[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 165 (Thursday, September 23, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6631-S6632]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                           Government Funding

  Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I want to begin today talking about the 
debt limit by returning to three very frightening statistics.
  The first is $15 trillion. That is the amount of household wealth 
that a leading economist recently warned could be wiped out of the 
economy should the government default on its debt.
  The second is 6 million. That is the number of jobs that the same 
analysis said could be lost should a default become a reality.
  The third statistic is 9 percent. That is the unemployment rate our 
country potentially faces if we don't do our jobs to raise the debt 
ceiling.
  Now, none of these statistics, none of these numbers need become a 
reality if both parties unite in the coming days to pass the continuing 
resolution sent to us by the House. It would keep the government open 
for 3 months. It would provide funding for disaster relief and Afghan 
refugees. And, of course, it would suspend the debt ceiling until the 
end of 2022 so we can pay for the debt incurred at the end of the 
previous administration.
  Every single Member of this Chamber is going to go on record as to 
whether they support keeping the government open and averting a default 
or support shutting us down and careening our country toward a first-
ever default.
  Democrats will be united in supporting the passage of the CR. It is 
the right thing to do for the American people, and it would immediately 
stop these unnecessary crises that are knocking at our doorstep.
  At the end of the day, the only thing that matters in a legislative 
body is how you vote. That is the most important thing we do. There are 
many other important things, but that is the one that matters the most. 
It is what our constituents sent us here to do.
  Now, Senate Democrats have said repeatedly that they are all for 
avoiding a government shutdown. They have said repeatedly that the debt 
ceiling must be raised.
  So I want to offer a novel suggestion: If Republicans want to avoid 
default, then they should vote yes. If the Republicans want to keep the 
government open, they should vote yes.
  But, incredibly, Leader McConnell, spinning a tail--a web of 
subterfuge, deception, and outright contradictions--has said that he is 
going to vote no, and he urges Republicans to vote no.
  This is ``Alice in Wonderland'' logic. Republicans claim to oppose a 
default, but they are saying they are going to vote for one anyway. 
They say they oppose a government shutdown, but they are going to vote 
for one anyway. They say they want disaster relief, but they say they 
are going to oppose it when the time comes.
  So they can resort to all the sophistry they want, but if they vote 
no, the Republican Party will be solidifying itself as the party of 
default, and the American people, unfortunately, will be the ones 
footing the bill--a high cost to pay for Republican games, political 
games.
  By voting to default, the Republicans would be telling the American 
people they are fine if people don't get their Social Security checks. 
They are saying they don't care if our veterans are denied benefits. 
They are saying they don't care if the markets come crashing down, 
hurting people's pensions and IRAs.

[[Page S6632]]

  Now, none of this is an exaggeration. Economist Mark Zandi, a former 
adviser to the late Senator McCain, wrote recently that a default would 
be ``a catastrophic blow to the nascent economic recovery from the 
COVID-19 pandemic.''
  He also warned that ``Americans would pay for this default for 
generations.'' I hope my Republican colleagues heard the last part, as 
they are thinking of indulging in the political game put forward by 
Leader McConnell. ``Americans would pay for this default for 
generations.''
  Of course, we all know by now that the Republican justifications for 
opposing raising the debt ceiling are entirely bunk. They say they are 
opposed to new spending, but the Wall Street Journal has said: 
``Raising the debt limit wouldn't facilitate future spending, and 
Congress would still need to raise the debt limit this fall even if no 
new major spending programs are enacted.''
  Do you hear that, Republicans? This is the Wall Street Journal. Even 
if not a single new spending program were enacted, we would still have 
to raise the debt that was incurred by President Trump and by all of 
your votes.
  How crass can you be? How heartless can you be? You voted to spend 
these moneys because of COVID--it was a valid reason--and now you don't 
want to pay for it, and you come up with some lame political sophistry, 
trying to justify it. But everyone sees through that--everyone.
  The truth is, we will be voting to pay for the debt accrued under 
Presidents of both parties, including the $8 trillion added to the debt 
under President Trump. Both sides incurred the debt; both sides should 
pay.
  It wasn't long ago that threatening a default on national debt was 
something you only heard in the fringes of the Republican Party. About 
10 years ago, the Republican Speaker at the time called the idea 
``insanity.''
  But today, it is literally the party line--a sad commentary on just 
how far down the rabbit hole the Republican Party has gone.
  If my Republican colleagues disagree, they have a simple option: They 
can vote yes to keep the government open. They can vote yes on 
suspending the debt limit. It is in their hands.
  But if Republican votes favor a shutdown and default, the American 
people will see exactly who is responsible for throwing our country 
into crisis.