[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 133 (Thursday, July 29, 2021)]
[House]
[Pages H4273-H4279]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                  DROUGHT IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Kahele). Under the Speaker's announced 
policy of January 4, 2021, the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) 
is recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the minority leader.


                             General Leave

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks 
and submit extraneous materials on the subject of my Special Order.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Arkansas?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today with Mr. Newhouse and my 
colleagues to discuss the catastrophic drought situation facing the 
Western United States.

[[Page H4274]]

  In my home State of Arkansas, we usually have plenty of water 
throughout all four seasons, but the West is different.
  As the lead Republican on the House Natural Resources Committee, I 
have heard personal accounts from folks across the West about the 
crippling effects of the Western drought both in the past and the 
present. This map shows the vast majority of the West is under severe 
drought.
  While we can certainly take short-term action to mitigate drought, we 
must ask ourselves two questions to solve this issue long-term. First, 
how did we get here; and, next, how can we avoid another situation like 
this one?
  Before we answer these questions, some important context is 
necessary. Decades ago, water engineers understood that the arid West 
would remain dry and its rivers went through boom and bust cycles of 
floods followed by intense drought.
  Under the initial direction of President Teddy Roosevelt, who signed 
the landmark Reclamation Act of 1902, dams were built to capture water 
in wet times for people to use during the dry times. Major metropolitan 
areas like Los Angeles, Phoenix, Las Vegas, Salt Lake City, and Denver, 
would not exist today if it weren't for these projects. Consumers 
nationwide still enjoy the fruits, nuts, and vegetables produced by 
these waters.
  Yet, starting in the 1970s, serial litigants began weaponizing a 
series of well-intended laws to curtail these projects. The Endangered 
Species Act has been the particular weapon of choice for many of the 
organizations that are actually headquartered in the cities created by 
water projects.

                              {time}  1815

  Not only did litigation compromise existing projects, but it also 
prevented us from building additional dams. Our current policies failed 
to measure accountability and results for environmental actions, and 
our bureaucracy has a paralysis-by-analysis approach when it comes to 
building new dams. We put a man on the Moon in shorter time than it 
takes just to study a new dam today.
  Our California Republican colleagues did something about this. They 
authored, along with Senator Dianne Feinstein, an innovative law signed 
by President Obama in 2016 that streamlined the dam studies and 
facilitated construction. The Trump administration then moved at a 
record pace to finish the never-ending studies on potential dams 
throughout the West.
  But today, the other side of the aisle is blocking the 
reauthorization of that critical law and is halting progress on a 
process that provides an all-of-the-above strategy to water supplies.
  The drought is not only having impact on water supplies for our 
communities, but it is also making a terrible situation even worse in 
our poorly managed forests. Every night we see the newscasts about 
raging forest fires that are destroying communities and scorching 
habitat for endangered species like the northern spotted owl. For 
months now we have sounded the alarm, only to be met with inaction from 
both the administration and our Democrat colleagues.
  While water may not be abundant out West, it is abundantly clear the 
administration has no plan. In contrast, we do. We have the Resilient 
Federal Forests Act, the Trillion Trees Act, the reauthorization of the 
Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, and bringing 
balance to the Endangered Species Act, to name a few, so we can avoid 
the next drought.
  We have the ability to overcome and avoid droughts, but we must have 
the political will to act. The American people deserve nothing less.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Stauber).
  Mr. STAUBER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today, joining my colleagues 
concerned about drought conditions ravaging America and wildfires 
devastating my district and the West.
  Whether it be northern Minnesota, California, Oregon, Colorado, or 
Idaho, we have a wildfire problem. The Superior National Forest in my 
district is boreal forest land nestled among thousands of acres of 
lakes and rivers.
  With these water resources, wildfires should be few and far between. 
Instead, we are seeing new fires starting and expanding more frequently 
than ever.
  Our hotshot teams and firefighters are doing an excellent job, but 
they fight a losing battle just like they do out West.
  According to my good friend and one of Congress' foremost leaders on 
wildfire issues, Representative LaMalfa, there are three factors 
causing fires: topography, weather, and forest management. Humans can 
control only one of those, and that is forest management.
  Our loggers do an excellent job when they are allowed. They take down 
dead trees, clear slash piles when possible, and benefit forest health 
by working collaboratively with other stakeholders to plant three trees 
for every one taken, when they are allowed.
  But far too often they aren't allowed. Radical activist groups sue at 
every turn when our loggers are trying to clear trees.
  Democrats continue to insist that more and more Federal lands be 
taken away from management, and instead they let fuel build up on our 
forest floor.
  Meanwhile, the ongoing drought crisis suffocates everyone. In 
northern Minnesota we have farmers driving a day's journey to spend too 
much on hay just so their livestock can survive one more year.
  I feel for my colleagues out West, too, as they struggle with 
drought-caused water shortages.
  Instead, activists, once again, sue at every turn and lobby their 
Democrat party allies to shut down responsible stewardship of water in 
the West.
  And what has the Democrat majority done? Nothing. Not a single 
hearing on drought or wildfire held in the Natural Resources Committee 
or in the House Agriculture Committee.
  There have been no Democrat solutions offered, only silence. At best, 
we get the canned talking points on why logging is bad for the 
environment or why we need to stop managing our land.
  And on the other hand, Republicans have offered solutions and 
provided resources to our constituents struggling with drought and 
wildfire.
  As a vice chair of the Congressional Western Caucus and ranking 
member of a House Natural Resources subcommittee, I can say that I am 
proud of our Republican actions. We have introduced legislation that 
would empower forest management and deliver water, our most precious 
resource, to those that need it in the West.
  We have held the administration accountable on their inaction by 
sending letters and grilling radical nominees opposed to any kind of 
development. We have moderated forums and listened to the needs of 
those who live and work in the affected communities.
  Mr. Speaker, let's control what we can control.
  Just listen to our resident forester, Ranking Member Westerman: We 
need to manage our forests, and that means our loggers clearing trees. 
It is good for our economy, our community, and our forests. We need to 
provide water resources so our Western agriculture producers can 
survive.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I thank Mr. Stauber for his leadership on 
the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources and his participation 
in all the things we work on trying to do conservation through the 
Natural Resources Committee.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Oregon (Mr. Bentz), whose 
district has been greatly affected by drought. He is the ranking member 
on the Subcommittee on Water, Oceans, and Wildlife. He is a water 
lawyer. He has got experience both firsthand and academically.
  Mr. BENTZ. Mr. Speaker, the problem is drought, and the problem is 
currently being suffered by some 70 million people across the Western 
United States, including many in my district.
  Reservoirs, creeks, springs, and wells are going dry, leaving fish, 
people, wildlife, homes, and agriculture without water.
  Republican Members have been working hard to bring attention to this 
issue. We organized a Republican water forum where we spoke with expert 
witnesses from across the West who are dealing with this issue every 
day. They are the ones from the communities directly affected.
  This problem does not exist in a vacuum. Drought makes wildfires far 
more severe, and severe wildfires destroy watersheds, in turn making us 
even more

