[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 145 (Tuesday, August 10, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6193-S6203]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                          LEGISLATIVE SESSION

                                 ______
                                 

       INVESTING IN A NEW VISION FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND SURFACE 
                 TRANSPORTATION IN AMERICA ACT--Resumed

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Senate will 
resume consideration of H.R. 3684, which the clerk will report.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk read as follows:

       A bill (H.R. 3684) to authorize funds for Federal-aid 
     highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and 
     for other purposes.


                               H.R. 3684

  Ms. CANTWELL. Madam President, many States in the United States need 
infrastructure investment, but I would put the State of Washington high 
on the list of States that desperately need infrastructure investment.
  We have been blessed with a growing economy and a big trade economy 
based on the Pacific rim and the actions of the Pacific rim. So we need 
to keep moving products. We need to keep moving services, and we need 
infrastructure investment to do so.
  I wanted to take this opportunity to thank the work done by the 
Commerce Committee and those who worked on the Infrastructure 
Investment Act, specifically: Kara Fischer, Michael Davisson, Joanie 
Lofgren, Zeb Schorr, Ronce Almond, Alex Simpson, G.G. Slais, Nicole 
Teutschel, Jennifer Quan, Matthew Bobbink, Jami Burgess, David Martin, 
Amit Ronen, Stacy Baird, Devon Helfrich, Patrick Eckroth, Naseem 
Mehyar, Hannah Albert, Eric Vryheid, Elle Wibisino, John Branscome, 
Shawn Bone, Brian McDermott, Mary Claire York, Jared Bomberg, Shannon 
Smith, John Beezer, Noam Kanter, Jordan Blue, Tiffany George, Lucy 
Koch, Hunter Hudspeth Blackburn, Kelly Ryan, Dave Stewart, Melissa 
Porter, and David Strickland.
  These are some of the individuals who were involved in putting 
together the commerce piece of this underlying bill. About 20 percent 
of the underlying bill was the focus of the Commerce Committee and its 
jurisdiction.
  I want to thank Ranking Member Wicker and his staff for the hard work 
to pull off what was the bipartisan bill that came to the Senate floor 
as part of this package.
  Our legislation, I think, is a historic investment to rebuild our 
transportation infrastructure, including investments in things like 
megaprojects, basically helping to eliminate our problems at grade 
crossings, improve our freight network, improve our environment by 
removing culverts, and helping Amtrak better serve the United States of 
America.
  All these were important investments, but we should look at the 
firsts. First, we are authorizing for the first time megaprojects. 
Megaprojects often take up so much of our budget in our States and 
federally they never get funded, but that doesn't mean they aren't 
critical to the United States.
  In the Northeast Corridor, we certainly have megaprojects. In the 
Pacific Northwest, we have megaprojects that would be critical, like 
the Columbia River Crossing between Vancouver and Portland, or the 
Highway 2 trestle in Everett. These projects deserve the attention of 
the Nation and, with this first-time authorization, will get so.
  The bill also puts a historic investment in freight and in Amtrak. As 
I mentioned, the economy of a global nature is demanding that we be 
able to

[[Page S6194]]

move competitively our products. But if we don't continue to invest in 
freight, we are not going to get that job done. So this provides $66 
billion to improve our passenger rail and freight system, the single 
largest investment that we have had in our Amtrak system that was 
funded 50 years ago.

  The Commerce Committee's bill lays the foundation for this funding, 
which I believe will do three things. It will mean more investment to 
fix the problems in the Northeast Corridor; more specifically, it will 
give us the ability to have more sequencing of trains throughout the 
United States of America; and it will provide for new service in city 
pairs that, I hope, will help economies all across the United States 
with more investments.
  I know, specifically, the Senator from Montana, Senator Tester, is 
very adamant about our Amtrak funding and the services that Montana 
demands. I want to thank him for his help on this.
  I want to thank Senator Duckworth for her hard work in making sure 
that Amtrak complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act. This is 
so important for us to do, and her language, making sure that we also 
have someone from the disabilities community on the Amtrak board, is 
the kind of thing that should be followed in other examples in this 
legislation.
  I also want to say, for the first time, we are addressing 
specifically at-grade crossings. This is the instance where there is 
congestion in freight, in my State, multiple times the increase in 
freight traffic. Again, you know, a lot of Midwest product moving to 
Asia has increased a demand in safety and transportation. Somebody 
quoted one of our reports that it took freight 3 days to get through 
just the city of Chicago because of the amount of congestion.
  Our job here is to make sure that our product, made and grown in the 
United States of America, gets quickly to its destinations or we will 
be outcompeted by other nations that have an infrastructure system that 
can beat us to those marketplaces. So this provides, for the first 
time, a focused program on improving at-grade crossings to continue to 
make the investments that need to be made to keep our freight moving 
and our public safe.
  It also, for the first time, authorizes transportation improvements 
to repair culverts. Culverts and other transportation infrastructure 
have done damage to our environment. They have done damage to fish; 
they have basically blocked spawning grounds. They have caused other 
infrastructure challenges to species all along our coastal States. This 
program will help to improve that situation by repairing some of the 
fish passage that has been blocked for so many years. This is so 
important for us in the Pacific Northwest, but it is also important 
throughout the South and for our many, many coastal communities.
  So this transportation legislation that went through the Commerce 
Committee, as I said, also, you know, makes other investments. This 
floor bill also makes other investments for bridge repair, for transit 
systems, for climate resiliency, and specifically for our airports. You 
probably haven't heard too much about that out here on the floor, but 
in the Commerce Committee, I can tell you that aviation, 
transportation, and competitive--I know that the Presiding Officer 
knows this very well; that in Las Vegas or in Reno that infrastructure 
like our airports is essential to our economy continuing to grow. 
SeaTac is probably one of the fastest growing airports in the United 
States right now, and under this legislation, we will also see an 
important improvement for our airports so they can continue to grow and 
so we can continue to make investments.
  I also want to, as I mentioned, thank Senator Wicker in the title for 
vehicle safety. These are important provisions that he and I and others 
on the committee--Senator Blumenthal for his work on safety legislation 
that related to both the Northeast Corridor and to individuals in 
transportation, including, with Senator Wicker, the lifesaving 
technology, like an automatic emergency braking system, preventing 
child heat stroke deaths, and impaired driving faculties.
  So I again thank all of the members of the Commerce Committee for 
their hard work in getting this legislation as part of this package.
  I think we can see that we have some firsts here: first investing in 
megaprojects; first in cleaning up our environmental problems with 
culverts; getting our freight product through our most congested 
corridors with improved at-grade crossing; and making the major 
investment so that Amtrak can continue to expand.
  So I look forward to working with my colleagues as we move through 
the legislative process and continue to make improvements in our 
transportation infrastructure.
  I yield the floor.


                   Recognition of the Minority Leader

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Republican leader is recognized


                         Budget Reconciliation

  Mr. McCONNELL. Madam President, later today, Senate Democrats want to 
take their next big step toward playing Russian roulette with our 
country. They want to begin pushing through a reckless taxing-and-
spending spree that was authored by our self-described socialist 
colleague, Chairman Sanders. Today, the American people will learn 
exactly where each of their Senators stand.
  The American people elected a 50-50 Senate, an incredibly close House 
of Representatives, and a President who pledged to govern down the 
middle and unify the country. But as soon as President Biden, Speaker 
Pelosi, and Leader Schumer got the keys, they handed them right over to 
the far left.
  Remember, Democrats inherited three safe and effective vaccines that 
were already rolling out nationwide and an economy that was primed to 
come roaring back, but our colleagues pressed ahead with a massive 
springtime spending package that even liberal experts said would drive 
inflation, and, of course, it did.
  Overall inflation has risen at the fastest rate in nearly 13 years. 
Core inflation hit its highest level in almost 30 years. Families are 
getting hit by higher prices everywhere, from the grocery store to the 
gas station, to their housing costs. Small businesses have had trouble 
reopening because would-be workers are getting a government bonus to 
actually stay home.
  So the country is still working through the side effects of the 
borrowing and spending the Democrats forced through back in the spring, 
but Democrats don't want to just refill their socialist prescription; 
they want to double the dose--double the dose. According to what they 
just released, Democrats want to unite behind Chairman Sanders' 
resolution to spend a staggering $4.2 trillion more. Of course, outside 
experts estimate the real cost will be even higher still.
  If it is even close to fully offset, as they claim it is, this seems 
almost certain to be the largest peacetime tax hike on record. So let 
that sink in--the largest peacetime tax hike on record.
  Even though their rough sketch of these tax hikes would shatter 
President Biden's promise not to raise taxes on the middle class, 
families earning well under the President's stated threshold would get 
hit and hit hard. This new reckless taxing-and-spending spree will fall 
like a hammer blow on workers and middle-class families: fewer jobs, 
lower wages, more inflation pushing costs higher and higher.
  What our colleagues are proposing and planning is absolutely jaw-
dropping. People want to pretend this is just business as usual, just 
liberals doing liberal things using Senate procedure. Make no mistake, 
this reckless taxing-and-spending spree is nothing like we have seen--
nothing.
  The basic math of their taxing and spending is toxic enough, but the 
radicalism that we will be debating on the floor goes well beyond 
dollars and cents. The policies they want to put behind this budget 
resolution read like somebody walked across the Rotunda to the House 
and handed the Squad a pen and piece of paper: sweeping--sweeping--
amnesty for illegal immigrants in the middle of a border crisis, 
regulations that are so radical that our colleague Senator Markey said:

       The green new deal is in the DNA of this . . . budget 
     resolution. All of the things that are in [this], we talked 
     about in the green new deal.

