[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 124 (Thursday, July 15, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4934-S4935]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                                 BUDGET

  Mr. LEE. Madam President, for far too long, the Federal Government 
has simply been spending and borrowing far more money than it should. 
It has been borrowing and spending money that it doesn't have. Now, for 
individuals, for businesses, even for States and local governments, 
this kind of conduct is not just inadvisable, which it clearly is, but 
it is also impossible. I mean, sure, people can get away with it for a 
short period of time, but the laws of mathematics are very quickly able 
to catch up with them so that they can't do it.
  The Federal Government is unique in this regard. There is something 
about the size of the U.S. economy, coupled with the status of the U.S. 
dollar as the world's reserve currency--a combination of factors--that 
has given the Federal Government this ability that is somewhat unique, 
you see, because it has access to essentially what amounts to a 
printing press in Washington, DC, that prints out more and more money 
with reckless abandon, more and more money in a way that would be 
impossible not just for any individual, any family, any business, or 
any nonprofit but also that most governments in the United States and 
the world could never dream of. Yet this government has been able to 
get away with it because of these unique factors and unique features 
that exist here. So the Federal Government just spends more money as if 
the laws of mathematics did not apply.

  Now, in recent history, the Federal Government has been spending 
something in the range of about $4 trillion a year. Tragically--this is 
a massive sum of money, but, tragically, that has represented about $1 
trillion a year more than we bring in. So we have added to our debt at 
a rate of about $1 trillion a year.
  This is stunning, especially when you consider the fact that we have 
been at the top of an economic cycle over the last few years. We have 
not been in a state of a recession and we were spending this money. 
Even with a booming economy, we weren't able to bring our outlays down 
to match our revenue that was coming into the Federal Government. So it 
has been about $4 trillion, more or less, over the last few years.
  But last year, with COVID-19, we spent a total of $6.6 trillion. That 
includes our COVID relief packages. This is an enormous volume of new, 
additional borrowed money on top of the trillion dollars a year or so 
that we were already spending, already borrowing; that we were already 
deciding to spend above and beyond what our revenues would allow us to 
spend.
  And then now the Democrats have announced a plan to spend another 
$3.5 trillion just this week. And on top of that, there is another 
trillion-dollar infrastructure package in the works. And earlier this 
year, there was a $1.9 trillion package that was passed. And so all of 
this is occurring in a year when we already have a staggering $28 
trillion debt.
  The reality is that the Federal Government does not itself feel the 
consequences of this; the people do. In other words, the Federal 
Government could get away with it because of this unique status that we 
have, the dollar being the world's reserve currency, the size of the 
U.S. economy. It has gotten away with it without adverse consequences 
that the Federal Government and its officers themselves feel directly.
  It does, however, produce consequences. They are felt by the people. 
Now, we have known for a long time that this was presenting something 
of a threat to future generations; something that we knew would really 
come to haunt our children and our grandchildren and their children 
after them. We have always known this. But at the rate when we have 
accelerated our massive deficit spending and the degree to which we 
have extended it, this is no longer just a problem for the future. 
This, you see, is affecting us right now.
  For a long time, I and others have talked about how it would affect 
our children and our grandchildren. And all this is still real--be a 
very real consequence. They will still have to face that debt. They 
will still have to pay it back. It will still be unpleasant, but not 
just in the future. They are caught up with us already.
  The problem is no longer generations away. It has now reached its 
hand into our wallets, into our families, and into our day-to-day 
lives.
  So what happens when too many dollars are produced out of thin air, 
when we just print more money? I mean, I know there is an intermediate 
step there. Technically, it is borrowed money. The money that we don't 
have isn't just printed. It is--it is borrowed as the U.S. Treasury 
bills are sold. And we borrow that money knowing that we are going to 
have to pay it back later. But it has the effect of just printing more 
money.
  When we just print more money, those dollars, which have now 
multiplied, they are still chasing, more or less, the same quantity of 
goods. And so what that means is that the same quantity of goods with 
more dollars results in each of those goods being able to command a 
higher price--just inflation.
  When you dump more money into the economy, it doesn't make things 
easier for people; it just raises the cost.
  Now, this hurts poor and middle-class Americans especially hard. It 
hurts especially hard those who are living on a fixed income, on a 
fixed wage or a fixed salary; those who aren't wealthy and don't have a 
large amount of money that they can use to invest to make sure that, as 
price inflation occurs, maybe they can make some money off of it too. 
This hurts the poor and middle-class American families the most, you 
see, because they have still got the same amount of money to spend, but 
everything is more costly. This isn't fair to them.
  It is causing--our own government is causing the increase in cost 
that hardworking families across Utah and throughout America are 
already feeling. Every day, as a result, it is getting harder to fill 
cupboards and refrigerators and bellies and gas tanks. Every day, it is 
getting more expensive to drive to work or to the doctor's office or to 
see your family and friends.
  From the price of housing to cars, to food, we are seeing the general 
level of inflation increasing at a higher rate than we have seen in 
many, many years.
  The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has produced data--the data for 
May that saw the biggest 12-month consumer price index increase in 13 
years. This follows the April number, which was 4.2 percent higher than 
April of last year.
  The data from May also showed that gasoline prices are up over 50 
percent from last year; that used vehicles are, on average, costing 30 
percent more over last year; and that food bought outside the home has 
seen a jump of 4 percent. Chicken prices are soaring. Boneless, 
skinless chicken breasts are

[[Page S4935]]

trading at $2 a pound compared to the $1.30 a pound that it averaged 
over the last decade.
  Some packages of diapers that cost about $25 as recently as last year 
now cost around $40, and there are fewer diapers inside the package, 
further emphasizing the nature of the problem.
  By the way, these higher prices disproportionately impact the poor 
and middle class, who don't have the luxury of investing their income 
and don't have the luxury of having that added buffer.

