[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 27, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5091-S5092]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Nomination of Tracy Stone-Manning
Mr. LANKFORD. Mr. President, a few weeks ago, President Biden
nominated Tracy Stone-Manning to be the leader of the Bureau of Land
Management. Many people in my State don't know much about the Bureau of
Land Management. We don't have a lot of areas actually managed in our
State by BLM. It has more than 10,000 employees. It manages roughly an
eighth of the Nation's land, including 65 million acres of our forests.
The land holds 30 percent of our minerals. Whoever leads this entity
leads the issue of how we are managing our forests, how we are handling
our minerals, how we are handling our energy development, livestock
grazing, recreation, and, yes, timber harvesting.
The individual President Biden nominated we now know was an Earth
First! ecoterrorist. She actually typed out, as she has admitted in the
past, a threatening letter that was sent out to leaders who were doing
forestry in Idaho, saying in her letter that she typed out--and she has
admitted that she typed out the threatening letter--that ``we,'' as she
put it, drove 500 pounds of spikes into the trees in the Idaho forest
and then threatened them, to say: If you harvest those trees, it will
not be good for you.
[[Page S5092]]
The challenge that we have here is that we have an individual who has
admitted that she actually was a part of a group to do tree spiking.
Now, what we don't know is if she actually drove a spike. We have no
idea. But we do know that she turned evidence on the other people who
did and admitted as a part of her plea bargain that she is the one who
actually did the letter from a rented typewriter to be able to make
sure she couldn't be traced and even in the letter said: If you find
me, it would be ``your worst nightmare.''
So what do we do about this? Typically, when you are going to deal
with the person who handles forestry for the United States and the
Bureau of Land Management and you find out this person has been
involved in tree spiking, which actually is designed to injure or kill
people who are logging or people who are actually harvesting the lumber
in the sawmills and actually processing that lumber, it would cause a
pause.
I cannot imagine what it is going to be if she is actually confirmed
in this position, and the individuals who come to her to get a permit
to be able to do any kind of forestry work, because they would have to
actually come to her office, what they would think when they actually
walked through the door, because the Bureau of Land Management notices
timber sales and signs off on timber sales for the country. The Bureau
of Land Management is the one that makes forest product sale plans. The
Bureau of Land Management is the one that develops, maintains, and
revises the plans for all public management, including identifying
areas for timber sales. In fact, the Bureau of Land Management is also
the group who sends in the firefighters to the wildfires to be able to
put out the fires, which could be including some of these same trees in
the days ahead that apparently still have the spikes in them from
decades ago. Understanding this is not just a loose issue. Individuals
from the Biden administration just recently have talked about how
timber harvesters and haulers are critical to forest management across
the country. We need these individuals to help with our forest
management. We have wildfires in the areas that individuals in the
Biden administration have testified because we are actually not
maintaining our forest management enough. We are not doing enough
harvesting and thinning in those areas, and so it is actually a
problem.
In fact, Christopher French, the Deputy Chief of the National Forest
System, recently testified the Forest Service research indicates we
need to dramatically increase the extent of impact of fuels treatment,
such as thinning, harvesting, planting, and prescribed burning across
all landscapes.
But yet the leader for the Bureau of Land Management who has been
recommended is an individual who has been outspoken in opposition, so
much so that she has been active in actually promoting spiking trees.
And it is not just spiking trees. It has also been her environmental
issues about grazing land--understanding the Bureau of Land Management
is responsible for millions of acres of grazing pastureland across the
West. Because the Federal Government owns so much land across the West,
many ranchers actually then lease out some of that land for grazing.
She has been outspoken as an opponent against this. That is not going
to help our ranchers across the West.
And what was most stark to me was this presentation that she had
years ago, where she designed several of what she considered to be
environmental-focused advertisements, this being one of them where she
has a picture of a young girl, and the heading is: ``Can you find the
environmental hazard in this photo?''
And then she lists out at the bottom of it: ``That's right. It's the
cute baby that's the environmental hazard.''
With this statement below that, she wrote: ``We breed more than any
other industrialized nation.''
Listen, I understand every President has the right to pick their
team, but when the leader of the Bureau of Land Management considers
this little girl to be an environmental hazard, have we not crossed a
threshold of saying our problem with our environment is that we have
too many little girls?
Honestly, is anyone else disturbed by this as a possibility to lead
the Bureau of Land Management, to make a decision about how we are
going to manage our forests, how we are going to handle our grazing
land, and what is going to be the general attitude about permitting and
people?
Because, apparently, from what she wrote, one of the biggest
environmental hazards we have as a country is we breed too much.
I don't think that little girl is a hazard. I think it is a little
girl. And I will absolutely oppose Tracy Stone-Manning to lead the
Bureau of Land Management. And I would ask my colleagues, even one of
my colleagues on the other side, to say: Do you not see a problem with
this nominee?
If so, let's find another person. Surely there is another Democrat
out there who doesn't have this set of views, who can lead our
forestry, our grazing area, and our mineral rights. Surely there is one
more Democrat who is out there somewhere who does not share these
views, because I don't think that little girl is a hazard. I think she
is a blessing.
With that, I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Texas.
Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to be able to
speak for 5 minutes and, following me, the Senator from Wyoming be able
to speak for 8 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered