[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 21, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5010-S5011]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NSCAI REPORT
Mr. MENENDEZ. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I may place
into the Record a portion of the final report by the National Security
Commission on Artificial Intelligence,
[[Page S5011]]
NSCAI. This landmark report and its important recommendations are the
result of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2019, which established the NSCAI as an independent
commission ``to consider the methods and means necessary to advance the
development of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and
associated technologies to comprehensively address the national
security and defense needs of the United States.''
In March 2021, the Commission submitted its final report to Congress
and the President, in part, warning of the dangers of the Chinese
Government obtaining the personal genetic information of U.S. citizens
and the importance of ensuring U.S. leadership in biotechnology. As we
complete our work on the United States Innovation and Competition Act
that will enable us to maintain our technological edge over China, it
is imperative that we acknowledge the findings of this Commission
regarding the critical importance of securing our biodata from China
and its agents. To that end, allow me to cite warnings and
recommendations directly from this Commission. I hope our State
Department leadership, including Secretary Blinken, take these into
serious consideration and put them into action.
On Page 53, the report finds: ``[China understands the tremendous
upside associated with leading the bio revolution. Massive genomic data
sets at places like BGI Group (formerly known as the Beijing Genomics
Institute), coupled with China's now-global genetic data collection
platform and ``all-of-nation'' approach to AI, will make them a
formidable competitor in the bio realm. BGI may be serving, wittingly
or unwittingly, as a global collection mechanism for Chinese government
genetic databases, providing China with greater raw numbers and
diversity of human genome samples, as well as access to sensitive
personal information about key individuals around the world. The United
States cannot afford to look back in 10 years and be ``surprised'' by
the biotechnology equivalent of Huawei.]''
Later, on Page 586, the report finds: ``[BGI has also benefited from
substantial support from the Chinese government, as well as its 2013
acquisition of a competing U.S. firm, Complete Genomics. There are
indications that BGI's links with the Chinese government may run deeper
than it publicly claims, as it built and operates China National
GeneBank, the Chinese government's national genetic database, and has
used PLA-owned supercomputers to process genetic information. Chinese
diplomats have pushed BGI-built COVID-19 testing kits, including in the
United States, and by August 2020 BGI had ``sold 35 million rapid
COVID-19 testing kits to 180 countries, and built 58 labs in 18
countries.'' The highest levels of the United States government should
publicly state these concerns so as to raise awareness among the U.S.
commercial and academic biotechnology communities, as well as U.S.
allies, many of which currently have partnerships or business dealings
with BGI.]''
The Commission then recommends on Page 587 that the State Department
design a specific initiative to warn America and its allies about BGI.
``[Launch a strategic communications campaign to publicly highlight the
links between the Chinese government and BGI. The Secretary of State
should personally voice concern about BGI's ties to the Chinese
government and instruct the Department to conduct a strategic
communications campaign to highlight those links and warn of the
dangers of the Chinese government obtaining personal genetic
information via BGI. The Department should also warn BGI and the
Chinese government that it will closely monitor BGI's activities, and
that should BGI be utilized as a mass DNA-collection apparatus for the
Chinese government, it could face additional U.S. regulatory action.]''
It is important to note that two subsidiaries of BGI were placed on
the entity list by the Commerce Department last year for their role in
aiding the genocide being perpetrated by the Chinese Government against
the Uyghur minority in Xinjiang, an issue that I and many of my Senate
colleagues have been vocal on.
In closing, I think it is important that this report be part of our
Record today.
____________________