[[Page H4275]]

vulnerable to drought. This horrific cycle will only continue until we 
find a better way to manage our forests. I think Ranking Member 
Westerman's forest resilience bill takes a huge step in that direction.
  My district right now is experiencing the third largest wildfire so 
far in the State's history. It has burned some 400,000 acres and is now 
only 56 percent contained.
  Some of my colleagues here are facing equally dangerous, destructive 
wildfires in their own districts, all worsened by the drought.
  The effects of this drought are devastating. Crops die in the fields, 
entire herds of cattle are being liquidated, trees and shrubs die from 
lack of water, home wells go dry, businesses leave, and communities are 
devastated. We need to do something.
  Briefly, I want to talk about the drought in the Klamath, which is in 
my district. I spoke earlier this summer about the situation and how 
the Bureau of Reclamation announced that earlier this year for the 
first time in the Klamath Project's history, there would be no water 
allocation to its largest part.
  This decision to allocate all of the water that the farmers had 
stored for their use instead to in-stream use is devastating to the 
people who live in those communities. Their livelihoods depend upon 
having adequate water.
  But this is, in the Klamath, a regulatory drought because there is 
sufficient water in a lake that if shared would have at least offset 
some of this damage. This illustrates the challenge posed by the 
Endangered Species Act, which was the foundation for the decision by 
the Bureau of Reclamation to allocate all of the water to in-stream and 
in-lake purposes, with none of the water going to the farmers.
  I have asked the Secretary of the Interior and other Department of 
the Interior officials repeatedly to allocate at least a small part of 
the 350,000 acre-feet of water to the project. Those requests have been 
denied.
  This denial has not only harmed the farmers. It has also harmed 
waterfowl who reside in a refuge in the center of the project. Last 
year we had more water than we do this year, and even then waterfowl 
suffered devastating botulism outbreaks. This will happen again this 
year and, sadly, this is totally preventable if at least a small part 
of the water was allocated to the district.
  The short-term solution would be a financial relief package that 
Representative LaMalfa and I are working on. I do hope that we will be 
successful in getting that passed. The long-term solution, though, is 
to engage in far more careful storage of water and utilizing other 
means of conservation and finally bringing balance to the Endangered 
Species Act.
  I would like to thank Ranking Member Westerman for organizing this 
Special Order hour to bring attention to this incredibly important 
problem in the West. It is time for both parties to put politics aside 
and get to work on this issue.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for his comments 
and for his work and for his solutions approach to what we can do to 
intervene in these drought situations.
  Next I yield to the gentleman from California (Mr. Obernolte), who is 
no stranger to dry conditions and to the effects of drought.
  Mr. OBERNOLTE. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to highlight the serious 
problem that is occurring in my district and across the American West 
with conditions of extreme drought. This is certainly not a new problem 
for us in the West and, certainly, not a new problem for us in 
California, but it is being particularly acutely felt. This is a 
problem that only our governmental intervention can solve.
  Mr. Speaker, since 1970, the population of my home State of 
California has roughly doubled, and yet we have built essentially zero 
new water storage projects. So what we have in California is not so 
much a problem with inadequate water, but a problem with inadequate 
water storage. The blame for that can be shared across all different 
branches of government over the last 50 years.
  In fact, since 2014, money has been appropriated in California for 
the construction of new water storage projects, including innovative 
projects like the Sites Reservoir that would add over a million acre-
feet of water storage to California, but unfortunately none of those 
projects have been built.
  Solving this problem is going to require an all-of-the-above stance 
towards accepting solutions from all different branches of government. 
That includes environmentalists, but it also includes projects like 
water storage. We are going to need to examine every single aspect of 
this problem to come up with solutions.
  Madam Speaker, I am also very concerned that we have been inadequate 
in our provision for not just water storage, but water treatment in my 
home State of California.
  We need to examine many more comprehensive solutions for treating the 
water, the wastewater that currently exists, to get that back into our 
water supply rather than letting it run out into the ocean or pumping 
it to other parts of our State, which is what happens in many parts of 
my home congressional district.
  Only we in Congress, working in conjunction with State and local 
government, can solve this problem. I am hopeful that as our attention 
turns to infrastructure we will not forget about the need for water 
infrastructure in our country, and particularly in parts of the West 
that are so severely affected by this drought.

