[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 126 (Monday, July 19, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4944-S4945]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                              SOCIAL MEDIA

  Mrs. BLACKBURN. Madam President, there was such an interesting 
occurrence that happened down the street a bit at 1600 Pennsylvania 
Avenue last weekend, and it is when White House Press Secretary Jen 
Psaki unveiled the scheme that her colleagues in the West Wing had 
worked out with Big Tech.
  Well, what they are setting about to do is to remove--and I am 
quoting her--``problematic'' content from Facebook and other digital 
platforms. That is right. They, the White House team, have decided that 
they are going to work with Big Tech, and they are going to remove 
``problematic''--their term--content from Facebook and other digital 
platforms.
  Now, I am certain that the White House was very confident that the 
press would treat this rather bizarre admission like they have treated 
other blatant oversteps coming out of this administration. After all, 
they, the press, have provided reliable cover for this White House 
since Inauguration Day.
  But here is the problem. It is no longer Inauguration Day. There is 
now a record to consider, and I will tell you what, no matter what they 
do, the mainstream media is not going to be able to turn the clock back 
on this overstep.
  In just 6 months, the Biden administration has done an admirable job 
showing the American people exactly who they are. We have seen enough 
at this point to take the admission of being in cahoots with Big Tech 
at face value. The administration has intentionally overwhelmed the 
airwaves with big promises that are conveniently light on details.
  And there is a good reason for that. What President Biden and the 
Democrats are trying to do would fundamentally transform this country 
into something that we, the people, would have a very difficult time 
even recognizing.
  They got off to a great start toward their goals by killing jobs in 
the name of climate extremism and opening the border to a flood of 
illegal immigrants with no plan at all to manage the influx. They just 
said: Let's send them to the States, and let local communities and 
States cover this cost.
  They tried to dupe the American people into getting behind a so-
called infrastructure plan that was anything but infrastructure. Then 
they doubled down on a brazen attempt to extend the Federal 
Government's control over schools and homes. They labeled this spending 
spree the American Families Plan to provide cover for yet another 
attack on, what else, the nuclear family.
  Then they launched an all-out war on the ballot box in the name of 
the people. And now we see that they worked out a perfect system to 
force the opposition to shut up--just throw a flag on your opponents 
and watch their digital footprint and their freedom of speech 
evaporate.
  There is a way to shut them down. It is called government-approved 
messaging. Obviously, somewhere in the White House, they tucked their 
realities that they alluded to back in January, and now this is what we 
are seeing.
  I know we already have members of the mainstream media who are 
running defense on behalf of this little collaboration between the 
White House and Big Tech, but it is time to get serious about what is 
going on here. The President of the United States is using the full 
force of his administration to silence his political opponents. That is 
correct.
  This isn't just dystopian. It also raises serious questions about how 
much pressure the Federal Government can put on a private entity to 
restrict political speech. Think about that. This administration, 
working with Big Tech, is going to deem certain messages government 
approved and others as being open to censorship. It is, indeed, a 
complete violation of the trust the American people put in Joe Biden 
when they sent him to the White House.
  But as the new majority has made clear, to tear down and rebuild the 
United States in their own image is something that is a goal. And in 
order to do that, they attack the foundation. They have to get rid of 
all the things that make America so incredibly special: our commitment 
to safety and security, the importance of the family, and the near 
sacrosanct promise of free speech and open debate.
  They have gotten off to a pretty good start, those Democrats. But for 
their vision to take hold, the Democratic majority must convince a 
critical mass of their countrymen to adopt their same narrow viewpoint. 
Fortunately, the American people are not accustomed to doing what they 
are told simply because an authority figure said go do it.
  Here is a quote that former President Reagan made regularly, and I 
know we have heard it and seen it on this floor several times so far 
this year:

       Freedom is never more than one generation away from 
     extinction. It has to be fought for and defended by each 
     generation.

  That is so important for us to remember. It is important because it 
is something that we are seeing really kind of lived out right now. We 
have to take this as something of a warning when you look at the steps 
that this administration is taking. If anything, they are taking big 
steps to see just how far they can push the limits of democracy: How 
much will the people take? How much freedom are they willing to give 
up?
  Just about every single policy coming out of this White House has 
been used by the Democrats as a weapon to diminish freedom in the name 
of a preapproved socialist fantasy. And in that fantasy, there is no 
room for free speech or dissent. Censorship becomes normalized. It is 
expected. Collectivism replaces individualism. The philosophies of 
democracy and self-determination fall victim to the moving goalposts of 
a living Constitution, and freedom is reduced to an outdated trope that 
only the unenlightened cling to.
  I wonder, how many people in this country do you think actually have 
that as a goal? How many do you think are wanting to give up their free 
speech and their freedom and hand it over to the government and let the 
government decide what they are going to give back to them, how much 
freedom they are going to allow them to exercise over their daily life, 
over their children's education, over the education that they want to 
have, or the job they want to have, or the home they want to live in, 
or the car that they want to drive? Do you really think that Americans 
want to give their freedom up?
  Since the 2016 election, the left has existed in a state of perpetual 
hysteria. It has been over the threat that our God-given freedom poses 
threats to their radical, socialist agenda. But instead of taking the 
conventional route of persuasion, they chose a high-pressure guilt 
campaign to force people into a prepackaged American experience. They 
want everyone marching in line with the daily talking points because we 
want calm, they say. Democracy is too messy. It is too unpredictable. 
No one wants to exist in that system, they say.
  But I differ in my opinion. Yes, it is messy, but this big, 
beautiful, diverse mess is what sets this country apart. It makes us 
strong and successful and unites us under the common cause of freedom. 
And as we are all well aware, it has also turned this shining city on a 
hill into a magnet for criticism from nations foundering under the 
disastrous consequences of their great socialist experiment.
  I would implore my colleagues on the other side of the aisle to stop 
trying to fit in with these failing systems. Stop diminishing the cause 
of freedom because it inconveniences you. Abandon your fear of open 
debate. This constant refusal to engage says much more about the 
strength of your policy positions than it does about ours. Above all, 
stop ignoring the American people. They didn't vote for this. They do 
not want this.
  It is so interesting to me every weekend to go home and listen to 
Tennesseans who talk about the changes

[[Page S4945]]

that they have seen in the Democratic Party and the policies that are 
coming forward that they are rejecting because they do not want to give 
up their freedom. They are willing to fight for their freedom so that 
their children and their grandchildren know the promises of the 
American dream and have the opportunity to live their lives in freedom.
  I yield the floor.

                          ____________________