flip on when they need to borrow money and switch off 
when they want to spend money.
  The debt suspension that expired in August covered all the debt that 
had been accumulated to that point. This is an argument about the 
future. Democrats want to use this temporary pandemic as a Trojan horse 
for permanent socialism. They have all but said so. And that is what 
millions and millions of Americans elected 50 Republican Senators to 
fight against.
  For 10 weeks now--10 weeks--Democrats have known what kind of 
government funding legislation could pass the Senate and what kind 
would fail. Republicans are not rooting for a shutdown or debt limit 
breach. We have given the united Democratic government total clarity 
about how each can be avoided. Republicans have explained exactly what 
kind of continuing resolution can pass the Senate with our support.
  Late last week, the House Democratic leader publicly said House 
Democrats are ready to swallow whatever CR the Senate can send them. So 
the House is ready. Senate Republicans are ready. We could have a 
bipartisan vote to fund the government today if not for the odd tactics 
of the Senate Democratic leader.
  Before we vote this afternoon, I will ask consent to strike the 
partisan CR that is dead on arrival and instead have the Senate vote on 
a clean continuing resolution that could pass this Chamber easily. We 
will see if Washington Democrats actually want to govern or whether 
they want to add the prospect of a government shutdown to the list of 
inflation, Afghanistan, the border, and all the other national crises 
that are the direct results of their own decisions.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                               January 6

  Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, you remember the day--you will never 
forget it--January 6. Here we were in this Chamber in the process of 
certifying the electoral college votes. It was a pretty solemn occasion 
because this happens once every 4 years. We have documents coming from 
the States telling us what happened in the election of last year for 
President of the United States. It is our job to make sure that those 
reports are documented and that the ordinary process of the democracy 
proceeds.
  This January 6 was not an ordinary day by any means. Before we set 
about our task here in the Senate and the House, the President of the 
United States, Donald Trump, held a rally, claiming that, in fact, he 
didn't lose the election, that he won the last election, and he alleged 
all sorts of fraud and misconduct on the part of Democrats and others 
that resulted in this faulty report that somehow or another he had lost 
the election.
  Well, his crowd got so fired up that they decided to march on the 
Capitol as we were counting the electoral college ballots. I can 
remember it well. Vice President Pence was sitting where you were, I 
say to the Presiding Officer. We were going through the regular 
process, and it was a little after 2 o'clock in the afternoon. All of a 
sudden, that door opened over there, and people came in in suits I had 
never seen before and literally yanked the Vice President off the 
podium and pulled him out that door.
  It was only a minute or two later that a member of the Capitol 
Police--the men and women who guard us and guard the visitors to this 
Capitol--a member of the Capitol Police stood where you are sitting and 
reported to us that there was a demonstration outside and that we 
should remain in this Chamber, in this Senate Chamber, because they 
were going to make it a safe room in the Capitol. At that time, I 
noticed staff people were being brought in and lined up along the back 
of the room itself.
  It wasn't 10 minutes later until the same member of the Capitol 
Police stood up and said: Change in plans; everybody leave as quickly 
as possible. And we all did, filing out toward the back of the room, 
every Member of the Senate. Luckily, the Parliamentarian or some other 
office decided to grab the boxes with the electoral college votes in 
them to preserve this important piece of history from possible mob 
action.
  As we were filing out of the Capitol, I couldn't help but look out 
the window and see the mobs coming on the Capitol, converging on the 
Capitol, carrying Trump signs. We went to a safe location and waited it 
out and later that evening resumed our activities on the floor of the 
Senate, counted the votes, and made it official, with the Vice 
President present.
  It was an important part of history. You would think that would be 
enough of an embarrassment to President Donald Trump that he would drop 
his claims that the election was stolen. He has done just the opposite. 
He has intensified these false, malicious claims that somehow or 
another the vote was rigged or stolen, whatever his term might be--a 
fraud on the public--despite clear evidence to the contrary.
  He pointed to a number of States that he said proved his point, where 
he just could not have lost--Donald Trump could not have lost these 
States--so clearly, he argued, something happened there that was 
criminal or wrong, and an investigation would show it.
  Well, one of those States was Arizona. Joe Biden carried Arizona by 
roughly 10,500 votes. Forty-five thousand Biden votes came from 
Maricopa County, so it was obviously crucial to his win. So the 
Republicans in Arizona decided they were going to zero in on Maricopa 
County and prove once and for all that Donald Trump didn't lose that 
county by 45,000 votes. Well, they went to great lengths to do it.
  First, they gathered all their rightwing groups and Trump's defenders 
and raised $5.7 million in donations. Then they hired a group with the 
unlikely name--I am looking for it here; something to do with ninjas. I 
am sure it will pop up. Oh, Cyber Ninjas. This group has no experience 
analyzing an election. Yet they turned over all the ballots from 
Maricopa County to them to recount.
  Well, they pursued many bizarre theories, one of which I think was 
promulgated by the ever-reliable Rudy Giuliani that somehow or another 
there were bamboo fibers found in these election ballots, and those 
were an indication of wrongdoing and can connect the conspiracy maybe 
even to international sources.
  The Cyber Ninjas rolled up their sleeves, pulled in the boxes of 
ballots, and started their count. They were determined to prove, once 
and for all, that the result that was announced that Biden carried the 
county by 45,000 votes was wrong. And they proved it. Through all their 
hard work and all the money that was spent, it turns out the draft 
report from the company, Cyber Ninjas, found that there were 99 
additional votes for Joe Biden, rather than the amount presented by the 
261 fewer votes for Donald Trump in Maricopa County, just the opposite 
of what they had predicted.
  Well, you would think that President Trump would at least be quiet or 
maybe even acknowledge that he was wrong. Come on, you remember him. 
Here is what he said in a statement after the review was announced. He 
said the review ``has uncovered significant and undeniable evidence of 
FRAUD! Until we know how and why this happened, our Elections will 
never be secure.''
  He just won't quit. And the problem, of course, is that so many 
Americans are buying it, primarily Republicans, increasing their 
numbers, believing his Big Lie about the election being stolen

[[Page S6686]]

from him. God forbid this man could lose an election. Who would ever 
dream of that? He can't think of the possibility. And they are joining 
him in the chorus, despite hard evidence that proves time and time and 
time again that he lost.
  It was a spirited election--Joe Biden and Donald Trump--and when it 
was all over, the American people made their choice. They accepted the 
reality of change. Now it is time for Donald Trump and his followers to 
do the same.
  I don't know if the cyber ninja turtles, or whoever they are, are 
going to go at it again in some other State, pick another State to do 
some investigation. More power to them. They are building up the 
majority for Joe Biden--just the opposite of what was predicted.