  We need more money for water storage projects, but we also need money 
for water treatment. I urge this body to act on this very important 
issue.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, I thank Mr. Obernolte for bringing his 
expertise in water to the House floor.
  Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Washington (Mr. 
Newhouse), the chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus, someone 
who is no stranger to agriculture, no stranger to drought, and 
certainly no stranger to the importance of water.
  Mr. NEWHOUSE. Madam Speaker, I want to thank Mr. Westerman for 
partnering with the Western Caucus to try to bring some attention to 
this really critical issue for our States out West and for all of our 
communities. So thank you very much.
  Water. It is perhaps our most vital resource in the American West, 
and unfortunately all of our States and our communities know all too 
well what the impacts are of severe drought and water shortages.

                              {time}  1830

  With over 90 percent of the West in a catastrophic drought, the Biden 
administration and House Democrats have truly failed to act.
  As chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus, I represent Members 
whose districts, like my own, are literally running out of water, water 
that is used to produce food to feed the world or to generate clean and 
renewable energy, water used to nourish our lands and our environment, 
water to cook and clean and to drink. We can no longer sit idly by as 
this historic drought ravages our communities.
  In April, the Biden administration announced the formation of an 
interagency working group tasked with finding solutions to address the 
drought that plagues the West. This working group, led by the 
Departments of Interior and Agriculture, has yet to provide clear 
objectives or produce any sort of plan.
  Earlier this month, members of the Western Caucus and Republicans 
from the House Natural Resources Committee sent a letter to the 
administration calling on them to provide to us the solutions and the 
ideas that they have for relief from the drought's impacts. As of this 
date they have not delivered.
  So as drought conditions become more common, we must find modern 
solutions. For over 30 years--well before my election to Congress--as a 
farmer in the Yakima Valley, as a State legislator, and as director of 
the Department of Agriculture for the State of Washington, I have 
worked in partnership with State, local, Tribal, and national leaders 
to bring forth collaborative solutions that improve water storage and 
delivery in my home State of Washington. I am proud of that work, but 
we have much to do.
  As we continue developing and deploying water conservation efforts, 
certainly there is more work that needs to be done. We must find short-
term as well as long-term solutions to address this issue that 
threatens our economies

