[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 123 (Wednesday, July 14, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4895-S4897]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                             Voting Rights

  Mr. MERKLEY. Mr. President, this is a critical time for America. It 
is a moment in which the actions we take or don't take will affect the 
very design of our government for generations to come.
  Our Founders had a vision that we all are created equal. In our 
initial Constitution, it wasn't fully manifested, but we have worked 
through several hundred years to come to that point that we recognize 
that every American should be able to participate in the direction of 
their country. We had some key moments in that national debate.
  I was always fascinated that when my father was born in 1919, women 
couldn't vote in America. We had all kinds of other barriers for 
communities of color--for Black Americans, for Native Americans--and 
those barriers we struck down time after time after time.
  Then we came to 1965, and we said there are still so many ways that 
communities are trying to keep every citizen from participating in 
voting, and we are going to make sure that ends from this point 
forward.
  President Johnson said that the power of the vote is the most 
significant tool ever developed to strike down injustice. It is a 
powerful tool. It is really the beating heart of our Republic, that 
ballot box, the ability to say: This is what I like, and this is what I 
don't like. This is who I like, and this is who I don't think will 
carry the policies I believe in.

  At its heart, this is a vision of power flowing up from the people, 
not down from the powerful, but here is the problem: The powerful don't 
like that vision of America, so they have many, many strategies 
designed to try to override that founding vision of participation. They 
have legions of lawyers, and they have legions of lobbyists. There are 
three drug lobbyists for every single Member of Congress. They

[[Page S4896]]

have the ability to fund mass media campaigns to try to change the way 
that issues are framed. They have the ability to participate with dark 
money in elections that manifests itself in those endless attack ads 
you see on social media and on television.
  They have all of these abilities, but the thing they really fear is 
the ballot box, and right now in America, they are going after the 
ballot box. We have to decide if we are going to defend it or not. That 
is the challenge that faces us, and it is a challenge that shouldn't be 
that difficult because every single one of us in this Chamber took an 
oath to the Constitution. The Constitution lays out the power, the 
vision of government of, by, and for the people. It starts off in the 
Constitution ``we the people,'' not ``we the powerful''--``we the 
people.''
  This assault has now spread to 18 States and 35 new, restrictive 
voting laws. These laws attack the ability to vote, and they are 
targeting Black Americans, communities of color, poor Americans, and 
college students. They make it harder to register. They make it easier 
to purge voters off the voting rolls. You can't vote if you are not on 
a voting roll. They attack early voting. They attack vote by mail. They 
attack curbside voting. They make it hard to drop off your ballot. They 
make it hard for people with disabilities to fill out their ballots.
  In some cases, they are creating a strategy of voter intimidation by 
allowing poll watchers to essentially hover over you as you vote and 
challenge your legitimacy to vote. They have even decided, in some 
cases, to make it so that, if you are in line to vote and it is a hot 
day, nobody can give you a drink of water. All of these strategies are 
about biasing America in its process so the powerful will run this 
place rather than the people.
  I would love to hear a Senator come to this floor and defend these 
attacks on the right to vote because, if you are not defending the 
right to vote, you are not defending the Constitution, and every one of 
us took an oath to that Constitution.
  We also have a challenge with the courts. It is the Supreme Court 
that said that it is OK to have hundreds of millions of dollars of dark 
money--and nobody knows where it came from--in our elections. Now, if 
you or I donate $100 to someone, it has to be disclosed. Everyone knows 
I made that donation. Yet if a powerful corporation or a billionaire 
puts $1 million or $100 million into an election, he can do it and 
remain in complete secrecy. That is why it is called dark money, and 
that is what the Court unleashed with its Citizens United decision.
  Then the Court said: That is not enough. We are going to go after 
voting rights by undermining the 1965 Voting Rights Act, even though 
this Chamber has reauthorized that act on a bipartisan basis time after 
time after time.
  First, the Court said in Shelby County v. Holder that preclearance no 
longer applies. So a State that had been routinely attempting to block 
citizens from voting no longer had to have new changes in its voting 
laws precleared to make sure it did not have a prejudicial effect 
against a targeted group of voters. Within days, chambers in this 
country were plotting about how to stop people from voting. The Supreme 
Court was maybe just so idealistic that they said nobody would ever do 
this again in America and that no chamber would ever do this in 
America. If that were right, if that were their thought, they were 
wrong because, within days, those plots unfolded.
  Then we have the most recent Supreme Court decision of Brnovich v. 
DNC, and Alito says that making voting inconvenient doesn't make access 
unequal. Well, let's just explain to this Justice, who apparently knows 
nothing about how voting really works, that when you make it 
inconvenient for a targeted group, you make access unequal. It is 
exactly the intent of these laws to make access unequal. Elena Kagan, 
in her dissent, said of the equal chance to participate in our 
democracy--referring to the 1965 Voting Rights Act--that this law, of 
all laws, should never be diminished by this Court.
  Section 2 is the most recent section attacked by the Supreme Court, 
and it bars procedures that result in the denial or abridgement of the 
right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of one's 
race or color. Well, one of the issues was from Arizona. It was a 
situation wherein you had no easy places to drop off your ballot in 
large Native American reservations. So by banning the ability of people 
to collect ballots and drop them off, you essentially make it 
extraordinarily difficult for this targeted community to vote, and that 
was the intent. That was the intent.
  Now, this law, section 2, didn't say anything about intent. It said 
the result. It didn't say it had to be a denial. It said an 
abridgement--in other words, an infringement--on the ability to cast a 
ballot, but Alito doesn't care. The majority on the Supreme Court 
doesn't care about defending the right to vote, the pulsating heart of 
our Republic.
  So where does that leave us? It leaves us as the critical factor to 
defend the Constitution. The Supreme Court won't do it. The States are 
undermining it. It is our responsibility--our responsibility--to set 
out those basic standards that defend the ability of every American to 
vote. That is why I am here on the floor tonight, talking about the For 
the People Act.