                              Debt Ceiling

  Madam President, I would like to speak on another topic, if I might.
  We are going to have a vote later this afternoon, and it is not an 
ordinary vote in the U.S. Senate. We are voting on what is called the 
debt ceiling.
  The debt ceiling is the acknowledgement of the government's debt. It 
looks backward, and it says: Over a period of time since we last 
expanded the size of the debt, we have incurred more debt, and, 
therefore, we have to acknowledge the new debt ceiling in order to 
establish that the United States is going to pay that debt--which, of 
course, we want a reputation for paying just bills. And, in this 
situation, these were bills for debts incurred during the Trump 
administration.
  It should be a rather routine thing. In fact, one might make the 
argument that the Senate and the House should not even be involved in 
this acknowledgement; it is simple accounting and should be announced 
to the American people. But for the time being, it is subject to a vote 
in the House and the Senate, and that is where the problems arise.
  Senator McConnell, the Republican leader from Kentucky, is hoping 
that the American public will not clearly understand the gravity and 
the importance of this vote. He has announced that he is going to 
boycott this vote and not a single Republican will vote to acknowledge 
the true debt of the United States of America.
  I don't know if he will be able to keep his word and whether every 
Republican Senator will march blindly behind him. They did once before, 
under the American Rescue Plan, when Joe Biden proposed that we do the 
things necessary to bring this pandemic to an end and get America back 
on its feet. Not a single Republican would vote for it.
  We promised cash payment of $1,400 for every family in America. It 
was in the American Rescue Plan. The Republicans all voted against it. 
We passed the money, billions of dollars, so that we could actually 
administer the COVID vaccine across America. We had discovered the 
vaccines, but, of course, there is a huge infrastructure needed to make 
sure that they are safely administered to the American people. That was 
in the American Rescue Plan, and all the Republicans voted against it.
  There was also a provision in there to deal with helping businesses 
reopen their doors. Saturday night in Chicago, I spoke to a 
restauranteur who told me about problems he had faced and the debts he 
incurred to get back on his feet. The American Rescue Plan helped 
Americans. And every Republican voted against it. Not a single 
Republican Member in the House or the Senate would support it.
  We are getting the same threats that the Republicans will walk out of 
the room. Resolving the debt ceiling is necessary to pay for decisions 
made. This is debt incurred during the Trump administration. And lest 
you think that this fiscally conservative Donald Trump was a good 
Republican when it came to debt, think again. The greatest increase in 
America's national debt in any 4-year period in our history, a 36-
percent increase.
  Let me repeat. Raising the debt ceiling has nothing to do with future 
spending. We are paying Donald Trump's bills. We are acknowledging what 
was done by the House and Senate, Republicans and Democrats--what was 
spent and now has to be repaid. This is about paying what we already 
owe, and it is also about averting an economic catastrophe.
  As a candidate, Donald Trump used to brag that he was ``king of 
debt.'' How about that. ``King of debt'' is what he says. Well, he 
proved it. His reckless spending as President, with America's credit 
card, added nearly $8 trillion to our national debt--$8 trillion. This 
is a third of the entire debt. It was incurred during the Trump 
administration.
  And now the Republicans, his party, refuse to acknowledge that debt 
and the fact that we have to pay it back. He racked up all that debt in 
4 years. Two trillion of that $8 trillion in Trump debt, incidentally, 
was spent on tax cuts for the richest people in America. Yes, that was 
the Trump plan, supported by the same Republicans who today are saying 
they won't even cast a vote to acknowledge that they did it, and it 
added to the deficit.
  By 2027, 83 percent of the benefits of the Trump tax cuts, supported 
by Senator McConnell and the Republicans, will go exclusively to the 
top 1 percent of wage earners in America. Republican Senators passed 
those tax cuts all on their own through reconciliation.
  I will tell you this. I didn't vote for it. No Democrats voted for 
it. What we are doing today is paying the piper, acknowledging that 
this is a legitimate debt of this country. We can change policy going 
forward, but since we enacted those tax cuts 4 years ago, it has added 
to the national debt. And we acknowledge it today, and Senator 
McConnell and the Republicans refuse to acknowledge it.
  During Trump's one term in office, the national debt increased by 
almost 36 percent--4 years: 36 percent. Our Republican colleagues voted 
to raise the Federal debt ceiling once and to suspend it twice during 
Donald Trump. And the Democrats stood with them because we understood 
that this is just basic requirement 101 of constitutional government. 
We shared the responsibility not because we agreed with his policies--
we don't--but because we understood that defaulting on the national 
debt could cause real damage to America.

  What would the costs of defaulting on our debt be exactly? According 
to some economists, we would see an estimated $15 trillion of household 
wealth wiped out, 6 million jobs lost, and a 9-percent unemployment 
rate. Every last American would feel the pain. If it continued for any 
period of time, it would threaten retirement funds, Social Security 
checks, even job security.
  Mark Zandi, a pretty well-respected economist with Moody's, warned 
that a default on America's debt would trigger ``financial 
Armageddon,'' threatening America's status as a world reserve currency, 
all because the Republicans refuse to acknowledge debt they voted for 
and created under Republican President Donald Trump.
  Even toying with the notion of default would have severe 
consequences. Back in 2011, House Republicans initially refused to 
raise the debt limit. America's credit rating was downgraded because of 
it. The result: higher borrowing costs and confidence in American 
leadership shaken globally.
  We will see if every Republican will fall under the dictates of 
Senator McConnell when it comes to defaulting on America's debt for the 
first time, and we will also see what the reaction to that is going to 
be.
  This measure we are going to vote on in about 2 hours suspends the 
debt ceiling to avoid default by the government, and it keeps the 
government open, just that basic. After all that we have been through 
and what we are going through with the pandemic, how can the 
Republicans play with this deadly economic strategy?
  Without a continuing resolution, the Federal Government will shut 
down in less than 4 days. With the Delta variant still taking 2,000 
American lives a day, this is no time to shut down the Federal 
Government. With victims of hurricanes and floods and wildfires 
desperate for help, this is not the time to close the doors of the 
Agencies that can help them. With our economy still recovering, now is 
not the time to damage it, intentionally, for political reasons.
  Right now, our No. 1 priority is keeping our Nation's economy on a 
path to recovery and helping families through a difficult time. We need 
to come together and fund the government. That is our fundamental 
responsibility. We need to pay our bills on time. We need to provide 
financial relief to Americans

[[Page S6687]]

who are battling disasters, whether they are in California or Oregon, 
Louisiana or Illinois, or Hawaii. And we need to grow our economy for 
future generations, increasing funding for childcare and healthcare and 
help for working families.
  President Biden's Build Back Better plan is a proven investment in 
our economic future. It includes the largest middle-class tax cut in 
history.
  Do you know what the Republicans call the largest middle-class tax 
cut in history? Socialism. Socialism. I heard Senator McConnell say it: 
They just want to pursue socialism. The largest tax cut for working 
families and children in American history.
  Unlike President Trump's tax giveaway to the rich, which Senator 
McConnell voted for and doesn't want to pay for, the Build Back Better 
plan will have the corporations pay their fair share.
  No one--this is a promise by President Biden to be held to--no one 
who makes $400,000 a year or less will pay more in taxes. He has been 
pretty clear on that, hasn't he? So this notion that we are going 
through some socialist tax-and-spend scheme here just isn't true.
  Seven months after he signed his tax cut into law, Donald Trump told 
the effervescent Sean Hannity of FOX News that: ``When [the Trump tax 
cut] kicks in, we'll start to pay off the debt like it's water''--
Donald Trump. That was a con.
  Now the bills are coming due, and the Republicans are racing for the 
exits. It is time to stop this ruse and fraud on the American people. 
We need to pay our bills, act responsibly, and actually help working 
families.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. MORAN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. Duckworth). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.


