[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 130 (Monday, July 26, 2021)]
[House]
[Pages H3881-H3883]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL CYBER DIRECTOR TO ACCEPT DETAILS ON
NONREIMBURSABLE BASIS
Ms. NORTON. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (S. 2382) to authorize the National Cyber Director to accept
details from other elements of the Federal Government on
nonreimbursable basis, and for other purposes.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
S. 2382
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL CYBER DIRECTOR TO ACCEPT
DETAILS ON NONREIMBURSABLE BASIS.
Section 1752(e) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law
116-283) is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (8) as
subparagraphs (A) through (H), respectively, and indenting
such subparagraphs two ems to the right;
(2) in the matter before subparagraph (A), as redesignated
by paragraph (1), by striking ``The Director may'' and
inserting the following:
``(1) In general.--The Director may'';
(3) in paragraph (1)--
(A) as redesignated by paragraph (2), by redesignating
subparagraphs (C) through (H) as subparagraphs (D) through
(I), respectively; and
(B) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new
subparagraph (C):
``(C) accept officers or employees of the United States or
member of the Armed Forces on a detail from an element of the
intelligence community or from another element of the Federal
Government on a nonreimbursable basis, as jointly agreed to
by the
[[Page H3882]]
heads of the receiving and detailing elements, for a period
not to exceed three years;''; and
(4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) Rules of construction regarding details.--Paragraph
(1)(C) shall not be construed to impose any limitation on any
other authority for reimbursable or nonreimbursable details.
A nonreimbursable detail made under such paragraph shall not
be considered an augmentation of the appropriations of the
receiving element of the Office of the National Cyber
Director.''.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentlewoman from
the District of Columbia (Ms. Norton) and the gentleman from
Pennsylvania (Mr. Keller) each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from the District of Columbia.
General Leave
Ms. NORTON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and
insert extraneous materials on S. 2382.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentlewoman from the District of Columbia?
There was no objection.
Ms. NORTON. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I rise in support of S. 2382, which would allow the National Cyber
Director to accept details from other elements of the Federal
Government as on a nonreimbursable basis.
Last year the Committee on Oversight and Reform helped advance
legislation to establish the Office of the National Cyber Director in
the Executive Office of the President. The bipartisan effort fulfilled
a key recommendation of the U.S. Cyberspace Solarium Commission, which
was established by the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act to
review the condition of our Nation's cybersecurity posture and to
develop solutions to defend against cyber threats.
{time} 1700
The National Cyber Director Act was signed into law through last
year's National Defense Authorization Act, creating a centralized
cybersecurity position in the White House to assist in the development
and streamlining of the Federal Government's strategy, coordination,
and response to cyber threats.
We were thrilled to see President Biden nominate and the Senate
confirm Chris Inglis, a widely-respected member of the Solarium
Commission, as the Nation's first National Cyber Director. Now, Mr.
Inglis needs a team to get to work immediately to address
cybersecurity, which remains one of the most urgent threats on the
Government Accountability Office's high-risk list.
Indeed, the State and non-state actors from Russia, China, Iran,
North Korea, and all corners of the globe are waging a silent war
capable of shutting down our critical infrastructure, breaching our
sensitive information system, and jeopardizing critical sectors in
America and globally.
Until Congress acts to provide the Office of the National Cyber
Director its first appropriation, the Office requires the ability to
bring in details on a nonreimbursable basis. This bill would grant that
authority.
Cyberattacks are critical, widespread, complex, and escalating as a
threat to our national and economic security. A challenge as grave and
pervasive as cybersecurity requires that our government be strategic,
organized, and ready. It is imperative that we pass this bill
immediately to allow the Office of the National Cyber Director to get
up running as it awaits its full appropriation.
Mr. Speaker, I strongly support this bill, and I urge my colleagues
to do the same. I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. KELLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, the National Cyber Director, or NCD, is a recently
congressionally authorized position for coordinating our Nation's cyber
infrastructure and activities located within the Executive Office of
the President. According to the Biden administration's statutory
interpretation of the NCD's authorizing statute, Chris Inglis, the
newly designated National Cyber Director, cannot staff his office with
qualified talent on loan from other Federal agencies.
The administration has determined that the NCD's authorizing statute
does not provide the necessary authority to accept nonreimbursable
detailees from other Federal agencies. Congress intended the NCD to be
able to use details to staff his office.
The NCD's authorizing statute gives power to the Director to utilize,
with their consent, the services, personnel, and facilities of other
Federal agencies, even voluntary and uncompensated services. But the
administration is preventing the NCD from accepting Federal details
while congressional appropriations are also pending.