[[Page H4276]]

and our environment and truly our way of life.
  Drought is not a partisan issue, and I urge the administration and my 
colleagues, my Democratic colleagues from the other side of the aisle 
to acknowledge the West's urgent needs and to work with us to provide 
actual relief, not just talk to our communities who truly are 
struggling.
  I thank Mr. Westerman of the Natural Resources Committee for drawing 
attention to this critical issue, for shedding some light on it, and, 
hopefully, by educating more people as to the seriousness of this 
critical issue we can truly make some progress in bringing some 
solutions forward that will help people all through the Western United 
States.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. I thank the gentleman again for his leadership on the 
Congressional Western Caucus. I thank him for the solutions-based 
approach he takes to problems, whether it is drought or other issues 
that we face with natural resources across the country. Hopefully, we 
can continue to work together and to bring more people in across the 
aisle that recognize that we do need to have action. Talking about 
things in D.C. don't solve farmers' problems in Washington State. It 
doesn't fix forest fire problems across the West and across the 
country. We need to talk and come to solutions and take action. So I do 
appreciate the gentleman's work.
  I yield to the gentlewoman from Colorado (Mrs. Boebert), who also 
lives in a place that is very prone to fire and is subject to drought.
  Mrs. BOEBERT. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding. It 
is an honor to serve on the House Natural Resources Committee with you.
  Madam Speaker, the West is currently burning to the ground. We are 
seeing historic wildfires, meanwhile the House of Representatives, the 
people's House, is arguing over mask mandates and passing dead-on-
arrival budgetary bills.
  Ninety-three percent of the West is under severe drought, and it is 
past time we pass legislation that would provide effective solutions 
that our constituents are calling for on a daily basis.
  That is exactly what I have been working toward. In March, I was 
proud to introduce the Western Water Security Act. This legislation 
protects Tribal groups, farmers, ranchers, agricultural districts, 
towns, small businesses, and other water users who rely on privately 
held water rights that have been put in jeopardy by the Federal 
Government. Instead of joining my bill to ensure these protections, 
Democrats are trying to curb cow flatulence; that is right, cow farts. 
That is their priority. The lack of leadership by House Democrats is 
totally unacceptable.
  And here is what I mean by that.
  Under President Trump, the historic multi-State Drought Contingency 
Plan was implemented which, among other benefits, prevented water cuts 
and rationing while protecting the water levels of Colorado's two 
largest reservoirs.
  Under President Trump, the Federal Government implemented Title 
Transfer authority, getting Federal water facilities transferred to 
local, more capable water suppliers.
  And under President Trump, Republicans fixed Obama's WOTUS 
regulations, providing water security to ranchers and farmers across 
America.
  In contrast, under the Biden regime, we have seen bureaucrat laziness 
101. An interagency working group was formed. Yeah, whoop-de-do. How is 
that working for anyone? What have they done? No one knows. Since 
April, my colleagues and I have questioned the Biden regime's 
appointees and received no concrete answers or responses that were 
promised.
  And there are more appointees that are waiting for confirmation, like 
the potential head of the Bureau of Land Management. The woman who will 
be the director of the Bureau of Land Management is a known 
ecoterrorist.
  This is all terrible. And this is all under the Biden regime. This 
regime is failing the American people, and the cost is far too high.
  I urge my colleagues to join my Western Water Security Act and let us 
begin to protect private property rights, and our water rights, while 
ensuring an abundant supply of clean water for future generations.