                            Border Security

  Mr. MORAN. Madam President, I rise this afternoon to bring further 
attention to the growing humanitarian and national security crisis we 
see at our southern border.
  President Biden's and Vice President Harris's handling of the 
southern border has been as incompetent as it has been inhumane. This 
is not a partisan view: their own special envoy to Haiti has resigned 
in protest.
  This administration is in denial; it is in denial about the scope of 
this crisis. Migrant crossings into the United States have already 
reached historic levels and, as I speak, thousands continue to arrive 
along our U.S.-Mexico border.
  Since taking office, President Biden and Vice President Harris have 
shirked responsibility for this crisis by placing blame on the historic 
levels of illegal crossing on everything from COVID-19 to climate 
change, to former President Trump. They are hoping Americans will 
forget that President Biden's first order of business was to repeal 
nearly every immigration policy of the previous administration.
  The Biden administration's talking points say our borders are closed, 
but their actions indicate just the opposite. More than 12,000 of the 
Haitians who gathered under the bridge in Del Rio over the past week 
have been released into the country.
  This is not a new policy--tens of thousands of migrants who have 
illegally crossed our border have been released since President Biden 
took office. Many were released without a court date and given nothing 
more than a list of ICE offices around the country, with instructions 
to report within 60 days.
  Unsurprisingly, it was reported in July that nearly 87 percent of 
50,000 individuals released without a court date fail to report as 
directed. This is a clear message that, if you make it to the United 
States, you will be allowed to stay without facing repercussions. This 
encourages families to make the dangerous trek north and entrust their 
safety to dangerous drug cartels at the risk of being murdered, 
assaulted, or trafficked because the reward is worth the risk.
  The Haitian refugees who recently began arriving at the U.S.-Mexico 
border are evidence of that mindset. They believed the administration's 
actions, not their words. They watched as thousands were allowed to 
stay in the country, and they gambled that they, too, would get the 
same treatment; that after living nearly a decade in countries like 
Brazil and Chile, now is the time to come.
  Nearly 9 months into the Biden Presidency, it is irrefutable that 
this administration's policies are fueling, are increasing the crisis 
both for our security and the humanity of people.
  The historic levels of crossing at the southern border have not only 
created this humanitarian crisis and put an incredible strain on our 
immigration system, but have seriously compromised our national 
security.
  In April, a few months ago, I visited the border and had the 
opportunity to speak with Agents of the FBI and DEA to hear firsthand 
how the crisis has affected their operations and the challenges it has 
created for them in carrying out their mission to disrupt transnational 
criminal organizations and apprehend major drug traffickers.
  The cartels that operate in Central America are sophisticated, 
adaptable, and ruthless. Not only do they take advantage of individuals 
attempting the trek to our southern border by forcing them to pay 
thousands of dollars to fund their operations and subject them to 
abuse, rape, and murder, they use these individuals to their strategic 
advantage. They will send thousands of individuals across the border at 
the same time in an attempt to overwhelm while cartels bring drugs and 
guns undetected.
  Just today, the DEA issued a public safety alert to warn against the 
alarming increase in counterfeit prescription pills containing fentanyl 
and meth that are being trafficked in the United States. Thus far this 
year, more than 9.5 million counterfeit pills have been seized--a rate 
that puts 2021 on a path to more seizures than the last 3 years 
combined. This is no coincidence.
  The administration's decision to continue ignoring this humanitarian 
and national security crisis is allowing a horrible situation to get 
even worse. Actions always speak louder than words. The Biden 
administration must take immediate action to secure the border and 
enforce our immigration laws.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mrs. BLACKBURN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
order for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                          Biden Administration

  Mrs. BLACKBURN. Madam President, I have noticed over the past few 
months that my Democratic colleagues have developed a habit of 
explaining away the anger of the citizens of this country. There is 
anger, and there is frustration. And what they do is to do a little 
turn in the conversation and make it the cause of the citizens.
  It is kind of blaming it on them instead of looking at themselves as 
Members of the Senate and saying, ``You know, what could we do 
better?''
  What I have seen is my colleagues on the other side of the aisle 
demand to know what is wrong with the American people; how could they 
not be on board with President Biden's so-called transformative 
agenda--change it all? Why won't they stand by and let us spend the 
country into economic oblivion while businesses fail, Main Streets see 
shuttered businesses, and once-safe border communities are being turned 
into war zones?
  You see, what they are really doing is trying to force the American 
people to adjust and abandon their principles--things that they have 
long believed, the founding first principles of this country. They want 
them to abandon that--abandon their expectations, and then accommodate 
the miserable failure that is Joe Biden's first few months in office. 
He has been wrong about most all of it.
  I honestly believe that many of the Democratic leaders have it wrong 
on this. The people aren't the ones who need to adjust. That burden 
belongs to the Democratic leadership--in the Senate, in the House, in 
the White House.

[[Page S6688]]

No matter how they try to dress it up or change it or smile, they are 
fast-tracking the road to socialism.
  The anger bubbling to the surface didn't come from out of nowhere. 
Contrary to popular belief, outrage is not our natural state, no. What 
you are seeing is beyond buyer's remorse or even buyer's fear. It is 
buyer's anger, righteous anger, at what they see happening; and it is 
the culmination of almost a year's worth of confusion, fear, 
frustration at the Biden administration for how they have failed to 
lead--weak leadership.
  You see, the American people aren't accustomed to watching their 
leaders intentionally--intentionally--jeopardize our security and 
prosperity on such a fundamental level. They are looking at all that 
has fallen apart and realizing that things are the way they are because 
President Biden and the Democratic leadership wants it to be this way. 
This is intentional.
  On day one, President Biden halted construction of the border wall 
and left those crossings wide open to drug traffickers, to sex 
traffickers, human traffickers, and gangs--basically hung out the 
``y'all come, you're welcome'' sign, opening that southern border.
  They did this knowing that hundreds of thousands of migrants were 
already on their way from Mexico and Central America. One hundred fifty 
countries this year have crossed that border illegally, and that--the 
vast majority of them would pay the cartels for their passage north by 
serving as drug mules, as prostitutes. What is being done to women and 
children is really awful. It is a humanitarian crisis.
  If they wanted to, Biden and the Democrats could put themselves 
between us and that threat. They could support strong immigration 
policies that protect refugees and also secure the border. It is 
possible, but they have refused to do it. Instead, they are funneling 
crowds of unvetted migrants into American communities and enabling the 
cartels to traffic women and children across State lines with impunity.
  How dare they? How dare they traffic like they are trafficking?
  Ignoring this problem isn't humanitarianism. It is not anti-racism. 
It is dangerous and exposes an appalling lack of wisdom on the part of 
the President; the Vice President, who is supposed to be the border 
czar; and their advisers.
  This administration seems to believe that threats to our national 
security will evaporate if we ignore them: Just don't think about it; 
don't talk about it; what you are seeing, you are really not seeing.
  What they are doing is creating policy in a bubble, which works well 
for grad seminars but fails miserably when there are lives on the line.
  The Biden administration failed in Afghanistan. Now, we can argue for 
the next decade--and I am sure we will--about lessons learned, but here 
is what the American people see: The Biden administration gave a 
terrorist organization the benefit of the doubt.
  That is right. They trusted the words of the Taliban above the words 
of the commanders on the ground. The commanders on the ground warned 
that such an abrupt withdrawal would end in chaos and casualties.
  But you know what? They wanted to be out by September 11. They wanted 
that date circled on the calendar. Joe Biden wanted to be the President 
who ended the war, but all he has done is emboldened the terrorists. 
And the war on terror continues. It continues. He ended nothing with 
the war on terror.

  We came out of Afghanistan, but now the families of 13 American 
servicemembers are left to grieve, while State Department officials 
make absurd claims about the power of diplomacy and the Taliban's role 
in regional politics, all the while ignoring the allies and the 
partners they abandoned. They still don't know how many Americans, how 
many of our SIV holders, applicants, their families are left behind 
enemy lines.
  And the people? The people in Tennessee whom I talk with when I go 
home every weekend--they are watching this. They are astounded, and 
they cannot believe what they are seeing the Democratic Party do.
  There is no reason, no accountability, no incentive to trust that the 
self-proclaimed ``adults in the room'' know what is best.
  Especially when it comes to the economy, Tennesseans can see a 
socialist agenda pulling the strings. Right now, they are staring down 
the barrel of a $3.5 trillion budget that the Democrats have weaponized 
against personal responsibility and decentralized control. Just seeing 
that pricetag was bad enough, and now we are hearing the pricetag is 
growing.
  But, now, Tennesseans know that the Democrats don't even care how 
much this costs nor do they care that, if all goes to plan, American 
businesses will carry a heavier tax burden than communist China. That 
is correct. The American businesses will have a higher tax burden than 
those in communist China. Living life as we know it will be too 
expensive for most of us to afford.
  No serious person could stand here on the floor of the Senate and 
pretend to be shocked at the level of anger and frustration that we are 
seeing back home. I talk to people every single week who feel 
betrayed--betrayed--by this administration. They feel unsafe.
  Many of the Tennesseans I speak to every day who voted for President 
Biden wish they had made another choice in the voting booth because, 
yes, they voted for the President, but they did not vote for this. They 
did not vote for the Afghanistan withdrawal and the manner we came out. 
They did not vote to embolden the communist Chinese. They did not vote 
for open borders. They did not vote for inflation that is skyrocketing, 
taxes--$2 trillion of taxes coming their way. No, they did not vote for 
that, and this is what makes them angry.
  I hear their anger with every telephone townhall, with every 
conversation. I hear their frustration. They are angry at the White 
House officials who use the full force of the U.S. Government to cover 
up their mistakes and try to make it sound like it is the problem of 
the people, because they know they have messed up.
  And the people have every right to be angry. The things we do in this 
Chamber don't exist in a bubble. They have real world consequences for 
real people who have real lives that they are living every day, and 
they know that they are beginning to live these lives in a more 
dangerous setting: crime on the streets, crime on the rise, open 
borders, unvetted migrants coming to their communities, COVID, measles 
outbreaks.
  They are angry. They have ``buyer's anger.'' I like to say, as I talk 
to women: Security moms are back. They are back in full force. They are 
back because they don't like the crime in the streets. They want safe 
communities. They want their children safe. They want their children 
who are going to college this fall to be safe. They are upset with the 
Afghanistan withdrawal, with the continuation of the war on terror, and 
that their children are going to have to go refight this.
  They are angry, and we hear their anger, and we know it is time for 
Members in this Chamber to stop playing politics with how much spending 
you can force out the door and address these problems that moms and 
dads and Americans across this country are faced with each and every 
day.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. CORNYN. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                           Government Funding