  Senator Markey.
  They want to induce 49 other States to make their electric grids more 
like California's; make it more expensive to mine critical minerals we 
need to compete with China; they want to take

[[Page S6195]]

working families' child tax credit and turn it into a permanent welfare 
program--listen to this--with no work requirement; they want to tamper 
with the prescription drug industry in ways that would leave Americans 
with fewer new treatments and fewer new cures; they want to put 
government's thumb on the scale of families' childcare choices and 
selectively subsidize parents whose households work the way Washington 
wants; and they want to tax more money out of Americans' pockets while 
reviving a special tax cut that overwhelmingly benefits wealthy people 
in blue States.
  So let's face it. The brute facts of the Senate's rules mean that, if 
50 Democrats plus the Vice President stick together, Republicans will 
probably not be able to save our colleagues from themselves. If all 50 
Democrats want to help Chairman Sanders hurt middle-class families, 
even if our colleagues who claim they are moderates want to follow the 
far left off this cliff, well, that is their prerogative, but we are 
going to argue it out right here on the floor at some length. Every 
single Senator will be going on record over and over and over.
  Senate Republicans will be bringing forward commonsense amendments 
that represent what Americans actually want and actually need. Our 
colleagues can look forward to votes on national security and funding 
our Armed Forces; votes to remove backdoor tax cuts for wealthy 
liberals; votes to protect family-owned small businesses and family 
farms from crushing tax hikes; votes to encourage schools to finally 
reopen in person; to stop the catch and release of COVID-positive 
illegal immigrants coming into our country; to protect taxpayers from 
being forced to fund the horrors of abortion. And that is just a 
sampling. Because our Democratic colleagues missed some deadlines, it 
has been an all-out sprint to prepare amendments.
  So I want to thank our nonpartisan Senate clerks and 
Parliamentarians. They have worked multiple weekends, straight through. 
They were kept up late last night processing hundreds of amendments, 
and they are going to be up late with all of us yet again.
  If President Biden and 50 Senate Democrats want to outsource domestic 
policy to Chairman Sanders, if this historically reckless taxing-and-
spending spree is how the modern Democratic Party wants to define 
itself, if they want inflation and tax hikes to be their legacy, then 
Republicans do not currently have the votes to spare the American 
families this nightmare, but we will debate and we will vote and we 
will stand up and we will be counted--and the people of this country 
will know exactly which Senators fought for them.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Warnock). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.


                              Gun Control

  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, this past Saturday, at 9 p.m., Chicago 
Police Officer Ella French was shot and killed during a traffic stop on 
the Chicago South Side.
  Her death is devastating. Officer French was 29 years old. She had 
served as a member of the Chicago Police Department since 2018.
  Her brother described her as the epitome of a good Samaritan. A 
fellow officer said of her: ``She truly showed the community that she 
loved them and would do anything for them.''
  Officer French's partner was also shot and critically wounded. We 
pray for his recovery.
  Two men have been charged by the Cook County State Attorney's Office 
in the shooting of these officers. A third man has been charged by the 
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois for 
conspiracy to violate Federal firearms laws.
  I hope that justice is delivered swiftly and fairly for the 
perpetrators of this horrible crime.
  And let me be clear. As devastating as her death is, scores of 
individuals are shot every week in Chicago, and many lose their lives. 
For each of their families, the loss is just as intense as the loss of 
Officer French.
  And as heartbreaking as Officer French's death is, it is also 
infuriating. We learned yesterday from the Chicago U.S. Attorney's 
Office that the gun used to murder Officer French was straw-purchased 
from a gun dealer in Indiana.
  What is a straw purchase? It happens when a person who can pass a 
background check buys a gun and gives it to a person who can't.
  Straw purchases have long been the way that guns have been funneled 
into the hands of those with felony convictions in Chicago, then to the 
streets, then to deadly incidents.
  According to the charges filed yesterday by the U.S. attorney, an 
Indiana man bought the handgun from a man in Hammond, IN, and gave to 
it a person with a felony conviction, who allegedly used it this last 
weekend to kill Officer French.
  For years, I have been fighting to toughen our laws against straw 
purchases. Right now, straw-purchasing is treated--listen to this--as a 
Federal paperwork violation for lying on a Federal gun purchase form. 
Charges are rarely brought, and when they are, the sentences are often 
just a matter of months. That needs to change.
  I have joined with Senator Leahy of Vermont and Senator Collins of 
Maine to introduce the Stop Illegal Trafficking in Firearms Act, a 
bipartisan bill that would make it an explicit Federal crime, carrying 
felony penalties when a person straw-purchases a firearm.
  We need to take this type of gun trafficking seriously. It is time 
for us to stop treating straw purchases like a paperwork misdemeanor.
  As we have learned in the death of Officer French, it is a deadly act 
and should be punished accordingly.
  Officer French's death is also a call to action for the strike force 
recently set up by the Department of Justice to crack down on regional 
firearms trafficking in Chicago.
  I met with Attorney General Garland in Chicago when he launched the 
strike force 2 weeks ago, and I have written to him now urging that the 
strike force immediately prioritize the investigation and prosecution 
of straw purchases like the one that took the life of Officer French.
  The strike force was established to keep a sustained focus on 
firearms trafficking in Chicago. That focus should include stopping 
straw purchases and holding the perpetrators accountable.
  I look forward to working with the Justice Department and with my 
colleagues to find ways to crack down on the deadly gun violence that 
straw purchasers help to fuel.


                            Opioid Epidemic

  Mr. President, 2020 set a record for drug overdose deaths in America. 
More than 93,000 lives were lost in the year 2020. In Illinois, 3,500 
of our neighbors died of overdose, a 27-percent spike from the year 
before.
  How did we get to this point? Who is responsible for this?
  There is one clear culprit: the pharmaceutical industry. For years, 
opioid manufacturers deliberately lied about the risks of their drugs--
deliberately. These companies have claimed their pain killers should be 
prescribed for common aches and pains. They even downplayed their 
addictive nature even though their research showed that it was a very 
real danger.
  These companies then shipped mountains of these pills to every corner 
of America. They aggressively promoted them to doctors, with the 
backing of dark money organizations.
  This epidemic wasn't created by some infectious virus; it was created 
by corporate greed--corporate greed. In the words of Richard Sackler of 
Purdue Pharma his company chose to flood our streets with ``a blizzard 
of prescriptions that will bury the competition.'' It ended up burying 
the users.

  As a result, 500,000 Americans families have had to bury loved ones 
who died of opioid overdoses and addictions since the start of the 
opioid epidemic--500,000 Americans, a figure in the same range as the 
610,000 Americans we have lost to COVID-19. The numbers are numbing.
  From 2006 to 2014, drug companies like Purdue Pharma inundated the 
country with 100 billion pain pills--100 billion. Let that soak in. 
That is roughly 300 opioid pills for every living American over that 
time.

[[Page S6196]]

  They flooded communities like the rural county of Hardin in downstate 
Illinois. They received enough opioids in Hardin County for each 
resident to have a nearly 3-month supply.
  Some counties in West Virginia and Kentucky had twice that level of 
oversupply.
  One pharma rep even bragged: ``I don't know how they can even house 
this many bottles.''
  Another wrote:

       Keep `em comin'! Flyin' out of here. It's like people are 
     addicted to these things. Oh, wait, people are . . .