  Madam Speaker, we need to drain the swamp, not our reservoirs. I 
thank Ranking Member Westerman for yielding me this time and for 
leading on this important issue.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman for reminding 
us that we do need to have our priorities in order, that there are 
important things that we are failing to address here in Congress.
  We are getting ready to break for the August break, and nothing will 
have been done to address wildfires or drought. I don't think that is 
what the American people deserve, nor what they want. It is a lack of 
priorities and a lack of leadership.
  Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California (Mr. 
LaMalfa), who understands agriculture because he is a farmer. He 
understands drought because he lives in California. He understands 
abundant water supplies because of where he lives in California. And he 
also understands catastrophic wildfire and how that is related to lack 
of management.
  Mr. LaMALFA. Madam Speaker, I thank Mr. Westerman for his work on the 
Natural Resources Committee where I was for several years, as well as 
working with the Western Caucus on this, as well.
  Obviously, it has been underlined during this time tonight that we 
are in a severe drought situation. The darker the color on the map the 
more severe that area is. So my part of California is the portion right 
here at the border here. Oregon is in that corner. So you see the dark 
brown is the Klamath Basin. My colleague, Cliff Bentz, spoke about that 
a little bit also on how dire that situation is.
  You see all over the map here that the whole West, much of it is in 
that brown color, called exceptional drought, and the orange area is 
called extreme drought.
  So what do we do about these situations? We must be proactive.
  In California--and I will talk a lot about California--but also that 
is of interest to the whole country because so much of the crops that 
so many of the people in this country use come from California.
  We have had leadership in the past that produced the Federal water 
project known as the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project 
that California did. Two of the biggest dams there are 4\1/2\-million 
and 3\1/2\-million acre feet by themselves. Now, an acre foot is 
326,000 gallons. An acre foot is enough to take care of two households 
or approximately 10 people for a year.
  And so we used to build these projects because we were forward 
thinkers then. And that water benefited so many of us. But when we talk 
about the drought situation, it also affects not just people and food 
supply and the water supply, but also as my colleague and I, Mr. Bentz, 
we share that area on the Oregon border where is the Klamath Basin is.
  So what does that mean for wildlife when we don't keep track of our 
water supply, we don't put it where it is the most beneficial? You get 
a situation like this. This is a refuge for ducks and other waterfowl 
that is going to be dry this year.
  Last year I was up there on a trip and during the year they had the 
deaths of 60,000 ducks and other waterfowl due to botulism because the 
water is so low, and it gets that disease in there and wipes out the 
flock which affects the whole Pacific Flyway.
  So this isn't just about farms and food and money and this and that. 
This is also about habitat. But the only habitat you hear about in 
California is such that might help the fish, the salmon or the sucker 
fish in Klamath Lake. The sucker fish do not sustain themselves by a 
full lake on that lake; indeed, it needs to be lower. And they have 
been trying to run water down the Klamath River in order to wipe out a 
virus--it is kind of a mold--by keeping it wet in order to help the 
salmon.
  And we see this also in the delta that flows through the bay area 
from those great watering sources that come through the Sacramento 
Valley and the San Joaquin Valley. They are wasting so much water 
running it through there trying to help the delta smelt. So much water 
is gone, and the smelt, when they do a trawl, a survey, they can't even 
find any more with the extra water that has been run through there for 
30 years.

[[Page H4277]]

  So what are we going to do? Why does this matter to all Americans? 
Well, certain crops, 99 percent, come from California, such as almonds, 
artichokes, celery, figs, garlic, raisins, kiwi, honeydew, nectarines, 
olives, cling peaches, pistachios, plums, sweet rice, and walnuts. You 
are not going find those easily imported from somewhere else--or at 
least of the quality that Americans are used to--if we don't fix our 
water situation in the State of California, either due to environmental 
and regulatory concerns or building more storage. We should be doing 
both. We need to be fixing the regulatory problems because the 
Endangered Species Act has been weaponized against things that work for 
people.

  We need to pause for a minute and see if these things that we are 
doing are even helping environmentally, even helping the fish 
populations, and they are not.
  This year the lakes will finally run out. In 2022, all bets are off 
because Lake Oroville is so low. Lake Shasta is pretty low. We won't 
have the water supply. You can forget agriculture. We know that they 
will. Agriculture seems to be the last in line for anything in 
California. But the urban areas are going run out before too long.
  Can you imagine trucking water into the urban areas? Can you imagine 
trying to set up temporary desal plants along L.A.? They have been 
trying to build a desal plant in Huntington Beach for 20 years, and the 
environmental groups put the brakes on that all the time. It is 
amazing. They are cutting their own throat.
  So when are we going to get focused on what works for people and 
their food supply and the domestic wells? Thousands of domestic wells 
are going dry around California, and we haven't even seen the full 
effect of this year when many thousands more will go dry.
  What do you do for those folks? Hey, forget agriculture, it isn't 
important. We will just import the food. Like imported oil was so great 
and imported electricity. No. We have to be thinking a lot more because 
the environmental movement has decimated this.
  Let's talk about forestry for a moment, all those overcrowded forests 
create their own drought, and they also don't let the water supply that 
would normally come down through the system and hit our lakes, it 
doesn't get there anymore because we have an inventory of 10 to one 
what we should be having in our forests
  So we have got a lot of work to do. We have to reform the Endangered 
Species Act. We have to reform the NEPA process to be able to get 
projects done and still take into account what we can do positively for 
the environment. We will still do that.
  Fish benefit from dams, yet all you hear about is tear the dams out. 
Whether it is up in Washington for Mr. Newhouse or my district and Mr. 
Bentz's district, that seems to be the big push.
  Where are we going to get this water supply? How are we going to have 
water for fish in order to have it go down the streams to the fish each 
year when you don't have the dam there because it is all gone in a 
short amount of time after the rain stops?