  Mr. CORNYN. Madam President, later this evening, the Democrat-
controlled Senate will hold a vote on another dead-on-arrival bill.
  This time, though, it isn't just a messaging bill designed to put on 
a show for their far left. This is legislation that is actually 
critical to the stability of our government, our economy, and the 
livelihood of millions of public servants.
  For months now, Republicans have made clear, though, we will not 
split the ticket when it comes to Democrats' reckless tax-and-spending 
spree. We will not vote to raise the debt limit just so Democrats can 
spend another $3.5 trillion and add that to the American people's 
credit card in a purely partisan exercise.
  If this was ever a secret, it was the worst kept secret in 
Washington, DC.

[[Page S6689]]

But our Democratic colleagues simply can't resist a chance to virtue 
signal even if it wastes valuable floor time here in the Senate.
  We have seen this before. In fact, Democrats' designed-to-fail agenda 
practically dominated the Senate's calendar this summer. There was a 
bill to exploit the cause of gender pay fairness in order to line the 
pockets of trial lawyers. There was legislation to overhaul America's 
election system and hand Democrats a permanent governing majority. The 
latest version of this bill, which will also fail, will come up for a 
vote in a matter of days.
  Senator Schumer has even forecasted votes on other bills that were so 
unpopular, as it turned out, that they didn't even make it to the 
Senate floor. There was one that would have eroded American's Second 
Amendment rights and another that would punish schools and hospitals 
that refused to comply with ``woke'' social norms.
  Now, this isn't an agenda to better the lives of the American people 
or protect the country from global threats. It is pandering, pure and 
simple. While pandering to their radical base is the focus of the 
Democrat-led Senate, there are a number of threats this body should 
actually address. The most obvious is the need to prevent another 
government shutdown.
  Let's not forget the Biden border crisis on our southern border. For 
the entirety of President Biden's term of office, Democrats have 
refused to acknowledge any sort of problem at all with our southern 
border because, apparently, they don't actually believe in borders or 
apparently care little about the drugs smuggled into this country that 
took the lives of 90,000 Americans last year alone. Even as hundreds of 
thousands of migrants poured across our border every month, Democrats 
showed no concern or didn't even acknowledge that there was a problem.
  Then things came to a head. Finally, the news media began to pay 
attention to Del Rio. Within a matter of days, 30,000 migrants--nearly 
30,000, primarily from Haiti--crossed the border and set up camp under 
the International Bridge in Del Rio, TX. Early statements indicated 
that the administration would make heavy use of title 42, which is a 
public health title designed to protect the American people against the 
spread of COVID-19. Early statements indicated the administration would 
make use of that public health title and expedited removal to return 
these individuals to their home countries. It sounded like a pretty 
remarkably sensible strategy.
  But now that the migrant camp has been cleared, we know that is not 
what happened. Only about 2,000 migrants were returned to Haiti, a 
small percentage of the nearly 30,000 who crossed into Del Rio. Some 
8,000 voluntarily returned to Mexico, but I expect many of those 
migrants and their families will make another attempt to reenter the 
United States. Another 5,000 of that number are currently being 
processed by the Department of Homeland Security.
  In a television appearance this weekend, Secretary Mayorkas said 10 
to 12,000 migrants, the ones that were huddled under the bridge in Del 
Rio, TX--10 to 12,000 migrants--have been released into the United 
States, untested for COVID-19, unvaccinated, when, in fact, the Biden 
administration has said that the public health title 42 was going to be 
used to exclude them.
  Well, those numbers are likely to grow in the coming days because, 
frankly, all the Biden administration was concerned about, apparently, 
was the bad optics of 30,000 migrants huddled under a border bridge in 
Del Rio, TX.
  What the Biden administration did, as opposed to what they said they 
were going to do, is an open invitation for more migrants to illegally 
come to the United States. Individuals who are trying to decide whether 
to make the dangerous journey to our borders are reading the same 
headlines and watching the same TV news shows that we are, and many of 
them are simply calling their relatives in the United States saying: 
Should I still come?
  And they are being given the green light because of the failure of 
the Biden administration to do anything to deter or to sway or to add 
costs to people illegally entering the United States. In so doing, the 
Biden administration is sending an unmistakable message to more 
migrants to come to the United States because, if you do, there is a 
good chance you will be released into the American countryside and 
disappear into that great American heartland. Migrants will ignore what 
President Biden is saying because they know what his administration is 
doing or, in this case, not doing, which is not securing the borders.
  Unless something changes, the Haitian migration and the crisis in Del 
Rio that fixated the attention of the news media and all America--
unless something changes from a policy perspective, this is going to 
happen again.
  We already know that border crossings are at their highest levels in 
20 years. Now the administration is apparently opening the door to even 
more illegal migration. And the smuggling organizations--the organized 
crime syndicates that profit from charging these migrants thousands of 
dollars to get them into the country--will continue to get rich because 
of the administration's unwillingness to enforce our immigration laws.
  Well, Congress has a duty to take action and address this crisis 
before it grows even more out of control. Democrats cannot ignore the 
responsibility to enforce our laws and secure our borders just because 
it upsets part of their political base.
  There are a lot of things we need to do in the Senate, and this 
parade of dead-on-arrival bills does nothing to move us in the right 
direction. Clearly, our Democratic colleagues are finding their 
newfound majority--they are having a lot of trouble using this power to 
actually govern. They have a wide gulf between the so-called moderates 
of their party--what they can stomach and what the progressive leftwing 
demands.
  They are up against the government funding deadline in just the next 
few days that could risk a shutdown during what is already tough 
economic times for many Americans because of the pandemic. They are 
trying to use a partisan budgetary process to pass trillions of dollars 
of more deficit-spending while also trying to get another trillion-
dollar infrastructure bill signed into law. To top things off, they 
have fanned the flames of the crisis at our border, struggled to defend 
an indefensible, disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, and offended 
America's oldest ally. This is not what governing looks like.
  There is no spotlight on a party like there is when you hold all the 
cards--when you control the White House, the House, and the Senate. The 
American people know who is responsible for the status quo. When the 
majority party all but refuses to work with the minority party, that 
spotlight grows even brighter.
  I hope--but frankly I don't expect--that our Democrats will 
reevaluate the wisdom of this parade of failed bills and spend a little 
bit of time working with Republicans on legislation that could actually 
pass and make a positive difference for our country.
  Madam President, I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                              Afghanistan