  It is called S. 1. Why? Because defending the right to vote is our 
No. 1 responsibility. That is the challenge we face, and if we fail in 
this challenge, then across this country, in State after State after 
State, communities are being targeted to make it hard for them to vote, 
and it will be harder for them to vote. It will change the outcome, and 
it will destroy the idea of equal representation. We cannot let that 
happen.
  Today, I met with members of the Texas Legislature. They have come 
here in order to stop the Texas House of Representatives from passing 
these types of laws that are targeted at stopping specific groups from 
voting.
  What are the types of laws that are being considered by the Texas 
Legislature right now? One is they don't like the idea of Christian 
communities voting on Sundays and getting in buses to go to the polls 
together. They call it Souls to the Polls. So they said: Do you know 
what? It will be against the law for more than three of you to get in a 
car and drive together to the polls. Are you kidding me? Has anybody 
heard of the right of association? Are any Senators here caring about 
defending the right of association in our Constitution?
  Can you imagine something so diabolical as to say: ``All three of you 
can get in a car but not four,'' and ``Do you know why? Because we want 
to stop you from using vans or buses to go vote''? That is crazy. It is 
as crazy as the Georgia effort to stop people from passing out water in 
long voter lines.
  What else is the Texas Legislature trying to do?
  It is infringing on overnight voting, voting for people who have long 
hours, who are working during the day. Overnight voting really made the 
ballot accessible.
  They are attacking drive-through voting. They are attacking online 
registration. They are attacking assistance to disabled Americans. They 
are making it easier to purge voters off the lists of voters, the 
registration lists.
  They even have in that bill stopping election workers from sending 
out absentee ballot applications. Is it a crime to be able to help your 
fellow citizen apply for a ballot? Yes, if Texas passes that law.
  They are also engaged in a process of voter intimidation by allowing 
partisan poll watchers to freely intimidate voters. That is wrong on so 
many levels. Intimidation is something that has a long history in our 
country. It is a very racist history. I remember one of the stories 
after the Civil War. You had a situation wherein you formed a group of 
horses surrounding a ballot poll place to prevent Black Americans from 
being able to get to the polls to vote.
  There are all kinds of other voter intimidation strategies. They were 
racist strategies. These efforts to stop Black Americans from voting 
are racist strategies. It is simply, simply wrong, and we have the 
responsibility to end these practices. The effort to silence the voices 
of the American people, to stop them from having a say through their 
votes, is just fundamental to the vision of a government of, by, and 
for the people.
  Citizens wonder why it is they are hearing that billionaires don't 
pay any taxes and that some of the most profitable corporations in 
America don't pay

[[Page S4897]]