                              {time}  1845

  We have to get our heads back together on how things really work. We 
are not going to have a food supply. We are not going to have a timber 
supply--because it is all burning right now--until we get past having 
the Endangered Species Act and the environmental organizations rule 
what we do in this country.
  Madam Speaker, we have to get serious.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, may I inquire how much time is 
remaining.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Ms. Bush). The gentleman has 27\1/2\ minutes 
remaining.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, I yield to another gentleman from 
California, who certainly understands agriculture, and he understands 
drought conditions, water management. He is also a farmer.
  Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California (Mr. 
Valadao).
  Mr. VALADAO. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Arkansas for 
yielding.
  Madam Speaker, I rise today to express my frustration with the 
majority's unwillingness to get involved in drought recovery and 
prevention in the Western United States.
  I am frustrated that my colleagues in the majority care so little 
about real people suffering from a lack of water. Some of my 
constituents have been forced to bathe with bottled water. Some of my 
constituents have been forced to abandon entire fields of crops because 
they simply don't have enough water for them. Some of my constituents 
can't drink the little water they have in their wells because the water 
contains arsenic and isn't safe to drink.
  Madam Speaker, this isn't a looming crisis. We are in the middle of a 
crisis. I am here today with several of my colleagues in the minority, 
most of which that hail from the Western States, and I know they share 
the same frustration as me.
  We have repeatedly called for hearings to be called on the Western 
drought, with no answer from the majority. We have tirelessly written 
letters to Biden administration officials and Western Governors 
requesting help, with no backing from the majority. We have introduced 
bills and put forward amendments to help prevent future droughts, with 
no consideration from the majority.
  Madam Speaker, how many times do we have to tell our colleagues in 
the majority that my constituents and the constituents of many of my 
colleagues here today are hurting?
  We are tirelessly trying to bring action in every way possible. We 
just ask that you work with us to get it done. This shouldn't be 
political. This is about real people and the desperate need for access 
to clean and reliable water.
  Madam Speaker, this isn't the first time you have heard from me on 
this issue, and it certainly will not be the last.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman from California, 
and I also agree with him that we haven't taken action.
  D.C. is fiddling while the West burns again. Here we are, getting 
ready to break for August recess with nothing to show, nothing to tell 
the people in the West on what is being done to mitigate these 
wildfires, to mitigate the drought.
  Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentlewoman from Iowa (Mrs. Miller-
Meeks), who just got the VIP Act passed earlier today.
  Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS. Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague, the ranking 
member of the Natural Resources Committee, Representative Westerman, 
both for yielding and also for all of his diligent efforts in helping 
us pass the Alexander Lofgren VIP Act.
  Madam Speaker, our Nation is in crisis. Right now, over half of Iowa 
is experiencing a moderate to extreme drought. This dire situation is 
mirrored around the country, with thousands of counties across the West 
experiencing historic drought conditions. This situation has a 
widespread impact on our way of life.
  For my constituents, it means our farmers and ranchers must fight 
even harder to make ends meet after this pandemic.
  As drought conditions worsen, so does the cost of irrigation. Less 
water means less yield, less in their pockets at the end of the day, 
and less in the ground for the next year.
  For our fellow Americans out West, not only does this drought harm 
farmers and ranchers, but the real threat of wildfires is made 
dramatically worse by the lack of moisture.
  Madam Speaker, this is shameful and avoidable. The government cannot 
make it rain, but it can and should plan for the future. Republicans 
have consistently advocated for increased water storage and regulatory 
streamlining, which would help conserve water for the dry years. These 
measures have been largely opposed by our Democrat colleagues.
  Now, as we move into August experiencing another major drought 
season, this majority and this administration have no plan, no 
solution, and have taken no action to prepare for the next drought 
season.
  Madam Speaker, not only is there no plan, but this current 
administration is actively making it more difficult for Iowans to 
access the water they need.
  During his confirmation hearing, EPA Administrator Michael Regan

[[Page H4278]]

stated that the Biden administration doesn't ``have any intention of 
going back to the original Obama WOTUS.''
  Unfortunately, on June 9, the EPA announced its intention to revise 
the definition of the waters of the United States once again and reopen 
the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. This decision is misguided and 
undoes the good work and progress achieved by the Trump administration.
  I have spoken with Iowans dozens of times about the issues created by 
the 2015 WOTUS rule. WOTUS hurts American farmers, ranchers, 
landowners, homebuilders, businesses, and just the average, ordinary 
property owner. It has caused confusion and hindered 
economic development.