  Mr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, in recent days, much has been said 
about Afghanistan. I spoke about it last time on September 15, and most 
of my colleagues have spoken on the very same subject. I come to speak 
more about it. Today, I will look at it from a very different angle. I 
am going to look at it from the angle that you see through the 
Inspector General lens.
  The sudden collapse of the Afghan Government and the Afghan Army 
threw me right back to years of oversight work and audits conducted by 
the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. Now, the 
terminology ``Special Inspector General for Afghanistan 
Reconstruction'' goes by the acronym SIGAR. That person goes by the 
name of his real name, Mr. John Sopko.
  SIGAR, in its reports, pulled no punches. Report after report over 
the years exposed and documented grim allegations of weak security, 
systemic

[[Page S6690]]

corruption, and waste--waste of taxpayers' dollars. Those core problems 
were brushed aside and allowed to eat away at the foundation of our 
commitment. In other words, our leaders were not heeding the warnings 
from the Inspector General, Mr. John Sopko.
  An inability to solve these problems prompted SIGAR to send warning 
signals. Those warning signals said our mission in Afghanistan was 
failing. And that is not a recent conclusion; that is things he stated 
over and over, over the years. This was all to the detriment of U.S. 
foreign policy and our national security--the fact that most of SIGAR's 
advice fell on deaf ears. SIGAR was like a lone wolf, howling out there 
in the wilderness.
  As the final scene of the Afghan tragedy unfolded, as we all saw on 
television at the Kabul Airport, in those circumstances, President 
Biden cut and run. He assigned blame squarely on the Afghans' 
shoulders, but that is not the whole truth. Just pick up any SIGAR 
report; it is plain to see in those reports that something was wrong. 
We were the chief architect and financier for the lion's share of the 
construction in Afghanistan that collapsed. If we are to learn from 
this experience, we need to begin by looking in the mirror.
  SIGAR's ``lessons learned reports'' clearly indicate that security 
against the Taliban threat was a top priority. According to SIGAR, 
security was never achieved. Based on repeated assessments of the 
army's readiness, SIGAR concluded that the Afghan Army lacked the 
capability to independently defend the country against internal and 
external threats, contrary to President Biden's hailing the capability 
of the Afghan military to preserve the country and defend it from the 
Taliban.
  And without security, nation building was a nonstarter. Now we 
question whether or not nation building ought to be part of the policy, 
but it seemed to be too often.
  When coupled with the systemic corruption I just mentioned--and SIGAR 
characterized that as an ``existential threat . . . that eroded army 
readiness''--prospects for survival of the government and the army of 
Afghans doing their job were very dim.
  Against advice that I have given previous administrations, the 
President announced the date certain for pulling out the U.S. military. 
And, by the way, that wasn't wise because you never tell your enemies 
what your plans are.
  So within days, the Taliban eliminated the Afghan Army with hardly a 
struggle. The Taliban then seized U.S. military assets.
  The Biden administration left Americans and Afghan allies behind 
enemy lines. Adding tragedy to the deeply flawed military exit, a U.S. 
drone strike killed 10 civilians.
  There is clear and present urgency for accountability. Do my fellow 
Senators pay appropriate attention to the work of the IGs throughout 
government? Maybe not often enough, but surely listening to SIGAR, not 
enough of us listened to him.
  Afghanistan's collapse underscores the merits of SIGAR's work out of 
three dozen confirmed IGs. IGs do important work, and their work should 
be considered greatly. And the fact that we ignored SIGAR's work in 
Afghanistan is a tragedy, particularly when the people in the executive 
branch of government ignored it.
  SIGAR was created to watchdog the huge sums of money pouring into 
Afghanistan. Mr. Sopko, the IG, did his job well. He issued aggressive, 
hard-hitting reports, documenting egregious waste and blatant 
corruption on both sides--our side and the Afghan side. Large sums of 
money simply disappeared.
  In a recent report, SIGAR served up a classic case of waste and 
corruption, and he did it on a silver platter. It is symptomatic of the 
rot that derailed our efforts in Afghanistan.
  One example involved the purchase of 20 refurbished Italian G222 
medium-lift aircraft for the Afghan Air Force. They added $549 million 
to the taxpayers' tab. These aircraft were needed but unsupportable and 
inoperable.
  The squandering on this project was matched by others exposed by 
SIGAR, like the 64,000 square-foot surge command center that was built 
for $34 million but never needed and never occupied.
  The G222 aircraft was just another notch in Uncle Sam's belt of 
wasteful spending. Those planes were thrown in the junk heap because of 
crooked mismanagement--and that was on our side.
  The Air Force general who led the program while on Active Duty, and 
then as vice president for the company selling the Italian aircraft, 
allegedly violated criminal conflict-of-interest statutes.
  SIGAR wanted to pursue criminal charges, but the Department of 
Justice refused to prosecute. The Department of Justice turned a blind 
eye to the general's alleged misconduct. Let that sink in.
  A half-billion taxpayer dollars went up in smoke, and no one was held 
to account. At a minimum, this reckless spending demanded disciplinary 
action. With little or no accountability, it was easy for crooks to 
line their pockets with schemes like the G222 aircraft.
  Now, SIGAR exposed that. It wasn't prosecuted, but SIGAR nailed quite 
a few. Investigations resulted in 160 criminal convictions. Corruption 
was found on both sides.
  The convicted included 42 Afghanis, 58 U.S. military personnel, 49 
U.S. contractors, and 11 U.S. Government personnel and citizens.
  Some money was recovered, but obviously you don't recover all of it. 
However, in such a target-rich environment, I suspect that SIGAR's 
investigators barely scratched the surface.
  Unfortunately, while SIGAR's finger was stuck in the dike, Uncle Sam 
kept spending money--kept the spigot wide open. Some estimate that over 
$2 trillion flowed through the pipe to a government and an army known 
by SIGAR to be riddled with systemic corruption. We tolerated it, and 
the money kept flowing.
  What happened in Afghanistan boils down to the fundamental principle 
of good government. Oversight is critical to accountability. SIGAR has 
more work to do. SIGAR will need to provide a full accounting for all 
the captured and abandoned weapons and equipment.
  You see a figure of $85 billion of that stuff left over there for the 
Taliban to use for whatever they want to use it for--hopefully, never 
against the United States.
  The IG will need to track down unexpended dollars in the pipeline, 
estimated at $6\1/2\ billion or more, so those tax dollars can be 
returned to the Treasury or allocated for other legitimate and needed 
purposes.
  The IG will need to investigate allegations that high officials fled 
with hundreds of millions of U.S. dollars in cash. And we are told that 
one of those was the former President. The most recent President of 
Afghanistan got away with millions and millions of dollars.
  Now, if true, this would be more proof of systemic corruption that 
was the country's undoing. Stolen tax dollars should be recovered.
  The House Defense authorization bill already instructs SIGAR to 
address these and other issues. I call on the Senate Armed Services 
Committee to adopt those same measures and authorize funding needed to 
finish the job by SIGAR.
  Congress needs to know why SIGAR's alarm bells on poor security, 
corruption, and waste were largely ignored. They were unmistakable 
indicators of the impending collapse that we now know has happened to 
the country of Afghanistan--to the Taliban.
  Once the decision was made to pull out U.S. troops in early 2020, 
preparations for evacuations were mandatory. So then why did our 
President make such a panicked and haphazard exit? Did no one see the 
warnings coming and the signs that showed what would happen? Did the 
military fail to develop an orderly exit strategy and evacuation plan, 
as alleged by Secretary Blinken?
  If true, who is responsible for that blunder? A congressional autopsy 
might help us avoid the same mistakes in the future. It might help us 
put forward a better foot to strengthen strategic alliances.
  As painful as it may be, we must never give up trying to learn from 
our past mistakes. We still face threats from terrorist groups with the 
same ideology as the 9/11 attackers have. And you know where they got 
their training--in Afghanistan.
  We still have troops in many countries combating terrorism in 
partnership with local forces. We can't afford

[[Page S6691]]

to sweep mistakes under the rug and just move on and forget about it.
  Without some soul searching, America risks further humiliation like 
we have just witnessed, which will only embolden our would-be 
adversaries.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Alabama.
  (The remarks of Mr. Tuberville pertaining to the introduction of S. 
2857 are printed in today's Record under ``Statements on Introduced 
Bills and Joint Resolutions.'')
  Mr. TUBERVILLE. I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Alabama.


