[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 162 (Monday, September 20, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6539-S6541]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
U.S. Supreme Court
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Madam President, I return to the Senate floor to
again discuss the scheme to capture our Supreme Court; in this case, it
will be through the lens of how recent Justices got on the Court. And I
will choose Brett Kavanaugh.
[[Page S6540]]
I think we all remember the famous list--the Federalist Society
list--that Donald Trump promised to follow in Supreme Court
appointments. The first interesting thing about Brett Kavanaugh is that
he was not on the list of candidates that Donald Trump had offered up--
this list that bought peace between house of Trump and house of Koch.
Trump had promised he would appoint off that scheme-approved Federalist
Society list. He didn't, and yet no one complained. That is a telltale
right there.
There was no complaining because Brett Kavanaugh knew this terrain.
He knew the central operative at the heart of this scheme, Leonard Leo.
He had worked on judicial nominations in the Bush White House with
Leonard Leo, who coordinated big donors' support for judicial nominees.
I have described before a judge who bemoaned to me what he called his
colleagues auditioning--auditioning for higher office, auditioning for
the Supreme Court. ``Auditioning'' was a telltale word that stuck with
me. You don't audition without someone to audition to. Well, Kavanaugh
knew the guy at the center of the scheme, and he knew that the donor
turnstile to the Supreme Court was run out of the Federalist Society.
So Kavanaugh not only auditioned with Leo; he auditioned at the
Federalist Society. And no one auditioned harder than Brett Kavanaugh.
As a circuit judge, he campaigned through 27 Federalist Society events.
I think he set the record for auditioning at Federalist Society events.
He knew who, and he knew where. And he also knew what the big donors
wanted. So he made sure his circuit-court opinions signaled his chops.
On abortion, Garza v. Hargan, OK to force a teenager to wait
indefinitely for an abortion as the clock ran; check.
On guns, Heller v. District of Columbia, a dissent in the follow-up
case to the Supreme Court Heller decision--in his case, one even more
extreme than Scalia; check.
For polluters, PHH v. CFPB, waving the Federalist Society's unitary
executive banner, even saying that regulatory agencies are a
significant threat--I am quoting him here, regulatory agencies, the
things that protect us from pollution and cheaters, are a ``significant
threat to individual liberty,'' if you are a polluter; check.
And most important to this dark money scheme, EMILY's List v. FEC,
where he said the front groups ``are constitutionally entitled to raise
and spend unlimited money in support of candidates for elected office''
because it is ``implausible that contributions to independent
expenditure political committees are corrupting.'' Yeah, how could that
possibly be corrupting? Check.
So this is behavior. In nature, when you see behavior, you can draw
conclusions. When you see, for instance, a vulture wheeling, you can
expect something dead below. It is not always true; the vulture may
just be wheeling in an updraft eddy. But when you get a number of
vultures wheeling, it is pretty reliable that there is something dead
below. And when so many judges start auditioning for advancement that
their behavior acquires a name from other judges, you can be pretty
sure there is an audience for their auditioning.
And Kavanaugh knew that audience. His relationship with Leonard Leo,
his hustling of Federalist Society events, his insider knowledge of the
Republican selection process and the big donors, and his ardent display
of his wares in all the ways big donors would want, was a winning
combination.
So Leonard Leo hand-walked him around the Trump Federalist Society
list and straight to the top of the judicial selection pile, and no one
with a hand in the Trump-Koch deal that spawned the Federalist Society
list voiced an objection.
Kavanaugh had auditioned his way around the list, and the scheme
could not have been happier with the outcome. All of that behavior is
telling. There is a scheme, and Kavanaugh knew how to play it.
Now that the scheme had its man, they would fight for him. They did
not know how hard the fight would be, until Dr. Christine Blasey Ford
came forward with a tale of youthful sexual assault by Kavanaugh and a
drunken buddy.
But even before that, there were telltales of the pressure to get
Kavanaugh onto the Court. Thousands of pages of records from his White
House days were withheld; blank pages stamped ``Constitutional
Privilege'' were presented to us on the committee. They couldn't even
bring themselves to call it ``executive privilege,'' the claim was so
far-fetched. ``Constitutional Privilege'' was an invented phrase, but
they knew no Republican would object.