  By reopening this rule, the Biden administration once again threatens 
economic development and creates uncertainty for rural America.
  Madam Speaker, creating this uncertainty, especially during this 
drought crisis, is a mistake. We should uphold the Navigable Waters 
Protection Rule and ensure that all Americans have straightforward 
access to the water they need to thrive and especially to survive.
  Thank you to the ranking member of the Committee on Natural 
Resources, Representative Westerman, for organizing today's Special 
Order to highlight this ongoing crisis.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman for 
highlighting how the drought is affecting the Midwest, not just the 
West, and for pointing out that our colleagues across the aisle and the 
administration not only have not taken any action and don't have a 
plan; they also won't listen to us who have plans, who want to take 
action.
  That is why we are here, why we are making this case that we have to 
take action. We can't just stand by and not try to do anything to help.
  Again, I thank the gentlewoman. She passed a bill with 420 votes 
affirmative and 0 against. I think she knows how to work in a 
bipartisan manner, and she wants to do solutions to help people.
  Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Utah (Mr. Moore), 
another freshman Member from the West, who certainly understands 
drought and natural resources.
  Mr. MOORE of Utah. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman from 
Arkansas.
  My bill this week was about 415-0, so I also know how to work in a 
bipartisan manner. I think that is probably what I appreciate the most 
about your leadership on the Committee on Natural Resources, the 
recognition of the long-term challenges that we have but being able to 
come up with real solutions for the short term.
  Madam Speaker, I rise today to continue the conversation that many of 
my colleagues have highlighted from their own individual districts. 
Coming from Utah, we are experiencing the worst drought in our modern 
history.
  Madam Speaker, 99.9 percent of Utah, according to the U.S. Drought 
Monitor, is experiencing extreme drought. The entire State is under 
this.
  The impact of this crisis cannot be overstated. The lack of water 
will reduce food and jobs and increase the frequency and size of 
wildfires. Unfortunately, our agriculture sector is bearing much of the 
brunt of this.
  Farmers and ranchers in my State and district have had to reduce 
their water use by 70 to 75 percent compared to 2020 numbers. This will 
increase food prices for years to come, but it will also decimate rural 
economies, which hurt our State and our Nation.
  The scope of this issue is magnified by the rapid population growth 
taking place in the West. In Utah, the population is expected to double 
by 2065. Increased water demand will strain our water infrastructure 
and could cripple economic expansion.
  We must pursue creative water policies that allow us to respond to 
the crises of today while preparing for the challenges of the future.
  I am proud of the great work being done by State leaders in Utah and 
in our Western States that are working toward this very goal. Here in 
Washington, we must carefully consider ways we can streamline, improve, 
and update laws and regulations that make it difficult for States to 
build the water infrastructure projects they need to meet our ever-
increasing demands.
  As this issue intensifies, it is incumbent upon us to give this 
crisis the attention that it deserves, to collaborate and to work 
toward a solution that can enable our communities to prosper in these 
difficult times.
  Madam Speaker, we owe this to our constituents, our districts, and 
our States.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Utah. I turn 
now to California, an area of California that is very dry, an area that 
has experienced a lot of forest fires. From talking to this gentleman, 
I know that a lot of those forest fires can be prevented, that we could 
have an abundance of resources, yet we seem to waste and mismanage 
these resources.
  Madam Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from California (Mr. 
McClintock).
  Mr. McCLINTOCK. Madam Speaker, I will speak on a related matter, and 
that is how our Forest Service approaches fire in our densely 
overcrowded and drought-stricken forest.
  Madam Speaker, on July Fourth, lightning struck a tree in the 
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest in Alpine County, California, starting 
a small fire that smoldered just over a quarter of an acre of rugged 
terrain.
  Now, instead of immediately attacking this fire, the U.S. Forest 
Service decided to monitor it instead--that is to say, to do precisely 
nothing.
  On July 16, 12 days later, that small fire of a quarter of an acre, 
now called the Tamarack fire, exploded out of control. It has now 
consumed 70,000 acres as of this writing. One of the towns in its path 
is Woodfords, California.
  In 1987, the Woodfords Fire Department responded to a report of fire 
on Forest Service land near their town in the same forest. They, too, 
were turned away. In fact, Federal officials threatened Woodfords' 
residents with arrest for even trying to extinguish the small blaze.
  Hours later, that fire exploded to 6,500 acres, costing 25 families 
their homes. Apparently, the Forest Service has learned absolutely 
nothing in 34 years.
  This let-burn policy of Federal land managers began back in 1972 
during the height of the radical environmental movement. It stems from 
the premise that fire is nature's way of cleaning up forests and that 
active suppression of fire leads to a buildup of excess fuels.
  That is right, as far as it goes because an untended forest is just 
like an untended garden. It will grow and grow until it chokes itself 
to death and will ultimately be consumed by catastrophic fire. That is 
how nature gardens.
  The U.S. Forest Service was formed to remove excess growth before it 
can burn and to preserve our forests in a healthy condition from 
generation to generation.
  In California, active land management reduced acreage that was 
annually lost to wildfire for more than 4 million acres a year in pre-
Columbian times to just a quarter-million acres during the 20th 
century.
  Federal foresters marked off excess timber and auctioned it to timber 
companies, which paid the Federal Government for harvesting rights.
  Environmental laws adopted in the 1970s now require years of 
environmental studies at a cost of millions of dollars before forest 
thinning can be undertaken. That essentially brought the era of active 
land management to a halt.
  The result? California's wildfire damage has returned to its 
prehistoric level, more than 4 million acres lost to catastrophic 
wildfire last year. You see, nature is a lousy gardener.
  In 1988, when the Federal let-burn policy produced the disastrous 
Yellowstone fires, President Reagan reversed it. ``I did not even 
know'' the policy existed, he said. ``The minute that this happened out 
there and Don Hodel went out, he made it plain that, no, we were 
withdrawing from that policy.'' That is what President Reagan said.
  Unfortunately, Reagan left, and the policy returned. The devastation 
that it has caused since then is tragic, avoidable, and incalculable.
  Especially given the hazardous conditions of today's forest, sensible 
policy would give top priority to extinguishing the small fires before 
they can explode out of control into mega-fires.
  Scrambling to explain their obvious dereliction of duty, Deputy 
Forest Supervisor Jon Stansfield complained