  Extending Government Funding and Delivering Emergency Assistance Act

  Mr. SHELBY. Madam President, I had hoped to be standing here today 
making a statement in support of the bill before us. For weeks, 
Chairman Leahy and I, along with chairs and ranking members of the 
subcommittees of the Appropriations Committee, worked cooperatively to 
produce a bipartisan package--a package that includes a continuing 
resolution to keep the government operating, as well as, two, emergency 
supplemental funding for disaster relief, and, three, to support those 
who needed rescuing following the President's hasty withdrawal from 
Afghanistan.
  Bipartisan support for anything is a rare commodity around here. 
Senator Leahy and I know that. But we have experienced bipartisan 
support with each other in the past, and it works. It is something that 
should be embraced and, I hope, emulated.
  We nearly got our work done, as appropriators so often do, but larger 
forces intervened. We are not by ourselves here. Leadership on the 
other side of the aisle intervened to pursue partisanship over comity 
and sabotage over constructive engagement by, I believe, unnecessarily 
forcing the debt limit increase into what would otherwise be a 
bipartisan package.
  The Republican leader, Senator McConnell, has been clear. We will not 
support any effort to increase the debt limit. The road to success was 
clearly marked; nevertheless, my Democratic colleagues chose to drive 
this package right into a ditch rather than embrace a bipartisan path 
forward.
  This is not complicated. There is a simple solution. Take up and pass 
a bill that was negotiated on a bipartisan, bicameral basis, which has 
support on both sides of the aisle--a bill that, one, keeps the 
government open, which we all want to do; two, provides much needed 
disaster assistance to storm-ravaged areas of our country; and three, 
delivers the aid necessary to address the Afghanistan withdrawal 
crisis. That is S. 2789, the Shelby-McConnell bill--who is here.
  If we don't take that path, I believe my colleagues on the other side 
of aisle owe the American people some answers here. For example, why 
did they--the Democrats--why did they choose to undermine a bipartisan 
effort to provide the American people with desperately needed disaster 
relief? Yes. And why did they choose to ignore the immediate needs of 
Afghans who deserve our support? Why are they threatening to shut down 
the government now that we have an alternative that would avoid that 
outcome?
  This does not have to happen. We know Thursday is the deadline. 
Instead of accepting victory, my Democratic colleagues, I believe, are 
embracing defeat and creating a new crisis that we all ought to avoid.
  It is a perilous path they are putting the country on, but it still 
is not too late. Today is Monday. We have a few days left. The majority 
can reverse course and put us back on track by immediately passing the 
Shelby-McConnell bill. It will keep the government open and provide 
much needed emergency funding. This is the bill we should be 
considering. I urge the majority to do so.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Vermont.
  Mr. LEAHY. Madam President, I know the speeches on the other side 
have gone a little longer than we expected, so I ask unanimous consent 
that I have time to complete my statement on the continuing resolution 
and national debt, which will be relatively short.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. LEAHY. Madam President, today, the Senate will hold a vote to 
allow for the consideration of a temporary, stopgap measure to keep the 
government funded through December 3. The measure also provides $28 
billion to help States ravaged by hurricanes and wildfires, like 
Hurricane Ida that recently tore through both the South and the 
Northeast. It provides critical assistance to Afghan refugees who fled 
the Taliban in the wake of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. 
Finally, it will raise the debt ceiling to December 2022, including the 
$8 billion of debt that was incurred under President Trump.
  Now, this shouldn't even be a close call. A government shutdown, if 
we had one, would needlessly cost the taxpayers billions of dollars--
billions of dollars--throughout our country. It would throw hundreds of 
thousands of people out of work. A government default would be 
catastrophic. And that is all completely avoidable.
  Yet, in the wake of the deadliest pandemic our country has seen in 
over 100 years and in the wake of natural disasters that have left a 
trail of death and destruction, the Republican leader and his party 
have decided to play a dangerous game of political brinksmanship. They 
have chosen--and it was a free choice on their part--to withhold their 
votes and prevent this bill from even being debated, threatening to 
shut down the U.S. Government--the U.S. Government--and have it default 
on its debts for the first time in the history of our great country.
  I think that is the height of irresponsibility and callousness. It is 
also pretty hypocritical, because who pays the price for this political 
brinksmanship? Not the Republican leadership careening us towards 
disaster but the American people. A government shutdown has serious 
consequences for people just trying to make ends meet--support their 
families, live their lives.
  Important food and nutrition programs--SNAP and WIC--would dry up in 
a matter of days, leaving millions of Americans in the wealthiest 
Nation on Earth without the help they need to put food on the table.
  Also, I look at our Nation's schools that are struggling to reopen 
after a pandemic. Assistance to those schools would be delayed.
  Then we look at our public health response to the mental health and 
substance abuse crisis. That would be severely hampered. And we cannot 
forget that we have an epidemic of drug overdoses in this country 
happening alongside the COVID pandemic.
  The Small Business Administration that provides so much assistance to 
our Nation's small businesses--I believe, as I said many times on this 
floor, that small businesses are the backbone of the American economy--
would be forced to close the door.
  More than half of the CDC would be furloughed just weeks after COVID 
deaths passed the grim toll of the 1918 pandemic in our own country and 
right before the start of the annual flu season.
  These are just a few examples of the needless pain a government 
shutdown would cause.
  As painful as a government shutdown would be, the consequences of 
defaulting on our debt for the first time, the first time in American 
history--that is even worse. The government of the wealthiest country 
in the world would not have funds to operate, meet its obligations, and 
pay its debts.
  The last time we even toyed with such an irresponsible idea, the 
credit rating of the U.S. Government was downgraded for the first time 
in history, and, boy, that cost every American, directly or indirectly, 
money. It certainly hurt businesses all over our country.
  If we were to default on our debt, then the women and men of the 
military would be handed IOUs in exchange for their bravery defending 
our country; Social Security checks that people earned and rely on to 
survive would stop; and the economy would take such a hit from which it 
would be hard to recover. The stock market would no doubt take a dive 
and then put millions of Americans' lifetime savings at risk. All of 
this as we are still recovering economically from the last 18 months of 
a global pandemic. And for what? So Republicans can make campaign 
commercials claiming they are the party of fiscal responsibility and do 
that with a straight face? Come on.

[[Page S6692]]

  While President Trump was in office, U.S. debt increased by $8 
trillion--$5\1/2\ trillion alone since we last raised the debt ceiling 
under President Trump. Incidentally, on that one, because it was so 
important to the country, there was bipartisan support for it.
  Republicans' irresponsible tax cut for the wealthiest Americans is 
partly to blame, but Democrats still supported the Trump administration 
when it needed to raise the debt limit to account for the resulting 
bills because, if we did otherwise, everybody in this country was going 
to be hurt. It would have been irresponsible. It would have been 
dangerous for the U.S. economy.
  The argument made by my colleagues that Republicans will not support 
raising the debt limit because they are not going to support the tax-
and-spend policies of the Democrats--well, it is probably just as well 
that many people wear masks these days because it hides their smiles, 
because that argument does not hold water. The bills they falsely claim 
to be socialist bogeymen have not even passed Congress, let alone been 
signed into law, and they are going to be fully paid for. In 2017, my 
friend the Republican leader chose not to take that path when 
Republicans passed a massive tax cut--massive tax cut--for the 
wealthiest in this country, and that was not paid for.
  Raising the debt limit is about meeting obligations our country has 
already made, and many of those obligations were made under President 
Trump. So playing political games with so much on the line--that is as 
irresponsible as it is irrational.
  The bill before us today provides a path out of this made-in-
Washington crisis--a path that could help all of our country. It can 
fund the government through December 3. It can raise the debt limit 
through December 2022. It could provide relief to communities all over 
our country that have been devastated by natural disasters and provide 
assistance for the brave Afghans who supported our mission through two 
decades of war.
  So we really have an off-ramp from this crisis. I wish my colleagues 
would take it. Vote to advance this bill. Stave off an unnecessary 
crisis. Put the American people first, ahead of the party. That is 
actually, I think, a pretty simple choice.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Republican leader.
  Mr. McCONNELL. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that Senators 
Cassidy, Kennedy, and I be allowed to complete our remarks prior to the 
vote.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