S. 2382 will help clarify the NCD's authority to accept Federal
details for a period not to exceed 3 years, and will help this new
office properly staff itself in the immediate months ahead.
We recognize the importance of helping this new office stand up its
operations during a time when the Nation deals with cyberattacks. I
reserve the balance of my time.
Ms. NORTON. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 5 minutes to the
gentleman from Rhode Island (Mr. Langevin).
Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman for yielding.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of S. 2382. As the author of
the National Cyber Director Act, I commend Senators Portman and Peters
for offering this important legislation to clarify the authorities of
this new office.
I said it before and I will say it again: Cybersecurity is the
national and economic security challenge of the 21st century. For 30
years we have been increasing the number of connected devices,
processes, and services connected to the internet at an exponential
rate. We can now instantly communicate with people half a world away
and use data repositories to drive advances in medicine, clean energy,
and commerce. With this connectivity comes vulnerability.
For these three decades, the United States has struggled to develop a
coherent cybersecurity strategy and to implement it to better protect
the country and cyberspace. While we have seen the results of this
failure in breaches ranging from the devastating, the tens of billions
of dollars in damage caused by, for example, NotPetya, to the mundane,
as companies fend off daily cyber probes.
Just in the last half century we have witnessed the Russian
Government target us through ransomware attacks through SolarWinds; the
Chinese Government break into instances of the Microsoft Exchange
Server, and criminals wreak havoc on the Colonial Pipeline, JBS, and
customers of Kaseya through ransomware attacks, so we are not where we
need to be.
Congress recognized this fact in 2018 when it created the Cyberspace
Solarium Commission, a distinguished body that I had the privilege of
being appointed to by Speaker Pelosi. Through a year of deliberation,
we developed a strategy of layered cyber deterrence, and had more than
80 recommendations to make that strategy a reality. Those
recommendations run the gamut from changes to our military to
regulations on private companies. But underlying all of them is the
recognition that the U.S. Government itself is still not organized for
success.
Now enter the National Cyber Director. This key recommendation called
for a Senate-confirmed leader within the Executive Office of the
President with the policy and budgetary authority to develop a national
strategy, oversee its implementation, and coordinate response to
significant cyber incidents.
With the help of Congressman Gallagher, the Solarium Commission's co-
chair, and through the leadership of Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney and her
staff, my National Cyber Director Act made it into last year's NDAA.
Earlier this month, the President had appointed and the Senate
confirmed our inaugural National Cyber Director, my fellow Solarium
Commission member, Chris Inglis, to take office as the first Director.
Chris' confirmation represents nothing less than a sea change in how
the government will coordinate cyberspace policy. Once this office is
fully staffed up, there will be a well of expertise within the White
House to ensure that the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security
Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sector risk management
agencies, the United States Cyber
[[Page H3883]]
Command, the intelligence community, and all of the other disparate
elements of the government are working in concert to improve our
cybersecurity. However, the Office of the National Cyber Director is
very much a startup at the moment.
While we will be voting on a full budget for this office later this
week, including, I hope, an amendment to provide the full $25 million
yearlong appropriation recommended by the Solarium Commission, we can't
wait until the full fiscal year 2022 budget is passed to get Director
Inglis on his feet and up and running.
After all, our adversaries certainly aren't constrained by our
budgetary calendar. In drafting the bill, we anticipated that the NCD
might need to call upon the personnel, facilities, or services of
Federal departments and agencies, with their permission, of course.
However, there seems to be some ambiguity within the White House about
whether this includes the ability of the Office to accept the services
of nonreimbursable detailees.
While I think the language and the congressional intent of the
original statute are quite clear, this bill should clear up any
misunderstanding once and for all by explicitly authorizing
nonreimbursable detailees. This legislation will help Director Inglis
get a staff vanguard in place and ensure he and his successors can take
advantage of the expertise resident at the various agencies that
contribute to our success in cyberspace.
Mr. Speaker, let me again thank Senators Portman and Peters and
Chairwoman Maloney for moving so quickly to address this urgent issue.
Congress has already shown tremendous support for this Office, and I
think the speed at which this bill moves is a testament to our
commitment to its success.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to support S. 2382.
Mr. KELLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Ms. NORTON. Mr. Speaker, I strongly support this bill and urge my
colleagues to do the same. I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentlewoman from the District of Columbia (Ms. Norton) that the House
suspend the rules and pass the bill, S. 2382.
The question was taken.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds
being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.
Mrs. GREENE of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and
nays.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3(s) of House Resolution
8, the yeas and nays are ordered.
Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this motion
are postponed.
____________________