any taxes. Well, it goes back to the many advantages the wealthy have 
in influencing the outcomes. Those reams of liars, those platoons of 
lobbyists, those media campaigns, that dark money, and now the effort 
to block the ballot box, that is how afraid the powerful are that the 
voice of the people will say: Invest in American families rather than 
tax breaks for billionaires. Tackle healthcare and housing and 
education. Create living-wage jobs rather than new tax cuts for the 
already wealthy and influential.
  What we have is a battle between the powerful and privileged holding 
onto their lever of power, trembling at the idea that American voters 
can get to the polls and determine to block it. They are afraid that, 
if voters can get to the polls, they might elect people who are 
fighting for Main Street rather than Wall Street. They are afraid they 
might invest--those elected individuals--in quality, affordable 
healthcare--and healthcare should be a right, not a privilege--that we 
might invest in housing because there is a tremendous housing shortage 
across America and that we might invest in education because education 
is the path to success in our complex society.
  So how do we address this? We pass S. 1, the For the People Act. We 
do it by following the example of men and women who sat in this Chamber 
half a century ago and used their power to pass the 1965 Voting Rights 
Act to give every American a full opportunity to vote.
  Once again, this more than half a century later, we are called upon 
to fight to defend our Constitution, to defend the ``we the people'' 
vision and ensure that every American can freely and fairly cast a 
ballot.
  This bill sets out basic national standards for how elections are 
conducted in accordance with the constitutional power specifically 
stated for Congress to be able to so set such standards to ensure that 
every American has equal freedom to vote, equal opportunity regardless 
of who they are, the color of their skin, or where they live. It 
ensures this access by protecting vote-by-mail, early voting, and 
fairness on ballot drop boxes.
  Why are early voting and vote-by-mail so scary to the powerful? Here 
is why. On election day, there are so many ways to stop people from 
voting. First of all, you reduce the number of precincts in the 
communities you don't want to vote, so there are fewer places to vote. 
Then you put them in places where there is no parking. That makes it 
harder. Then you reduce the number of precinct workers in those 
locations, so there are really long lines. You have heard about those 
lines--3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours. Then you tell 
people you can't even give people a glass of water to those who are 
waiting in those lines. Then you intimidate people by allowing partisan 
poll watchers to hover over people while they vote or one single person 
to challenge the legitimacy of the right to vote of every single person 
who walks in that door, because that is another one of the bills that 
is being passed in State after State.
  Election day can be easily manipulated, and there are even more ways 
to do it. One is--and this happens--you send out false information 
about what day is election day. You send out texts that say: So sorry 
you missed the election last Tuesday. Hope you make it to the polls 
next time.
  So people think they missed the vote. They are, like, well, I thought 
it was next Tuesday, but I got this text, so it was last Tuesday.
  You put out false information about where the voting location is. You 
proceed to make sure you change the location from the previous time so 
people get confused about where to go and vote in the wrong precinct, 
and then you make it illegal for their vote to be counted if they voted 
in the wrong precinct.
  Election day is easy to manipulate. The antidote is early voting and 
vote-by-mail, and that is why the powerful are attacking early voting 
and vote-by-mail.
  Now, my State, Oregon, was the first State to adopt vote-by-mail. It 
did so when we had a Republican house and a Republican senate in my 
State. Utah was a major early State to do vote-by-mail. It is 
considered a red State, a Republican State. This isn't blue or red. 
This is American. This is our Constitution.
  A second thing that the For the People Act does is stop billionaires 
from buying elections with dark money. You know, no matter if you poll 
Republicans, Independents, or Democrats, they all believe billionaires 
shouldn't be able to buy elections with dark money. They know that if a 
billionaire can create the equivalent of a stadium sound system that 
drowns out the voice of the people, that that is just wrong.
  Think about how Americans thought of those early debates in the town 
square. Everyone got their chance to stand up and have their say. You 
didn't allow someone to erect a big sound system to drown out the 
people you didn't want to speak. No. Give everyone--that is kind of the 
heart, isn't it, of our First Amendment? Free speech. Everyone should 
be able to have their voice heard and not be drowned out by 
advertisements by anonymous billionaires buying elections.
  The third thing this act does is it ends partisan gerrymandering. It 
creates independent Commissions--equal numbers of Republicans, 
Democrats, Independents--and therefore fights for the vision of equal 
representation.
  Now, I have heard some folks salivating over increased 
gerrymandering, hoping to influence that other institution down the 
hall, saying: Hey, we have an extra 15 votes we shouldn't have right 
now. Let's get 25 with increased gerrymandering.
  Well, it is just wrong to attack the principle of equal 
representation. You don't have equal representation if the system is 
rigged so that politicians choose their voters rather than voters 
choosing their politicians.
  The fourth thing the For the People Act does, it takes on ethics 
reforms and targets corruption. Again, whether you ask Democrats, 
Republicans, or Independents, they want the corruption out of our 
system. They want to ensure that public officials serve the public, not 
some private cause or serve themselves; that we are going to do the 
people's business, not the business of some outside billionaire or some 
outside corporation.
  These principles are widely supported across the country. The people 
sometimes say: Why don't you have any Republican sponsors on this bill? 
Why don't Republicans support this bill?
  Across this Nation, Republicans overwhelmingly support these four 
principles in this bill. It is incredibly bipartisan. But not here in 
this Chamber because here is where the powerful speak, and the minority 
leader has said: I am going to lock down my Senators from supporting 
these efforts to defend our Constitution.
  I would be embarrassed--I would be embarrassed if a leader of a 
caucus said it is going to lock me down to prevent me from defending 
the Constitution. I would be more than embarrassed; I would be alarmed. 
I would be outraged, as should every Member of this body across the 
aisle--should be outraged that they are being told they are locked down 
from defending the Constitution.
  Next month, America will celebrate the 56th anniversary of the 1965 
Voting Rights Act, the most powerful, significant advancement this 
Nation has ever made to realize that ``we the people'' vision of 
America.
  Lyndon Johnson called August 6, 1965--the day he signed that law--``a 
triumph for freedom as huge as any victory that has ever been won on 
any battlefield.'' He said: ``The heart of the act is plain. Wherever, 
by clear and objective standards, States and counties use regulations, 
or laws, or tests to deny the right to vote, then they will be struck 
down.''
  Well, that is our job, to do what President Johnson thought was 
accomplished when he signed the Voting Rights Act--to strike down 
regulations, laws, or tests designed to deny the right to vote to 
targeted groups of Americans across this country. So let's do our job. 
Put this bill on the floor, and get it passed.
  Thank you, Mr. President.

                          ____________________