         Unanimous Consent Request--Shelby-McConnell Amendment

  Mr. McCONNELL. So, Madam President, the Democratic leader has 
scheduled a vote today that he knows will fail. For more than 2 months, 
since July, Republicans have been clear about where we stand: We are 
willing to work together to keep the government open. We are not 
willing to help Democrats raise the debt ceiling while they write a 
reckless taxing-and-spending spree of historic proportions behind 
closed doors.
  Democrats control the entire government--the Senate, the House, the 
White House. They intend to sideline Republicans and go it alone to 
slam American families with historic tax hikes and borrowing. So they 
will need to raise the debt limit on a partisan basis as well. And they 
have known that for 2 months now--2 months.
  Just like then-Senator Biden and Senator Schumer voted no on a debt 
limit increase and made a unified Republican government handle it alone 
back in the early 2000s, this has happened before.
  Earlier this year, Senate Democrats requested and won additional 
flexibility to make policy on party lines. They have every single tool 
they need to do their job.
  The Democratic leader, the Speaker of the House, and the President of 
the United States have had 10 weeks--10--to plan for funding the 
government and addressing the debt limit. There never had to be one 
ounce of drama to any of this. Any drama here is self-created by the 
Democrats. Republicans continue to try to help our Democratic friends 
avoid multiple new crises of their own making.
  On the debt limit, Democrats have all the time and all the tools to 
do what they have to do, and I have explained in detail how they need 
to proceed. Because Democrats ignored our warning back in July, they 
must amend their previous budget resolution with debt limit 
instructions and proceed through a fast-track process.
  On the more urgent issue, government funding, Senator Shelby and I 
have a clean CR that could pass today. Our bill tracks with bipartisan 
talks. It would keep the government open, fund disaster relief for 
Louisiana, and fund defensive assistance for our ally Israel and their 
Iron Dome, and it drops the debt limit language that Democrats have 
known is a nonstarter for more than 2 months.
  The Senate could advance this bill tonight. If Democrats will let us, 
we could take a bipartisan step tonight toward guaranteeing there will 
be no government shutdown. If the Democratic leader lets us, the Senate 
could advance government funding legislation with a big bipartisan vote 
yet tonight.
  The House Democratic majority leader has said they will take up 
whatever CR the Senate sends them. The House is ready. Senate 
Republicans are ready. The only holdout is the Senate Democratic leader 
and his partisan tactics.
  So, in just a moment, I will ask consent that Democrats forget about 
the vote they know will fail and instead let the Senate vote on a bill 
that can actually pass.
  It is up to the Democrats. We can either move this legislation 
forward tonight or we can have a show vote, which they know will fail, 
and inch closer toward another crisis of their own making.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Louisiana.
  Mr. CASSIDY. Madam President, I rise supporting my colleague's 
proposal.
  This proposal provides disaster supplemental assistance relief for 
Southwest and Southeast Louisiana; it extends the National Flood 
Insurance Program; it funds the government; and it restores funding for 
Israel's Iron Dome.
  We are 3 days away from a government shutdown for one reason: 
Democrats control Washington.
  A clean vote on disaster relief and a continuing resolution to fund 
the government--legislation filed by Senators McConnell and Shelby--
passes today with overwhelming bipartisan support. We know that. But my 
Democratic colleagues are holding this critical funding set not just to 
fund the government but funding set to benefit victims of disasters in 
my State and elsewhere hostage to fund their planned tax-and-spend 
extravaganza.
  Disaster victims need disaster relief. It is 1 month since Hurricane 
Ida, 6 months from unprecedented ice storms, 12 months since Hurricanes 
Laura and Delta wreaked havoc on Southwest Louisiana. Disaster 
assistance is long overdue. This bill gets it done.
  And while we are recovering from 2-years' worth of storms, we can't 
allow the National Flood Insurance Program to expire. Many 
policyholders, especially in Louisiana, are still recovering from 
hurricane damage. Government shouldn't pull the rug of insurance from 
beneath them. It is critical the program is extended so homeowners are 
covered if there is another storm. This proposal extends NFIP. It also 
provides disaster relief.
  The proposal is good for Louisiana. It is good for the country. I 
urge my colleagues to support this proposal.
  With that, I yield.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Louisiana.
  Mr. KENNEDY. Madam President, I rise in support of Senator 
McConnell's legislation.
  On August 27, 2020, just 13 months ago, Hurricane Laura hit 
Louisiana. Forty-five days later, Hurricane Delta hit Louisiana. 
Nineteen days after that, Hurricane Zeta hit Louisiana. We got a little 
bit of a break. Four months after that, we were part of the historic 
winter storm, about which we have all read. And then 3 months after 
that, we had a historic rainfall event in Louisiana, up to 12 inches, 
unrelated to a hurricane. Three months after that, Hurricane Ida hit 
Louisiana. And 2 weeks later, Hurricane Nicholas hit Louisiana.
  Every one of these storms was over 100 miles per hour sustained 
winds. The

[[Page S6693]]