  And we in Utah are feeling the pinch. According to a recent survey, 
85 percent of Utahans are worried about inflation.
  So what does this mean? Well, sadly, it means hard choices are in 
front of us; hard choices that we are going to have to face sooner than 
we might wish, but we will have to face them whether we want to or not.
  This means that we will have to say no to some hard things; things 
that--while not necessarily bad in and of themselves, things that might 
be good; things that others are incorrectly presenting as necessary and 
affordable when they are not. But we have to say no to them so that we 
can say yes to what is necessary.
  So what is truly necessary? Well, being able to buy groceries and put 
food on the table; being able to pay your rent or your mortgage; being 
able to turn on the heat or the air-conditioning in your home; being 
able to buy gasoline to drive to work, to the doctor, or to take your 
kids to school; being able to pay for school clothes and field-trip 
fees, not to mention baseball uniforms and soccer cleats.
  And you can forget about that trip to see that relative you haven't 
been able to embrace in 16 months.
  These are all things that are necessary and they are all things that 
have one thing in common. They are all being jeopardized because of the 
government's reckless spending and acting outside of its proper scope.
  This, you see, creates a vicious cycle. It is a cycle that is all too 
convenient for many in government, who are making the decisions.
  And who makes the decisions ultimately? Well, that is Congress--the 
Senate and the House of Representatives. You see, under our 
constitutional system, you can't spend any money through the Treasury 
of the United States without Congress authorizing it, without Congress 
appropriating it. So we have to do all of this by law, and it 
ultimately comes down to us.
  That dynamic I described earlier of an effective printing press that, 
you know--well, it is a little more complicated than that. It is 
effectively a case that we just print more money, compounded by the 
fact that, culturally, within the Congress of the United States--among 
Republicans and Democrats alike, among Senators and Members of the 
House of Representatives alike--we have grown too accustomed to a 
pattern, a dangerous pattern, that is good for the political class, 
maybe favorable in some ways for a small handful of elected 
politicians, but bad for everyone else.
  You see, the way it works in this town, the way the news media tends 
to report on these things, you tend to get praised if you vote yes. 
There is always someone you can point to who benefits from the bill 
that gets passed from the money that gets spent.
  Very often does anyone get anything but criticism for voting against 
those things, even if, even though, even when by their very nature 
those things tend to impoverish, albeit in increments, increments that 
are sometimes difficult to observe at any given moment, to purchasing 
power of poor and middle-class Americans.
  So what this mean is, in many ways, we are trading one thing for 
another. We are trading the ability to be praised as an elected 
official, an elected politician one day in order to spend money. You 
get praised for that, but poor and middle-class Americans are paying 
the price.
  For a long time we have been able to sweep this under the rug. For a 
long time Washington has avoided getting blamed for this because it has 
been incremental, it has been indirect, it has been something that is 
perhaps explainable in some cases through other mechanisms. Not 
everyone immediately connects inflation to out-of-control spending 
decisions by elected Senators and congressmen.
  But we have ratcheted up the spending levels so much over the last 
year and a half. And, yes, this has been under the direction of 
Republicans and Democrats alike. We have turned that up so much, so 
quickly that people are feeling the effects more directly, more 
immediately, more unmistakably than ever before. And, yes, it is our 
fault because, yes, we have put our own political convenience ahead of 
the interests of poor and middle-class Americans, and that is to our 
shame. That is to our shame especially if we don't recognize that we 
are doing it and seek to correct it.
  When it comes to voting on large spending packages, there is this 
trend of politicians voting yes and being praised, and politicians 
voting no and being criticized.
  Look, it will be of little comfort to the poor and middle class of 
this country who feel the buying power of their seemingly dwindling 
paycheck shrink each week just so that politicians can vote yes on 
large spending packages for a short-term amount of praise and political 
gain.
  At times I have been accused of being a reflexive no vote on things 
that some of my colleagues are willing to explain away or justify or 
defend wholeheartedly. But here is an important point that I would like 
to make: I vote no not by reflex but through reason.
  I vote no when I see how the consequences will affect those I 
represent in real, everyday life, not just the intended consequences of 
legislation that might indeed have a good goal and might indeed 
accomplish good things, but the unintended negative consequences also.
  I vote no if it will mean saying yes to what really matters, what 
really counts for making everyday life better for Utahans and 
hardworking Americans across the country.
  And I vote no so that Utahans can say yes to the things that they 
need, because if we don't ever say no, we are hurting them. If we 
always say yes, we are putting them in a position of having to say no 
to the things that matter most to them and to their children and their 
families.
  Look, this government's reckless spending is notorious, but it is 
finally catching up with us. This problem exists because the Federal 
Government and the politicians in Washington, DC, work hand-in-hand 
with our central bank to spend enormous amounts of money that we simply 
do not have.
  This has been facilitated by so many who are so willing to call on 
it, even though it results in the dangerous accumulation of power and 
money in the hands of the few at the expense of the poor and middle 
class.
  We are feeling the consequences of these things right here and right 
now. It is up to us to take action, to pump the brakes and steer our 
government back in a fiscally responsible, sustainable, and sane 
direction. The consequences will only get worse if we do not and if we 
do not do so very fast.
  I yield the floor.

                          ____________________