  That level of greed and disregard for human suffering is an outrage, 
and the companies responsible must be held accountable.
  You may be asking: Why haven't we done that already?
  It is a good question--because not only was the Federal Drug 
Enforcement Administration aware of this obscene volume of 
overproduction; they authorized it. They gave permission.
  The Drug Enforcement Administration of the U.S. Federal Government is 
responsible for determining the amount of opioid pills allowed to be 
put on the market each year. They are effectively the gatekeeper for 
these drug manufacturers and for years--years--they allowed opioid 
production quotas to keep increasing.
  Between 1993 and 2015, production of oxycodone increased 39-fold; 
hydrocodone, 12-fold; fentanyl, 25-fold.
  In 2016, America's pharmaceutical industry produced 14 billion opioid 
doses in 2016 alone, enough for every adult American to have a 3-week 
supply of opioids.
  Think about that. Authorized by the Federal Government, requested by 
the pharmaceutical industry, we put a quota that Pharma asked for to 
produce 14 billion opioid pills in a year, enough for every American to 
have a 3-week supply.
  Any wonder that we had an opioid epidemic?
  I pressed the Drug Enforcement Administration on this issue years 
ago, when I learned of this. I asked them: How can you approve these 
ever-increasing quotas. Pharma is insatiable. They will ask for as many 
pills as they can possibly push into the American people's families, 
especially when DEA had data that showed this overproduction was 
fueling a deadly national drug crisis.
  A couple years ago I worked with my Republican colleague, Senator 
John Kennedy of Louisiana, to start stemming the tide of addictive 
drugs. We passed a bipartisan bill that gave the DEA the authority they 
said they needed to set commonsense production levels.
  We changed the law so the DEA must--must--consider abuse, overdose 
deaths, and the public health impact when determining opioid quotas.
  Our approach worked, partially. Over the past 5 years, the DEA has 
lowered opioid quotas by an average of 60 percent.
  The DEA, this Federal Agency, will soon be proposing its 2022 quotas, 
and I am sending a letter urging them to use their new authority and 
common sense to rein in the greed of Big Pharma.
  In the face of all this suffering, new legal challenges have been 
brought to hold Big Pharma accountable for death and despair of the 
opioid epidemic. Thousands of lawsuits from States, counties, cities, 
and victims have been consolidated in one Federal court in Cleveland, 
OH.
  This movement reminded me of another breakthrough moment in public 
health, when our Nation came together to hold Big Tobacco accountable 
for its misleading marketing over the decades. We started holding these 
companies accountable in 1998, with the Master Tobacco Settlement 
Agreement. That settlement was estimated to provide States with $246 
billion over 25 years. But despite the pressing need, only a tiny 
fraction--a meager 8 percent of that amount--was actually dedicated to 
tobacco prevention and cessation activities.
  Instead, tens of billions from that settlement have gone toward 
filling gaps in State budgets and funding pet projects like roads and 
bridges and stadiums, even a tobacco museum.
  As new opioid settlements are reached, we must learn from the missed 
opportunity with tobacco lawsuits. We must ensure that the funds from 
forthcoming opioid settlements are used to fortify health systems so 
they can respond to the current opioid crisis and prevent our next drug 
epidemic
  All of us know what is going on out there. Even people who 
acknowledge their opioid addiction and are desperate for treatment and 
need help immediately wait for weeks and months to enter a drug rehab 
facility. That is just unacceptable. We need community- and 
residential-based treatment. We need to expand naloxone access. We need 
to address the childhood trauma often at the root of addiction and 
other public health strategies.
  One of the things which I believe is essential, as our kids get back 
to school after the pandemic experience, is that we need more 
counselors on the scene at the schools dealing with these kids and this 
transition back into somewhat normal life. These are critical moments 
in a child's formation, and I hope that we can have resources available 
to help them.
  The best way to hold Big Pharma accountable is by compelling these 
companies to pay the price for fueling this crisis, and their 
restitution should be devoted to helping America heal.
  Last month, a bipartisan group of State attorneys general announced 
the framework of a litigation settlement involving Johnson & Johnson 
and the Nation's three largest drug distributors. The companies would 
pay a total of $26 billion over 18 years to resolve the suits, in 
addition to changing their business practices.
  The work isn't over yet, and I applaud the State attorneys general 
for their extensive work involving these opioid defendants.
  Legal proceedings continue for several other key industry 
stakeholders that have yet to be held accountable--that includes the 
Sackler family of Purdue and OxyContin infamy.
  The Sacklers are trying to engineer a legal scheme to escape 
liability through the bankruptcy court. That is the family that started 
Purdue Pharma, which was responsible for this opioid crisis. They think 
they found a venue now--a bankruptcy court--that is going to get them 
off the hook or at least make sure they can protect the money that they 
have made off of this criminal enterprise.
  The Sacklers are trying to engineer a legal scheme to escape 
liability for their conduct through the bankruptcy court, avoiding 
future lawsuits, while paying $4.5 billion, while protecting their vast 
fortunes estimated at over $11 billion.
  That is why Senator Warren and I recently teamed up to introduce the 
Nondebtor Release Prohibition Act, which would prevent the 
nonconsensual release of liability through bankruptcy proceedings.
  Translation: The Sacklers should not get a discounted ticket to ride 
into the sunset protecting their billions of dollars. They need to be 
held personally liable, and the amount charged against them should be 
taken into account.
  We must demand that the worst corporate actors are held accountable 
for their role in this crisis. Far too many families have suffered as a 
result of corporate greed and malfeasance.


                       Recognizing Barb's Bakery

  Mr. President, sometimes you have the best of luck in life, and it is 
not planned. Neighbors of ours in Springfield, IL, Tom and Bridget 
Lamont, have invited us to join them at their little house on Lake 
Michigan in Leelanau Peninsula in the State of Michigan. In that time, 
we have had great experiences together, and we have come to know a 
terrific little shop called Barb's Bakery in Northport, MI. After years 
and years of wonderful service and great pride, they are giving up the 
business soon.
  I have put in the Record a tribute to Barb's Bakery of Northport, MI. 
I am joined by Debbie Stabenow and Gary Peters, both Senators from 
Michigan
  Mr. President, donuts have been enjoying a renaissance in recent 
years. Today, you can find ``gourmet'' donuts with flavors like 
kumquat, beet, guava, bacon maple, malted, salted cookie dough, and 
blueberry bourbon basil. But for my money, nothing beats the famed cake 
donuts and cinnamon twists baked fresh every morning at Barb's Bakery 
in the small town of Northport, MI. There is nothing exotic about 
Barb's donuts. They are simple, old-fashioned perfection.
  My wife Loretta and I discovered Barb's Bakery years ago during a 
vacation in Northport with our friends,

[[Page S6197]]

Tom and Bridget Lamont, and we have gone back nearly every year since. 
Over the years, we have become friends with the owner, Barb Holcomb, 
and her husband Jerry Holcomb--great people.
  When Loretta and I first discovered her bakery, Barb's donuts may 
have been the primary reason that travelers would make a detour through 
Northport, a picturesque little village at the tip of Michigan's scenic 
Leelanau Peninsula. That has all changed now. In recent years, new 
restaurants and shops have sprung up around town. But Barb's Bakery 
remains the anchor, both a destination--and a local institution. Each 
morning, it brings local cherry farmers, young families, and tourists 
together over coffee and donuts.
  I try to stop by Barb's a little after 6 a.m., shortly after Barb or 
Jerry opens the doors. I will get a cup of coffee and a cinnamon twist, 
and Jerry and I will sit with the locals sharing local news and 
figuring out how to solve the problems of the world. Barb starts her 
workday at 1 a.m. each morning. That is when she goes to work to mix 
the batter for the next day's baking. By 6:30, the benches outside are 
usually filled with local farmers and retirees. At around 8 am, the 
late sleepers and tourists show up. But by 10:30 or 11, the last donut 
has usually been sold--so insider tip: Get there early.
  You can smell the aroma of Barb's Bakery about 2 blocks away. Barb 
tells me the butter-yellow, clapboard bakery building was first 
constructed around 1850. Over the years, it has housed a dentist's 
office, a shoe repair shop, and now, Barb's bakery.
  Barb first start working there when she was 13. She bakes her 
signature cinnamon twists on massive trays that hold about 6 dozen 
twists each. On an average day, she sells six trays full. Donuts are 
another big seller--classic cake donuts, plain or chocolate-iced--plus 
the special, seasonal flavors: cherry during cherry season and pumpkin 
in the fall. And Barb bakes the best cherry pies you have ever tasted.
  Barb learned how to make her famous cinnamon twists from the women 
who owned the bakery when Barb was a teenager. Now, Barb is getting 
ready to pass that precious knowledge on. After 40 years of baking for 
others, Barb Holcomb recently sold her bakery to a young couple from 
the area, who plan to keep baking some of Barb's signature treats,
  And Barb and Jerry are looking forward to taking a little time off 
and maybe sleeping late every once in a while. Barb plans to put quite 
a few miles on the royal blue 1970s Cadillac she just bought. She will 
continue to give generously, and quietly, to the people and the village 
of Northport, as she always has. And Barb and Jerry are hoping to do 
some traveling.
  Years ago, shortly after she graduated from high school, Barb and a 
girlfriend took a magical trip through Greece and Afghanistan. And Barb 
fell in love with Turkey. She returned again and again, often bringing 
friends with her. She bought a house in Istanbul, which she kept for 
many years. And she learned to speak Turkish fluently.
  As Barb and Jerry get ready to start a new chapter of their lives 
together, Loretta and I want to thank them for all of the delicious 
donuts and for their friendship. And Michigan Senators, Debbie Stabenow 
and Gary Peters, want to join me in saluting Barb and Jerry.
  Let me close by saying to Barb: ``Iyi sanslar.'' Best of luck, my 
friends.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                           Budget Resolution

  Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, in the time that I have been in the 
Congress, which includes 6 years in the House of Representatives and 
now in my 17th year in the Senate, I have been a part of or witness to 
or voted on numerous spending proposals and appropriation bills, tax 
bills, deficit reduction bills, and debt-limit increase bills through 
the years, and I don't think I have ever seen in all my time in the 
Congress a spending bill where Democrats didn't want to spend more and 
Republicans wanted to spend less.
  Maybe that is consistent with our overall governing philosophies. 
Republicans historically believe in limited but effective government, 
in personal freedom coupled with individual responsibility, in economic 
freedom, and in peace through strength. Those are sort of guiding 
principles.
  So when you get into a debate about spending and budgets and 
appropriation and taxes and all those sorts of things, in all the time 
I have been here--and I say this with respect to the bill that we are 
going to be voting on here in a few moments--Republicans try to spend 
more efficiently, more effectively--less, because they know that every 
dollar that gets spent here is coming from an American taxpayer.
  So when the bipartisan legislation that the Senate will vote on here 
momentarily was being considered, it started out at about $2.5 
trillion. That is what President Biden wanted to spend on 
infrastructure. Democrats in the Congress--in the Senate; for sure in 
the House of Representatives but in the Senate here as well--wanted to 
spend way more than what Republicans wanted to spend. Republicans, on 
the other hand, wanted to come up with a bill that met the needs that 
the country has, that was robust in addressing infrastructure concerns 
out there but spent significantly less than what Democrats proposed
  I say that simply because it has been my experience--I have observed 
this, as I said, over the better part of 25 years now here in the 
Congress--that every debate, every fight about spending, taxes, and 
debt, Democrats want to spend more and Republicans want to spend less, 
again with the recognition that every one of those dollars that gets 
spent here in Washington, DC, is coming from an American taxpayer 
somewhere across this country.
  So, as we think about what we are going to do next, I have to just 
say it is staggering to me, what we are talking about--the dimensions; 
the scale; $3.5 trillion in spending on top of $2 trillion spent 
earlier this year, much of which had nothing to do with the 
coronavirus.
  Much of the justification for a lot of the spending at one time, at 
least, was that we had to deal with the pandemic, the coronavirus, but 
that is not the case now. We still have ongoing issues there. We need 
to make sure that we are investing in vaccines and all the things that 
make sure that people in this country are able to combat and that we 
are able to get this pandemic behind us. But what we are talking about 
with this $3.5 trillion that the Democrats are intending and that we 
are going to vote on later today--$3.5 trillion--their own estimate, 
not ours. A lot of private estimates out there suggest that when this 
is fully implemented over the full window, you are talking about $5.5 
trillion. You add to that the $2 trillion that has already been spent 
earlier this year--all put on the debt, by the way, all borrowed from 
our children and grandchildren--and you are talking about a stunning, 
staggering, insane amount of money.
  I have heard the analogy used here on the floor and other places by 
Democrats saying: Well, this is like the New Deal. This is the modern 
New Deal for America.
  Well, the New Deal occurred in the middle of a Great Depression, 
where unemployment rates were running as high as 25 percent. The New 
Deal happened at a time when--my dad grew up in the Depression. I have 
heard him tell the stories through the years. People were struggling. 
They were struggling enormously. The government stepped in with some 
programs to help address that to get people back to work.
  But what we are talking about here is double--double--the size of the 
New Deal as a percentage of our economy--double--at a time when we 
have, and the President was crowing about this the other day, 5 
percent, 5.4 percent unemployment in this country and 900,000 new jobs 
created in the last reporting.
  So if you think about where the economy is, we are coming out of the 
pandemic. People are investing again. People are getting out. They are 
spending money. We are seeing growth get back in the economy. We are 
seeing jobs created. It is literally, to me, the definition of 
``insanity'' to pour 3.5 trillion, by their estimate--by a lot of

[[Page S6198]]

other estimates, 5 trillion--more dollars into the economy to literally 
give people free everything.
  This isn't about addressing the pandemic or helping get people back 
to work. We have programs that do that. We have unemployment insurance 
that has been in place now for a long time. Many of us think the plus-
up that the Federal Government provided was for too long because it was 
keeping people from going back to work. But the fact of the matter is, 
we are talking about a massive expansion of the Federal Government 
literally to give people pretty much free everything.
  Not only does that contradict, I think, what this country was all 
about, which in its inception was about freedom and liberty, personal 
freedom, economic freedom, individual responsibility, providing people 
incentives to achieve and to do well, making sure that we have programs 
in place, safety nets for those who need that help, but the idea that 
at a time when the economy is growing and expanding and unemployment is 
at a fairly low rate historically, we are creating jobs that the 
Federal Government would think that it needs, in all its wisdom here in 
Washington, DC, to infuse $5 trillion.
  We already have inflation. It is at the highest rate in 13 years. Do 
you think pouring a lot of--flooding the economy with a whole bunch 
more money isn't going to exacerbate the inflation problem we already 
have? Not to mention, they are talking about paying for it--I don't 
think it will all be paid for. I think a lot of it will go onto the 
debt.
  By the way, under this budget that is being proposed today, that the 
Democrats are, on a one-sided partisan procedure, going to vote on, is 
the biggest thing that we have seen certainly in my lifetime and will 
dwarf, as I said, anything we have seen in history. The debt at the end 
of all that--at the end of all that, 2031, the 10-year budget window--
will be $45 trillion, 134 percent of our gross domestic product.
  There was a day when we were worried about borrowing up to 100 
percent of GDP. Well, we have blown past that. We have dwarfed that. 
This is now completely out of control, completely out of hand. We are 
talking about a massive amount of new spending to expand government 
and, to the degree that it is paid for, paid for with taxes that are 
going to hit individuals, that are going to hit businesses, that are 
going to hit small businesses, and that are going to hit farmers and 
ranchers.
  When you go down the list of taxes, the tax increases in this 
proposal, again, I mean, I don't know where you stop. The idea--the 
suggestion by the administration that you are not going to hit people 
who make less than $400,000 a year is just absolutely, again, I think, 
insane. I don't know how you can raise $3.5 trillion in taxes and not 
have an economic impact felt by people who are on the lower end of the 
income scale.
  I mean, think about it. When taxes go up on businesses, what happens? 
Well, people work for businesses. Democrats think it is easy. We will 
just raise taxes on businesses. Businesses are not paying enough. Well, 
where do people in this country work? They work for businesses. That is 
where they get their paychecks. That is where they get their benefits. 
Wages go down when taxes on businesses go up, to a historical fact.
  If you think about what also happens when taxes are put on 
businesses, businesses obviously can do a couple of things. They may 
reduce wages or not hire people or reduce the size of their workforce. 
But they also pass that on with the cost of higher prices to people out 
there in the economy who are paying the price for it. That is what we 
are talking about here. It is just absolutely, absolutely stunning, 
really, in my time in the Congress to observe something that is being 
compared to, historically, the New Deal in a circumstance where the 
economy is growing and expanding, people should be going back to work; 
and in a time when we have already a $30 trillion debt, as I said, 
headed in 2031 to $45 trillion in debt, and something that literally 
dwarfs, as a percentage of the economy, what was done at the time of 
the New Deal, parallel the analogy that is being used here by my 
colleagues on the other side. There is just absolutely no rationale for 
doing this.