wind for Hurricane Ida was clocked at its highest at 185 miles per 
hour. If you add up all the damages, it is about $150 billion in 13 
months.
  Now, other States were impacted by these storms, but Louisiana took 
it full in the face. This was as brutal a blow as nature has inflicted 
on an American State in modern history. We will be coughing up bones 
for years, and this legislation is going to help us recover.
  In fact, this legislation does every single thing that my colleagues 
Senator Cassidy and Senator McConnell talked about that my Democratic 
friends want to do, everything: keeps government open, maintains flood 
insurance, gives disaster relief not just to Louisiana but to my 
friends in the Northeast part of our country, to my friends on the west 
coast. It does help my State, Southwest, Southeast, North Louisiana, 
but we are not the only ones.
  Senator McConnell's legislation does everything except one thing, one 
thing: increasing the debt ceiling that Senator Schumer can do in a 
matter of days on his own.
  Why are we fighting over this? You know, nature abhors a moron. It is 
moronic for us to be having this fight when it can be so easily solved.
  Everything in Senator McConnell's legislation can easily pass this 
body with 70 votes, and we know it. And then Senator Schumer can come 
right behind by simply amending the budget resolution, and our problems 
are solved. Nature abhors a moron. Let's don't be moronic.
  I yield back to Senator McConnell.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Republican leader.
  Mr. McCONNELL. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the 
Senate proceed to Calendar No. 137, H.R. 5305. I further ask that the 
first amendment in order be the Shelby-McConnell amendment to the text 
of which is identical to Calendar No. 135, S. 2789; that there be 2 
hours of debate, equally divided between the two leaders or their 
designees, and upon the use or yielding back of that time, the Shelby-
McConnell amendment be agreed to; finally, upon disposition of the 
Shelby-McConnell amendment, the bill, as amended, be read a third time 
and the Senate vote on passage of the bill, as amended, with a 60-
affirmative-vote threshold required for passage.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  Mr. LEAHY. Madam President, reserving the right to object.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Vermont.
  Mr. LEAHY. I have listened to this debate. I have also listened to my 
two dear friends from Louisiana speak about the disaster recovery, and 
I support disaster recovery for that. But I would just point out that 
on the proposal of the Republican leader, there would be no funds in 
the Treasury to pay for disaster recovery or for writing a check to 
Israel for the Iron Dome because it doesn't raise the debt limit.
  And the substitute offered by my friend, introduced by my dear friend 
the vice chairman of the Appropriations Committee, Senator Shelby, does 
not solve the problem in front of us. It doesn't address the looming 
debt crisis facing our Nation, so it ignores that that exists.
  Now, perhaps my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want to 
wash their hands of this. They can. Much of that debt was incurred 
under a Republican President and under a Republican-controlled Senate 
and debt racked up by irresponsible tax cuts championed by the 
Republican Party for the wealthiest of Americans. And, yes, debt also 
occurred in a bipartisan fashion to deal with multiple crises that 
faced the Nation: Disaster assistance in the wake of hurricanes and 
wildfires keep getting worse every year because we don't combat climate 
change; COVID relief to keep this country from careening head first 
into economic disaster in the wake of a worldwide pandemic; historic 
levels of support and investment in our Nation's military and our men 
and women in uniform.
  And to try to put this all at the feet of President Biden's Build 
Back Better agenda, a yet-unpassed reconciliation bill that is not the 
law--it hasn't been passed--is ridiculous. We are talking about debt we 
already incurred, not spending in the future.
  And as my Republican colleagues know, we expect to fully pay for 
those investments. They may not like how we are going to offset the 
spending, but that is what the legislative process is for, to debate 
them. At least we are willing to pay for the bills we incur, which is 
more than could be said for the Republicans when they pushed a massive 
tax cut for the wealthy that was not paid for.
  So let's stop this political brinksmanship. Let's secure the full 
faith and credit of the United States. Let's pass and increase the debt 
limit. To do otherwise puts our country and our economy at risk.
  The substitute also scales back the assistance provided to Afghan 
refugees that was included in the House-passed bill.
  Now, I was pleased when we reached bipartisan and bicameral agreement 
of $6.3 billion in the House-passed bill for much needed assistance for 
the brave Afghans who supported our mission through two decades of war. 
It is our duty; it is our obligation to support them.
  But the substitute bill they are seeking to pass would shorten the 
length of time we provide assistance to thousands of Afghan women and 
men who fled to the United States to escape the wrath of the Taliban--
food, medical care, housing, basic things they need.
  The bill also eliminates their right to obtain a REAL ID-compliant 
U.S. driver's license, yet we want them to go out and seek jobs.
  How are they going to do that if they can't drive?
  There shouldn't even be a debate. I could give a dozen more reasons, 
but I know people are ready to vote, so I object.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard.


                             Cloture Motion

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Pursuant to rule XXII, the Chair lays before 
the Senate the pending cloture motion, which the clerk will state.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

                             Cloture Motion

       We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the 
     provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, 
     do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to 
     proceed to Calendar No. 137, H.R. 5305, a bill making 
     continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending 
     September 30, 2022, and for providing emergency assistance, 
     and for other purposes.
         Charles E. Schumer, Ben Ray Lujan, Patrick J. Leahy, Jack 
           Reed, Jacky Rosen, Robert P. Casey, Jr., Angus S. King, 
           Jr., Tammy Duckworth, Tammy Baldwin, Patty Murray, 
           Thomas R. Carper, Tim Kaine, Sheldon Whitehouse, 
           Benjamin L. Cardin, Tina Smith, Kirsten E. Gillibrand, 
           Christopher Murphy.

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. By unanimous consent, the mandatory quorum 
call has been waived.
  The question is, is it the sense of the Senate that debate on the 
motion to proceed to H.R. 5305, a bill making continuing appropriations 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2022, and for providing 
emergency assistance, and for other purposes, shall be brought to a 
close?
  The yeas and nays are mandatory under the rule.
  The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk called the roll.
  Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from California (Mrs. 
Feinstein) is necessarily absent.
  Mr. THUNE. The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator 
from Nebraska (Mr. Sasse).
  The yeas and nays resulted--yeas 48, nays 50, as follows:

                      [Rollcall Vote No. 385 Leg.]

                                YEAS--48

     Baldwin
     Bennet
     Blumenthal
     Booker
     Brown
     Cantwell
     Cardin
     Carper
     Casey
     Coons
     Cortez Masto
     Duckworth
     Durbin
     Gillibrand
     Hassan
     Heinrich
     Hickenlooper
     Hirono
     Kaine
     Kelly
     King
     Klobuchar
     Leahy
     Lujan
     Manchin
     Markey
     Menendez
     Merkley
     Murphy
     Murray
     Ossoff
     Padilla
     Peters
     Reed
     Rosen
     Sanders
     Schatz
     Shaheen
     Sinema
     Smith
     Stabenow
     Tester
     Van Hollen
     Warner
     Warnock
     Warren
     Whitehouse
     Wyden

                                NAYS--50

     Barrasso
     Blackburn
     Blunt
     Boozman
     Braun
     Burr
     Capito
     Cassidy
     Collins
     Cornyn
     Cotton
     Cramer
     Crapo
     Cruz
     Daines
     Ernst
     Fischer
     Graham
     Grassley
     Hagerty
     Hawley
     Hoeven
     Hyde-Smith
     Inhofe
     Johnson
     Kennedy
     Lankford
     Lee
     Lummis
     Marshall

[[Page S6694]]


     McConnell
     Moran
     Murkowski
     Paul
     Portman
     Risch
     Romney
     Rounds
     Rubio
     Schumer
     Scott (FL)
     Scott (SC)
     Shelby
     Sullivan
     Thune
     Tillis
     Toomey
     Tuberville
     Wicker
     Young

                             NOT VOTING--2

     Feinstein
     Sasse
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Heinrich). On this vote, the yeas are 48, 
the nays are 50.
  Three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn not having voted 
in the affirmative, the motion is not agreed to.
  The motion was rejected.


                          Motion to Reconsider

  Mr. SCHUMER. I enter a motion to reconsider the failed cloture vote.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The motion is entered.
  Mr. SCHUMER. Now, Mr. President, I want to make sure everyone 
understands exactly what has happened here on the Senate floor. The 
Republican Party has now become the party of default, the party that 
says America doesn't pay its debts.
  Our country is staring down the barrel of two totally Republican-
manufactured disasters--a government shutdown and a first-ever default 
on the national debt. The impacts of both would gravely harm every 
single American in this country. Republicans would let the country 
default for the first time in history.
  A few moments ago, the Senate had an opportunity to begin solving 
these problems right away. Democrats did their part and voted yes, but 
Senate Republicans meanwhile voted to drive our country straight toward 
a government shutdown and the first default in our country's history.
  Let me be clear. What the Republicans in the Senate did tonight is 
not normal. This isn't your typical Washington practice, and it 
shouldn't be treated as such. It has far more severe consequences than 
the typical political cat fight. Republicans know the consequences of 
their obstruction. They know a default would likely create a recession. 
They know that middle-class families will suffer immensely. They have 
heard the same warnings that we have. And by many calculations, the 
Republican default will raise the deficit by more than the American 
Rescue Plan, and yet Republicans still obstructed tonight.
  It is one of the most reckless, one of the most irresponsible votes I 
have seen take place in the Senate, and it should send a signal to 
every family, small business, market watcher about who in this Chamber 
is in favor of endangering the economic stability of our country and 
who isn't.
  Let me repeat: The Republican Party has solidified itself as the 
party of default, and it will be the American people who pay the price. 
Social Security checks, Medicare benefits, veterans benefits, small 
business--all this and more are now on the chopping block because 
Senate Republicans are playing games with the full faith and credit of 
the United States.
  Now, despite Republican intransigence, this matter cannot be set 
aside for even a moment. Before the vote, I changed my vote from yes to 
no in order to reserve the option on additional action on the House-
passed legislation.
  Keeping the government open and preventing a default is vital to our 
country's future, and we will be taking further action to prevent this 
from happening this week.

                          ____________________