[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 124 (Thursday, July 15, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4914-S4915]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Police Departments
Mr. THUNE. Madam President, it didn't take long. Just a year since
``defund the police'' became a rallying cry and cities started cutting
money from police budgets, crime is surging.
At the beginning of June, the New York Times reported:
Homicide rates in large cities were up more than 30 percent
on average last year, and up another 24 percent for the
beginning of this year.
Homicides are up in New York City, Philadelphia, Chicago, Los
Angeles, Columbus; and the list goes on. And it isn't only homicide
rates that have risen. During the first 4 months of the year, Los
Angeles saw a 73-percent increase in shootings.
As of the end of May, Portland, OR, which has been ravaged by violent
riots over the past year, was on track to exceed 1,000 shootings for
this year, as compared to 389 in 2019.
A Washington Examiner piece from June reported:
Through the first 14 weeks of this year, New York City saw
an 81 percent increase in shootings, the highest number of
shootings during the same time period since 2002. Robberies,
grand larcenies, felony assaults, and shootings have all
increased in April and May compared to last year.
San Francisco has seen a surge in car break-ins, among other crimes,
with the San Francisco Chronicle reporting in June that ``last month,
the Police Department's Central Station saw a 753 percent increase in
auto burglaries compared to the previous May.''
In Oakland, CA, carjackings are up almost 88 percent, shootings are
up 70 percent, and homicides are up 90 percent.
Unfortunately, I could go on all day. The crime surge is real, and it
is frightening. I quoted a lot of statistics and percentages, but there
are real people behind every one of those crimes--people whose lives
have been cut short or ravaged by violence, people whose sense of
safety has been destroyed.
It turns out that--surprise--defunding the police is a terrible idea.
It is no coincidence at all that cities that have slashed their police
budgets have seen huge increases in violence. Some of them are even
recognizing the mistake they made and seeking to restore the funding
that they cut. A Fox Business piece reports:
Cities like New York City, Oakland, Baltimore, Minneapolis,
and Los Angeles are planning to reinstate tens of millions
for the construction of new police precincts, increase police
department budgets, among other plans to bankroll more
efforts to confront the uptick in crime.
Unfortunately, the problem won't necessarily be fixed that easily
because ``defund the police'' rhetoric has not just resulted in smaller
police budgets; it has also resulted in police demoralization and left
departments worried about deploying officers to do their jobs. It has
resulted in a wave of police retirements and resignations.
The New York Times reports:
Thousands of police officers nationwide have headed for the
exits in the past year. A survey of almost 200 police
departments indicated that retirements were up 45 percent and
resignations rose by 18 percent in the year from April 2020
to April 2021 when compared with the previous 12 months.
That is from the New York Times.
The city of Asheville, NC, has lost one-third of its police force--
one-third, Mr. President. It is not surprising. It turns out that when
you spend months vilifying police officers and demonizing them for
doing their jobs, some of them no longer want to stay. This is perhaps
the worst consequence of the ``defund the police'' movement.
Cutting police budgets is not a good idea, but resources and
equipment can be built back up again, sometimes fairly quickly. It is a
lot harder to replace good seasoned officers with years of experience
protecting public safety. While it would be hard to replace them at any
time, it is particularly hard today because it is difficult to imagine
why anyone would want to become a police officer right now. Why would
good men and women sign up for a job where they are regularly
characterized as the worst kind of criminals? Why would they sign up
knowing they may
[[Page S4915]]
be prevented from or punished for doing the job we ask them to do?
Violence against police officers--always a danger--is up. The
sickening scene of protesters shouting ``death to police'' outside a
hospital where two ambushed law enforcement officers were fighting for
their lives has to be emblazoned on the minds of police officers
nationwide. Again I ask, why would anyone want to join the police under
these conditions?
The ``defund the police'' movement is not only costing us many good
officers today, it has depleted the pool of good officers for the
future, and that is a travesty.
The unfortunate truth is, the Democrats bear a substantial amount of
responsibility for the situation we find ourselves in because this is a
party that either actively contributed to the ``defund the police''
rhetoric or implicitly endorsed it by largely staying silent, not to
mention the less-than-censorious attitude the Democrats frequently
displayed when it came to the violence and property destruction of last
summer and the past year.
California Representative Maxine Waters said protesters in
Minneapolis this April should ``get more confrontational'' should the
verdict in the Chauvin trial not go their way.
Far-left Members of the House of Representatives spent the past year
making statements like these:
Policing in our country is inherently and intentionally
racist.
No more policing, incarceration, and militarization.
Now, more mainstream Democrats have become wise to the fact that
their party's association with the ``defund the police'' movement may
threaten their electoral chances next year. As polling demonstrated,
Americans are squarely against the idea of defunding the police. So the
President and other Democratic leaders all of a sudden announced their
concern about surging crime, but they are still trying to have their
cake and eat it, too, because missing from their messaging is any real
condemnation of ``defund the police'' rhetoric and the terrible toll it
has taken on our cities and police departments.
In fact, President Biden, who is currently trying to reinvent himself
as tough on crime, filled key roles in the Department of Justice with
individuals who have gone on record with their support for defunding
the police. President Biden's Secretary of Labor actually cut police
funding while serving as Boston's mayor, and his Secretary of Housing
and Urban Development has suggested that we should consider decreasing
police budgets.
Democrats' actual crime-fighting plans are long on punishing gun
dealers and gun manufacturers and short on actually going after
criminals. The President's nominee to head the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives seems more interested in targeting
law-abiding gun owners than in dealing with the surge in gun crime.
I have one last point to make about the ``defund the police''
movement, and that is its fundamental injustice. Are there bad police
officers out there? Of course there are. There are bad teachers out
there, too, and bad social workers and bad small businessmen. But just
as it would be outrageous to demonize all teachers because of a few bad
apples in their profession, it is outrageous to demonize the hundreds
of thousands of dedicated men and women defending public safety in this
country because of a handful of bad offers.
We owe our men and women in law enforcement a great debt--a debt we
can't even fully comprehend. These men and women go out and risk their
lives every day of the week, every month of the year, to keep us safe.
But they don't just risk their lives; they also bear a heavy physical
and emotional burden. Most of us go about our daily lives without
having to confront much evil because our law enforcement officers go
out every day to confront it for us. They confront violence so that we
don't have to, and they pay a price. It is tough to have to see evil on
a daily basis, to spend years rescuing children who are in trouble or
supporting victims of violence or bringing rapists to justice, but it
is a price most of them are glad to pay. They signed up to protect the
innocent, to keep the public safe and evil at bay, and they are proud
to do it. We owe them and their families our profound gratitude.
It is abhorrent that anti-police rhetoric has become such an accepted
part of our national conversation and has been winked at or endorsed by
so many Democratic leaders. We owe our police officers much better.
I hope the belated realization among some that police officers are
essential to keeping our communities safe will spell the end of the
``defund the police'' movement. It is time to focus on protecting
public safety and honoring men and women who spend every day working to
promote it.
I yield the floor.