[Congressional Record Volume 167, Number 122 (Tuesday, July 13, 2021)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4839-S4840]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Capitol Fencing and January 6
Mr. President, I want to speak on a different topic at this point,
Mr. President. As I walked into the Capitol, I took a look around and
saw something that I have been waiting for. Families were walking
across the parking lot right in front of the Capitol, enjoying
themselves. Children were out in the grass running around. People were
crowding together to snap selfies. That used to be so routine around
here, but since January 6, it has not been the case.
Behind all of these families visiting their Nation's Capitol Building
was this beautiful dome of the Capitol--majestic, unobstructed for the
first time in 6 months.
Over the weekend, Capitol workers removed the remaining metal fencing
and concrete barriers that have surrounded this building since the mob
attack on January 6. My special thanks to those workers.
That security fencing stood as a reminder of what happened on January
6 when former President Donald Trump summoned and agitated a mob to
Washington and then sent them on a mission to storm the heart of
democracy.
Well, Trump is gone. But our democracy is still here. And the smiling
faces outside the Capitol this week are a testament to the resilience
that many Americans share today.
I want to thank President Biden for helping to unite this Nation. He
brought us together by appealing to our shared values and our shared
identity. His steady, nonconfrontational approach has been a breath of
fresh air after the stifling storm of hateful, divisive tweets of the
Trump years.
His leadership--President Biden's leadership--has allowed us to
reopen this Capitol. So every American, and every visitor to the
people's house, can experience this historic value.
But even as we celebrate the walls around our Capitol coming down, it
is important to recognize that there are still many unanswered
questions about January 6. Our Nation suffered a deadly, shameful,
infamous--infamous--security breach on January 6. You would think that
every Member of the Senate would be demanding to know what was behind
it, what caused it, and to find a way to make certain it never happens
again, especially since it left 140 Capitol Police officers and other
law enforcement officers injured and 1 dead.
Sadly, most Republican lawmakers actively oppose investigating what
happened on January 6. Even worse, some of them are whitewashing the
events. Republican lawmakers in the House have called the
insurrectionists patriots. Patriots? Have you seen the video? Those
were patriots marching through these halls with Confederate flags,
Trump flags?
One House Member, who helped barricade the House doors to protect
himself from this mob, now calls the insurrectionists ``a normal
tourist visit.'' Get out of here.
Appallingly, the former President, Donald Trump, last week
threatened--now, listen to this--he is going to share sensitive,
personal information about the officers who defended Members of
Congress from an insurrectionist who attempted to storm the Speaker's
Lobby.
These despicable efforts to rewrite the events of January 6, to
somehow lionize the terrorists who participated in it and denigrate
those who defended us, are nothing short of disgusting--and a second
assault on our democracy.
It is a slap in the face of every officer who protected this building
from a murderous mob. Our officers deserve answers for what happened
that day, and they deserve to know who is responsible for it.
More than 535 people have already been arrested for their involvement
in that insurrection--and many of them have ties to White supremacists
and domestic terrorist organizations. How did these far-right, fringe
groups plan their attack on our democracy? Who helped them? Who funded
their effort? Who planted pipe bombs outside the headquarters of both
political parties? What contacts, if any, did Members of Congress have
with these insurrectionists in the days leading up to the attack?
We don't have a full accounting. Yet, last month, Republican Senators
filibustered the creation of an independent, bipartisan commission to
investigate the January 6 insurrection. Senator McConnell pleaded with
his caucus to block this commission.
Well, Congressional Democrats are determined to give the officers who
defended this Capitol and the American people the truth about January
6. We are not going to tolerate whitewashing this attack for political
purposes.
I strongly support Speaker Pelosi's decision to form a bipartisan
select committee to investigate it, and I look forward to its findings.
And as the House moves forward with its own investigation, we need to
ask ourselves why the Republican Senate leader and all but six
Republican Senators voted to prevent the Senate from doing its part to
uncover the truth about this assault on our Capitol.
Not only does the Republican leader oppose efforts to investigate
what happened on January 6, he is leading the effort against the
funding needed to ensure it doesn't happen again. House and Senate
Democrats have put forward good-faith proposals to provide emergency
funding to deal with the ongoing security issues at the Capitol and
give the Capitol Police and staff here the resources they need to do
their job.
If this Senate fails to approve that supplemental funding package,
the Capitol Police department may have to start furloughing dozens--
maybe hundreds--of officers at the end of this month.
Let me be clear. No one--no one--has paid a heavier price for the
insurrection than our Capitol Police Force. They will carry the trauma
of January 6 with them for the rest of their lives.
These officers work day and night to keep us safe and to secure the
Capitol Complex for the American people who visit. The least we can do
is to make sure they receive their paychecks.
Yesterday, Senator Patrick Leahy introduced an updated version of the
supplemental package for security. It would fully pay our Capitol
Police officers' salaries and provide additional funding to secure the
Capitol Complex. It would also provide much-needed funding to deal with
the impacts of the pandemic on the Capitol.
Over the last year, both the pandemic and insurrection put a huge
financial strain on this institution. Keeping the Capitol and the
people who work here in a safe situation is a new environment that will
cost money.
So far, Republican colleagues have been unwilling to face the reality
that we find ourselves in today and to spend the money needed to
respond to the real threats we are facing. Their proposal falls short
of the needs of the moment. Senator Leahy's proposal will address the
issues facing the Capitol Complex.
And don't we owe it to the men and women who protect us and our staff
and our visitors to support their important work and pass this bill?
When a filibuster prevents the Senate from even investigating an
attack on the Senate itself and another filibuster may be used to
threaten paying our police officers who protect us, we have to ask a
basic question: Who really benefits from the misuse of a filibuster?
Does the current overuse and misuse of this filibuster benefit our
democracy? Absolutely not.
The Republican leader has used the filibuster in a way never seen in
the history of the Senate to prevent us from even starting debate on
legislation that would make it easier for Americans to vote.
You know that, Mr. President, better than anyone because your State
of Georgia is going through that debate at this very moment.
Does the filibuster in its current form actually benefit America? How
could it? Last month, Senator McConnell used the filibuster to block
this body from taking up equal pay legislation, preventing employers
from discriminating against women in the workplace. It is one of the
many policies supported by a broad majority of American people of both
political parties. Unfortunately, those ideas--as good as they are, as
popular as they are, as needed as they are--are dead on arrival in the
Senate thanks to Senator McConnell and his filibuster.
So again, I ask: What benefits do we derive from grinding our
government to a halt? It is a small club that benefits. You know who is
in it? The wealthiest individuals and the richest corporations. The
elites are the only people who benefit from our broken political
system. It stops progress altogether.
[[Page S4840]]
The Framers of the Constitution never intended for one-half of one
branch of government to be equipped with a kill switch that any Senator
can push to avoid honest debate. The filibuster as it is used today
doesn't promote bipartisanship. It is preventing bipartisan progress.
As I said, the proposal to form an independent commission to
investigate the January 6 insurrection had broad, bipartisan support in
the Senate. Six Republican colleagues had the courage to stand up and
join all of the Democrats in calling for this January 6 commission. But
a minority of Senators--all Republican--refused. This is not how our
legislative process is supposed to function.
Our Nation's Founders wanted to give each Senator a voice, not a veto
over every piece of legislation. That is how the filibuster is being
misused today.
So as we celebrate the reopening of the Capitol grounds, let's take a
moment to appreciate the fact our democracy has survived, but it cannot
protect itself from future attacks. That responsibility falls on our
shoulders. No wasting time on delay tactics; it is time to do the work
that we were sent to Washington to do.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Padilla). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
The Republican whip.