  But that is what it calls for, $3\1/2\ trillion. According to the 
budget committee analysts, it includes $4.2 trillion in spending--on 
discretionary spending--and increased interests on the debt are 
included.
  That bill, which was entirely unpaid for--and I am talking about the 
$1.9 trillion bill that was passed in March, that was ostensibly COVID 
relief, but, in reality, was more like a list of payoffs to Democrat 
constituents.
  There were billions and billions of dollars for schools, while 
keeping teachers unions happy by omitting any requirement for actually 
getting kids back in the classroom, even though schools have barely 
touched the billions of COVID aid they have already been given.
  And, by the way, handoffs to States with a distribution formula 
heavily weighted in favor of blue States, included bailouts for union 
pensions, loans for labor unions, and I could go on.
  And when we talk about the money that is going to be, you know, in 
the budget the Democrats are going to force us to vote on later today, 
the additional spending that is going to be in there, that is on top 
of--on top of--the trillions that we put out the door last year, much 
of which went to State governments and many of which don't know how to 
spend the money they already have. We are talking trillions, much of 
which went to, as I said, blue States.
  But while that bill wastes a lot of taxpayer dollars, the problem 
with that bill pales in comparison to what is before us today. Today, 
Democrats are taking the first step toward a massive and permanent 
expansion of government that would be paid for on the backs of ordinary 
Americans. And my colleagues, as I said, on the other side of the 
aisle, will tell you they are just levying tax hikes on wealthy 
Americans, but that is not the whole story.
  Those corporate tax hikes that Democrats are proposing, that tax just 
isn't going to be paid for by CEOs and the board members of 
corporations. A huge part of that is going to fall on American workers 
in the form of things like lower salaries and fewer opportunities.
  The Tax Foundation notes that the share of the corporate tax burden 
that falls on labor is, ``routinely found to be between 50 percent and 
100 percent, with 70 percent or higher the most likely outcome.''
  By substantially hiking taxes on corporations, Democrats will be 
substantially increasing the burden borne by workers, not to mention 
reducing our competitiveness in the global economy by once again giving 
the United States one of the highest corporate tax rates in the 
developed world.
  With our economy still emerging from the challenges of coronavirus, 
it is very difficult to understand why Democrats would decide that we 
should make American businesses less competitive on the global stage.
  And that is the impact of just one of the Democrats' tax hikes. I 
haven't talked about the probable effects of their tax hike on small 
businesses--that is right, small businesses--or the negative economic 
effects of their huge tax increase on investment.
  And then--then--there is the Democrats' new death tax. That is right, 
new death tax to add to our already existing death tax, which will 
reduce inheritances for middle-class Americans around the country, not 
to mention threatening the very existence of family farms and ranches 
and small businesses.
  From the way that Democrats have been governing, you would think that 
voters have given them a resounding mandate to permanently expand 
government and implement the socialist fantasies of the far left.
  In fact--we all know this--Democrats hold a narrow majority in the 
House of Representatives, where they lost seats; and the Senate is 
equally split between Democrats and Republicans.
  And Democrats' far-left Presidential candidates couldn't make it out 
of the Democrat primary. That is right, President Biden was able to win 
the Democrat primary and the general election because he presented 
himself accurately or inaccurately as a moderate.
  But despite their lack of a mandate, Democrat leaders are apparently 
more and more willing to let the far left of the Democrat party run the 
show, which is why we are standing here today contemplating a $4.2 
trillion

[[Page S6199]]

spending spree to permanently expand the size of government.
  We don't yet know all the details of Democrats' budget-busting 
spending legislation, but what we do know is not encouraging. In 
addition to taxes that will burden hard-working Americans and hurt our 
economy, Democrats are contemplating a new welfare benefit with no 
associated work requirement. Lots and lots of free stuff, like 2 free 
years of community college; elements of Democrats' most extreme 
specialist fantasy, the Green New Deal; amnesty for individuals here in 
our country illegally; funding for tens of thousands--yes, tens of 
thousands--of new IRS agents; a tax cut for blue State millionaires and 
billionaires; and more.
  And, by the way, on that point, it is really ironic to me to hear 
Democrats come down here and talk about Republicans wanting to cut 
taxes for rich people when this proposal, in this legislation, 50 
percent--50 percent of the tax cut, by doing away with the cap on 
deductibility of State and local taxes; 50 percent of that benefit goes 
to people making more than $1 million a year. So much for worrying 
about people on the low income of the income scale.
  Democrats want to spend taxpayer dollars to hire hundreds of 
thousands of young people for a Civilian Climate Corps to fight climate 
change--Civilian Climate Corps. There is no word yet on whether this is 
actually an effective way to address our Nation's climate challenges, 
but that isn't going to stop Democrats from spending billions of 
dollars to find out.
  I haven't even mentioned how all this new government spending is 
likely to increase inflation. Americans are already facing significant 
inflation, thanks in part to Democrats' earlier flooding of the economy 
with government spending. Now Democrats want to come close to doubling 
that spending. I don't even want to think about what inflation will 
look like if they succeed in their spending plans.
  Thanks to Democrats' decision to utilize special Senate budget rules 
for their tax-and-spending spree, they have the ability today to force 
through this massive spending package on a totally partisan basis.
  But my Republican colleagues and I will do everything we can to 
protect Americans from the consequences of Democrats' reckless, 
reckless legislation. And I hope some of my colleagues on the other 
side of the aisle--all it takes is one--will intervene before their 
party's taxing-and-spending spree turns an economic recovery into an 
economic disaster.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Ohio
  Mr. PORTMAN. Mr. President, let me start by commending my colleague 
from South Dakota, Senator Thune, for his explanation of what is before 
us next after the vote that we are about to take, and that will be 
getting into the budget resolution leading to a reconciliation package. 
And he is absolutely right, these taxes and this high-level spending is 
not something that our country can sustain, and I appreciate his 
outlining the very specific impacts it would have on the people we 
represent.
  But this morning, I am also here to talk about how the Senate will do 
something very good today prior to getting into the budget resolution. 
The Senate is about to make history.
  And we have heard over the years--in fact, over the decades--about 
the need for us to fix our infrastructure. Every President in modern 
times has talked about it--President Bush, President Obama, President 
Trump, President Biden. We have talked about it a lot here. There is a 
joke around town that infrastructure week has come and gone so many 
times that people are a little cynical when we talk about it.
  Well, today is infrastructure day. We are actually going to see what 
we have been talking about, which is the Senate, on a bipartisan basis, 
saying: You know what, it is time to fix our roads and bridges. We can 
do so in a responsible way, not by raising taxes on the American 
people, but by making important investments in long-term capital assets 
that will last for years.
  So it is an investment in fixing up our roads, our bridges, our water 
systems, our railroads, our ports, our electrical grids, our broadband 
network, and expanding that, and more.
  We have had a number of procedural votes to get us to this point; and 
based on those procedural votes, I think it is clear that we will have 
the votes today, on a bipartisan basis, to do this important work. The 
Senate will have done its job, and we will have achieved a real lasting 
bipartisan victory for the people we represent.
  The bill, called the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, will 
improve the lives of all Americans by making this long-overdue 
investment of $548 billion over the next 5 years in new spending to 
repair, upgrade, and replace the crumbling infrastructure all of our 
constituents rely on every day.
  That doesn't mean the money is going to be spent, by the way, over 
the next 5 years. It is authorized for that period, but we spend over 
the next 5, 10, 15, maybe 20 years on projects all over the country.
  We know we need this investment. The American Society of Civil 
Engineers gives our American infrastructure a grade of C-minus. They 
also project that our economy stands to lose more than $10 trillion in 
economic growth in GDP by 2039, should we fail to invest in repairs.
  There is an international organization that looks at all the 
countries in the world, who says who has got the best infrastructure in 
the world and, by the way, we are number 13 or 14 on that list now. So 
many countries are ahead of us.
  China spends about four times more than we do on infrastructure as a 
percent of their GDP. Why? Because they know that will make their 
economy more efficient and they want to beat us in the economic fight 
that we have globally.
  We want to win. That is one reason this is so important.
  The American people, by the way, understand the need for this 
investment. In two of the more recent polls from CNBC and CBS News, 87 
percent of the American people back bipartisan efforts to fix our 
roads, our bridges, and our water systems.
  We know that this targeted, long-term investment in core 
infrastructure is good for the economy. Building out hard assets make 
us more competitive in the global economy and will create hundreds of 
thousands of good jobs for builders, plumbers, electrical engineers, 
coders, and so many other fields.
  Economists, including Douglas Holtz-Eakin of the American Action 
Forum and Michael Strain of the conservative American Enterprise 
Institute, have pointed out that this type of spending on long-term 
spending on hard assets does not further inflation but, in fact, is 
counterinflationary.
  To me, not only does this investment make sense, but, importantly, 
what we are doing here today also demonstrates to the American people 
that we can get our act together on a bipartisan basis and get 
something done. We can do big things on a bipartisan basis if we put 
our minds to it.
  Again, after years, even decades of talking about the need to do 
this, we are finally getting it done.
  Is it exactly the bill I would have drafted?
  No. It is not exactly the bill any Senator in this Chamber would have 
drafted because it represents a true bipartisan effort. Each side made 
concessions to find that common ground.
  I want to take this opportunity to briefly thank my colleagues who 
have gotten us to this point. We spent a lot of long nights and long 
days working to write this legislation, and there has been a group of 
members who have been particularly committed to it.
  One is Shelley Moore Capito, who is on the floor right now. The work 
she did with President Biden early on laid the foundation for this. She 
is also the ranking member of the EPW Committee that produced some of 
the legislation that we incorporated on the surface transportation 
front.
  But there are so many others. And I would like to start with my 
counterpart, the lead negotiator on the other side of the aisle, 
Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona. The two of us began meeting more 
than 4 months ago to have discussions that would then lay the 
foundation for our path forward. And it was in the context of President 
Biden having proposed a huge package, $2.65 trillion--so-called 
infrastructure package--and we believed we could pull out real 
infrastructure from there, take the high taxes out, and get something 
done for the American people. I