The pressure was on. The play had been signaled. The money behind the
scheme was the money behind the Republican Party, so Democrats could
complain, but the Republican wall would hold. All our objections and
requests would be overruled.
Another example of signaling from nature, you can tell a lot about
the wind by looking at the water, as sailors know. You don't have to
feel it; you can understand the wind by looking at the water. Little
wavelets show where gusts of wind can be found on a still day. The
water darkens where there are stronger puffs on windy days. As the wind
grows, the waves grow bigger, and then whitecaps form. And as the wind
strengthens more, wind lines appear--Langmuir circulation, the
scientists call it--aligned with the wind's direction. And in a full
gale, spindrift, foam from the tops of the waves--spindrift blows off
the wave tops.
In the same way that you can tell a lot about the pressure of the
wind by looking at the behavior of the water, you can tell a lot about
the pressure of the scheme by looking at the behavior of the
Republicans--particularly in the gale-force controversy over Dr. Blasey
Ford's testimony. By all rights, in any normal world, Kavanaugh would
have been withdrawn. The fact that he wasn't is a telling signal of
pressures afoot.
Allegations of sexual violence motivate domestic violence and victims
groups, groups which Senators do not ordinarily choose to cross.
Is one judge worth that? Why not just pick another?
Yet they went forward--another telling signal of the pressure.
Senators usually prize their chance to question Supreme Court
nominees, yet Republicans gave that up to a female prosecutor sent to
disarm Dr. Blasey Ford's testimony--yet another signal.
Of course that didn't work. The witness's testimony was clear and
credible. The female prosecutor was sent packing. Republican Senators
were left in the touchy position of having to disbelieve Dr. Blasey
Ford without any basis for disbelieving her.
Yet only one Republican Senator buckled--another signal. Senator
Flake demanded some investigation, and here, the gale force pressure
kicked in. This could not go on. Kavanaugh was too great a prize. The
FBI was pressured to do a fake investigation. That is a fire alarm of a
signal.
We saw many signs of things awry. For a while, early on, the FBI
became impervious to information. To put it mildly, that is not the
FBI's customary disposition. An FBI that suddenly becomes impervious to
information is quite a signal. The FBI was told which few witnesses
could be interviewed. The interviews were cursory and terse.
Other witnesses who came forward were ignored or turned away. Even
when Dr. Blasey Ford and other witnesses were trolled by the ``flying
monkeys'' of the far right so venomously that Dr. Blasey Ford had to
stop teaching, had to leave her home, had to hide herself under the
protection of a security detail, witnesses still tried to come forward.
So ultimately, under pressure, the FBI announced a tip line for
witnesses to contact, but the tip line was a fake.
The FBI has procedures for things, and it has tip line procedures.
The FBI did not follow its tip line procedures. It appears the FBI did
not follow up on any of the tips that came in on the Kavanaugh tip
line. Instead, the FBI routed the Kavanaugh-related tips to the White
House Counsel's Office for a decent burial.
We on the committee were ultimately allowed, in a classified
setting--classified setting--2 hours of what you could call speed
dating with documents to look through pile after pile of documents--no
notes allowed, no photos allowed, no copies allowed. One of those
piles, though, was tip line results, so we know that tips came in.
[[Page S6541]]
The FBI admits thousands of tips came in. None were followed up.
FBI statements at the time said they were following standard
procedure. What they meant by that, which they later admitted, is that
in background investigations, they are agents of the White House and
under White House political direction, so their regular procedures did
not apply. The standard procedure they said they were following was the
procedure of not following the standard procedures, if you can get
around that verbal somersault.
What the FBI did not say is that, aside from standard investigative
procedures they did not follow, there are also standard FBI procedures
for background investigations. The FBI is a procedure-bound
institution. We are still digging and we are going to keep digging, but
it looks like they didn't follow those background investigation
procedures either.
For apparently the first and only time in a background investigation,
I believe an FBI ``investigation'' was put under the operational
control of the White House so that the White House could craft, with
the FBI, the appearance of an FBI investigation without any real
investigating. The kind of pressure it takes to do that is intense.