[[Page H4279]]

that they just didn't have the resources to put out the small fire when 
a water drop by helicopter could have stopped it cold.
  Yet, they had the resources to photograph it by helicopter, and they 
had the resources to do countless airdrops after they had allowed it to 
explode out of control.

                              {time}  1900

  Now, the Federal Government owns 96 percent of Alpine County, leaving 
it with virtually no tax base and entirely dependent on tourism 
attracted by the national forest. The fire has not only taken people's 
homes and destroyed their businesses, but it has severely damaged the 
forest resource that Alpine County's entire economy depends on for 
tourism.
  It is dangerous nonsense to monitor incipient fires in today's forest 
tinderbox, even if they seem to pose no immediate danger. No person in 
his right mind would monitor a rattlesnake curled up in his bedroom 
because it isn't doing much of anything at the moment. He would kill it 
before it does.
  In our national forests, only the Forest Service can prevent small 
blazes from becoming forest fires, and it is about time they did.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, I thank the gentleman for his 
leadership in the past in getting bipartisan legislation in place.
  I remember a couple of years ago I was out around South Lake Tahoe 
and I saw the fruits of the efforts of Representative McClintock, 
working in a bipartisan manner with many groups, to do the Lake Tahoe 
Restoration Act, part of what was in the bipartisan WIIN Act.
  And I felt proud as an American from Arkansas to be in California and 
seeing the forest actually being managed and knowing that it was my 
colleague, Mr. McClintock, that pushed for that. And more of that needs 
to be done, enough of it is not happening. We need more land that gets 
treated like that. It looked like a park. From a forestry perspective, 
I would have maybe taken a few more trees out, but it was way better 
than what was left around it and it is making great progress, and that 
is because of solutions-based approaches to getting the job done and 
making a difference out on the ground.
  But we have got 80 million acres of forest land in this country that 
is subject to catastrophic wildfire. When you mix that with the drought 
conditions that we are seeing today, Madam Speaker, it is a recipe for 
disaster.
  Mr. McClintock talked about a lightning strike that was left to burn, 
when it could have been put out early. We see massive destruction. We 
are seeing that in eastern Oregon, and we will continue to see it. We 
are seeing one of the worst wildfire seasons that we have ever seen.
  I think Americans need to understand how important healthy forests 
are to good watersheds. Teddy Roosevelt knew that. He talked about the 
importance of developing the West and protecting the watersheds and the 
timber in the upper parts of the watersheds, because that timber acts 
as a filter. It acts like a sponge that holds water and releases it 
slowly so that you don't get all of it running off at one time.
  We have these massive forest fires, next comes the flooding and the 
landslides and the degradation to our streams. We want to help species 
like the Chinook salmon. But when we are washing the topsoil into the 
streams, that is not helping any kind of fish.
  We let wildfires burn right down to the edge of the stream. If we 
were doing forest management, we would thin the forest. We would be the 
gardener and the caretaker. We have solutions. We have proposed 
legislation but, unfortunately, Congress has failed to act. Not only 
has Congress failed to act, but Congress has failed to be able to come 
together and talk about these issues, and we need to do that.
  I hope that over this August recess my colleagues across the aisle 
will have a change of heart, so when we get back here in September, 
these bills will come to the floor, and we will do real bipartisan work 
that is good for the environment, that is good for the economy, and 
that is good for America. We stand ready to do that.
  Republicans are ready to work for the good of America--for rural 
America, and we want to make a difference. We invite our friends across 
the aisle to join us.
  Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

                          ____________________