[[Page S6200]]

commend her for her leadership, for her courage, and for her ability to 
keep us on track during some tough times during this process.
  From there, it truly became a group effort, particularly among five 
Republicans and five Democrats, who spent a lot of long days and nights 
negotiating the framework of this legislation. Some of us had worked 
together before at the end of the year in putting together the so-
called 908 framework for the COVID-19 bill that passed late last year, 
that was also bipartisan.
  To my friends and colleagues, Senator Susan Collins, Mitt Romney, 
Lisa Murkowski, Bill Cassidy, Joe Manchin, Jeanne Shaheen, Mark Warner, 
and John Tester, thank you for your efforts these past few months.
  I also want to give special thanks to our colleague, Kevin Cramer, 
who joined our group late but was instrumental in finalizing this 
agreement.
  I want to thank the White House and especially Steve Ricchetti and 
Brian Deese and Louisa Terrell for their support of this effort and 
their commitment to trying to work in a bipartisan way to get it done.
  I also want to thank Senator Tom Carper, who just joined us in the 
room. Along with Senator Capito, he was the EPW chair. He was the 
ranking member that laid much of the foundation for this legislation, 
particularly with regards to our roads and our bridges.
  I want to thank my other colleagues in the so-called G-22, who helped 
in the 22 different working groups that were formed to help put this 
legislation together: Richard Burr, Lindsey Graham, Mike Rounds, Thom 
Tillis, Todd Young, Jerry Moran, Chris Coons, Maggie Hassan, John 
Hickenlooper, Mark Kelly, Angus King, Jacky Rosen--11 Democrats and 11 
Republicans.
  And then to my colleagues who voted with us repeatedly to advance 
this bill toward final passage and helped us to get to this point by 
giving us good input that was incorporated in the legislation--Mike 
Crapo, Roy Blunt, Chuck Grassley, John Hoeven, Jim Risch, Deb Fischer, 
Roger Wicker, John Cornyn, Dan Sullivan--thank you for your input, your 
encouragement, and your support.
  I want to give a particular thank you to my friend and colleague our 
Republican leader, Senator Mitch McConnell. I want to thank him for his 
encouragement and his support throughout this process, for sticking his 
neck out. I know he is probably the only person who is as happy as I am 
in this Chamber to see us move forward with this legislation that will 
help us find a long-term solution to a major bridge, the Brent Spence 
Bridge that links our home State of Ohio and Kentucky.
  I want to thank the committee staffs, who did so much to lay the 
groundwork for this legislation. About 73 percent of the pages in this 
final 2,700-page legislation are legislation that either passed the 
Senate or cleared committees in the Senate in this Congress, and that 
is a tribute to the quiet bipartisanship that goes on at the committee 
level every day that allows us to get these things done with the 
requisite knowledge and expertise.
  I also want to thank all of the nonpartisan staff here in the U.S. 
Senate for their work as well. I know that over the past few weeks, 
especially, the legislative counsel has worked closely with my staff 
and the staffs of other offices to help formalize this proposal into 
final text before us today. They worked weekends. They worked late 
nights.
  The same with the Joint Committee on Taxation and the Congressional 
Budget Office, they have worked around the clock to get us to this 
point.
  And the staff here on the floor, they have been here just as early as 
we have and stayed just as late as any of us, in fact, later, to ensure 
that this could be possible. I thank them.
  I also want to thank the more than 100 industry associations, unions, 
and trade groups that came forward to endorse this Infrastructure 
Investment and Jobs Act. That includes business groups, like the 
chamber of commerce, the Business Roundtable, and the National 
Association of Manufacturers. It also includes labor groups, like the 
AFL-CIO Building Trades Council, the International Brotherhood of 
Teamsters, the Laborers International Union of North America.
  It also includes supporters from all levels of government, including 
the National League of Cities; the U.S. Conference of Mayors, who 
endorsed it; the National Governors Association.
  It includes more than 30 agricultural groups, including the American 
Farm Bureau.
  These organizations, and so many others like them, have been critical 
to encouraging Members of the Senate to do the right thing.
  And, finally, I want to, again, thank my staff and the staffs of all 
the Members who worked for months to get this bill to the finish line. 
We would not be here without them. There is no question about that.
  On a personal staff level, I want to thank Kevin Smith, Sarah Peery, 
Avery Pierson, Anne Gordon, Mike Sinacore, Lydia Denis, Adeline Ewing, 
Connor Rabb, Connor Hinson, Kalyn Swihart, Matt Lloyd, and our entire 
comms team: Angie Youngen and Nate Dehmlow, Stephanie Mertz, and Chris 
Mitchell.
  On my Homeland and Security Governmental Affairs staff, I want to 
thank Pam Thiessen, Amanda Neely, Sam Mulopulos, Cara Mumford, Trey 
Hicks, Liam McKenna, Jeff Post, and Emily Benavides.
  Again, we wouldn't be standing here and about to have this vote 
without them working their hearts out, staying late, getting in early, 
and ensuring that every single part of this bill has been looked over 
carefully to make sure we got it right.
  Everyone involved in this effort can be proud of what this body is 
achieving today. The Senate is doing its job. It is doing its job by 
helping the American people we represent through a historic investment 
in our Nation's infrastructure that will serve the American people for 
decades to come.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from West Virginia
  Mrs. CAPITO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I be allowed 
to speak for up to 10 minutes, followed by Senators Carper and Schumer 
for up to 10 minutes each.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mrs. CAPITO. Mr. President, well, it is great to be on the floor 
today. I think we have much to celebrate. We have a lot of tired 
people, I think, who have devoted a lot of time and energy to this 
effort. And so, after a long week of amendments, it is time to get this 
done.
  Isn't it, Senator Carper, my chairman on EPW?
  We have talked all week about how the Infrastructure Investment and 
Jobs Act delivers for the American people, and I am proud that the 
foundation of this bill--the foundations of this bill--is, as the 
Senator from Ohio just mentioned, based off of the two very bipartisan, 
unanimously bipartisan, EPW infrastructure bills that we passed in the 
spring.
  This historic investment reflects our commitment to keeping America 
safe, improving our global competitiveness, and growing our economy. So 
I am going to go through a few of the highlights because I think they 
are important for the American people to know exactly what this bill 
does.
  It provides $303.5 billion over 5 years for Federal highway 
programs--a 35-percent increase from the last bill.
  There is a new $2 billion rural surface transportation grant that 
will dedicate resources to the Appalachian Development Highway System 
that runs through many of our States and other critical projects across 
rural America.
  Combined, the overall package includes $40 billion in dedicated 
resources for bridges--the single largest investment in bridge 
infrastructure construction of the Interstate System.
  I am from a small State. I got a lot of bridges. I got a lot of 
bridges, and, unfortunately, a lot of them are not in the best 
condition. This would be a monumental improvement in what I see every 
day in my State.
  The bill authorizes $35 billion for water projects across the 
country, with a focus on upgrading aging infrastructure. This is a bill 
that we passed out of our EPW Committee.
  It invests in innovative technologies and provides assistance to 
rural and low-income communities to help them keep their water safe and 
clean.
  This package represents the largest investment in clean drinking 
water in

[[Page S6201]]

our Nation's history. That is something that I think we all can be 
proud of.
  There is funding for broadband--essential to this 21st-century 
economy--education, tourism, healthcare, and all of the things we have 
realized that broadband brings us and how important it is for each 
family and each business to have it; ports, airports, locks and dams. 
Funding for the Corps of Engineers will improve our water resources 
infrastructure, facilitating the movement of goods and mitigating flood 
risks.
  Reauthorization of the AML Program will provide billions of dollars 
to clean up abandoned mine sites. It is important in our State. 
Pennsylvania has got a lot of them too
  We are fighting against climate change, and we are cleaning up our 
environment.
  This legislation doesn't just invest in our infrastructure, but it 
will allow projects to move more quickly. Far too often, infrastructure 
projects are delayed because of the expensive and arduous environmental 
review and permitting process.
  An environmental impact statement under the NEPA Act for highway 
projects takes an average of 7 years. Think about how long that is and 
how much more money that costs.
  The highway bill unanimously approved by our EPW Committee includes 
numerous project delivery provisions to provide a more efficient, 
predictable process.
  Notably, it codifies ``One Federal Decision.'' One Federal Decision 
for highway projects would establish a 2-year goal for completing 
environmental reviews. This isn't skirting the environmental process. 
This isn't running roughshod over it. This is putting a time clock on 
it. Let's move it.
  It requires predictable schedules coordinated by Agencies and 
requires a single environmental document with concurrent reviews, 
providing accountability and transparency.
  The EPW bill that we passed makes other commonsense reforms, like 
allowing States to be reimbursed for early utility relocation necessary 
for a project while the process is ongoing.
  Additional provisions in the broader legislation will extend the 
FAST-41 permitting reforms, with which Senator Portman is very, very 
instrumental, to help us build other types of infrastructure more 
efficiently.
  The reforms and investments this bill makes aren't just for now but 
for the next generation.
  We have had a very lengthy and robust debate on the Senate floor. I 
would like to thank Senators Portman and Sinema; Senator Collins, who 
is on the floor; Senator Portman, Senator Sinema, all of the group of 
20. If I start naming them, I am going to leave somebody out. But, 
particularly, Senators Portman and Sinema picked up the ball where I 
left it. You know, I would like to think I got it to the 5-yard line. 
Maybe not so quite, but I got the ball rolling, and I got it moving in 
the right direction, and then they did the tough sledding ahead, and I 
thank them for that.
  I would also like to thank my counterpart, Chairman Carper. He has 
been great in managing this bill on the floor but also to keep the 
guardrails on that we established to make sure that the group--the 
bipartisan group--was following along with what the committee had 
unanimously passed and how we felt would be the most effective way to 
invest in our infrastructures for the future.
  I would like to thank my entire EPW Committee team, starting with my 
staff director, Adam, who has been with me for many, many years. What 
you don't know, and what I know, is that Adam was back in the back with 
Mary Frances, and they were the traffic cops through the whole 
amendment process, working with the committees, the different five 
committees; Republican, Democrat; leadership, leadership; all of the 
different individual Members.