That is gale force. That is the spindrift flying. It takes a gale of
pressure to have the FBI violate so many of its own procedures, to
meekly go along with the White House's abuse of the FBI's longstanding
reputation for thoroughness and integrity. That is the kind of gale-
force pressure the scheme can mount. The scheme had to have its prize.
Republicans even turned their guns on polite, honorable, bipartisan
Dianne Feinstein. She was accused of a corrupt plot to sandbag
Kavanaugh. Senator Feinstein is not capable of such a thing, and
everyone knows it, so this attack on her was yet another signal.
There was a new narrative to impose. Kavanaugh becomes the victim,
wicked Democrats become the wrongdoers, Dr. Blasey Ford and her
testimony get swept aside, and, in a well-whipped stampede of partisan
tribal anger and grievance, Kavanaugh sweeps onto the Court.
Another signal that I am still seeing now is the effort of rightwing
media to cover this all up. After Senator Coons and I pressed the FBI
on this bogus investigation, the National Review and other rightwing
outlets immediately published articles to tidy things up. Their main
source seems to be a former Republican Judiciary staffer who tweeted
and then deleted ``Unfazed and determined. We will confirm Judge
Kavanaugh'' just a few days after the Blasey Ford investigation came to
light, before this so-called investigation was concluded.
The coverup article suggests three things: First, hey, we had a
chance to read all of the over 4,500 tips the FBI received; second,
there was a 400- or a 600---it varies depending on the article--page
FBI report assessing the tips and exonerating Kavanaugh that was
circulated to all Senators, and all we had to do was read it; and
third, that had there been anything wrongful or incriminating or
derogatory that was found, it could have been referred for further
investigation.
Let's look at those three claims.
First, this ``open access'' to those documents was the 2-hour window
I was talking about where we could go in and speed-date with raw FBI
documents in piles and interview reports--again, no notes, no copies,
no pictures; just piles of documents in a room we had to walk through
and clear out of--and if we wanted, we could return to review the
documents when votes on cloture and confirmation were ongoing. I am not
making that up.
The supposed report, this 400- or 600- or whatever page report, is
actually a 28-page document compiled by Republican Senate Judiciary
Committee staff, not the FBI, with hundreds of pages of attachments to
thicken it up. Those 28 pages are pure political whitewash that cast
aside the credible claims offered to the FBI for further investigation
but altogether ignored. Saying that this Republican committee report--
so-called--was available to Senate Democrats is like saying we should
have turned on FOX News for the lowdown on these tips--not actually.
As to the idea that we could have referred anything suspicious for
further examination, I really don't know what these rightwing outlets
are talking about. If they meant the FBI, that is not true. The FBI and
the White House had agreed that the investigation was over as far as
they were concerned. If they mean the Senate Judiciary Committee, that
is as laughable as the 28-page whitewash.
One last signal here. The FBI continues to dodge questions about this
investigation. It was over 2 years ago that Senator Coons and I asked
simple, direct questions about the tip line. Only this summer did we
receive the first smidgeon of a response. The response deflected us to
an MOU between the White House and the FBI, which, when we dug around
and found it, which we had to do ourselves, proved not to substantiate
what we were being told. So we repeated our questions and repeated our
questions, and last week, Director Wray appeared in Senate Judiciary
and promised answers in 2 weeks. We will see.
As a prosecutor, I know those cases where you can't go forward, for a
victim, with charges. There could be innumerable reasons, but sometimes
you just can't. In those unfortunate cases, it can matter a great deal
to the victim that she at least got an honest and thorough
investigation of her claim. Dr. Blasey Ford was denied even that. The
FBI sacrificed her to the gale-force political pressure applied by the
scheme to get this well-auditioned nominee into place.
And let's get real. You don't apply gale-force political pressure for
judges who are just going to call balls and strikes. Four hundred
million dollars--$400 million--has been spent in dark money on this
Court-capture scheme. For $400 million, you don't want balls and
strikes. You want judges who will throw the game for you. You want what
you paid for--a captured Court. And if you look at its track record,
that is this Court. It is the Court that dark money built, and it is
delivering.
To be continued.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from West Virginia.