  So I am going to give Adam 1 day off, and then I think he will be 
right back at it. But he is really irreplaceable to our committee but 
also to this whole process.
  And also in the Chamber with us today, Lauren Baker and Murphie 
Barrett have many, many hours of just incredible depth of knowledge in 
this area. We couldn't have done it without you.
  I am going to name the rest of my staff who is not here with us: 
Libby Callaway, Georgianna Clemmons, who I announced has still not had 
her baby--I announced it last I time mentioned her; she is still 
waiting--Marli Collier, Travis Cone, Sarah Delavan, Will Dixon, 
Elizabeth Horner, Max Hyman, Tyler Jenkins, Jess Kramer, Jake Kennedy, 
Matt Lupes, Kayla McMurry, Taylor Meredith, Jacob Mitchell, Kelley 
Moore, Katherine Smith, Travis Voyles, and Andy Zock for their tireless 
efforts that have helped advance our committee's infrastructure 
legislation.
  On my personal team, I would like to thank my chief of staff, Joe 
Brubaker and J.T. Jezierski for their leadership.
  I really want to thank Senator Carper's EPW staff, especially Mary 
Frances Repko, who is on the floor with the Senator today, but also 
Rebecca Higgins, John Kane, Greg Dotson, Laura Gilliam, Heather Dan, 
Mackie McIntosh, Annie D'Amato, Kenneth Martin, and Tyler Hoffman-
Reardon for their dedication to this process as well.
  I will say, under Mary Frances's leadership and Adam's leadership on 
my committee, I think they have demonstrated to many committees, and 
certainly to us as the chairman and ranking member, that you can have 
conversations, communications, and you can work things out. You can 
work things out if you just stick with it.
  So thank you, both, very, very much.
  It is time to bring this bill home and do the work that the American 
people expect us to do, which is to find bipartisan, consensus-driven 
solutions to our Nation's pressing challenges. And this is a pressing 
challenge.
  Again, I urge a vote of yes on this historic bipartisan bill that 
will improve our core infrastructure.
  If we pass this important legislation, I hope that the House will 
move swiftly--and as a former Member of the House, as we all are, the 
House can move swiftly when they need to--and get this bill to the 
President's desk quickly.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Delaware.
  Mr. CARPER. Mr. President, Senator Capito has been very, very 
gracious in her thanks and praise, and it is now her turn to be on the 
receiving end.
  We have all heard of the Gang of 20 or the Gang of 22--the Group of 
20 or 22--but before there was a gang or a group of 22, there was a 
gang of 1--the Senator from West Virginia, my native State.
  She joined in with the President and the President's team to really 
get the ball rolling and sort of took the hand off from what we had 
done working with the administration, meeting with the administration, 
meeting with the President.
  But with the President, after our meeting, they decided to engage. 
They decided to engage with the Senator.
  And, eventually, to use a football analogy here, she might not have 
gotten the ball into the end zone, but I say to the Senator, you 
certainly got it into the red zone, and we are grateful for all of your 
work, and, really, your good humor and good treatment when things were 
tough.
  Sitting right here on my left is Mary Frances Repko, the staff 
director of our EPW Committee on the Democratic side. And she is joined 
today, I think, on the floor by John Kane, by Mackie McIntosh, and by 
Tyler Hoffman. And we have Adam over here sitting next to the ranking 
member--Adam.
  I have gone before through the names of your staff, but I will just 
say you all are back here, and we are grateful for the great support 
and work that you have done, each one of you.
  I would be remiss if I didn't thank--you don't get to be floor 
managers without somebody in the leadership saying: Well, we would like 
you to be floor managers. So to Senator Schumer and Senator McConnell, 
thank you for putting your confidence and trust in Senator Capito and 
me.
  To the floor staff, the folks who work for the leaders, thank you 
very much for keeping us on the straight and level and heading in the 
right direction.
  Rob Portman is still here on the floor. I don't see Kyrsten Sinema. 
Rob is here. Rob, Senator Portman, succeeds George Voinovich. He was a 
dear

[[Page S6202]]

friend as Governor. We were Governors together and Senators together. I 
miss George every day, but you have more than filled his shoes, my 
friend, and I salute you for your leadership.
  Kyrsten Sinema is relatively new here, but she has really, really 
impressed a lot of people, taken the bull by the horns, never gave up, 
just wouldn't give up. And because of her efforts and the partnership 
she has with Senator Portman, we are here today.
  I quoted a couple of times during debate the words of Winston 
Churchill. Winston Churchill, when he was thrown out of office at the 
end of World War II, was asked as he left 10 Downing Street: Is this 
the end?
  He replied, famously: This is not the end. This is not the beginning 
of the end. This is the end of the beginning. The end of the beginning. 
And so it is here with us today.
  We are nearing the end of a debate and the final vote on the 
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021. And before we take a 
vote on the adoption of this measure, I just want to take a moment to 
reflect briefly on how this bipartisan infrastructure bill came to be.
  Senator Capito has already referred to this, but I wanted to 
reinforce it. In February of this year, at my encouragement, President 
Biden invited Senator Capito, Senator Cardin, Senator Inhofe, and me--
all senior members of the Environment and Public Works Committee--to 
the White House to discuss the need to make bold investment in our 
Nation's crumbling infrastructure. He asked us, the Environment and 
Public Works Committee, to lead the effort to address that need; to get 
to work in our committee by crafting and reporting to the full Senate, 
to this body, surface transportation legislation--roads, highways, 
bridges--as well as drinking water and water sanitation infrastructure, 
climate change legislation by springtime. That was the request.
  In the weeks that followed, working together with all 22 members--20 
members, rather, of the Environment and Public Works Committee, that is 
exactly what we did--10 Democrats, 10 Republicans working together. In 
May, we reported out of our committee a 5-year transportation bill with 
a unanimous bipartisan vote of 20 to 0.
  By more than a third, we increased investments in our roads, our 
highways, and our bridges, with a historic climate title to help 
address the most serious challenge facing our planet, and that is the 
threat of global warming.
  That Transportation bill is at the core of the legislation we 
consider today, along with the drinking water and wastewater 
infrastructure legislation that was also reported unanimously out of 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works earlier this year and 
passed by the full Senate right here, earlier this year, by an 89-to-2 
vote.
  That bill targets the most impoverished communities across America to 
help them meet their drinking and wastewater treatment needs.
  I am proud--we are proud--of the work that our committee has done, 
made possible by the partnership that we enjoy. I think of the work 
that we did--I think of it as laying the foundation. Clean drinking 
water, wastewater sanitation, roads, highways, bridges, climate really 
are the foundation on which this package was built.
  And we tried to provide an example to the rest of the Senate and the 
other committees of jurisdiction, and I like to think that maybe we did 
that.
  Leadership is all about leading, and the President sought and 
encouraged us to try to lead earlier this year, and I think we have met 
that request and then some. I want to thank him. He didn't give up 
either. And he has been negotiating with Senator Capito and negotiating 
with the team, the gang of 22. He never gave up. A lot of people said 
this was a fool's errand. He never gave up. I am proud of him and the 
leadership that he has provided.
  The bill that is before this body today builds on the strong 
bipartisan work of our committee, Environment and Public Works, as well 
as the good work done by our colleagues on other committees--the 
Commerce Committee and the Energy and Natural Resources Committee among 
them. My appreciation to all who worked so tirelessly on this Herculean 
undertaking.

  Now, let me be clear. This legislation isn't perfect. It has been 
said before. You will hear that again. I have never written a bill that 
was perfect, and this certainly, even though we had a fair hand in 
writing a lot of it, is not perfect. In spite of making real progress, 
it doesn't go as far as we would like to go in advancing equity, the 
way we treat other people--the Golden Rule, treating other people the 
way we want to be treated--in tackling the existential crisis of our 
time, and that is climate change.
  There is much more work to do on these issues--issues that, in my 
mind, we have a moral obligation to address. So rest assured I will be 
joining my colleagues in fighting for progress on these fronts in the 
days and weeks ahead.
  But let's not make the perfect the enemy of the good. And make no 
mistake, the bill before us does a whole lot of good. It is the largest 
long-term investment in our Nation's infrastructure in almost a 
century--almost a century--and the largest Federal investment in 
history when it comes to public transit, clean energy transmission, 
climate resiliency, clean drinking water, and wastewater 
infrastructure.
  Now, on this day, the American people are looking for us to 
strengthen our economy and support our communities and build for our 
future. On this day, we have a President dedicated to moving past 
partisan divides and meeting the moment for our Nation. And on this 
day, leaders in this body from across the political spectrum have come 
together in shared purpose, in common cause, and commitment to find a 
way forward.
  I want to close with the thought that there is a lot of bridge money 
in here, a lot of money to fix bridges all over: West Virginia, 
Delaware, Ohio, Maine. You name it. There is a lot of troubled water in 
our country, troubled water. And I would like to think, with this 
legislation, crafted together across the aisle, bipartisan, with the 
administration, we have created a bridge over troubled waters. Think 
about that: a bridge over troubled waters--and right at a time when we 
really needed one. And we could use a few more as we go along.
  Sometimes when I travel people ask me--they say: What do you do? What 
do you do anyway?
  They don't know what I do, on the airplane or whatever. I say: I help 
people.
  They say: How do you help them?
  I think the best way we can help people is help them find a job, have 
a job where they can support themselves and their families. We can help 
make sure that they have clean water to drink. We can help make sure 
they have clean air to breathe.
  Those are ways that we are helping people with this legislation--big 
time, big time--and we will be doing it for a long time.
  Colleagues, on this day, we can vote to make a downpayment on a 
brighter future for our country. I want to ask you to join me in 
seizing the day in voting to advance this legislation together. On this 
day, let us seize the day. Carpe diem. Carpe diem.
  I yield the floor


                   Recognition Of The Majority Leader

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader is recognized.
  Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, first let me, before I begin, thank 
Senators Carper and Capito for managing this bill and doing it in such 
a fine way--and their staffs as well.
  Now, Mr. President, it has been a long and winding road, but we have 
persisted, and now we have arrived. There were many logs in our path, 
detours along the way, but the American people will now see the most 
robust injection of funds into infrastructure in decades.
  In a few moments, the Senate will pass the bipartisan infrastructure 
bill, dedicating over a trillion dollars to strengthen every major 
category of our country's physical infrastructure. It has been a long 
time in coming. Our economy is No. 1 in the world, but infrastructure 
ranks No. 13. You will find better roads, bridges, airports, and 
broadband in the United Arab Emirates than in the United States of 
America.
  Today, the Senate takes a decades-overdue step to revitalize 
America's infrastructure and give our workers, our businesses, and our 
economy the tools

[[Page S6203]]

to succeed in the 21st century. The bill will make large and 
significant differences in both productivity and job creation in 
America for decades to come.
  To my colleagues, particularly the group of 10, then 11, then 22 who 
worked so hard in a bipartisan way, congratulations. Congratulations on 
a job well done. Thank you to our committee chairs and ranking members 
whose expertise was required at several stages. And to the staff who 
sacrificed weekends, family gatherings, and most often sleep in order 
to finish this bill, thank you.
  Thank you to President Biden and his team at the White House. 
President Biden has been in office for only 7 months, and already the 
Senate is about to pass the first major infrastructure package in over 
a decade, on a bipartisan basis, with his complete and total 
involvement.
  Throughout the process, I have tried to prod the negotiators along 
when they have needed it and given them space when they have asked for 
it. At times, it took a deadline to kick negotiations into high gear; 
other times it required a few extra days to allow compromise to gel. 
But when the Senate is run with an open hand rather than a closed fist, 
Senators can accomplish big things.
  So despite this long road we have taken, we have finally, finally 
reached the finish line.
  Of course, we Democrats believe we need to do much more. The 
bipartisan infrastructure bill is a very significant bill, but our 
country has other very significant, very important challenges. Working 
families need help. Small businesses need a leg up. Climate change 
threatens the future of our planet. Our Tax Code needs to be 
straightened out. Other parts of our infrastructure not addressed in 
this bipartisan bill still need focus, attention, and help.
  So to my colleagues who are concerned that this does not do enough on 
climate, for families, and making corporations and the rich pay their 
fair share, we are moving on to a second track, which will make 
generational transformation in these areas.
  Once this bill is complete, the Senate will immediately turn to the 
second track in our two-track strategy, passing a budget resolution 
that will unlock historic investments in American jobs, American 
families, and the fight against climate change. The two-track strategy 
is proceeding full steam ahead.
  At its core, the Democratic budget--both parts--is about restoring 
the middle class in the 21st century and giving more Americans the 
opportunity to get there. Too many in the middle class are worried 
about their future. The sunny American optimism has turned into a 
sourness, an anger, a divisiveness in the land.
  Bold, transformative action on both traditional infrastructure and on 
helping families--middle-class families--cope and on climate will 
restore that bright, sunny optimism that has been part of this American 
psyche for centuries.
  At its core, what we want to do is this: We want to cut taxes for 
families.
  We want to create millions of jobs while tackling the climate crisis, 
and we want to pay for it by making corporations and the wealthy 
finally pay their fair share.
  After we pass the bipartisan infrastructure bill this morning, 
Senators should expect to vote to proceed to the budget resolution, and 
we will begin the process for debating amendments shortly thereafter.
  Democrats are prepared to move quickly and decisively through the 
amendment process so we can finish what we set out to do before the end 
of the work period. The longer it takes to finish, the longer the 
Senate will be in session.
  At the start of July, I set two ambitious goals for this Chamber 
before our August recess. One was to pass a bipartisan infrastructure 
bill to boost our economy, something the Senate has not achieved in 
many years, and this is a strong and bold accomplishment. The second 
was to pass a budget resolution with the kinds of transformative 
changes I have mentioned. Pundits called it wishful thinking in a 
Chamber known for unhurried deliberation.
  Well, we are moments away from achieving the first goal, and I am 
confident that very soon the Senate will take the first major step 
toward achieving our second goal. The Senate is on track to finish both 
tracks and deliver an outstanding result for the American people.


                           Vote on H.R. 3684

  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Padilla). Under the previous order, all 
postcloture time is expired.
  The amendments were ordered to be engrossed and the bill to be read a 
third time.
  The bill was read the third time.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The bill having been read the third time, the 
question is, Shall the bill, as amended, pass?
  Mr. SCHUMER. I ask for the yeas and nays.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
  There appears to be a sufficient second.
  The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk called the roll.
  Mr. THUNE. The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator 
from South Dakota (Mr. Rounds).
  The result was announced--yeas 69, nays 30, as follows:

                      [Rollcall Vote No. 314 Leg.]

                                YEAS--69

     Baldwin
     Bennet
     Blumenthal
     Blunt
     Booker
     Brown
     Burr
     Cantwell
     Capito
     Cardin
     Carper
     Casey
     Cassidy
     Collins
     Coons
     Cortez Masto
     Cramer
     Crapo
     Duckworth
     Durbin
     Feinstein
     Fischer
     Gillibrand
     Graham
     Grassley
     Hassan
     Heinrich
     Hickenlooper
     Hirono
     Hoeven
     Kaine
     Kelly
     King
     Klobuchar
     Leahy
     Lujan
     Manchin
     Markey
     McConnell
     Menendez
     Merkley
     Murkowski
     Murphy
     Murray
     Ossoff
     Padilla
     Peters
     Portman
     Reed
     Risch
     Romney
     Rosen
     Sanders
     Schatz
     Schumer
     Shaheen
     Sinema
     Smith
     Stabenow
     Sullivan
     Tester
     Tillis
     Van Hollen
     Warner
     Warnock
     Warren
     Whitehouse
     Wicker
     Wyden

                                NAYS--30

     Barrasso
     Blackburn
     Boozman
     Braun
     Cornyn
     Cotton
     Cruz
     Daines
     Ernst
     Hagerty
     Hawley
     Hyde-Smith
     Inhofe
     Johnson
     Kennedy
     Lankford
     Lee
     Lummis
     Marshall
     Moran
     Paul
     Rubio
     Sasse
     Scott (FL)
     Scott (SC)
     Shelby
     Thune
     Toomey
     Tuberville
     Young

                             NOT VOTING--1

       
     Rounds
       
  The bill (H.R. 3684), as amended, was passed.
  The VICE PRESIDENT. The majority leader.
  Mr. SCHUMER. Madam President, once again, congratulations to all of 
those who worked so hard on this very significant and very important 
bill, and now we proceed to the second track.

                          ____________________